Bill Nye was on Tucker Carlson last night, lying his ass off...watch this fool

[Crick]

He had them and Carlson did not.

Nye said that thanks to humans, there will never be another Ice Age.
What do you think about his claim?

I think within the next millenia, it's very likely true. But "never" is a long time.

 

[RollingThunder]

He had them and Carlson did not.

Opinions are not facts.

Right, hammered....wish you would remember that before you post your idiotic and very ignorant opinions about scientific facts that you are too stupid to understand.

In the real world, Nye had the facts and Carlson had ignorance and misinformation and bluster....so he ended up looking like a fool to everyone except you denier cult dingbats who are as confused and full of shit as Carlson.

 

[Muhammed]

He had them and Carlson did not.

Opinions are not facts.

Right, hammered....wish you would remember that before you post your idiotic and very ignorant opinions about scientific facts that you are too stupid to understand.

In the real world, Nye had the facts and Carlson had ignorance and misinformation and bluster....so he ended up looking like a fool to everyone except you denier cult dingbats who are as confused and full of shit as Carlson.

Cult huh?

I've studied cults for many years. The CAGW alarmists are an example of a doomsday cult.

Bill Nye was not stating facts in the video, he was stating his opinions.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

He had them and Carlson did not.

Opinions are not facts.

Right, hammered....wish you would remember that before you post your idiotic and very ignorant opinions about scientific facts that you are too stupid to understand.

In the real world, Nye had the facts and Carlson had ignorance and misinformation and bluster....so he ended up looking like a fool to everyone except you denier cult dingbats who are as confused and full of shit as Carlson.

Nye said that, thanks to humans, there will never be another Ice Age.
What do you think about that claim?

 

[Crick]

Without some sort of major technological development, it may be true that humans will never see another ice age. What's your point?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Without some sort of major technological development, it may be true that humans will never see another ice age. What's your point?

Is that a bad thing?

 

[RollingThunder]

Without some sort of major technological development, it may be true that humans will never see another ice age. What's your point?

Is that a bad thing?

Not necessarily....for any humans who might still be alive in ten thousand years or so, when the next 'ice age' would have happened.....but it is completely irrelevant to us and our immediate descendants in a way that the immediate climate change crisis is not. The possibility that there may not be another 'ice age' in the distant future is also completely irrelevant to the fact the the world is currently on course towards the kind of abrupt major temperature increases that have resulted in mass extinctions in the geological past.....and these temperature increases are already starting what will almost inevitably become the sixth great mass extinction in the Earth's long history. If the human race goes extinct because we destroyed the biosphere of our only planet, nobody will be worrying about future 'ice ages'.

THE EXTINCTION CRISIS
The Center for Biological Diversity
It’s frightening but true: Our planet is now in the midst of its sixth mass extinction of plants and animals — the sixth wave of extinctions in the past half-billion years. We’re currently experiencing the worst spate of species die-offs since the loss of the dinosaurs 65 million years ago. Although extinction is a natural phenomenon, it occurs at a natural “background” rate of about one to five species per year. Scientists estimate we’re now losing species at 1,000 to 10,000 times the background rate, with literally dozens going extinct every day [1]. It could be a scary future indeed, with as many as 30 to 50 percent of all species possibly heading toward extinction by mid-century [2].

Unlike past mass extinctions, caused by events like asteroid strikes, volcanic eruptions, and natural climate shifts, the current crisis is almost entirely caused by us — humans. In fact, 99 percent of currently threatened species are at risk from human activities, primarily those driving habitat loss, introduction of exotic species, and global warming [3]. Because the rate of change in our biosphere is increasing, and because every species’ extinction potentially leads to the extinction of others bound to that species in a complex ecological web, numbers of extinctions are likely to snowball in the coming decades as ecosystems unravel.

 

[skookerasbil]

lol........the k00ks have been tossing bombs about extinction processes for 25 years now. They keep doing it. Where has it gotten them? But they keep doing it!

Think maybe its time to come up with a Plan B?

duh......perhaps you haven't noticed. The new administration is taking a baseball bat to the head of the EPA! Global warming programs..........out. University $ about to be contingent upon skeptic science being included in research. Clean Power Plan being tossed into the shitter.

Why?

Because they can be! Jackasses still haven't made the case but are strutting around...........still..........in this religious bubble.

If public policy is dismissive of the "consensus" science, the science isn't mattering in the real world.

Time for Plan B s0ns!!

 

[mamooth]

I've studied cults for many years.

From the inside, obviously.

The CAGW alarmists

"CAGW" is cult lingo. You shouldn't use it, as it's an instant giveaway that the speaker is a fanatical jihadist acolyte of the WUWT cult.

 

[mamooth]

Is that a bad thing?

Obviously yes, because it means that in the short term, we're heating the planet to an extent that will do great harm to humans, not to mention the environment.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Is that a bad thing?

Obviously yes, because it means that in the short term, we're heating the planet to an extent that will do great harm to humans, not to mention the environment.

Wow, no Ice Age is bad, obviously. How many would die if we had another Ice Age?

 

[mamooth]

Wow, no Ice Age is bad, obviously. How many would die if we had another Ice Age?

None, as we'd figure out how to handle it in 20,000 - 50,000 years.

In contrast, millions will die soon if we overheat the world.

And you're really clueless for not understanding something that simple. You're like an idiot who says he has to run the furnace full blast starting in July because winter will be be coming.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Wow, no Ice Age is bad, obviously. How many would die if we had another Ice Age?

None, as we'd figure out how to handle it in 20,000 - 50,000 years.

In contrast, millions will die soon if we overheat the world.

And you're really clueless for not understanding something that simple. You're like an idiot who says he has to run the furnace full blast starting in July because winter will be be coming.

None, as we'd figure out how to handle it in 20,000 - 50,000 years.

And if it was much sooner?

In contrast, millions will die soon if we overheat the world.

Die from what? Longer growing seasons? Higher crop yields?