Bill de Blasio Reveals That He Wants To Steal From You Using Socialism

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong

Socialism has universally been a massive failure and the idea of a natural unemployment rate is delusional crap

Are there always unemployed people in every society? Yes! But it is not natural it is the result of volitional choice.

There is no living wage issue. Any wage is a living wage depending on how one chooses to live

nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics; propaganda and rhetoric is all they know.

Being able to apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is as market friendly as it gets. We could have solved simple poverty Yesterday; but, the Poor may benefit.

That's great except I am not a republican and my post still stands as fact

Unemployment compensation is not market friendly as it takes from those actually trying to buy and sell in the market

Redistribution by force is never market friendly under any circumstances and never has been

We have solved poverty through capitalism

We solved poverty when the rich were taxed 70 and 80%. Since 1979, wages have been flat, while giving the wealthy a 270% raise.. That isn't solving poverty.

We solved it long before then.

Taxation of any kind solved nothing

Exactly! In the forties, fifties, sixties, and part of the seventies there was a middle class because corporations were taxed 70 to 80%. Taxation back then gave people dignity, a sense of worth, and money in their pockets. It definitely solved the problem.

Wrong

It was solved before that.

Heavy taxation only slowed economic growth, destroyed black families and created dependency.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong

Socialism has universally been a massive failure and the idea of a natural unemployment rate is delusional crap

Are there always unemployed people in every society? Yes! But it is not natural it is the result of volitional choice.

There is no living wage issue. Any wage is a living wage depending on how one chooses to live

nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics; propaganda and rhetoric is all they know.

Being able to apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is as market friendly as it gets. We could have solved simple poverty Yesterday; but, the Poor may benefit.

That's great except I am not a republican and my post still stands as fact

Unemployment compensation is not market friendly as it takes from those actually trying to buy and sell in the market

Redistribution by force is never market friendly under any circumstances and never has been

We have solved poverty through capitalism

You don't know what you are talking about like usual, right winger. Nobody takes y'all seriously about economics. Compensation for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment must engender a positive multiplier effect upon our economy. Only the right wing would complain about solving simple poverty at the rock bottom cost of compensation for being unemployed.

Just so it's clear what you are talking about, you want to be paid $15/hr even when you refuse available employment.

it is less expensive than means tested welfare and requires no fraud.

And, it ensures local governments still have recourse to steady revenue.

It is more expensive and only encourages laziness.

 

[BWK]

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment that socialism can solve for in a market friendly manner. The infrastructure already exists in our Republic.

Raising the minimum wage could solve the cost of living issue.

Wrong

Socialism has universally been a massive failure and the idea of a natural unemployment rate is delusional crap

Are there always unemployed people in every society? Yes! But it is not natural it is the result of volitional choice.

There is no living wage issue. Any wage is a living wage depending on how one chooses to live

nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics; propaganda and rhetoric is all they know.

Being able to apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is as market friendly as it gets. We could have solved simple poverty Yesterday; but, the Poor may benefit.

And there's your favorite fallacy on display. You still haven't shown where you're going to get the additional trillions you'll need every year.

people with recourse to an income can pay taxes. the costs can be recovered.

Sounds like you really do believe you can fill a swimming pool by pumping water from the deep end to the shallow end.

people with recourse to an income can pay taxes. the costs can be recovered.

What you understand about economics would fit in a thimble. You're embarrassing yourself

even women can gossip; you may need to oil wrestle me if you want your "even chance".

I have a degree in economics.

You're clueless...trust me

Good, now show us why Republicans support post # 67 when that is pure Socialism?

Why should we subsidize farmers against the failures of farming, and not government subsidized health insurance? Explain away your economic differences there.

You're another economic illiterate and don't know what Socialism is...just what your left loon sites spoon feed you.

Each and everyone of you leftist assholes use the exact same talking points.

Why do you think that is? It's because your masters are instructing you what to say. None of you are capable of original thought

So you can't explain it then? Why am I surprised. You just said absolutely nothing as you always do.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong

Socialism has universally been a massive failure and the idea of a natural unemployment rate is delusional crap

Are there always unemployed people in every society? Yes! But it is not natural it is the result of volitional choice.

There is no living wage issue. Any wage is a living wage depending on how one chooses to live

nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics; propaganda and rhetoric is all they know.

Being able to apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is as market friendly as it gets. We could have solved simple poverty Yesterday; but, the Poor may benefit.

That's great except I am not a republican and my post still stands as fact

Unemployment compensation is not market friendly as it takes from those actually trying to buy and sell in the market

Redistribution by force is never market friendly under any circumstances and never has been

We have solved poverty through capitalism

You don't know what you are talking about like usual, right winger. Nobody takes y'all seriously about economics. Compensation for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment must engender a positive multiplier effect upon our economy. Only the right wing would complain about solving simple poverty at the rock bottom cost of compensation for being unemployed.

You are more right wing than I am and yes I do.

You are massively ignorant and delusional here.

Once again there is no natural rate of unemployment

Redistribution and entitlements for doing nothing does nothing for our economy and never has.

It only increases dependency and creates welfare queens.

Once again. We have solved poverty through capitalism your idiotic ideas would only bring it back

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment that socialism can easily solve for in a market friendly manner with existing infrastructure in our Republic.

The right wing has a problem with it Because the Poor may benefit.

Wrong.
There is no natural rate of unemployment no matter how many times you prove your ignorance by saying there is

There is no market friendly form of socialism

Socialism increases poverty world wide which is why intelligent people oppose it

 

[danielpalos]

nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics; propaganda and rhetoric is all they know.

Being able to apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is as market friendly as it gets. We could have solved simple poverty Yesterday; but, the Poor may benefit.

That's great except I am not a republican and my post still stands as fact

Unemployment compensation is not market friendly as it takes from those actually trying to buy and sell in the market

Redistribution by force is never market friendly under any circumstances and never has been

We have solved poverty through capitalism

You don't know what you are talking about like usual, right winger. Nobody takes y'all seriously about economics. Compensation for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment must engender a positive multiplier effect upon our economy. Only the right wing would complain about solving simple poverty at the rock bottom cost of compensation for being unemployed.

Just so it's clear what you are talking about, you want to be paid $15/hr even when you refuse available employment.

it is less expensive than means tested welfare and requires no fraud.

And, it ensures local governments still have recourse to steady revenue.

It is more expensive and only encourages laziness.

you have no moral authority; and, Capitalism works.

 

[Ame®icano]

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment that socialism can solve for in a market friendly manner. The infrastructure already exists in our Republic.

Raising the minimum wage could solve the cost of living issue.

Your stupidity hurts...

Your hate rant is a pretty pitiful excuse for a counter argument.

Before you open your mouth again (or post again, if that term bothers you) use the search to check how many times danielpalos wrote exactly the same sentences to similar and to even unrelated subjects.

 

[Soupnazi630]

And there's your favorite fallacy on display. You still haven't shown where you're going to get the additional trillions you'll need every year.

people with recourse to an income can pay taxes. the costs can be recovered.

Not in the trillions and now you are only impoverishing people who have jobs

most, of not all is already being collected via less efficient means. we could be lowering costs via a general tax on employers.

Yes and the result is an unworkable economic mess.

Your stupid and ignorant ideas would only make the problem worse.

anybody can gossip. i merely gainsay your contention since you have no economic argument.

Wrong I stated facts you stated delusion

 

[danielpalos]

nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics; propaganda and rhetoric is all they know.

Being able to apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is as market friendly as it gets. We could have solved simple poverty Yesterday; but, the Poor may benefit.

That's great except I am not a republican and my post still stands as fact

Unemployment compensation is not market friendly as it takes from those actually trying to buy and sell in the market

Redistribution by force is never market friendly under any circumstances and never has been

We have solved poverty through capitalism

You don't know what you are talking about like usual, right winger. Nobody takes y'all seriously about economics. Compensation for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment must engender a positive multiplier effect upon our economy. Only the right wing would complain about solving simple poverty at the rock bottom cost of compensation for being unemployed.

You are more right wing than I am and yes I do.

You are massively ignorant and delusional here.

Once again there is no natural rate of unemployment

Redistribution and entitlements for doing nothing does nothing for our economy and never has.

It only increases dependency and creates welfare queens.

Once again. We have solved poverty through capitalism your idiotic ideas would only bring it back

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment that socialism can easily solve for in a market friendly manner with existing infrastructure in our Republic.

The right wing has a problem with it Because the Poor may benefit.

Wrong.
There is no natural rate of unemployment no matter how many times you prove your ignorance by saying there is

There is no market friendly form of socialism

Socialism increases poverty world wide which is why intelligent people oppose it

you merely appeal to ignorance of economics.

solving for simple poverty must engender a positive multiplier effect upon our economy.

 

[danielpalos]

people with recourse to an income can pay taxes. the costs can be recovered.

Not in the trillions and now you are only impoverishing people who have jobs

most, of not all is already being collected via less efficient means. we could be lowering costs via a general tax on employers.

Yes and the result is an unworkable economic mess.

Your stupid and ignorant ideas would only make the problem worse.

anybody can gossip. i merely gainsay your contention since you have no economic argument.

Wrong I stated facts you stated delusion

you have no facts, only gossip. you need a superior argument not simple bigotry.

 

[Soupnazi630]

That's great except I am not a republican and my post still stands as fact

Unemployment compensation is not market friendly as it takes from those actually trying to buy and sell in the market

Redistribution by force is never market friendly under any circumstances and never has been

We have solved poverty through capitalism

You don't know what you are talking about like usual, right winger. Nobody takes y'all seriously about economics. Compensation for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment must engender a positive multiplier effect upon our economy. Only the right wing would complain about solving simple poverty at the rock bottom cost of compensation for being unemployed.

You are more right wing than I am and yes I do.

You are massively ignorant and delusional here.

Once again there is no natural rate of unemployment

Redistribution and entitlements for doing nothing does nothing for our economy and never has.

It only increases dependency and creates welfare queens.

Once again. We have solved poverty through capitalism your idiotic ideas would only bring it back

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment that socialism can easily solve for in a market friendly manner with existing infrastructure in our Republic.

The right wing has a problem with it Because the Poor may benefit.

Wrong.
There is no natural rate of unemployment no matter how many times you prove your ignorance by saying there is

There is no market friendly form of socialism

Socialism increases poverty world wide which is why intelligent people oppose it

you merely appeal to ignorance of economics.

solving for simple poverty must engender a positive multiplier effect upon our economy.

No I am explaining reality to you because you are massively ignorant of economics.

Solving for poverty involves nothing more than getting out of people's way.

They will see it themselves and socialism never has a positive multiplier effect.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Not in the trillions and now you are only impoverishing people who have jobs

most, of not all is already being collected via less efficient means. we could be lowering costs via a general tax on employers.

Yes and the result is an unworkable economic mess.

Your stupid and ignorant ideas would only make the problem worse.

anybody can gossip. i merely gainsay your contention since you have no economic argument.

Wrong I stated facts you stated delusion

you have no facts, only gossip. you need a superior argument not simple bigotry.

I have absolute facts and a superior argument which wrecked your delusional claims.

And you know this is true

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong

Socialism has universally been a massive failure and the idea of a natural unemployment rate is delusional crap

Are there always unemployed people in every society? Yes! But it is not natural it is the result of volitional choice.

There is no living wage issue. Any wage is a living wage depending on how one chooses to live

nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics; propaganda and rhetoric is all they know.

Being able to apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is as market friendly as it gets. We could have solved simple poverty Yesterday; but, the Poor may benefit.

And there's your favorite fallacy on display. You still haven't shown where you're going to get the additional trillions you'll need every year.

people with recourse to an income can pay taxes. the costs can be recovered.

Sounds like you really do believe you can fill a swimming pool by pumping water from the deep end to the shallow end.

lol. Only the Right Wing, never gets it.

We are discussing the rock bottom cost of a form of minimum wage.

Only the right wing has a capital problem with the rock bottom cost of a form of Minimum wage.

Wrong.
Anyone with average intelligence opposes minimum wage

 

[BWK]

nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics; propaganda and rhetoric is all they know.

Being able to apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is as market friendly as it gets. We could have solved simple poverty Yesterday; but, the Poor may benefit.

That's great except I am not a republican and my post still stands as fact

Unemployment compensation is not market friendly as it takes from those actually trying to buy and sell in the market

Redistribution by force is never market friendly under any circumstances and never has been

We have solved poverty through capitalism

You don't know what you are talking about like usual, right winger. Nobody takes y'all seriously about economics. Compensation for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment must engender a positive multiplier effect upon our economy. Only the right wing would complain about solving simple poverty at the rock bottom cost of compensation for being unemployed.

Just so it's clear what you are talking about, you want to be paid $15/hr even when you refuse available employment.

it is less expensive than means tested welfare and requires no fraud.

And, it ensures local governments still have recourse to steady revenue.

It is more expensive and only encourages laziness.

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment that socialism can solve for in a market friendly manner. The infrastructure already exists in our Republic.

Raising the minimum wage could solve the cost of living issue.

Your stupidity hurts...

Your hate rant is a pretty pitiful excuse for a counter argument.

Before you open your mouth again (or post again, if that term bothers you) use the search to check how many times danielpalos wrote exactly the same sentences to similar and to even unrelated subjects.

Not sure how many times he said it and don't care, I know what I posted has been met with zero debate via facts. I'm the only one posting the actual numbers no one wants to challenge.

 

[BWK]

nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics; propaganda and rhetoric is all they know.

Being able to apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is as market friendly as it gets. We could have solved simple poverty Yesterday; but, the Poor may benefit.

And there's your favorite fallacy on display. You still haven't shown where you're going to get the additional trillions you'll need every year.

people with recourse to an income can pay taxes. the costs can be recovered.

Sounds like you really do believe you can fill a swimming pool by pumping water from the deep end to the shallow end.

lol. Only the Right Wing, never gets it.

We are discussing the rock bottom cost of a form of minimum wage.

Only the right wing has a capital problem with the rock bottom cost of a form of Minimum wage.

Wrong.
Anyone with average intelligence opposes minimum wage

most, of not all is already being collected via less efficient means. we could be lowering costs via a general tax on employers.

Yes and the result is an unworkable economic mess.

Your stupid and ignorant ideas would only make the problem worse.

anybody can gossip. i merely gainsay your contention since you have no economic argument.

Wrong I stated facts you stated delusion

you have no facts, only gossip. you need a superior argument not simple bigotry.

I have absolute facts and a superior argument which wrecked your delusional claims.

And you know this is true

This is what low taxes on the wealthy have done for forty years and counting; vulture chart - Google Search It's given us flat wages and a raise of 270% for the 1%. Show us where your facts paint a different picture.

 

[Soupnazi630]

And there's your favorite fallacy on display. You still haven't shown where you're going to get the additional trillions you'll need every year.

people with recourse to an income can pay taxes. the costs can be recovered.

Sounds like you really do believe you can fill a swimming pool by pumping water from the deep end to the shallow end.

lol. Only the Right Wing, never gets it.

We are discussing the rock bottom cost of a form of minimum wage.

Only the right wing has a capital problem with the rock bottom cost of a form of Minimum wage.

Wrong.
Anyone with average intelligence opposes minimum wage

Yes and the result is an unworkable economic mess.

Your stupid and ignorant ideas would only make the problem worse.

anybody can gossip. i merely gainsay your contention since you have no economic argument.

Wrong I stated facts you stated delusion

you have no facts, only gossip. you need a superior argument not simple bigotry.

I have absolute facts and a superior argument which wrecked your delusional claims.

And you know this is true

This is what low taxes on the wealthy have done for forty years and counting; vulture chart - Google Search It's given us flat wages and a raise of 270% for the 1%. Show us where your facts paint a different picture.

You keep posting the same horse shit Bernie Sanders propaganda.

It is nothing more than childish bigotry and hatred or the successful for being successful.

Wahes are fine and healthy does everyone

 

[BWK]

people with recourse to an income can pay taxes. the costs can be recovered.

Sounds like you really do believe you can fill a swimming pool by pumping water from the deep end to the shallow end.

lol. Only the Right Wing, never gets it.

We are discussing the rock bottom cost of a form of minimum wage.

Only the right wing has a capital problem with the rock bottom cost of a form of Minimum wage.

Wrong.
Anyone with average intelligence opposes minimum wage

anybody can gossip. i merely gainsay your contention since you have no economic argument.

Wrong I stated facts you stated delusion

you have no facts, only gossip. you need a superior argument not simple bigotry.

I have absolute facts and a superior argument which wrecked your delusional claims.

And you know this is true

This is what low taxes on the wealthy have done for forty years and counting; vulture chart - Google Search It's given us flat wages and a raise of 270% for the 1%. Show us where your facts paint a different picture.

You keep posting the same horse shit Bernie Sanders propaganda.

It is nothing more than childish bigotry and hatred or the successful for being successful.

Wahes are fine and healthy does everyone

The figures I posted came from the Centers for Tax Policy. If you can't counter those figures, then I just proved you wrong. There is nothing childish or hateful about it. They are simple facts. Do you have a counter rebuttal?

 

[BWK]

Not in the trillions and now you are only impoverishing people who have jobs

most, of not all is already being collected via less efficient means. we could be lowering costs via a general tax on employers.

Yes and the result is an unworkable economic mess.

Your stupid and ignorant ideas would only make the problem worse.

anybody can gossip. i merely gainsay your contention since you have no economic argument.

Wrong I stated facts you stated delusion

you have no facts, only gossip. you need a superior argument not simple bigotry.

He never says anything.

 

[georgephillip]

In America it is primarily the rich who benefit from socialism:

Michael Hudson: America's Monetary Imperialism

"The reality since World War I is that the United States has taken the lead in shaping the international financial system to promote gains for its own bankers, farm exporters, its oil and gas sector, and buyers of foreign resources – and most of all, to collect on debts owed to it.

"Each time this global system has broken down over the past century, the major destabilizing force has been American over-reach and the drive by its bankers and bondholders for short-term gains.

"The dollar-centered financial system is leaving more industrial as well as Third World countries debt-strapped.

"Its three institutional pillars – the International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Bank and World Trade Organization – have imposed monetary, fiscal and financial dependency, most recently by the post-Soviet Baltics, Greece and the rest of southern Europe.

"The resulting strains are now reaching the point where they are breaking apart the arrangements put in place after World War II."

 

[Soupnazi630]

Sounds like you really do believe you can fill a swimming pool by pumping water from the deep end to the shallow end.

lol. Only the Right Wing, never gets it.

We are discussing the rock bottom cost of a form of minimum wage.

Only the right wing has a capital problem with the rock bottom cost of a form of Minimum wage.

Wrong.
Anyone with average intelligence opposes minimum wage

Wrong I stated facts you stated delusion

you have no facts, only gossip. you need a superior argument not simple bigotry.

I have absolute facts and a superior argument which wrecked your delusional claims.

And you know this is true

This is what low taxes on the wealthy have done for forty years and counting; vulture chart - Google Search It's given us flat wages and a raise of 270% for the 1%. Show us where your facts paint a different picture.

You keep posting the same horse shit Bernie Sanders propaganda.

It is nothing more than childish bigotry and hatred or the successful for being successful.

Wahes are fine and healthy does everyone

The figures I posted came from the Centers for Tax Policy. If you can't counter those figures, then I just proved you wrong. There is nothing childish or hateful about it. They are simple facts. Do you have a counter rebuttal?

Not an official source you fool

As worthless as Breitbart and I already countered your crap with facts and arguments which you can only respond to with lies.

 

[Ame®icano]

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment that socialism can solve for in a market friendly manner. The infrastructure already exists in our Republic.

Raising the minimum wage could solve the cost of living issue.

Your stupidity hurts...

Your hate rant is a pretty pitiful excuse for a counter argument.

Before you open your mouth again (or post again, if that term bothers you) use the search to check how many times danielpalos wrote exactly the same sentences to similar and to even unrelated subjects.

Not sure how many times he said it and don't care, I know what I posted has been met with zero debate via facts. I'm the only one posting the actual numbers no one wants to challenge.

If my intention was to debate you, I would quote your post and reply to it.

As you can see from your own quote/post, I DID NOT REPLY TO YOU, and I DID NOT QUOTED YOU. I quoted and replied specifically to danielpalos. Now, fuck off... politely.