Bill de Blasio Reveals That He Wants To Steal From You Using Socialism

No I am explaining reality to you because you are massively ignorant of economics.

Solving for poverty involves nothing more than getting out of people's way.

They will see it themselves and socialism never has a positive multiplier effect.
1929 proves you wrong. And, providing for the general welfare is in our Constitution.
No it does not actually it proves me right.

And the preamble it not law
nobody t weakes the right wing seriously about economics or Constitutional law.
And they take you even less serious since you have shown massive ignorance.
what ignorance is that, Right Winger? you have nothing but bigotry, not any facts. and, this is Not one of your, twice a day moments.
For one calling me bigoted which is a cowardly balled faced lie.

For another calling me a right winger when you are more of a right winger than I am

For another repeating that capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment which is nothing more than a made up assertion.
 
Wrong.
Anyone with average intelligence opposes minimum wage
only the right wing is that dumb.

Social services cost the equivalent to fourteen dollars an hour. There is absolutely no reason to subsidize employers with Cheap labor in our First World economy.
Social services cost enormous amount beyond your false claim and only encourages dependency
Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployed merely for the bottom line; it only encourages cronyism.
It has no such natural rate of unemployment which is simply a made up delusional claim.
Anybody who knows Anything about economics understands that concept and does not appeal to ignorance of it to try to refute anything.
Not they do not understand what in fact.

Your appeal to authority is a failure and proof of ignorance of economics.
 
1929 proves you wrong. And, providing for the general welfare is in our Constitution.
No it does not actually it proves me right.

And the preamble it not law
nobody t weakes the right wing seriously about economics or Constitutional law.
And they take you even less serious since you have shown massive ignorance.
what ignorance is that, Right Winger? you have nothing but bigotry, not any facts. and, this is Not one of your, twice a day moments.
For one calling me bigoted which is a cowardly balled faced lie.

For another calling me a right winger when you are more of a right winger than I am

For another repeating that capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment which is nothing more than a made up assertion.
it is an economic concept. and, providing for the general welfare is a general power.
 
only the right wing is that dumb.

Social services cost the equivalent to fourteen dollars an hour. There is absolutely no reason to subsidize employers with Cheap labor in our First World economy.
Social services cost enormous amount beyond your false claim and only encourages dependency
Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployed merely for the bottom line; it only encourages cronyism.
It has no such natural rate of unemployment which is simply a made up delusional claim.
Anybody who knows Anything about economics understands that concept and does not appeal to ignorance of it to try to refute anything.
Not they do not understand what in fact.

Your appeal to authority is a failure and proof of ignorance of economics.
simple rejection is not a valid refutation.
 
The blinders are off:

131106100014-01-blasio-fam-1106-horizontal-large-gallery.jpg


New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio slammed the current economic model in New York City and the world-at-large during a recent speech; bizarrely claiming there’s “plenty of money,” it’s just not properly distributed. The Big Apple Democrat was speaking at his State of the City address when he made the stunning admission; vowing to redistribute the wealth throughout the nation’s largest metropolis.

"There’s plenty of money in the world. Plenty of money in this city," Mayor de Blasio said. "It’s just in the wrong hands!"
Yup........like most socialists....they want your money. They feel they have the right to just take it whenever they can manufacture a reason....or manufacture a crisis that warrants taking more.​
Capitalist want yer money also, so do crooks of which their is not much difference between a socialist or a capitalist when it comes to taking away yer dough
The difference is that socialism is forced and capitalism is voluntary.
 
No it does not actually it proves me right.

And the preamble it not law
nobody t weakes the right wing seriously about economics or Constitutional law.
And they take you even less serious since you have shown massive ignorance.
what ignorance is that, Right Winger? you have nothing but bigotry, not any facts. and, this is Not one of your, twice a day moments.
For one calling me bigoted which is a cowardly balled faced lie.

For another calling me a right winger when you are more of a right winger than I am

For another repeating that capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment which is nothing more than a made up assertion.
it is an economic concept. and, providing for the general welfare is a general power.
No it is not an economic concept it is a made up assertion.

And no stupid it is not a general power
 
The blinders are off:

131106100014-01-blasio-fam-1106-horizontal-large-gallery.jpg


New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio slammed the current economic model in New York City and the world-at-large during a recent speech; bizarrely claiming there’s “plenty of money,” it’s just not properly distributed. The Big Apple Democrat was speaking at his State of the City address when he made the stunning admission; vowing to redistribute the wealth throughout the nation’s largest metropolis.

"There’s plenty of money in the world. Plenty of money in this city," Mayor de Blasio said. "It’s just in the wrong hands!"
Yup........like most socialists....they want your money. They feel they have the right to just take it whenever they can manufacture a reason....or manufacture a crisis that warrants taking more.​
Capitalist want yer money also, so do crooks of which their is not much difference between a socialist or a capitalist when it comes to taking away yer dough
The difference is that socialism is forced and capitalism is voluntary.

Up until 'too big to fail', then socialism was demanded by failed capitalists

~S~
 
Social services cost enormous amount beyond your false claim and only encourages dependency
Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployed merely for the bottom line; it only encourages cronyism.
It has no such natural rate of unemployment which is simply a made up delusional claim.
Anybody who knows Anything about economics understands that concept and does not appeal to ignorance of it to try to refute anything.
Not they do not understand what in fact.

Your appeal to authority is a failure and proof of ignorance of economics.
simple rejection is not a valid refutation.
Actually yes it is when the other guy simply asserts without facts evidence or logic.

You make assertions without facts evidence or logic which are then refuted in the same fashion
 
nobody t weakes the right wing seriously about economics or Constitutional law.
And they take you even less serious since you have shown massive ignorance.
what ignorance is that, Right Winger? you have nothing but bigotry, not any facts. and, this is Not one of your, twice a day moments.
For one calling me bigoted which is a cowardly balled faced lie.

For another calling me a right winger when you are more of a right winger than I am

For another repeating that capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment which is nothing more than a made up assertion.
it is an economic concept. and, providing for the general welfare is a general power.
No it is not an economic concept it is a made up assertion.

And no stupid it is not a general power
why should i believe Your bigotry and not an economists bigotry?

and, yes, it is Expressly declared a General power.
 
And they take you even less serious since you have shown massive ignorance.
what ignorance is that, Right Winger? you have nothing but bigotry, not any facts. and, this is Not one of your, twice a day moments.
For one calling me bigoted which is a cowardly balled faced lie.

For another calling me a right winger when you are more of a right winger than I am

For another repeating that capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment which is nothing more than a made up assertion.
it is an economic concept. and, providing for the general welfare is a general power.
No it is not an economic concept it is a made up assertion.

And no stupid it is not a general power
why should i believe Your bigotry and not an economists bigotry?

and, yes, it is Expressly declared a General power.
I have none and you have no economist supporting you.

So far all you have cited is Sanders who is a massive fool
 
Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployed merely for the bottom line; it only encourages cronyism.
It has no such natural rate of unemployment which is simply a made up delusional claim.
Anybody who knows Anything about economics understands that concept and does not appeal to ignorance of it to try to refute anything.
Not they do not understand what in fact.

Your appeal to authority is a failure and proof of ignorance of economics.
simple rejection is not a valid refutation.
Actually yes it is when the other guy simply asserts without facts evidence or logic.

You make assertions without facts evidence or logic which are then refuted in the same fashion
Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment of the benefit of the capital bottom line.

Compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is market friendly and corrects for that natural rate of capital inefficiency.
 
And they take you even less serious since you have shown massive ignorance.
what ignorance is that, Right Winger? you have nothing but bigotry, not any facts. and, this is Not one of your, twice a day moments.
For one calling me bigoted which is a cowardly balled faced lie.

For another calling me a right winger when you are more of a right winger than I am

For another repeating that capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment which is nothing more than a made up assertion.
it is an economic concept. and, providing for the general welfare is a general power.
No it is not an economic concept it is a made up assertion.

And no stupid it is not a general power
why should i believe Your bigotry and not an economists bigotry?

and, yes, it is Expressly declared a General power.
It is not a general power.
 
what ignorance is that, Right Winger? you have nothing but bigotry, not any facts. and, this is Not one of your, twice a day moments.
For one calling me bigoted which is a cowardly balled faced lie.

For another calling me a right winger when you are more of a right winger than I am

For another repeating that capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment which is nothing more than a made up assertion.
it is an economic concept. and, providing for the general welfare is a general power.
No it is not an economic concept it is a made up assertion.

And no stupid it is not a general power
why should i believe Your bigotry and not an economists bigotry?

and, yes, it is Expressly declared a General power.
I have none and you have no economist supporting you.

So far all you have cited is Sanders who is a massive fool
Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is economic bigotry that is superior to Your bigotry.
 
It has no such natural rate of unemployment which is simply a made up delusional claim.
Anybody who knows Anything about economics understands that concept and does not appeal to ignorance of it to try to refute anything.
Not they do not understand what in fact.

Your appeal to authority is a failure and proof of ignorance of economics.
simple rejection is not a valid refutation.
Actually yes it is when the other guy simply asserts without facts evidence or logic.

You make assertions without facts evidence or logic which are then refuted in the same fashion
Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment of the benefit of the capital bottom line.

Compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is market friendly and corrects for that natural rate of capital inefficiency.
Capitalism has no natural rate of unemployment and redistribution is never market friendly
 
what ignorance is that, Right Winger? you have nothing but bigotry, not any facts. and, this is Not one of your, twice a day moments.
For one calling me bigoted which is a cowardly balled faced lie.

For another calling me a right winger when you are more of a right winger than I am

For another repeating that capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment which is nothing more than a made up assertion.
it is an economic concept. and, providing for the general welfare is a general power.
No it is not an economic concept it is a made up assertion.

And no stupid it is not a general power
why should i believe Your bigotry and not an economists bigotry?

and, yes, it is Expressly declared a General power.
It is not a general power.
it must be, it says so, Expressly.
 
For one calling me bigoted which is a cowardly balled faced lie.

For another calling me a right winger when you are more of a right winger than I am

For another repeating that capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment which is nothing more than a made up assertion.
it is an economic concept. and, providing for the general welfare is a general power.
No it is not an economic concept it is a made up assertion.

And no stupid it is not a general power
why should i believe Your bigotry and not an economists bigotry?

and, yes, it is Expressly declared a General power.
I have none and you have no economist supporting you.

So far all you have cited is Sanders who is a massive fool
Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is economic bigotry that is superior to Your bigotry.
I have no bigotry and capitalism has no natural rate of unemployment
 
Anybody who knows Anything about economics understands that concept and does not appeal to ignorance of it to try to refute anything.
Not they do not understand what in fact.

Your appeal to authority is a failure and proof of ignorance of economics.
simple rejection is not a valid refutation.
Actually yes it is when the other guy simply asserts without facts evidence or logic.

You make assertions without facts evidence or logic which are then refuted in the same fashion
Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment of the benefit of the capital bottom line.

Compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is market friendly and corrects for that natural rate of capital inefficiency.
Capitalism has no natural rate of unemployment and redistribution is never market friendly
how do you explain structural forms of unemployment?
 
For one calling me bigoted which is a cowardly balled faced lie.

For another calling me a right winger when you are more of a right winger than I am

For another repeating that capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment which is nothing more than a made up assertion.
it is an economic concept. and, providing for the general welfare is a general power.
No it is not an economic concept it is a made up assertion.

And no stupid it is not a general power
why should i believe Your bigotry and not an economists bigotry?

and, yes, it is Expressly declared a General power.
It is not a general power.
it must be, it says so, Expressly.
It does not and it is not
 
it is an economic concept. and, providing for the general welfare is a general power.
No it is not an economic concept it is a made up assertion.

And no stupid it is not a general power
why should i believe Your bigotry and not an economists bigotry?

and, yes, it is Expressly declared a General power.
I have none and you have no economist supporting you.

So far all you have cited is Sanders who is a massive fool
Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is economic bigotry that is superior to Your bigotry.
I have no bigotry and capitalism has no natural rate of unemployment
you appeal to ignorance of that economic concept; why is that?
 
Not they do not understand what in fact.

Your appeal to authority is a failure and proof of ignorance of economics.
simple rejection is not a valid refutation.
Actually yes it is when the other guy simply asserts without facts evidence or logic.

You make assertions without facts evidence or logic which are then refuted in the same fashion
Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment of the benefit of the capital bottom line.

Compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is market friendly and corrects for that natural rate of capital inefficiency.
Capitalism has no natural rate of unemployment and redistribution is never market friendly
how do you explain structural forms of unemployment?
I don't as you made it up
 

Forum List

Back
Top