Bill de Blasio Reveals That He Wants To Steal From You Using Socialism

[hadit]

The blinders are off:

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio slammed the current economic model in New York City and the world-at-large during a recent speech; bizarrely claiming there’s “plenty of money,” it’s just not properly distributed. The Big Apple Democrat was speaking at his State of the City address when he made the stunning admission; vowing to redistribute the wealth throughout the nation’s largest metropolis.

"There’s plenty of money in the world. Plenty of money in this city," Mayor de Blasio said. "It’s just in the wrong hands!"
​

Yup........like most socialists....they want your money. They feel they have the right to just take it whenever they can manufacture a reason....or manufacture a crisis that warrants taking more.​

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment that socialism can solve for in a market friendly manner. The infrastructure already exists in our Republic.

Raising the minimum wage could solve the cost of living issue.

You're still saying the same things and you're still wrong.

i gainsay your contention. you need a valid argument.

Where are you going to get the money?

 

[danielpalos]

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment that socialism can solve for in a market friendly manner. The infrastructure already exists in our Republic.

Raising the minimum wage could solve the cost of living issue.

Wrong

Socialism has universally been a massive failure and the idea of a natural unemployment rate is delusional crap

Are there always unemployed people in every society? Yes! But it is not natural it is the result of volitional choice.

There is no living wage issue. Any wage is a living wage depending on how one chooses to live

nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics; propaganda and rhetoric is all they know.

Being able to apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is as market friendly as it gets. We could have solved simple poverty Yesterday; but, the Poor may benefit.

And there's your favorite fallacy on display. You still haven't shown where you're going to get the additional trillions you'll need every year.

people with recourse to an income can pay taxes. the costs can be recovered.

What you understand about economics would fit in a thimble. You're embarrassing yourself

even women can gossip; you may need to oil wrestle me if you want your "even chance".

 

[danielpalos]

The blinders are off:

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio slammed the current economic model in New York City and the world-at-large during a recent speech; bizarrely claiming there’s “plenty of money,” it’s just not properly distributed. The Big Apple Democrat was speaking at his State of the City address when he made the stunning admission; vowing to redistribute the wealth throughout the nation’s largest metropolis.

"There’s plenty of money in the world. Plenty of money in this city," Mayor de Blasio said. "It’s just in the wrong hands!"
​

Yup........like most socialists....they want your money. They feel they have the right to just take it whenever they can manufacture a reason....or manufacture a crisis that warrants taking more.​

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment that socialism can solve for in a market friendly manner. The infrastructure already exists in our Republic.

Raising the minimum wage could solve the cost of living issue.

Wrong

Socialism has universally been a massive failure and the idea of a natural unemployment rate is delusional crap

Are there always unemployed people in every society? Yes! But it is not natural it is the result of volitional choice.

There is no living wage issue. Any wage is a living wage depending on how one chooses to live

nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics; propaganda and rhetoric is all they know.

Being able to apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is as market friendly as it gets. We could have solved simple poverty Yesterday; but, the Poor may benefit.

That's great except I am not a republican and my post still stands as fact

Unemployment compensation is not market friendly as it takes from those actually trying to buy and sell in the market

Redistribution by force is never market friendly under any circumstances and never has been

We have solved poverty through capitalism

You don't know what you are talking about like usual, right winger. Nobody takes y'all seriously about economics. Compensation for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment must engender a positive multiplier effect upon our economy. Only the right wing would complain about solving simple poverty at the rock bottom cost of compensation for being unemployed.

 

[danielpalos]

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment that socialism can solve for in a market friendly manner. The infrastructure already exists in our Republic.

Raising the minimum wage could solve the cost of living issue.

Wrong

Socialism has universally been a massive failure and the idea of a natural unemployment rate is delusional crap

Are there always unemployed people in every society? Yes! But it is not natural it is the result of volitional choice.

There is no living wage issue. Any wage is a living wage depending on how one chooses to live

nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics; propaganda and rhetoric is all they know.

Being able to apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is as market friendly as it gets. We could have solved simple poverty Yesterday; but, the Poor may benefit.

And there's your favorite fallacy on display. You still haven't shown where you're going to get the additional trillions you'll need every year.

people with recourse to an income can pay taxes. the costs can be recovered.

Not in the trillions and now you are only impoverishing people who have jobs

most, of not all is already being collected via less efficient means. we could be lowering costs via a general tax on employers.

 

[danielpalos]

The blinders are off:

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio slammed the current economic model in New York City and the world-at-large during a recent speech; bizarrely claiming there’s “plenty of money,” it’s just not properly distributed. The Big Apple Democrat was speaking at his State of the City address when he made the stunning admission; vowing to redistribute the wealth throughout the nation’s largest metropolis.

"There’s plenty of money in the world. Plenty of money in this city," Mayor de Blasio said. "It’s just in the wrong hands!"
​

Yup........like most socialists....they want your money. They feel they have the right to just take it whenever they can manufacture a reason....or manufacture a crisis that warrants taking more.​

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment that socialism can solve for in a market friendly manner. The infrastructure already exists in our Republic.

Raising the minimum wage could solve the cost of living issue.

You're still saying the same things and you're still wrong.

i gainsay your contention. you need a valid argument.

Where are you going to get the money?

Let's consider getting it from employers via a general tax instead of our current regime.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Wrong

Socialism has universally been a massive failure and the idea of a natural unemployment rate is delusional crap

Are there always unemployed people in every society? Yes! But it is not natural it is the result of volitional choice.

There is no living wage issue. Any wage is a living wage depending on how one chooses to live

nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics; propaganda and rhetoric is all they know.

Being able to apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is as market friendly as it gets. We could have solved simple poverty Yesterday; but, the Poor may benefit.

And there's your favorite fallacy on display. You still haven't shown where you're going to get the additional trillions you'll need every year.

people with recourse to an income can pay taxes. the costs can be recovered.

What you understand about economics would fit in a thimble. You're embarrassing yourself

even women can gossip; you may need to oil wrestle me if you want your "even chance".

I have a degree in economics.

You're clueless...trust me

 

[BWK]

The blinders are off:

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio slammed the current economic model in New York City and the world-at-large during a recent speech; bizarrely claiming there’s “plenty of money,” it’s just not properly distributed. The Big Apple Democrat was speaking at his State of the City address when he made the stunning admission; vowing to redistribute the wealth throughout the nation’s largest metropolis.

"There’s plenty of money in the world. Plenty of money in this city," Mayor de Blasio said. "It’s just in the wrong hands!"
​

Yup........like most socialists....they want your money. They feel they have the right to just take it whenever they can manufacture a reason....or manufacture a crisis that warrants taking more.​

Capitalist want yer money also, so do crooks of which their is not much difference between a socialist or a capitalist when it comes to taking away yer dough

Capitalist earn their money… Socialists do not

Without the Socialist programs such as Sports socialism or the farm bill to keep them going or create their wealth, they wouldn't earn any money. Do you know what Socialism is?

 

[BWK]

nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics; propaganda and rhetoric is all they know.

Being able to apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is as market friendly as it gets. We could have solved simple poverty Yesterday; but, the Poor may benefit.

And there's your favorite fallacy on display. You still haven't shown where you're going to get the additional trillions you'll need every year.

people with recourse to an income can pay taxes. the costs can be recovered.

What you understand about economics would fit in a thimble. You're embarrassing yourself

even women can gossip; you may need to oil wrestle me if you want your "even chance".

I have a degree in economics.

You're clueless...trust me

Good, now show us why Republicans support post # 67 when that is pure Socialism?

Why should we subsidize farmers against the failures of farming, and not government subsidized health insurance? Explain away your economic differences there.

 

[fncceo]

a general tax on employers.

As employers are already taxed, I'm assuming you mean an additional tax.

So, you tax an employer, here are his options:

1. Hire fewer employees ... putting more people on unemployment benefits
2. Raise the price of his goods or services ... making the minimum wage / unemployment benefits worth less
3. Keep the existing number of employees and paying them less ... meaning his best employees will leave and the quality of his goods and services (for which he now has to charge more) will decrease.
4. Go out of business
5. Take the hit and explain to his existing or potential investors (including the banks which give him operating credit) that their investment will now have less return than before and hope they will be understanding -- given that most investors have employees of their own, this reduction in ROI will only compound the same issues into a cascade effect.

In the mean time, we're paying people to stay home and watch reality TV because there are fewer jobs in the free market.

 

[80zephyr]

The blinders are off:

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio slammed the current economic model in New York City and the world-at-large during a recent speech; bizarrely claiming there’s “plenty of money,” it’s just not properly distributed. The Big Apple Democrat was speaking at his State of the City address when he made the stunning admission; vowing to redistribute the wealth throughout the nation’s largest metropolis.

"There’s plenty of money in the world. Plenty of money in this city," Mayor de Blasio said. "It’s just in the wrong hands!"
​

Yup........like most socialists....they want your money. They feel they have the right to just take it whenever they can manufacture a reason....or manufacture a crisis that warrants taking more.​

Capitalist want yer money also, so do crooks of which their is not much difference between a socialist or a capitalist when it comes to taking away yer dough

The major difference being you get something in return and you're not forced to do it at the end of a gun.

Amazing how they conflate voluntary transactions in which both sides benefit, with the coercion by the Bolsheviks.

Either they are as dumb as asphalt, or simply low-life lying Liberals.

There is no "both sides benefit" in capitalism. The only ones who benefit are the owners of the people. The transactions occur because people need food or gasoline or whatever. The owners of people do not need anything but suckers like republicans.

 

[BWK]

The blinders are off:

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio slammed the current economic model in New York City and the world-at-large during a recent speech; bizarrely claiming there’s “plenty of money,” it’s just not properly distributed. The Big Apple Democrat was speaking at his State of the City address when he made the stunning admission; vowing to redistribute the wealth throughout the nation’s largest metropolis.

"There’s plenty of money in the world. Plenty of money in this city," Mayor de Blasio said. "It’s just in the wrong hands!"
​

Yup........like most socialists....they want your money. They feel they have the right to just take it whenever they can manufacture a reason....or manufacture a crisis that warrants taking more.​

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment that socialism can solve for in a market friendly manner. The infrastructure already exists in our Republic.

Raising the minimum wage could solve the cost of living issue.

Wrong

Socialism has universally been a massive failure and the idea of a natural unemployment rate is delusional crap

Are there always unemployed people in every society? Yes! But it is not natural it is the result of volitional choice.

There is no living wage issue. Any wage is a living wage depending on how one chooses to live

nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics; propaganda and rhetoric is all they know.

Being able to apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is as market friendly as it gets. We could have solved simple poverty Yesterday; but, the Poor may benefit.

That's great except I am not a republican and my post still stands as fact

Unemployment compensation is not market friendly as it takes from those actually trying to buy and sell in the market

Redistribution by force is never market friendly under any circumstances and never has been

We have solved poverty through capitalism

We solved poverty when the rich were taxed 70 and 80%. Since 1979, wages have been flat, while giving the wealthy a 270% raise.. That isn't solving poverty.

 

[Ame®icano]

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment that socialism can solve for in a market friendly manner. The infrastructure already exists in our Republic.

Raising the minimum wage could solve the cost of living issue.

Your stupidity hurts...

 

[hadit]

The blinders are off:

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio slammed the current economic model in New York City and the world-at-large during a recent speech; bizarrely claiming there’s “plenty of money,” it’s just not properly distributed. The Big Apple Democrat was speaking at his State of the City address when he made the stunning admission; vowing to redistribute the wealth throughout the nation’s largest metropolis.

"There’s plenty of money in the world. Plenty of money in this city," Mayor de Blasio said. "It’s just in the wrong hands!"
​

Yup........like most socialists....they want your money. They feel they have the right to just take it whenever they can manufacture a reason....or manufacture a crisis that warrants taking more.​

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment that socialism can solve for in a market friendly manner. The infrastructure already exists in our Republic.

Raising the minimum wage could solve the cost of living issue.

Wrong

Socialism has universally been a massive failure and the idea of a natural unemployment rate is delusional crap

Are there always unemployed people in every society? Yes! But it is not natural it is the result of volitional choice.

There is no living wage issue. Any wage is a living wage depending on how one chooses to live

nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics; propaganda and rhetoric is all they know.

Being able to apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is as market friendly as it gets. We could have solved simple poverty Yesterday; but, the Poor may benefit.

That's great except I am not a republican and my post still stands as fact

Unemployment compensation is not market friendly as it takes from those actually trying to buy and sell in the market

Redistribution by force is never market friendly under any circumstances and never has been

We have solved poverty through capitalism

You don't know what you are talking about like usual, right winger. Nobody takes y'all seriously about economics. Compensation for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment must engender a positive multiplier effect upon our economy. Only the right wing would complain about solving simple poverty at the rock bottom cost of compensation for being unemployed.

Just so it's clear what you are talking about, you want to be paid $15/hr even when you refuse available employment.

 

[Soupnazi630]

The blinders are off:

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio slammed the current economic model in New York City and the world-at-large during a recent speech; bizarrely claiming there’s “plenty of money,” it’s just not properly distributed. The Big Apple Democrat was speaking at his State of the City address when he made the stunning admission; vowing to redistribute the wealth throughout the nation’s largest metropolis.

"There’s plenty of money in the world. Plenty of money in this city," Mayor de Blasio said. "It’s just in the wrong hands!"
​

Yup........like most socialists....they want your money. They feel they have the right to just take it whenever they can manufacture a reason....or manufacture a crisis that warrants taking more.​

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment that socialism can solve for in a market friendly manner. The infrastructure already exists in our Republic.

Raising the minimum wage could solve the cost of living issue.

Wrong

Socialism has universally been a massive failure and the idea of a natural unemployment rate is delusional crap

Are there always unemployed people in every society? Yes! But it is not natural it is the result of volitional choice.

There is no living wage issue. Any wage is a living wage depending on how one chooses to live

nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics; propaganda and rhetoric is all they know.

Being able to apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is as market friendly as it gets. We could have solved simple poverty Yesterday; but, the Poor may benefit.

That's great except I am not a republican and my post still stands as fact

Unemployment compensation is not market friendly as it takes from those actually trying to buy and sell in the market

Redistribution by force is never market friendly under any circumstances and never has been

We have solved poverty through capitalism

You don't know what you are talking about like usual, right winger. Nobody takes y'all seriously about economics. Compensation for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment must engender a positive multiplier effect upon our economy. Only the right wing would complain about solving simple poverty at the rock bottom cost of compensation for being unemployed.

You are more right wing than I am and yes I do.

You are massively ignorant and delusional here.

Once again there is no natural rate of unemployment

Redistribution and entitlements for doing nothing does nothing for our economy and never has.

It only increases dependency and creates welfare queens.

Once again. We have solved poverty through capitalism your idiotic ideas would only bring it back

 

[hadit]

The blinders are off:

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio slammed the current economic model in New York City and the world-at-large during a recent speech; bizarrely claiming there’s “plenty of money,” it’s just not properly distributed. The Big Apple Democrat was speaking at his State of the City address when he made the stunning admission; vowing to redistribute the wealth throughout the nation’s largest metropolis.

"There’s plenty of money in the world. Plenty of money in this city," Mayor de Blasio said. "It’s just in the wrong hands!"
​

Yup........like most socialists....they want your money. They feel they have the right to just take it whenever they can manufacture a reason....or manufacture a crisis that warrants taking more.​

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment that socialism can solve for in a market friendly manner. The infrastructure already exists in our Republic.

Raising the minimum wage could solve the cost of living issue.

You're still saying the same things and you're still wrong.

i gainsay your contention. you need a valid argument.

Where are you going to get the money?

Let's consider getting it from employers via a general tax instead of our current regime.

How much more are you going to increase the cost of doing business?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

And there's your favorite fallacy on display. You still haven't shown where you're going to get the additional trillions you'll need every year.

people with recourse to an income can pay taxes. the costs can be recovered.

What you understand about economics would fit in a thimble. You're embarrassing yourself

even women can gossip; you may need to oil wrestle me if you want your "even chance".

I have a degree in economics.

You're clueless...trust me

Good, now show us why Republicans support post # 67 when that is pure Socialism?

Why should we subsidize farmers against the failures of farming, and not government subsidized health insurance? Explain away your economic differences there.

You're another economic illiterate and don't know what Socialism is...just what your left loon sites spoon feed you.

Each and everyone of you leftist assholes use the exact same talking points.

Why do you think that is? It's because your masters are instructing you what to say. None of you are capable of original thought

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong

Socialism has universally been a massive failure and the idea of a natural unemployment rate is delusional crap

Are there always unemployed people in every society? Yes! But it is not natural it is the result of volitional choice.

There is no living wage issue. Any wage is a living wage depending on how one chooses to live

nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics; propaganda and rhetoric is all they know.

Being able to apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is as market friendly as it gets. We could have solved simple poverty Yesterday; but, the Poor may benefit.

And there's your favorite fallacy on display. You still haven't shown where you're going to get the additional trillions you'll need every year.

people with recourse to an income can pay taxes. the costs can be recovered.

Not in the trillions and now you are only impoverishing people who have jobs

most, of not all is already being collected via less efficient means. we could be lowering costs via a general tax on employers.

Yes and the result is an unworkable economic mess.

Your stupid and ignorant ideas would only make the problem worse.

 

[Soupnazi630]

The blinders are off:

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio slammed the current economic model in New York City and the world-at-large during a recent speech; bizarrely claiming there’s “plenty of money,” it’s just not properly distributed. The Big Apple Democrat was speaking at his State of the City address when he made the stunning admission; vowing to redistribute the wealth throughout the nation’s largest metropolis.

"There’s plenty of money in the world. Plenty of money in this city," Mayor de Blasio said. "It’s just in the wrong hands!"
​

Yup........like most socialists....they want your money. They feel they have the right to just take it whenever they can manufacture a reason....or manufacture a crisis that warrants taking more.​

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment that socialism can solve for in a market friendly manner. The infrastructure already exists in our Republic.

Raising the minimum wage could solve the cost of living issue.

Wrong

Socialism has universally been a massive failure and the idea of a natural unemployment rate is delusional crap

Are there always unemployed people in every society? Yes! But it is not natural it is the result of volitional choice.

There is no living wage issue. Any wage is a living wage depending on how one chooses to live

nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics; propaganda and rhetoric is all they know.

Being able to apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is as market friendly as it gets. We could have solved simple poverty Yesterday; but, the Poor may benefit.

That's great except I am not a republican and my post still stands as fact

Unemployment compensation is not market friendly as it takes from those actually trying to buy and sell in the market

Redistribution by force is never market friendly under any circumstances and never has been

We have solved poverty through capitalism

We solved poverty when the rich were taxed 70 and 80%. Since 1979, wages have been flat, while giving the wealthy a 270% raise.. That isn't solving poverty.

We solved it long before then.

Taxation of any kind solved nothing

 

[BWK]

a general tax on employers.

As employers are already taxed, I'm assuming you mean an additional tax.

So, you tax an employer, here are his options:

1. Hire fewer employees ... putting more people on unemployment benefits
2. Raise the price of his goods or services ... making the minimum wage / unemployment benefits worth less
3. Keep the existing number of employees and paying them less ... meaning his best employees will leave and the quality of his goods and services (for which he now has to charge more) will decrease.
4. Go out of business
5. Take the hit and explain to his existing or potential investors (including the banks which give him operating credit) that their investment will now have less return than before and hope they will be understanding -- given that most investors have employees of their own, this reduction in ROI will only compound the same issues into a cascade effect.

In the mean time, we're paying people to stay home and watch reality TV because there are fewer jobs in the free market.

What's wrong with the employer making less by being taxed more?

 

[hadit]

The blinders are off:

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio slammed the current economic model in New York City and the world-at-large during a recent speech; bizarrely claiming there’s “plenty of money,” it’s just not properly distributed. The Big Apple Democrat was speaking at his State of the City address when he made the stunning admission; vowing to redistribute the wealth throughout the nation’s largest metropolis.

"There’s plenty of money in the world. Plenty of money in this city," Mayor de Blasio said. "It’s just in the wrong hands!"
​

Yup........like most socialists....they want your money. They feel they have the right to just take it whenever they can manufacture a reason....or manufacture a crisis that warrants taking more.​

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment that socialism can solve for in a market friendly manner. The infrastructure already exists in our Republic.

Raising the minimum wage could solve the cost of living issue.

Wrong

Socialism has universally been a massive failure and the idea of a natural unemployment rate is delusional crap

Are there always unemployed people in every society? Yes! But it is not natural it is the result of volitional choice.

There is no living wage issue. Any wage is a living wage depending on how one chooses to live

nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics; propaganda and rhetoric is all they know.

Being able to apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is as market friendly as it gets. We could have solved simple poverty Yesterday; but, the Poor may benefit.

And there's your favorite fallacy on display. You still haven't shown where you're going to get the additional trillions you'll need every year.

people with recourse to an income can pay taxes. the costs can be recovered.

Sounds like you really do believe you can fill a swimming pool by pumping water from the deep end to the shallow end.