BBC Hands Airwaves Over To Israel’s Minister For War

[Phoenall]

Any one with a sliver of intelligence can look back just over 100 years and count the numbers of innocents mass murdered by Islamic terrorism, and see that it runs into the upper tens of millions in Asia alone. Then there are the figures for the M.E that are also in the tens of millions. Look at the horn of Africa and count the dead there at the hands of muslims. We don't need to fabricate numbers as the death tolls are freely available on the Internet Strange then how he made the comment on camera in an interview, and now the pro islam cabal is truing to have all copies removed.

Forget the last 100 years, my focus lately has been from the year 700 throughout 1800, where there was little or no Western engagement with the mideast. The research I've been doing has been just horrifying, as the amounts of people slaughtered by muslims in africa, the mideast and asia made WW2 look like a party. It is tragic that this history is not more widely known, because if it were, and people generally understood the goal of most muslims to conquer the planet, islam would have justifiably been destroyed long ago.

It is coming don't you worry, more and more Europeans are seeing islam as the vile evil cult that it is and are turning against it.

 

[Coyote]

It can easily be argued that IE speaks to the frustrations many Palestinians have with the erosion of a two-state solution, and the possibility of their ever achieving rights. That too is free speech. Yet you condemn one as hate and applaud the other as justifiable frustration.

Hate is hate. But apparently not when it's the likes of Pamela Geller directing it against innocent Muslims.

And what "Islamanization of America" are you referring to?

You sure never vary from the Islamist terrorist M.O., do you?

You are always right here with the official terrorist talking points that rejecting Islamist terrorism is no different than the Islamist terrorism, itself.

Really now? How about offering some examples of this?

 

[Coyote]

..and?

Pamela Geller Southern Poverty Law Center

Civil Freedoms AFDI hate group leaders Robert Spencer Pamela Geller can t take a hint

The "and" here is that your heroes have named their website after programs unleashed to mass murder as many Jews as possible, including the point blank murder of Jewish children.

They aren't "my heros". I have not defended them nor advocated for them. Try honesty for a change.

Geller has never been part of a terrorist organization, and just because you feel compelled to defend terrorism because you see it as fashionable, that does not mean Geller and your murderous terrorist friends are the same.

Geller advocates hate and the killing of Muslims. She does not have to be a part of a "terrorist organization" to be contemptable. yet you seem compelled to defend her.

Now...let's have some honesty Dogma (are you capable of that?) -- Where have I defended terrorism?

I see aris2chat agrees. Perhaps she can answer as well. Or maybe she can explain why she defends the hatred spewed from the likes of Geller as if it were any different than the hatred spewed by EI. You both will defend anti-Muslim hatred to the death while condemning anti-semitism.

Note - EI itself is not a terrorist organization either.

it is not about hate but the right to speak out against such actions like refugees throwing christians off a boat to Italy. About abuse of girls. About support of terrorism. About imposing Islamic "will" in US schools. About "they an riot and kill" but the rest of the world has to be silent.
Stories she posts about are those in main stream media. She is expressing the frustration so many people have with the islamization of america and the world. It is about free speech and being able to ask questions and even saying "no" to muslim that make americans feel like they are being forced to submit.
There are so many others that speak about that are about inciting hate against muslims. Geller is rather sedate by comparison. She is not saying anything that cannot be heard from many other main stream talking heads on the TV or radio.
She is not going to kiss Islamists arse, but she might smack them across the cheek from time to time.

It can easily be argued that IE speaks to the frustrations many Palestinians have with the erosion of a two-state solution, and the possibility of their ever achieving rights. That too is free speech. Yet you condemn one as hate and applaud the other as justifiable frustration.

Hate is hate. But apparently not when it's the likes of Pamela Geller directing it against innocent Muslims.

And what "Islamanization of America" are you referring to?

EI has supported attacks on jews and Israelis before and spreading Hamas' call for kidnapping Israelis today. The site is not just anti-Israel but anti-semitic. It is a hate site.

I don't like geller. I find her a bit abrasive but I support her right to speak. She does not say anything you can't hear on any of the major news channels on a daily basis. Anger and frustration is no blind hate or support of violence.
EI supports violence. Geller support public protest and political action.

There is more hate and incitement from college protest, park soap boxes and even from churches. Walk down some major city like NY and the the plackards some of the people carry. Listen to some of these AM radio station. Listen to protesters in DC. They can be so much worse.

Supporting terrorism and bigotry at the Electronic Intifada - Blogs - Jerusalem Post

Terrorism and the Internet Electronic intifada declared on Israel on Facebook. Hamas and radical Islamic groups encouraged by Iran employ social networks on the Internet for the struggle against Israel

I support her right to speak.

I support EI's right to speak.

I even support the right of Neo-Nazi's and the KKK to speak.

It's free speech and once you start blocking it, it's a dangerous precededent.

Geller's speech is no different than that of white supremacists - it instigates hatred, intolerance and even violence. In her own words she would have no problem with Muslims being killed.

Violence directed at minorities never starts with just violence acts. It starts with the rhetoric of hate which reach, when it's not condemned, creates an atmosphere where that hate and belief in the messages becomes "acceptable" - even at political levels. It is no longer even questioned. That is what people like Geller are doing. They deliberately distort truth, even fabricate stories (and I gave you examples of that) in order to inflame people to hate Muslims. NOT Muslim extremists - she makes no such distinctions - but all Muslims and Islam it's entirety.

We have elected officials following that trend and people like calling for removing civil rights of Muslim citizens. It's not violence but then, the Nazi's did not start with violence either. They started with anti-semitic rhetoric and a marginalization of Jews through legislation. Hate rhetoric can and does lead to hate crimes against people. Is that so much better than physical violence? Would you be as supportive of Geller's rhetoric if it were anti-Jewish? How about Holocaust denial? At what point does it go to far? When elected officials start spouting it?


Ugly anti-Muslim taunts by Texas lawmaker protesters are embarrassments to Texans Dallas Morning News

Oklahoma Republican under fire for racist anti-Muslim comments - NY Daily News

An Oklahoma lawmaker is doubling down on racist remarks he made last week and even upped his fiery rhetoric, saying that all American Muslims are a "cancer in our nation that needs to be cut out out."


Republican state Sen. John Bennett refused to apologize Wednesday for a Facebook post he wrote last week in which he said his constituents should "be wary of individuals who claim to be Muslim American, be especially wary if you're Christian."​

Herman Cain - CNN Debate - Muslim Loyalty Tests Mediaite
Idaho Republican s bigoted anti-Muslim mass email has state party furiously backtracking
The American Muslim TAM

 

[Coyote]

It can easily be argued that IE speaks to the frustrations many Palestinians have with the erosion of a two-state solution, and the possibility of their ever achieving rights. That too is free speech. Yet you condemn one as hate and applaud the other as justifiable frustration.

Hate is hate. But apparently not when it's the likes of Pamela Geller directing it against innocent Muslims.

And what "Islamanization of America" are you referring to?

You sure never vary from the Islamist terrorist M.O., do you?

You are always right here with the official terrorist talking points that rejecting Islamist terrorism is no different than the Islamist terrorism, itself.

Even the Queen of denmark says there are reasons to stand up to Islam.

Queen of Denmark We must give Islam opposition

Speaking against Islamism is not in itself hate speech.

Speaking against extremism is not hate speech. But that is not what the likes of Geller and Wilder are about.

 

[Coyote]

You seem to have a problem with exposing hate groups when you agree with their sentiments.

You are happy to label Electronic Infatada as hateful and dishonest. But you stop short of EVER criticizing Anti-Islamic rhetoric.

Here's a sample of what you don't seem to consider "hateful" and "dishonest" - just "angry" at "current events". How are these sorts of things any less hateful than the anti-semitic rhetoric you are quick to condemn?

Pamela Geller: Pamela Geller advocates banning Islam demolishing mosques deporting and killing Muslims Islamophobia Today eNewspaper

If a government wants to learn how to manage growing Islamic problems, take some advice from Ottoman army officer Mustafa Kemal Atatürk. Atatürk abolished Islam by putting a complete ban on Islamic materials, demolishing mosques, and removing any traces of Islam in his country to get rid of the evil. Those who tried to revolt were put in their place, or basically killed….

It is time for the UK to stop wasting their military abroad, but bring them to patrol their own streets and begin to remove Muslims. And it is vital time to plan and arrange deportation programs – and even arrange new deportation programs for practicing Muslims born in England to be deported to their parent’s country of origin.

Before you start whining childishly, why don't you address a very simple question: what do you think is going to happen in British and other Western societies when the proportion of muslims reaches 30% or more? Do you believe they will not try to islamicize the society, and forcibly introduce sharia and anti-semitic practices and policies as they have done - EVERYWHERE ELSE? Your integrity is at issue here, so answer it honestly.

It is going to depend on that individual country and the make up of it's immigrant population, and how long they've been there. It's a myth that when it reaches a certain percentage automatic things happen.

What "everywhere else" are you talking about?

Who died and made you the arbritor of "integrity"? As far as I can tell...you have nothing to do with it. And that is a good thing.

 

[Coyote]

It's no more hateful and dishonest than Pam Gellars site which is also a hate mongering site.

Pam Geller is not working under the auspices of a known terrorist organization nor does she share any genocidal agenda, so once again, all you are proving is your own dishonesty, underhandedness and lack of human decency.

Electronic Infantada is an on-line media source that is biased towards the Palestinians. People like you choose to excuse the hate that comes from those like Geller. It's quite clear from your unwillingness, and those of others here - to ever condemn it. Dishonesty? Lack of human decency? Look into your mirror. She's associated with neo-Nazi's and white supremacists.

And she shares a genocidal agenda.

Pamela Geller: Pamela Geller advocates banning Islam demolishing mosques deporting and killing Muslims Islamophobia Today eNewspaper

If a government wants to learn how to manage growing Islamic problems, take some advice from Ottoman army officer Mustafa Kemal Atatürk. Atatürk abolished Islam by putting a complete ban on Islamic materials, demolishing mosques, and removing any traces of Islam in his country to get rid of the evil. Those who tried to revolt were put in their place, or basically killed….


It is time for the UK to stop wasting their military abroad, but bring them to patrol their own streets and begin to remove Muslims. And it is vital time to plan and arrange deportation programs – and even arrange new deportation programs for practicing Muslims born in England to be deported to their parent’s country of origin.

65% of all Brits advocate banning islam, demolishing mosques and deporting muslims. Some think that muslims found guilty of child abuse and assisting terrorism should be executed and their remains dumped in a pit. Is this wrong for the majority of Brits to feel this way after suffering Islamic violence, aggression and flouting of the law for 14 years under a neo Marxist regime. Until you have lived with islamonazi aggressives and violence you are in no position to say that it is wrong to want them out of your country. And the biggest culprits for the terrorism

Should civil rights be determined by a mob? Subject to popular appeal? Is that what you support?

At one the majority of Americans supported slavery and later legalized segregation. They claimed blacks were subhuman, inherently violent and incapable of governing themselves.

 

[Dot Com]

Any one with a sliver of intelligence can look back just over 100 years and count the numbers of innocents mass murdered by Islamic terrorism, and see that it runs into the upper tens of millions in Asia alone. Then there are the figures for the M.E that are also in the tens of millions. Look at the horn of Africa and count the dead there at the hands of muslims. We don't need to fabricate numbers as the death tolls are freely available on the Internet Strange then how he made the comment on camera in an interview, and now the pro islam cabal is truing to have all copies removed.

Forget the last 100 years, my focus lately has been from the year 700 throughout 1800, where there was little or no Western engagement with the mideast. The research I've been doing has been just horrifying, as the amounts of people slaughtered by muslims in africa, the mideast and asia made WW2 look like a party. It is tragic that this history is not more widely known, because if it were, and people generally understood the goal of most muslims to conquer the planet, islam would have justifiably been destroyed long ago.

It is coming don't you worry, more and more Europeans are seeing islam as the vile evil cult that it is and are turning against it.

Thats why the conservative PM was wooing them to bank there last year eh Scooter?

David Cameron unveils plans to make London a Mecca for Middle East wealth - UK Politics - UK - The Independent

 

[Coyote]

.

Pam Geller is not working under the auspices of a known terrorist organization nor does she share any genocidal agenda, so once again, all you are proving is your own dishonesty, underhandedness and lack of human decency.

She editorializes on stories and issues. She does fabricate stories or incite violence. .

Here is some elaboration:

She does fabricate stories to inflame and incite: Have you seen what she has to say on the Bosnian genocide, and defends the Serbian war criminals? This event has been well documented.

How about this one on "Puppy Bombs" (designed to generate hatred and anger) - Robert Spencer Pamela Geller discover puppy bomb jihad loonwatch.com

False or misleading Fatwah's?

Geller's claim that Muslims burned alive hundreds of Christians, complete with photographs: Hoaxes And Fabrications On Islam And Muslims - Islam for Muslims - Nigeria The actual story? A fuel tanker explosion in the Congo: Fuel tanker explosion kills over 230 in Congo Reuters

Yet people excuse her or even support her.

Puppy Bombs Rescued from Egyptian Violence - Middle East - News - Arutz Sheva

Puppy bombs The latest weapon in the Muslim Brotherhood arsenal - National counterterrorism Examiner.com

just reporting stories from other sources.

The fatwa source was

Tunisians Raise Alarm on Possible Fatwa Encouraging Sexual Jihad - Al-Monitor the Pulse of the Middle East

Geller does not create these stories, they come from mainstream news sources.

Yes she creates them - in the same way conspiracy theorists 's take unrelated "facts" and turn them into a false story. For example story that Muslims were burning hundreds of Christians but in reality, the story was fiction and the pictures taken from a horrific fire in the Congo.

Or claiming that the Serbian genocide was "manufactured" - how is that different than holocaust deniers?

On the puppy bomb story - the original source retracted it, it was shown to be a wrong and she still promotes on her sitees, it knowing it is false: Nuts and Fruits Department Pamela Geller s Puppy Bombs Hatewatch

What difference is there between making up a story and knowingly promoting a false story? There is none.



The puppy bomb story is a good example

Here are some examples of Christians being burnt alive from non partisan sources


Christians Burned Alive Muslim Persecution of Christians November 2014

Muslims Take 100 Christians Burn Them Alive Slit Their Throats Shoot Them And Hack Them To Death - Walid Shoebat

....there are savages everywhere and Boko Haram is an extremist terrorist group noted for excessive brutality and intolerance.

Here are some more Christians being burned alive:
Suspected Witches Burned Alive by Christians in Kenya The Tale Of Bitter Truth
BBC NEWS Africa Horror of Kenya s witch lynchings
Christians burn 100’s of Muslims alive, hack others to death with machetes

 

[Coyote]

BBC Hands Airwaves Over To Israel’s Minister For War

_________________________________________________________________________
SOURCE: electronicintifada.net

Submitted by Amena Saleem
Thu, 04/09/2015 16:32 pm

Moshe Yaalon poses for a photo with notorious racist blogger Pamela Geller. (Wikipedia) The writer and journalist Karl Sabbagh posed an interesting question this month. Writing on the current affairs website Al Araby, Sabbagh asked: “British journalists are among the best and most skeptical in the world. Why then, with a few honorable exceptions, do they fail to be skeptical when comes to Israel?”

The question was especially pertinent in light of an egregious interview conducted by senior BBC presenter Sarah Montague just two weeks earlier with Israel’s “defense” minister Moshe Yaalon.

Montague was interviewing Yaalon on the BBC’s flagship radio news program Today in the week of Benjamin Netanyahu’s election victory, a victory which followed his very public declaration that there would be no Palestinian state if he was returned to power.

But Montague didn’t probe and challenge Yaalon on whether his prime minister’s declaration has highlighted Israel’s contempt for international law, for the so-called peace process, and revealed a desire to remain indefinitely as an illegal occupier of Palestinian land. She didn’t ask him if Netanyahu’s admission means that Israel can no longer be viewed as a “partner for peace” by its Western allies. […]

READ MORE: BBC hands airwaves over to Israel s minister for war The Electronic Intifada
______________________________________________________________________________

electronic intifada? one of the worse sites to use or quote from. Try a more factual site instead of one that deals in hate mongering

It's no more hateful and dishonest than Pam Gellars site which is also a hate mongering site.

Is that because it tells the truth which is very painful to you.

No. It's because I don't like bigotry or it's supporters.

Yet you defend Islamic violence and atrocities, why is that.

Where? Specifically please provide links to where I've defended that or admit you are a liar.

 

[Coyote]

ei.evidencewatch.com

Electronic Intifada Propaganda or Education

..and?

Pamela Geller Southern Poverty Law Center

Civil Freedoms AFDI hate group leaders Robert Spencer Pamela Geller can t take a hint

It shows that you are anti semitic and a Jew hater because you believe islamonazi lies over the truth.

Actually...I think it shows you are an idiot because you can't seem to string more than a couple of words together without accusing someone of being a Jew hater or spewing "ISLAMONAZI" crap all over the board like an angry toddler spitting up.

So are you claiming that if one considers Pamela Geller's often debunked rhetoric to be hate speech and lies then one is an anti-semitic Jew hater? and that SPLC is "IslamoNazi"? Grow up.

 

[Coyote]

ei.evidencewatch.com

Electronic Intifada Propaganda or Education

..and?

Pamela Geller Southern Poverty Law Center

Civil Freedoms AFDI hate group leaders Robert Spencer Pamela Geller can t take a hint

EDITORIAL The FBI dumps a hate group - Washington Times

The poverty law center, known by its initials SPLC, is actually a money-making scheme — some have called it a “scam” — of an Alabama lawyer who set out years ago to get rich on the backs of the poor and the duped.

Civil Freedoms are the exact opposite and defend muslims right to be violent by demonising anyone who speaks out against muslim extremism and violence

You better recheck the accuracy of that story:
No The FBI Hasn t Ditched The Southern Poverty Law Center Blog Media Matters for America

 

[Coyote]

.

Pam Geller is not working under the auspices of a known terrorist organization nor does she share any genocidal agenda, so once again, all you are proving is your own dishonesty, underhandedness and lack of human decency.

She editorializes on stories and issues. She does fabricate stories or incite violence. .

Here is some elaboration:

She does fabricate stories to inflame and incite: Have you seen what she has to say on the Bosnian genocide, and defends the Serbian war criminals? This event has been well documented.

How about this one on "Puppy Bombs" (designed to generate hatred and anger) - Robert Spencer Pamela Geller discover puppy bomb jihad loonwatch.com

False or misleading Fatwah's?

Geller's claim that Muslims burned alive hundreds of Christians, complete with photographs: Hoaxes And Fabrications On Islam And Muslims - Islam for Muslims - Nigeria The actual story? A fuel tanker explosion in the Congo: Fuel tanker explosion kills over 230 in Congo Reuters

Yet people excuse her or even support her.

Puppy Bombs Rescued from Egyptian Violence - Middle East - News - Arutz Sheva

Puppy bombs The latest weapon in the Muslim Brotherhood arsenal - National counterterrorism Examiner.com

just reporting stories from other sources.

The fatwa source was

Tunisians Raise Alarm on Possible Fatwa Encouraging Sexual Jihad - Al-Monitor the Pulse of the Middle East

Geller does not create these stories, they come from mainstream news sources.

Yes she creates them - in the same way conspiracy theorists 's take unrelated "facts" and turn them into a false story. For example story that Muslims were burning hundreds of Christians but in reality, the story was fiction and the pictures taken from a horrific fire in the Congo.

Or claiming that the Serbian genocide was "manufactured" - how is that different than holocaust deniers?

On the puppy bomb story - the original source retracted it, it was shown to be a wrong and she still promotes on her sitees, it knowing it is false: Nuts and Fruits Department Pamela Geller s Puppy Bombs Hatewatch

What difference is there between making up a story and knowingly promoting a false story? There is none.



The puppy bomb story is a good example

Yes it is of your anti Semitism and defence of Islamic violence and terrorism

Muslim Brotherhood caught using puppies as fire bombs - Washington Times

Robyn Urman, a rescuer with the New Jersey group, Pet ResQ Inc, said this isn’t the first time Muslim Brotherhood members had been busted trying to use animals as gasoline-fired bombs, Breitbart reported.

Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/nov/1/muslim-brotherhood-caught-using-puppies-fire-bombs/#ixzz3XZ19ktEa
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

Is the Muslim Brotherhood Using Puppies as Bombs Spoiler No. Foreign Policy
Puppy Bomb Hoax Doubts Cast Over Reports Of Animals Caught Up In Egypt Violence
Muslims bite puppies in Tahrir Square puppies are rescued to America Dr. Hatem Bazian Worldbulletin News

Sorry, but no. That claim seems to be fiction. And, given that everyone has cell phone cameras these days I would think we would see photos of burning puppies.

 

[Coyote]

ei.evidencewatch.com

Electronic Intifada Propaganda or Education

..and?

Pamela Geller Southern Poverty Law Center

Civil Freedoms AFDI hate group leaders Robert Spencer Pamela Geller can t take a hint

The "and" here is that your heroes have named their website after programs unleashed to mass murder as many Jews as possible, including the point blank murder of Jewish children.

They aren't "my heros". I have not defended them nor advocated for them. Try honesty for a change.

Geller has never been part of a terrorist organization, and just because you feel compelled to defend terrorism because you see it as fashionable, that does not mean Geller and your murderous terrorist friends are the same.

Geller advocates hate and the killing of Muslims. She does not have to be a part of a "terrorist organization" to be contemptable. yet you seem compelled to defend her.

Now...let's have some honesty Dogma (are you capable of that?) -- Where have I defended terrorism?

I see aris2chat agrees. Perhaps she can answer as well. Or maybe she can explain why she defends the hatred spewed from the likes of Geller as if it were any different than the hatred spewed by EI. You both will defend anti-Muslim hatred to the death while condemning anti-semitism.

Note - EI itself is not a terrorist organization either.

Just as hamas isn't as well I bet. It is funded by terrorist groups and is staffed by terrorists.

When you tell the truth about islam and the muslims using their own words it is not hatred but being truthful. The liars are those that claim the truth is hatred

EI is electronic media. It's not a "group". Hamas is.

 

[Coyote]

ei.evidencewatch.com

Electronic Intifada Propaganda or Education

..and?

Pamela Geller Southern Poverty Law Center

Civil Freedoms AFDI hate group leaders Robert Spencer Pamela Geller can t take a hint

The "and" here is that your heroes have named their website after programs unleashed to mass murder as many Jews as possible, including the point blank murder of Jewish children.

They aren't "my heros". I have not defended them nor advocated for them. Try honesty for a change.

Geller has never been part of a terrorist organization, and just because you feel compelled to defend terrorism because you see it as fashionable, that does not mean Geller and your murderous terrorist friends are the same.

Geller advocates hate and the killing of Muslims. She does not have to be a part of a "terrorist organization" to be contemptable. yet you seem compelled to defend her.

Now...let's have some honesty Dogma (are you capable of that?) -- Where have I defended terrorism?

I see aris2chat agrees. Perhaps she can answer as well. Or maybe she can explain why she defends the hatred spewed from the likes of Geller as if it were any different than the hatred spewed by EI. You both will defend anti-Muslim hatred to the death while condemning anti-semitism.

Note - EI itself is not a terrorist organization either.

it is not about hate but the right to speak out against such actions like refugees throwing christians off a boat to Italy. About abuse of girls. About support of terrorism. About imposing Islamic "will" in US schools. About "they an riot and kill" but the rest of the world has to be silent.
Stories she posts about are those in main stream media. She is expressing the frustration so many people have with the islamization of america and the world. It is about free speech and being able to ask questions and even saying "no" to muslim that make americans feel like they are being forced to submit.
There are so many others that speak about that are about inciting hate against muslims. Geller is rather sedate by comparison. She is not saying anything that cannot be heard from many other main stream talking heads on the TV or radio.
She is not going to kiss Islamists arse, but she might smack them across the cheek from time to time.

Speaking from first hand experience of full Islamic communities resorting to violence and making their self imposed ghetto's into no-go areas. The foul smell coming from the muslim ghetto's turn peoples stomachs and forces them to sell cheaply. The gangs of muslim youths gathering in residential areas to intimidate and terrorise the inhabitants. The attacks on lone men and women walking past muslim ghettos by gangs screaming get out of our area. This was even caught on camera when a politician was told to get out of the muslim area when he was holding a meeting with muslim leaders.

Many Americans don't know what it is like to be intimidated and to have no recourse at all to fight back.

Your "first hand experience" sounds like it comes right out of Storm Front.

 

[rhodescholar]

It is going to depend on that individual country and the make up of it's immigrant population, and how long they've been there.

Typical liberal pablum, soft-sold for consumption by the multi-cultural leftists and their acolytes.

It's a myth that when it reaches a certain percentage automatic things happen. What "everywhere else" are you talking about?

Really? So why don't you show us on the map in my link what arab muslim countries are free, respectful of civil/human rights, and highly democratic
in nature:

https://www.freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/MapofFreedom2014.pdf

More to the point, I can point out numerous regions in the US and Europe where large groups of muslims have immigrated and are demanding sharia law, have made life intolerable for non-muslims living nearby, and are demanding sharia. Why don't you point out a few areas in the West where large numbers of arab muslims are living that are clean, wealthy, and tolerant of minority rights?

Who died and made you the arbritor of "integrity"? As far as I can tell...you have nothing to do with it. And that is a good thing.

Unlike PC/deluded people like yourself, I do not need to be declared anything, I deal in facts and do not feel the need to spew soothing words that comfort the leftist muslim terror apologists. Islam is a death cult, and arab muslims are amongst the most intolerant people on earth - I haven problem stating that fact, and broadcasting it to the world. They have a terrible 1,400 year history of insane levels of violence and murder, which continues to this day.

 

[rhodescholar]

Thats why the conservative PM was wooing them to bank there last year eh Scooter?

David Cameron unveils plans to make London a Mecca for Middle East wealth - UK Politics - UK - The Independent

There is a world of difference between bringing in a few wealthy sheiks who will never be there, and hordes/masses of impoverished, bottom-feeding arab muslims with their hands out for welfare and a predilection to raping white women and terrorizing the local population.

 

[montelatici]

Thats why the conservative PM was wooing them to bank there last year eh Scooter?

David Cameron unveils plans to make London a Mecca for Middle East wealth - UK Politics - UK - The Independent

There is a world of difference between bringing in a few wealthy sheiks who will never be there, and hordes/masses of impoverished, bottom-feeding arab muslims with their hands out for welfare and a predilection to raping white women and terrorizing the local population.

Sounds like Stormfront talk to me.

 

[Coyote]

It is going to depend on that individual country and the make up of it's immigrant population, and how long they've been there.

Typical liberal pablum, soft-sold for consumption by the multi-cultural leftists and their acolytes.

Such a pity. I kind of expected a more in depth answer from someone who calls himself "Rhodescholar".

It's a myth that when it reaches a certain percentage automatic things happen. What "everywhere else" are you talking about?

Really? So why don't you show us on the map in my link what arab muslim countries are free, respectful of civil/human rights, and highly democratic
in nature:

https://www.freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/MapofFreedom2014.pdf

Hmmm...moving goal posts and setting up strawmen are you?

Muslim majority countries - typically Africa and Middle East have never, culturally had a country that is "free, free, respectful of civil/human rights, and highly democratic in nature". Is that religion or culture? You are talking about areas where family, tribal, ethnic and religious affiliations are far more important than state. Did you happen to notice the countries on your Freedom Map marked in purple? Many of them do not have Muslim majorities or even your so called "30%" marker which comes right out of the Rightwing Anti-Islamic Playbook. You aren't even very original there.

More to the point, I can point out numerous regions in the US and Europe where large groups of muslims have immigrated and are demanding sharia law, have made life intolerable for non-muslims living nearby, and are demanding sharia. Why don't you point out a few areas in the West where large numbers of arab muslims are living that are clean, wealthy, and tolerant of minority rights?

Well this is interesting. Ok. I'll bite. Where are these "numerous regions in the US"?

As to your second question - I know of no areas in the US where Musims live any differently than any other group of US citizens.

Who died and made you the arbritor of "integrity"? As far as I can tell...you have nothing to do with it. And that is a good thing.

Unlike PC/deluded people like yourself, I do not need to be declared anything, I deal in facts and do not feel the need to spew soothing words that comfort the leftist muslim terror apologists. Islam is a death cult, and arab muslims are amongst the most intolerant people on earth - I haven problem stating that fact, and broadcasting it to the world. They have a terrible 1,400 year history of insane levels of violence and murder, which continues to this day.

[/QUOTE]

Oh there you go again utterly destroying your Rhodescholar impersonation

 

[Coyote]

Thats why the conservative PM was wooing them to bank there last year eh Scooter?

David Cameron unveils plans to make London a Mecca for Middle East wealth - UK Politics - UK - The Independent

There is a world of difference between bringing in a few wealthy sheiks who will never be there, and hordes/masses of impoverished, bottom-feeding arab muslims with their hands out for welfare and a predilection to raping white women and terrorizing the local population.

Sounds like Stormfront talk to me.

Yup.

 

[rhodescholar]

Such a pity. I kind of expected a more in depth answer from someone who calls himself "Rhodescholar".

I see, so the mod thinks he can get a pass on personal insults, and the rest of us have to respect them - well no longer, FUCK YOU SCUMBAG. Let the whole forum see what a piece of shit you are hiding behind your mod status making personal attacks, you non-credible fucking piece dogshit. The gloves are now off.

Muslim majority countries - typically Africa and Middle East have never, culturally had a country that is "free, free, respectful of civil/human rights, and highly democratic in nature". Is that religion or culture?

Since all 57 muslim countries are not free, all over the planet, what does that tell a sane, rational person who, unlike you, can think for themselves? Or do you need it spelled out for you, moron?

You are talking about areas where family, tribal, ethnic and religious affiliations are far more important than state.

What the fuck does that have to do with basic human freedoms or rights? So that gives them a pass to horrifically "other" tribes badly? Is this the fucking caveman era?

Did you happen to notice the countries on your Freedom Map marked in purple? Many of them do not have Muslim majorities or even your so called "30%" marker which comes right out of the Rightwing Anti-Islamic Playbook. You aren't even very original there.

Speaking of straw man, asshole, I did NOT claim that ONLY muslim countries are not free, I claimed that ALL muslim countries are not free. Your achievement of being a mod clearly did not require an intelligence test.

Well this is interesting. Ok. I'll bite. Where are these "numerous regions in the US"? As to your second question - I know of no areas in the US where Musims live any differently than any other group of US citizens.

Facts, much fuckhead?

Islam Driving the Social and Legal Agenda in the West Daniel Pipes
Articles The Muslim Takeover of West Bengal
Michigan Public School Board Allows Muslims to Pray - The Last Resistance
The Danger Within Militant Islam in America Daniel Pipes
Amnesty International and Muslim Discrimination in Europe