Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
...There are news sites with their own leanings and hate sites with little or no truth. If you care to, you can find the facts somewhere in the middle...
You have to want to search and evaluate on your own. It helps if you have a good understanding of the players.
I too use a wide variety of sources, I believe I have a pretty good grasp of the players, and how's this for somewhere in the middle:
No.
Even though it sums up the arab muslim position perfectly ?
It's no more hateful and dishonest than Pam Gellars site which is also a hate mongering site.
Pam Geller is not working under the auspices of a known terrorist organization nor does she share any genocidal agenda, so once again, all you are proving is your own dishonesty, underhandedness and lack of human decency.
She editorializes on stories and issues. She does fabricate stories or incite violence. She is like a thousand talking heads out there from Fox to al-Jezeera.
She shows the horror and hypocrisy of radical islam and terrorism. She is not a sponsor of terrorist groups.
Angry at current events, yes. Hateful of all muslims, no.
You have a problem with exposing what certain groups are doing in the name of Islam against others? It is the same stories you can find in a few dozen or more publication around the same time.
She does not recruit for terrorist groups to go and chop off heads of civilians.
I am sure that being a Jewish right-wing fascist makes her a non-partisan teller of the truth. She is an embarrassment to thoughtful Jews, even strong supporters of Israel.
Because she tells the truth about islam, just like Geert Wilders does. And that is why you don't like them do you. We have all recently seen how muslims deal with those who speak the truth with Charlie Hebdo , and the world is waking up to them.
BBC Hands Airwaves Over To Israel’s Minister For War
_________________________________________________________________________
SOURCE: electronicintifada.net
Submitted by Amena Saleem
Thu, 04/09/2015 16:32 pm
Moshe Yaalon poses for a photo with notorious racist blogger Pamela Geller. (Wikipedia) The writer and journalist Karl Sabbagh posed an interesting question this month. Writing on the current affairs website Al Araby, Sabbagh asked: “British journalists are among the best and most skeptical in the world. Why then, with a few honorable exceptions, do they fail to be skeptical when comes to Israel?”
The question was especially pertinent in light of an egregious interview conducted by senior BBC presenter Sarah Montague just two weeks earlier with Israel’s “defense” minister Moshe Yaalon.
Montague was interviewing Yaalon on the BBC’s flagship radio news program Today in the week of Benjamin Netanyahu’s election victory, a victory which followed his very public declaration that there would be no Palestinian state if he was returned to power.
But Montague didn’t probe and challenge Yaalon on whether his prime minister’s declaration has highlighted Israel’s contempt for international law, for the so-called peace process, and revealed a desire to remain indefinitely as an illegal occupier of Palestinian land. She didn’t ask him if Netanyahu’s admission means that Israel can no longer be viewed as a “partner for peace” by its Western allies. […]
READ MORE: BBC hands airwaves over to Israel s minister for war The Electronic Intifada
______________________________________________________________________________
electronic intifada? one of the worse sites to use or quote from. Try a more factual site instead of one that deals in hate mongering
It's no more hateful and dishonest than Pam Gellars site which is also a hate mongering site.
Is that because it tells the truth which is very painful to you.
It's no more hateful and dishonest than Pam Gellars site which is also a hate mongering site.
Pam Geller is not working under the auspices of a known terrorist organization nor does she share any genocidal agenda, so once again, all you are proving is your own dishonesty, underhandedness and lack of human decency.
She editorializes on stories and issues. She does fabricate stories or incite violence. .
.
It's no more hateful and dishonest than Pam Gellars site which is also a hate mongering site.
Pam Geller is not working under the auspices of a known terrorist organization nor does she share any genocidal agenda, so once again, all you are proving is your own dishonesty, underhandedness and lack of human decency.
She editorializes on stories and issues. She does fabricate stories or incite violence. .
Here is some elaboration:
She does fabricate stories to inflame and incite: Have you seen what she has to say on the Bosnian genocide, and defends the Serbian war criminals? This event has been well documented.
How about this one on "Puppy Bombs" (designed to generate hatred and anger) - Robert Spencer Pamela Geller discover puppy bomb jihad loonwatch.com
False or misleading Fatwah's?
Geller's claim that Muslims burned alive hundreds of Christians, complete with photographs: Hoaxes And Fabrications On Islam And Muslims - Islam for Muslims - Nigeria The actual story? A fuel tanker explosion in the Congo: Fuel tanker explosion kills over 230 in Congo Reuters
Yet people excuse her or even support her.
.
It's no more hateful and dishonest than Pam Gellars site which is also a hate mongering site.
Pam Geller is not working under the auspices of a known terrorist organization nor does she share any genocidal agenda, so once again, all you are proving is your own dishonesty, underhandedness and lack of human decency.
She editorializes on stories and issues. She does fabricate stories or incite violence. .
Here is some elaboration:
She does fabricate stories to inflame and incite: Have you seen what she has to say on the Bosnian genocide, and defends the Serbian war criminals? This event has been well documented.
How about this one on "Puppy Bombs" (designed to generate hatred and anger) - Robert Spencer Pamela Geller discover puppy bomb jihad loonwatch.com
False or misleading Fatwah's?
Geller's claim that Muslims burned alive hundreds of Christians, complete with photographs: Hoaxes And Fabrications On Islam And Muslims - Islam for Muslims - Nigeria The actual story? A fuel tanker explosion in the Congo: Fuel tanker explosion kills over 230 in Congo Reuters
Yet people excuse her or even support her.
Puppy Bombs Rescued from Egyptian Violence - Middle East - News - Arutz Sheva
Puppy bombs The latest weapon in the Muslim Brotherhood arsenal - National counterterrorism Examiner.com
just reporting stories from other sources.
The fatwa source was
Tunisians Raise Alarm on Possible Fatwa Encouraging Sexual Jihad - Al-Monitor the Pulse of the Middle East
Geller does not create these stories, they come from mainstream news sources.
I am sure that being a Jewish right-wing fascist makes her a non-partisan teller of the truth. She is an embarrassment to thoughtful Jews, even strong supporters of Israel.
Because she tells the truth about islam, just like Geert Wilders does. And that is why you don't like them do you. We have all recently seen how muslims deal with those who speak the truth with Charlie Hebdo , and the world is waking up to them.
She's about as truthful as Electronic Infatada.
I am sure that being a Jewish right-wing fascist makes her a non-partisan teller of the truth. She is an embarrassment to thoughtful Jews, even strong supporters of Israel.
Because she tells the truth about islam, just like Geert Wilders does. And that is why you don't like them do you. We have all recently seen how muslims deal with those who speak the truth with Charlie Hebdo , and the world is waking up to them.
She's about as truthful as Electronic Infatada.
EI intentionall incites hate and violence.
You might not like the phrasing of geller, the way she writes, but the stories come from generally accepted sources. She is not creating stories or fabricating lies with the intent of inciting violence.
I don't usually care of Geller but I find stories there from time to time.
EI is a poison site. Anything I find there I have to seek at least three or more legitimate sources, and I still take it with a large does of salt. It is propaganda, half truths and out right lies. Exceedingly anti-Semitic and supports the use of violence against jews.
The "and" here is that your heroes have named their website after programs unleashed to mass murder as many Jews as possible, including the point blank murder of Jewish children.
Geller has never been part of a terrorist organization, and just because you feel compelled to defend terrorism because you see it as fashionable, that does not mean Geller and your murderous terrorist friends are the same.
The "and" here is that your heroes have named their website after programs unleashed to mass murder as many Jews as possible, including the point blank murder of Jewish children.
They aren't "my heros". I have not defended them nor advocated for them. Try honesty for a change.
Geller has never been part of a terrorist organization, and just because you feel compelled to defend terrorism because you see it as fashionable, that does not mean Geller and your murderous terrorist friends are the same.
Geller advocates hate and the killing of Muslims. She does not have to be a part of a "terrorist organization" to be contemptable. yet you seem compelled to defend her.
Now...let's have some honesty Dogma (are you capable of that?) -- Where have I defended terrorism?
I see aris2chat agrees. Perhaps she can answer as well. Or maybe she can explain why she defends the hatred spewed from the likes of Geller as if it were any different than the hatred spewed by EI. You both will defend anti-Muslim hatred to the death while condemning anti-semitism.
Note - EI itself is not a terrorist organization either.
The "and" here is that your heroes have named their website after programs unleashed to mass murder as many Jews as possible, including the point blank murder of Jewish children.
They aren't "my heros". I have not defended them nor advocated for them. Try honesty for a change.
Geller has never been part of a terrorist organization, and just because you feel compelled to defend terrorism because you see it as fashionable, that does not mean Geller and your murderous terrorist friends are the same.
Geller advocates hate and the killing of Muslims. She does not have to be a part of a "terrorist organization" to be contemptable. yet you seem compelled to defend her.
Now...let's have some honesty Dogma (are you capable of that?) -- Where have I defended terrorism?
I see aris2chat agrees. Perhaps she can answer as well. Or maybe she can explain why she defends the hatred spewed from the likes of Geller as if it were any different than the hatred spewed by EI. You both will defend anti-Muslim hatred to the death while condemning anti-semitism.
Note - EI itself is not a terrorist organization either.
it is not about hate but the right to speak out against such actions like refugees throwing christians off a boat to Italy. About abuse of girls. About support of terrorism. About imposing Islamic "will" in US schools. About "they an riot and kill" but the rest of the world has to be silent.
Stories she posts about are those in main stream media. She is expressing the frustration so many people have with the islamization of america and the world. It is about free speech and being able to ask questions and even saying "no" to muslim that make americans feel like they are being forced to submit.
There are so many others that speak about that are about inciting hate against muslims. Geller is rather sedate by comparison. She is not saying anything that cannot be heard from many other main stream talking heads on the TV or radio.
She is not going to kiss Islamists arse, but she might smack them across the cheek from time to time.
It can easily be argued that IE speaks to the frustrations many Palestinians have with the erosion of a two-state solution, and the possibility of their ever achieving rights. That too is free speech. Yet you condemn one as hate and applaud the other as justifiable frustration.
Hate is hate. But apparently not when it's the likes of Pamela Geller directing it against innocent Muslims.
And what "Islamanization of America" are you referring to?
The "and" here is that your heroes have named their website after programs unleashed to mass murder as many Jews as possible, including the point blank murder of Jewish children.
They aren't "my heros". I have not defended them nor advocated for them. Try honesty for a change.
Geller has never been part of a terrorist organization, and just because you feel compelled to defend terrorism because you see it as fashionable, that does not mean Geller and your murderous terrorist friends are the same.
Geller advocates hate and the killing of Muslims. She does not have to be a part of a "terrorist organization" to be contemptable. yet you seem compelled to defend her.
Now...let's have some honesty Dogma (are you capable of that?) -- Where have I defended terrorism?
I see aris2chat agrees. Perhaps she can answer as well. Or maybe she can explain why she defends the hatred spewed from the likes of Geller as if it were any different than the hatred spewed by EI. You both will defend anti-Muslim hatred to the death while condemning anti-semitism.
Note - EI itself is not a terrorist organization either.
it is not about hate but the right to speak out against such actions like refugees throwing christians off a boat to Italy. About abuse of girls. About support of terrorism. About imposing Islamic "will" in US schools. About "they an riot and kill" but the rest of the world has to be silent.
Stories she posts about are those in main stream media. She is expressing the frustration so many people have with the islamization of america and the world. It is about free speech and being able to ask questions and even saying "no" to muslim that make americans feel like they are being forced to submit.
There are so many others that speak about that are about inciting hate against muslims. Geller is rather sedate by comparison. She is not saying anything that cannot be heard from many other main stream talking heads on the TV or radio.
She is not going to kiss Islamists arse, but she might smack them across the cheek from time to time.
It can easily be argued that IE speaks to the frustrations many Palestinians have with the erosion of a two-state solution, and the possibility of their ever achieving rights. That too is free speech. Yet you condemn one as hate and applaud the other as justifiable frustration.
Hate is hate. But apparently not when it's the likes of Pamela Geller directing it against innocent Muslims.
And what "Islamanization of America" are you referring to?
An ISIS affiliate is now publishing a monthly magazine in Gaza and the Hamas fighters are going to eat it up. They will probably use it as a study guide.
The "and" here is that your heroes have named their website after programs unleashed to mass murder as many Jews as possible, including the point blank murder of Jewish children.
They aren't "my heros". I have not defended them nor advocated for them. Try honesty for a change.
Geller has never been part of a terrorist organization, and just because you feel compelled to defend terrorism because you see it as fashionable, that does not mean Geller and your murderous terrorist friends are the same.
Geller advocates hate and the killing of Muslims. She does not have to be a part of a "terrorist organization" to be contemptable. yet you seem compelled to defend her.
Now...let's have some honesty Dogma (are you capable of that?) -- Where have I defended terrorism?
I see aris2chat agrees. Perhaps she can answer as well. Or maybe she can explain why she defends the hatred spewed from the likes of Geller as if it were any different than the hatred spewed by EI. You both will defend anti-Muslim hatred to the death while condemning anti-semitism.
Note - EI itself is not a terrorist organization either.
it is not about hate but the right to speak out against such actions like refugees throwing christians off a boat to Italy. About abuse of girls. About support of terrorism. About imposing Islamic "will" in US schools. About "they an riot and kill" but the rest of the world has to be silent.
Stories she posts about are those in main stream media. She is expressing the frustration so many people have with the islamization of america and the world. It is about free speech and being able to ask questions and even saying "no" to muslim that make americans feel like they are being forced to submit.
There are so many others that speak about that are about inciting hate against muslims. Geller is rather sedate by comparison. She is not saying anything that cannot be heard from many other main stream talking heads on the TV or radio.
She is not going to kiss Islamists arse, but she might smack them across the cheek from time to time.
It can easily be argued that IE speaks to the frustrations many Palestinians have with the erosion of a two-state solution, and the possibility of their ever achieving rights. That too is free speech. Yet you condemn one as hate and applaud the other as justifiable frustration.
Hate is hate. But apparently not when it's the likes of Pamela Geller directing it against innocent Muslims.
And what "Islamanization of America" are you referring to?
EI has supported attacks on jews and Israelis before and spreading Hamas' call for kidnapping Israelis today. The site is not just anti-Israel but anti-semitic. It is a hate site.
I don't like geller. I find her a bit abrasive but I support her right to speak. She does not say anything you can't hear on any of the major news channels on a daily basis. Anger and frustration is no blind hate or support of violence.
EI supports violence. Geller support public protest and political action.
There is more hate and incitement from college protest, park soap boxes and even from churches. Walk down some major city like NY and the the plackards some of the people carry. Listen to some of these AM radio station. Listen to protesters in DC. They can be so much worse.
Supporting terrorism and bigotry at the Electronic Intifada - Blogs - Jerusalem Post
Terrorism and the Internet Electronic intifada declared on Israel on Facebook. Hamas and radical Islamic groups encouraged by Iran employ social networks on the Internet for the struggle against Israel
It can easily be argued that IE speaks to the frustrations many Palestinians have with the erosion of a two-state solution, and the possibility of their ever achieving rights. That too is free speech. Yet you condemn one as hate and applaud the other as justifiable frustration.
Hate is hate. But apparently not when it's the likes of Pamela Geller directing it against innocent Muslims.
And what "Islamanization of America" are you referring to?
You sure never vary from the Islamist terrorist M.O., do you?
You are always right here with the official terrorist talking points that rejecting Islamist terrorism is no different than the Islamist terrorism, itself.
An ISIS affiliate is now publishing a monthly magazine in Gaza and the Hamas fighters are going to eat it up. They will probably use it as a study guide.The "and" here is that your heroes have named their website after programs unleashed to mass murder as many Jews as possible, including the point blank murder of Jewish children.
They aren't "my heros". I have not defended them nor advocated for them. Try honesty for a change.
Geller has never been part of a terrorist organization, and just because you feel compelled to defend terrorism because you see it as fashionable, that does not mean Geller and your murderous terrorist friends are the same.
Geller advocates hate and the killing of Muslims. She does not have to be a part of a "terrorist organization" to be contemptable. yet you seem compelled to defend her.
Now...let's have some honesty Dogma (are you capable of that?) -- Where have I defended terrorism?
I see aris2chat agrees. Perhaps she can answer as well. Or maybe she can explain why she defends the hatred spewed from the likes of Geller as if it were any different than the hatred spewed by EI. You both will defend anti-Muslim hatred to the death while condemning anti-semitism.
Note - EI itself is not a terrorist organization either.
it is not about hate but the right to speak out against such actions like refugees throwing christians off a boat to Italy. About abuse of girls. About support of terrorism. About imposing Islamic "will" in US schools. About "they an riot and kill" but the rest of the world has to be silent.
Stories she posts about are those in main stream media. She is expressing the frustration so many people have with the islamization of america and the world. It is about free speech and being able to ask questions and even saying "no" to muslim that make americans feel like they are being forced to submit.
There are so many others that speak about that are about inciting hate against muslims. Geller is rather sedate by comparison. She is not saying anything that cannot be heard from many other main stream talking heads on the TV or radio.
She is not going to kiss Islamists arse, but she might smack them across the cheek from time to time.
It can easily be argued that IE speaks to the frustrations many Palestinians have with the erosion of a two-state solution, and the possibility of their ever achieving rights. That too is free speech. Yet you condemn one as hate and applaud the other as justifiable frustration.
Hate is hate. But apparently not when it's the likes of Pamela Geller directing it against innocent Muslims.
And what "Islamanization of America" are you referring to?
EI has supported attacks on jews and Israelis before and spreading Hamas' call for kidnapping Israelis today. The site is not just anti-Israel but anti-semitic. It is a hate site.
I don't like geller. I find her a bit abrasive but I support her right to speak. She does not say anything you can't hear on any of the major news channels on a daily basis. Anger and frustration is no blind hate or support of violence.
EI supports violence. Geller support public protest and political action.
There is more hate and incitement from college protest, park soap boxes and even from churches. Walk down some major city like NY and the the plackards some of the people carry. Listen to some of these AM radio station. Listen to protesters in DC. They can be so much worse.
Supporting terrorism and bigotry at the Electronic Intifada - Blogs - Jerusalem Post
Terrorism and the Internet Electronic intifada declared on Israel on Facebook. Hamas and radical Islamic groups encouraged by Iran employ social networks on the Internet for the struggle against Israel
The Ibn Taymia media center, an ISIS-affiliated media wing in the Gaza Strip, published the first issue of a new monthly magazine, titled “The Last Promise,” aimed at its supporters and potential recruits.
The first issue, featuring a combination of militant lecturing and practical advice, follows the same template as publications from groups including ISIS and al-Qaeda.
There’s a “Know Your Enemy” section, dedicated to the Israeli Defense Force, which outlines the military’s history. Another section advises “do not share your information after being captured by the enemy,” “always listen to commands,” and to always keep weapons clean.
Also included is a poem purportedly penned by Osama bin Laden, praising martyrdom and jihad.
In Gaza ISIS Affiliate Publishes Its First Magazine
aris2chat ,did you know of this periodical?
