Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I am unaware of what you are talking about. Go ahead and make your point. Instead of wasting server space. Just explain to all of us why you think the SP1 and semi automatics that are loosely based on it were designed for combat.If I hadn't made my points, you wouldn't be scratching the scabs on your stumps every few weeks.
If you were confident that your citation says what you assert, you wouldn't hesitate to quote it.
Stop lying.I am unaware of what you are talking about. Go ahead and make your point. Instead of wasting server space. Just explain to all of us why you think the SP1 and semi automatics that are loosely based on it were designed for combat.
Balls in your court.
I have never spoken to anyone named the5thhorseman befor March of this year.Stop lying.
You're fully aware, as we've gone through this on a monthly basis for years.
Every time you are boxed in, you start mewling about "making a case".....my case is what got you started digging.
Just smile and wave, boys... smile and wave.I am unaware of what you are talking about. Go ahead and make your point. Instead of wasting server space. Just explain to all of us why you think the SP1 and semi automatics that are loosely based on it were designed for combat.
So why notify The5thHorseman?I have never spoken to anyone named the5thhorseman befor March of this year.
Don't be afraid. Go ahead and make your argument. You also have others across two threads waiting to see this magical argument.
Because you made the comment on another thread. Duh.So why notify The5thHorseman?
Stop yapping about wasting bandwidth.
PS.So why notify The5thHorseman?
Stop yapping about wasting bandwidth.
BATF certified that the modified weapon submitted by Colt did not meet BATF's definition of "machine gun"So……the AR-15 was designated a civilian rifle one year before the M16 was issued in Vietnam….
U.S.A. – -(Ammoland.com)- “This responds to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request … concerning the following: 1. All classification letters (or if classification letters were named in some other way, those records) regarding Model R6000 Colt AR-15 SP1 Sporter Rifle, Serial No. GX4968 which was approved in approximately 1963; and 2. All classification letters … for AR-15 platform rifles predating the submission to the ATF for the Colt AR15 SP1 Sporter Rifle,” Adam C. Siple, Chief Information and Privacy Governance Division, notified attorney Stephen Stamboulieh in a Nov. 22 response (see below). “In response to your request, we have processed a total of 2 pages of responsive material.
——————-
Colt sent a pilot model rifle (serial no. GX4968) to the BATF for civilian sale approval on Oct. 23, 1963. It was approved on Dec. 10, 1963, and sales of the ‘Model R6000 Colt AR-15 SP1 Sporter Rifle’ began on Jan 2, 1964,” one critic of the article contended. “The M16 wasn’t issued to infantry units until 1965 (as the XM16E1), wasn’t standardized as the M16A1 until 1967, and didn’t officially replace the M14 until 1969.
Original ATF AR-15 Classification Refutes Claim that Rifle ‘Not Meant’ for Civilians
[T]he magazine, unsurprisingly to anyone familiar with its anti-gun bent, attempted to bolster a claim that “these rifles were meant for the military, not civilians.”www.ammoland.com
A distinction w/o a difference.BATF certified that the modified weapon submitted by Colt did not meet BATF's definition of "machine gun"
Why do you imbeciles think that is "clever"?A distinction w/o a difference.
I copied and pasted the phrase from one of your posts- you tell me.Why do you imbeciles think that is "clever"?
I didn't rebleat it, you did...I copied and pasted the phrase from one of your posts- you tell me.
It's because it IS a civilian rifle. It's based on the M-16 which is a military rifle. The AR is semi-auto while the M-16 is full auto. The control freaks in the ATF know this. But pressure from the Marxist Party (Demwits) have then re-naming anything that's black and scary looking.So……the AR-15 was designated a civilian rifle one year before the M16 was issued in Vietnam….
U.S.A. – -(Ammoland.com)- “This responds to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request … concerning the following: 1. All classification letters (or if classification letters were named in some other way, those records) regarding Model R6000 Colt AR-15 SP1 Sporter Rifle, Serial No. GX4968 which was approved in approximately 1963; and 2. All classification letters … for AR-15 platform rifles predating the submission to the ATF for the Colt AR15 SP1 Sporter Rifle,” Adam C. Siple, Chief Information and Privacy Governance Division, notified attorney Stephen Stamboulieh in a Nov. 22 response (see below). “In response to your request, we have processed a total of 2 pages of responsive material.
——————-
Colt sent a pilot model rifle (serial no. GX4968) to the BATF for civilian sale approval on Oct. 23, 1963. It was approved on Dec. 10, 1963, and sales of the ‘Model R6000 Colt AR-15 SP1 Sporter Rifle’ began on Jan 2, 1964,” one critic of the article contended. “The M16 wasn’t issued to infantry units until 1965 (as the XM16E1), wasn’t standardized as the M16A1 until 1967, and didn’t officially replace the M14 until 1969.
Original ATF AR-15 Classification Refutes Claim that Rifle ‘Not Meant’ for Civilians
[T]he magazine, unsurprisingly to anyone familiar with its anti-gun bent, attempted to bolster a claim that “these rifles were meant for the military, not civilians.”
You’ve only been a member for six months. If you posted before that, you must have gotten banned and are illegally posting.Stop lying.
You're fully aware, as we've gone through this on a monthly basis for years.
Every time you are boxed in, you start mewling about "making a case".....my case is what got you started digging.
Consider the prohibitive likelihood that you're a moron.You’ve only been a member for six months. If you posted before that, you must have gotten banned and are illegally posting.
I’m not boxed in. I am knowledgeable on the topic. You are not.Stop lying.
You're fully aware, as we've gone through this on a monthly basis for years.
Every time you are boxed in, you start mewling about "making a case".....my case is what got you started digging.
I have a very good idea who he is. Let’s see if he is man enough to come forward.You’ve only been a member for six months. If you posted before that, you must have gotten banned and are illegally posting.
