Barry Obama Calls for Israel to End Their ‘Occupation,’ Wants State for Palestinians...

All that is irrelevant, you cannot read.
Irrelevant to you, possibly. Yet you can not discern if a person is able to read, let alone entertain this discussion with intellect.

That's unimportant. You have no dog in the race. :)

The "Palestinians"? They can have Gaza... when we are done with it. :thup:
 
Irrelevant to you, possibly. Yet you can not discern if a person is able to read, let alone this discussion.

That's unimportant. You have no dog in the race. :)
Read this jackass. Arabic came from the Koran, the book Mohammed wrote

 
Read this jackass. Arabic came from the Koran, the book Mohammed wrote

You can't even use commas to denote possession, sparky.


The Jews and Eretz predate Britannica while the language of Arabic --> Aramic --> Hebrew all use the Aleph Beit. :)
 
Read this jackass. Arabic came from the Koran, the book Mohammed wrote

Arabic preceded the Qu’ran.
 
Barack Obumbler would sound far more reasonable if he lost his voice entirely.
nc_obamasign1017_500kmsnbc_121017.jpg
 
No.

But, happily, the old scumbag is out of office.

(I don’t care for any threats of violence even purely jocular ones.)
If the truth comes out, the treasonous dogs should hang if they do not confess.

As Hillary said, they will all hang for this treason.

"IF"

Otherwise, you are correct and that's a major difference between fact and truth.
 

The terms used in the definition derive from English legal tradition, specifically the Treason Act 1351. Levying war means the assembly of armed people to overthrow the government or to resist its laws.

:thup:


1699318780445.jpeg
 
Of course he does.



View attachment 853411


View attachment 853412




Screen-Shot-2023-11-04-at-7.37.01-PM-e1699141073224.png


The left will not let this die. This is the distraction they need. They want and need total chaos as they flounder amid the changing tides. This is their setup. Their last chance at total takedown of the US. There will be no burnout, just them fanning the flame with outrageous anger against the truth. :thup:

Be prepared!
Israel might be “occupying” Gaza today but it argued it hasn’t since 2005. Apparently that didn’t work out well.

Much depends on the definition of the word “occupy.”



On October 15, US President Joe Biden cautioned Israel not to “reoccupy” Gaza. This choice of words touched on a core debate: is Israel occupying the Gaza Strip—such that it owes protections to the population there—or is it not?

Israel believes it “disengaged” from Gaza in 2005 when it completely withdrew its military and civilians from the area. With this withdrawal, Israel and the United States—as well as many international legal, military, and foreign policy experts—argue that Israel ceded the effective control needed under the legal definition of occupation, therefore ending the occupation. Still, Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant recently stated that after the conflict, Israel would “no longer have ‘responsibility for life in the Gaza Strip,’” seemingly confirming a level of ongoing engagement.

In contrast, many prominent international institutions, organizations and bodies—including the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), the United Nations Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, UN General Assembly (UNGA), European Union (EU), African Union, International Criminal Court (ICC) (both Pre-Trial Chamber I and the Office of the Prosecutor), Amnesty International, and Human Rights Watch—as well as international legal experts and other organizations, argue that Israel has occupied Palestinian territories including Gaza since 1967.1 While they acknowledge that Israel no longer had the traditional marker of effective control after the disengagement—a military presence—they hold that with the help of technology, it has maintained the requisite control in other ways.

The status of Israel’s occupation is legally significant, as it determines the legal obligations Israel owes to Gaza. Occupying states have heightened responsibilities to protect local populations and have the basic health and safety supplies they need to survive. Given concerns about Israel’s actions in Gaza—such as possible war crimes, including starvationand the denial of humanitarian aid—Israel would likely be in breach of these obligations.
 

Hamas-Deal-reached-with-Israel-to-restore-Calm-in-Gaza-2-1200x630.jpg


In a video from 2021 that is now gaining traction once again on social media, concerning the current geopolitical climate in the Middle East, ex-Senator and former Pakistani Envoy Raja Zafar ul Haq, who currently serves as the chairman of the Pakistan Muslim League-N (one of the major political parties in the country), is seen boasting about the fact that the Pakistani Army has been actively involved in imparting military and combat training to Hamas terrorists over a significant span of time, extending over several decades.

 

Forum List

Back
Top