Ibentoken
Don't Tread on Me
The poor Obama cultists are feeling isolated these days. Less room to maneuver their counter arguments in. The walls are closing in.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You forgot something. Obama is a serial liar and hates Americans and America. That's the problem.
You, chum, are not a Republican. I am. I tell the truth. You are the serial liar seal who hates America and Americans. Step off.
Wannabee pubs like those from the TP and beyond, like Jarl and Iben, are here for grins and chuckles only.
They are amusing.
You, chum, are not a Republican. I am. I tell the truth. You are the serial liar seal who hates America and Americans. Step off.
LMFAO.
The GOP make believer is calling someone else a liar.
Funny shit.
I have no idea what that's all about. Poor thing must have bumped its little noggin
You forgot something. Obama is a serial liar and hates Americans and America. That's the problem.
You, chum, are not a Republican. I am. I tell the truth. You are the serial liar seal who hates America and Americans. Step off.
LMFAO.
The GOP make believer is calling someone else a liar.
Funny shit.
I don't think Cheney saw that coming because when he responded, he called her Reagan instead of Megyn! Funny as shit!!!
Wow! Look at the lefties that watch FOXNews and give it so much relevance in today's political discussions. Mind numbing how they fall over themselves to report on this station.
Then the nut job who starts the thread thinks his words and thoughts are so important he always make his comments in bold. Some people just can't get over themselves.
LMFAO.
The GOP make believer is calling someone else a liar.
Funny shit.
I have no idea what that's all about. Poor thing must have bumped its little noggin
He has been like that since the day I signed on here. He is so insecure with his position as a progressive, he attempts to portray himself as a republican to solidify his sentiments as "true republican ideas"...even though they are nothing more than your typical left leaning ideas that most moderates don't agree with...much less conservatives.
I take his posts with a grain of salt.
So you just proved that FOX is fair and balanced and defeated every far left talking point about FOX NEWS.
Good for you little far left solider.
How come you rightwing neanderthals aren't talking about this story this morning?
Megyn ain't Cheney's bitch, so you shouldn't be either. Where's Politicalchic today?
Let the disowning of the Fox News Primetime Darling begin! (cackle...cackle...snort)
Megyn Kelly to Dick Cheney: Wrong, sir
6/19/14 6:35 AM EDT
FOX News Megyn Kelly had some tough questions for former Vice President Dick Cheney on Wednesday night, after he and his daughter, Liz, offered a scathing review of the Obama administrations foreign policy.
In your op-ed [in the Wall Street Journal], you write as follows: Rarely has a U.S. president been so wrong about so much at the expense of so many, Kelly said on her show The Kelly File. But time and time again, history has proven that you got it wrong as well sir.
Read more: Megyn Kelly to Dick Cheney: Wrong, sir - Kendall Breitman - POLITICO.com
I saw the interview and would ask Megyn what she would do if Saddam allowed 100,000 children a year to starve to death because he would not
certify his WMDs were destroyed especially when Saddam's son-in-law who was in charge of WMDs had defected and described existing WMDs development.
Wow! Look at the lefties that watch FOXNews and give it so much relevance in today's political discussions. Mind numbing how they fall over themselves to report on this station.
Then the nut job who starts the thread thinks his words and thoughts are so important he always make his comments in bold. Some people just can't get over themselves.
Your mind was already that way...Is that all you got? Complaining about bold type?
Wow! Look at the lefties that watch FOXNews and give it so much relevance in today's political discussions. Mind numbing how they fall over themselves to report on this station.
Then the nut job who starts the thread thinks his words and thoughts are so important he always make his comments in bold. Some people just can't get over themselves.
Your mind was already that way...Is that all you got? Complaining about bold type?
Is that what you got out of his post? That he was complaining about bold type? Nothing else?
You truly need to take some reading comprehension courses.
You have no idea how much you are missing.
How come you rightwing neanderthals aren't talking about this story this morning?
Megyn ain't Cheney's bitch, so you shouldn't be either. Where's Politicalchic today?
Let the disowning of the Fox News Primetime Darling begin! (cackle...cackle...snort)
Megyn Kelly to Dick Cheney: Wrong, sir
6/19/14 6:35 AM EDT
FOX News Megyn Kelly had some tough questions for former Vice President Dick Cheney on Wednesday night, after he and his daughter, Liz, offered a scathing review of the Obama administrations foreign policy.
In your op-ed [in the Wall Street Journal], you write as follows: Rarely has a U.S. president been so wrong about so much at the expense of so many, Kelly said on her show The Kelly File. But time and time again, history has proven that you got it wrong as well sir.
Read more: Megyn Kelly to Dick Cheney: Wrong, sir - Kendall Breitman - POLITICO.com
So you just proved that FOX is fair and balanced and defeated every far left talking point about FOX NEWS.
Good for you little far left solider.
KELLY: You mentioned that, you know, the status of forces agreement and President Obama has taken a lot of heat for not negotiating that with Maliki. However, critics point out that it was President Bush who did sign the deal that said we'd get all U.S. forces out of there by the end of 2011.
D. CHENEY: With a status forces agreement for a stay behind force.
KELLY: And when the President -- our current president sought to renegotiate that, al Maliki didn't want it, that's what the President's defenders say. That he tried, he wanted to keep some stay behind forces that would protect the gains our troops had made, but Maliki made it too tough.
D. CHENEY: No, that's not quite accurate, Megyn. What happened was our generals recommended a stay behind forces from 14,000 to 18,000. The White House rejected it. So the military came back with the recommendation of 10,000. The White House rejected it. They took it all the way down to 3,000. I think by the time they got to the level, the Iraqis looked at it. And believed that we weren't serious, that Obama was absolutely committed to completely withdraw from Iraq, and they were unable to come to an agreement, but I think in part because the Iraqis didn't think he really wanted one and he certainly didn't push it. We have agreements like that with 40 nations around the world. They should have been able to come to an agreement with the Iraqis, and I think that failure to do so is what has precipitated the current crisis.
How come you rightwing neanderthals aren't talking about this story this morning?
Megyn ain't Cheney's bitch, so you shouldn't be either. Where's Politicalchic today?
Let the disowning of the Fox News Primetime Darling begin! (cackle...cackle...snort)
Megyn Kelly to Dick Cheney: Wrong, sir
6/19/14 6:35 AM EDT
FOX News Megyn Kelly had some tough questions for former Vice President Dick Cheney on Wednesday night, after he and his daughter, Liz, offered a scathing review of the Obama administrations foreign policy.
In your op-ed [in the Wall Street Journal], you write as follows: Rarely has a U.S. president been so wrong about so much at the expense of so many, Kelly said on her show The Kelly File. But time and time again, history has proven that you got it wrong as well sir.
Read more: Megyn Kelly to Dick Cheney: Wrong, sir - Kendall Breitman - POLITICO.com
I saw the interview and would ask Megyn what she would do if Saddam allowed 100,000 children a year to starve to death because he would not
certify his WMDs were destroyed especially when Saddam's son-in-law who was in charge of WMDs had defected and described existing WMDs development.
Of course you would because reality isnt what you deal with...Hypotheticals and conspiracies of doom and gloom is your forte'.
What I noticed is that you didnt disagree with her assessment of him being wrong.