Are you born gay?

This is certainly one way that AIDS is being transfered to the Straight community.

Of course the queers will tell you that 'it's not a queer disease... when in fact AIDS is nothing, if not a queer disease.

Again... Take the deviant (queer / IV drug user) out of the equation and presto... AIDS has no where to go.

How do you define "queer disease"? If it's that only gays contract it then you contradict yourself admitting that it's being given in any way to straights.
 
Of course no one has proven your theory... Your 'theory' was that your opposition would lay the blame on Blacks... I merely stated the incontestable facts relevant to the sexual practices and mores of the African culture.

Now that Africans happen to be black as a general, but not exclusive rule is irrelevant. The fact is that their sexual practices tend towards a rationalization accepting of homosexual sex and that has realized their fate with regards to AIDS.

And where a culture accepts homosexual sex, it sets itself up to be highly subject to the contraction of AIDs and that sis, is a simple fact of nature. When you add to that, that Nature tends to kill off those cultures that accept homosexuality, well it's readily observable that in so doing those cultures engage in what can only be considered cultural suicide.

It's what idiots do...

Still waiting for some facts to support your statements.
 
Again, your words, exposing the truth:
I don't care that you are gay. I've told you before, I'm interested in knowing how much of a struggle it is for you to pretend that you aren't gay. How did you come to decide to do it? How long ago did you decide? If you are married, does your spouse know of your un-gayness?

People that deny their identities are fascinating to me.
 
How do you define "queer disease"? If it's that only gays contract it then you contradict yourself admitting that it's being given in any way to straights.

I define a queer disease as a disease which is contracted solely through the sexual practices or other behavior where blood or sexual fluids are exchanged with queers.

Now that hardly means that non-queers are not subject to the disease. This being yet another tidbit of evidence that there is nothing biologically distinct between a queer and a non-queer.

It is queer behavior that sets them apart; purely and simply. The fact is that if one does not engage in sex with a queer, or with someone that HAS engaged in sex with a queer, or otherwise exchange blood or sexual fluids with a queer... there is no chance that they will contract AIDS.

Take the queers out of the equation and AIDS has no where to go.
 
I don't care that you are gay. I've told you before, I'm interested in knowing how much of a struggle it is for you to pretend that you aren't gay. How did you come to decide to do it? How long ago did you decide? If you are married, does your spouse know of your un-gayness?

People that deny their identities are fascinating to me.
Trying to justify what you said with tortured explanations is only making it worse for you.
 
Trying to justify what you said with tortured explanations is only making it worse for you.

Ravi brings up an important point. Hopefully, your spouse, if she is a she, is aware of your decision not to be gay and is sympathetic to the pain this must cause you.
 
Ravi brings up an important point. Hopefully, your spouse, if she is a she, is aware of your decision not to be gay and is sympathetic to the pain this must cause you.
At another board I used to belong to, there was a guy who claimed his wife used to be a lesbian and he was always bragging how he, with his church's help, kept her straight. I don't know why, but it used to crack me up pretty good. I once asked him if it bothered him that he had to be jealous of both other men and other women.
 
Ravi brings up an important point. Hopefully, your spouse, if she is a she, is aware of your decision not to be gay and is sympathetic to the pain this must cause you.

So I take it that this species of reasoning is that mos tlame of all Socialist rationalizations that those who contest homosexuality are only doing so because they themselves are homosexuals and merely ashamed to admit it?

I swear ladies, does it not occur to you at ALL that homosexuality is a human weakness which is to be shunned, belittled and those unable to simply resist the urge to screw their bestest good buddy are lessor people because of their weakness?

The fact that we're all imperfect, hardly means that we should set the least among us up as role models to be admired for that failure... Of course that queers are prone to sugesting that the culture should rest on the notion that the lowest common denominator should be held up as the highest goal to which each member should strive, is all the evidence anyone really needs to recognize that you should be shoved ad far back into the closet as possible and where someone refuses, they should be destroyed.

In essence what your stated thesis demands is that America should look more like Africa; where everyone is subject to contracting AIDS. This based upon your rejection of any notion which suggests that people should avoid homosexual sex, which is the primary means by which AIDS is tranferred from one person to the next...

Of course you'll quickly point out that IV drug use is also highly efficient in tranferring AIDS, but you'll deny that for this to be possible you need a QUEER IV DRUG USER to enter the equation; NEXT you'll point out that hetero-sexuals can also pass AIDS along; BUT AGAIN... FOR THAT TO HAPPEN YOU NEED A QUEER TO ENGAGE IN SEX WITH A HETERO...

No Queers... No AIDS.
 
And the scientific studies supporting your "facts" are where?

Never mind, you're just a troll looking for attention.

The Scientific Studies which show that AIDS is sread through Homosexual Sex... Now if you want to project that Homosexual Sex does not spread AIDS, then fine... but you do so against the tide of incontestable scientific fact.

Now sure, hetero sexuals that engage in IV drug use can contract AIDS... but the fact is that a QUEER WAS SOMEWHERE DOWN RANGE OF THAT EXCHANGE.

FACT: If one does NOT engage in homosexual sex or the exchange of blood with someone that HAS ENGAGED IN HOMOSEXUAL SEX, there is absolutely NO CHANCE of contracting AIDS.

PERIOD!
 
So sorry if you don't know the difference between social, political and economic constructs. You should really get a handle on that.

ROFLMNAO... Oh GOD! Now that is precious...

I guess what tickles me the most about this sort of drivel is how quickly they are to project a failure in reasoning, but are so incapable of pointing to, or discussing the failure in term of specifics.

Clearly they want to, but they are prevented from doing so by their abject ignorance...
 
Last edited:
ROFLMNAO... Oh GOD! Now that is precious...

I guess what tickles me the most about this sort of drivel is how quickly they are to project a failure in reasoning, but are so incapable of pointing to, or discussing the failure in term of specifics.

Clearly they want to, but they are prevented from doing so by their abject ignorance...

Belt up you ponce.
 
The Scientific Studies which show that AIDS is sread through Homosexual Sex... Now if you want to project that Homosexual Sex does not spread AIDS, then fine... but you do so against the tide of incontestable scientific fact.

Now sure, hetero sexuals that engage in IV drug use can contract AIDS... but the fact is that a QUEER WAS SOMEWHERE DOWN RANGE OF THAT EXCHANGE.

FACT: If one does NOT engage in homosexual sex or the exchange of blood with someone that HAS ENGAGED IN HOMOSEXUAL SEX, there is absolutely NO CHANCE of contracting AIDS.

PERIOD!

HIV/AIDS prevalence rates in the South Bronx are among the highest in the USA. Transmission in this area during the 1980s was primarily due to injected drug use (IDU). To assess the role of heterosexual transmission among persons with newly diagnosed HIV infection, we surveyed patients (pts) at a large S. Bronx hospital where 9% of 18-44-yr-old pts with admission diagnoses unrelated to HIV infection were HIV+ when blindly tested in 1991. From 7/92-4/94, we conducted a non-blinded survey of 677 pts aged 18-44 yrs who defined being HIV+ and had no HIV-related diagnoses. Many (43%) were born in countries where heterosexual HIV transmission predominates (foreign born = FB). 24% reported high-risk heterosexual sex, including having sex with sex workers (14%), IDUs (12%), and HIV+ persons (5%) or practicing sex work (6%). 38% had sex with FB persons. Few reported IDU (6%) or male homosexual sex (MSM) (4%). Of 448 (67%) who were HIV tested, 24 (5.4%) were HIV+ (7% of men, 4% of women, M:F ratio [of HIV+ pts]=1.4:1). 17 (71%) HIV+ pts reported possible HIV infection sources during interview or posttest counseling. 12 (50%) HIV+ pts reported high-risk heterosexual sex, with or without other risk factors. The CDC hierarchical risk classification identified heterosexual sex as the most common transmission mode. Of those who denied MSM, IDU, or transfusions, 9 (38%) reported high-risk heterosexual sex, namely sex with high-risk persons and/or sex work (n=5) or sex with FB persons (n=4). Fewer persons reported MSM (n=4), IDU (n=2), or transfusion (n=2). In this Bronx hospital population, high-risk heterosexual activity is common and now may be the leading source of new HIV infections.

Heterosexual transmission: The leading cause of new HIV infections in the South Bronx, New York?
 

Forum List

Back
Top