CDZ Are RW's safe in arguing OUR ideas are proven and the LW's are all un/dis-proven?

[leecross]

Are RW's safe in arguing OUR ideas are proven and the LW's are all un/dis-proven?

 

[william the wie]

Pretty much.

 

[BuckToothMoron]

Can you be more specific- which ideas are you specifically referring to?

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Nothing is safe because the apprehension of truth, while absolute in itself, is dependent upon the knowledge and intellect of the person exposed to it.

 

[sparky]

Can you elaborate Lee?


~S~

 

[sartre play]

If all info is fake, no way to prove anyone's point.

 

[william the wie]

If all info is fake, no way to prove anyone's point.

True, we have entered an idiocracy where the left compares apples and oranges routinely and the right is often suffering correction fatigue.

 

[Darkwind]

Anyone who assumes they have all the right answers is wrong.

 

[william the wie]

The results will be seen when the primary season starts.

 

[Mac1958]

No "idea" is perfect, nor is its implementation.

Maybe we could try communication and collaboration, which could lead to innovation and all new ideas that we can all live with.

Sure works in the business world, but it does require the submerging of egos, and listening skills are also required.



Ha ha. Just kidding.
.

 

[McRocket]

Are RW's safe in arguing OUR ideas are proven and the LW's are all un/dis-proven?

What?

That you can NEVER spend too much on the military, that the poor should basically look after themselves, that trickle-down-economics works, that protectionism is good, that only paying lip service to a balanced budget is fine, that life begins at conception?

No...those ideas are NOT proven...unless you mean proven to be utter nonsense.

Both major parties offer some good ideas and a TON of stupid ones (the left's latest, socialism mania is a good example of the latter. Guaranteed income for all? Pleeeease.).

 

[leecross]

Are RW's safe in arguing OUR ideas are proven and the LW's are all un/dis-proven?

What?

That you can NEVER spend too much on the military, that the poor should basically look after themselves, that trickle-down-economics works, that protectionism is good, that only paying lip service to a balanced budget is fine, that life begins at conception?

No...those ideas are NOT proven...unless you mean proven to be utter nonsense.

Both major parties offer some good ideas and a TON of stupid ones (the left's latest, socialism mania is a good example of the latter. Guaranteed income for all? Pleeeease.).

No, your refusal to recognize reality is not a refutation your argument can rest upon for long.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Ideology is ideology. Truth is truth.

Once and a while they overlap, but not nearly often enough.

 

[alang1216]

Are RW's safe in arguing OUR ideas are proven and the LW's are all un/dis-proven?

I guess it wasn't proven to the electorate since we now have a Democratic House.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Are RW's safe in arguing OUR ideas are proven and the LW's are all un/dis-proven?

I guess it wasn't proven to the electorate since we now have a Democratic House.

The Left has held public education for over half a century. I suspect it would take brute force to wrest it from their grip.

 

[alang1216]

Are RW's safe in arguing OUR ideas are proven and the LW's are all un/dis-proven?

I guess it wasn't proven to the electorate since we now have a Democratic House.

The Left has held public education for over half a century. I suspect it would take brute force to wrest it from their grip.

So you're saying your ideology is superior but highly educated people are too ignorant to see it? It seems the less educated you are the more likely you'll be RW.

When it comes to education, the parties have switched places over the past two decades.

According to a Pew Research Center poll released this week, Democrats are now the party of college graduates, especially those with post-graduate work. Meanwhile, people with a high-school degree or less, by far the larger group, slightly lean toward Republicans.

Both preferences are the reverse of what they were in the 1990s.

According to Pew, 54 percent of college graduates either identified as Democrats or leaned Democratic, compared to 39 percent who identified or leaned Republican. One-third of Americans have a college degree.

Just 25 years ago, those numbers were perfectly reversed in the Pew survey, with the GOP holding a 54-39 advantage among people with college degrees.​

 

[Tax Man]

Are RW's safe in arguing OUR ideas are proven and the LW's are all un/dis-proven?

I guess it wasn't proven to the electorate since we now have a Democratic House.

The Left has held public education for over half a century. I suspect it would take brute force to wrest it from their grip.

No Child Left Behind was not a liberals idea.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Are RW's safe in arguing OUR ideas are proven and the LW's are all un/dis-proven?

I guess it wasn't proven to the electorate since we now have a Democratic House.

The Left has held public education for over half a century. I suspect it would take brute force to wrest it from their grip.

So you're saying your ideology is superior but highly educated people are too ignorant to see it? It seems the less educated you are the more likely you'll be RW.

When it comes to education, the parties have switched places over the past two decades.

According to a Pew Research Center poll released this week, Democrats are now the party of college graduates​

Perhaps, but industry can't hire many of them because they can't read or write properly, or do much of anything else useful. They make excellent drones, however.

Submitted for your approval is Ocasio-Cortez, whose Boston U. degree in economics, and I say this gently, has yet to make a public appearance.

Meanwhile, people with a high-school degree or less, by far the larger group, slightly lean toward Republicans.

Right. Those inner city geniuses all drift to the Republicans as moths to the flame.​

 

[Blues Man]

Are RW's safe in arguing OUR ideas are proven and the LW's are all un/dis-proven?

I guess it wasn't proven to the electorate since we now have a Democratic House.

The party of the president loses the house in midterm election 92% of the time

 

[alang1216]

Are RW's safe in arguing OUR ideas are proven and the LW's are all un/dis-proven?

I guess it wasn't proven to the electorate since we now have a Democratic House.

The Left has held public education for over half a century. I suspect it would take brute force to wrest it from their grip.

So you're saying your ideology is superior but highly educated people are too ignorant to see it? It seems the less educated you are the more likely you'll be RW.

When it comes to education, the parties have switched places over the past two decades.

According to a Pew Research Center poll released this week, Democrats are now the party of college graduates​

Perhaps, but industry can't hire many of them because they can't read or write properly, or do much of anything else useful. They make excellent drones, however.

Submitted for your approval is Ocasio-Cortez, whose Boston U. degree in economics, and I say this gently, has yet to make a public appearance.

Meanwhile, people with a high-school degree or less, by far the larger group, slightly lean toward Republicans.

Right. Those inner city geniuses all drift to the Republicans as moths to the flame.​

Typical. When the numbers don't support your position, Edited-meister

Among the 31 states (plus D.C.) with party registration, there are nearly 12 million more registered Democrats than Republicans. I got to ask, WHO are you proving your idea to? Besides yourselves of course.