Apportionment Of Congressional Seats From Census Contingent On Number Of Citizens

" What Is And What Never Should Be "

* Time To Clarify The Solvency Of US Citizens *

Your ignorance is telling. Three-fifths of a Person is a clue to everyone but the right wing.
The three-fifths reference is well understood and you are talking out your retarded ass again and obviously not feigning stupidity but demonstrating it in full .

The reference is clearly antiquated by a fact that there was not a notion of citizenship until us fourteenth amendment .
 
Constitution says persons

If it meant citizens, the t would say so
Sooooo when they wrote it then----did they count slaves and indians as PERSONS or where they just ignored in the count? Indians living here were considered foreigners not citizens.


"The Constitution speaks of people, citizens, persons, other persons (a euphemism for slaves) and Indians not taxed"
 
Constitution says persons

If it meant citizens, the t would say so
Sooooo when they wrote it then----did they count slaves and indians as PERSONS or where they just ignored in the count? Indians living here were considered foreigners not citizens.


"The Constitution speaks of people, citizens, persons, other persons (a euphemism for slaves) and Indians not taxed"
Slaves counted as 3/5 of a person
Indians were specifically excluded
 
" Treason Against US Citizens "

* Fuck Illegal Migrants *

To avoid hypocrisy I'll say give Trump enough authority on this as authority that will be given Biden on gun control.
One issue has nothing to do with the other .

Citizens are entitled to vote and illegal migrants and migrants in general are not allowed to vote ; let the citizens who especially disregard the law and harbor fugitives take care of their vagrant populations .

The apportionment cannot be perfect because there is not a one to one correspondence between the number of citizens per state and the number of congressional seats that can be allocated and there will always be a minute disparity , but to assert that an egregious , ridiculous , blatant imbalance be implemented - based upon the inclusion of illegal migrants - undermines everything about citizens and their entitlement to manage the state .
This does affect fiscal policies; abolish your extra-Constitutional right wing and alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror, don't try to enact Poor laws.
 
" What Is And What Never Should Be "

* Time To Clarify The Solvency Of US Citizens *

Your ignorance is telling. Three-fifths of a Person is a clue to everyone but the right wing.
The three-fifths reference is well understood and you are talking out your retarded ass again and obviously not feigning stupidity but demonstrating it in full .

The reference is clearly antiquated by a fact that there was not a notion of citizenship until us fourteenth amendment .
nope; there is already a Constitutional mechanism to better enforce our naturalization clause since we have no immigration clause.
 
Constitution says persons

If it meant citizens, the t would say so
Sooooo when they wrote it then----did they count slaves and indians as PERSONS or where they just ignored in the count? Indians living here were considered foreigners not citizens.


"The Constitution speaks of people, citizens, persons, other persons (a euphemism for slaves) and Indians not taxed"
Slaves were actually counted as three-fifths of a Person. Only Indians not taxed are excluded.
 
I have it on good authority (Hillary Clinton) that the unfortunates whom we refer to as "illegal aliens" are "hard-working Americans," hence they are probably paying taxes of various sorts. Sales taxes, gasoline taxes, real estate taxes (either directly or through their monthly rent payments), excise taxes, and some of them even pay FIT and Social Security taxes.

And so that we are consistent, we must not base this on whether they are net positive or negative assets to the country since we have a shitload of natural-born American citizens who are net drains on the public fisc and there is no question about THIER being included.

While the Founders were probably not thinking of this particular issue when they composed Article I, "free Persons" means persons.
 
" Treason Against US Citizens "

* Fuck Illegal Migrants *

To avoid hypocrisy I'll say give Trump enough authority on this as authority that will be given Biden on gun control.
One issue has nothing to do with the other .

The Constitution calls for a count of the people, not of citizens, to determine seats in congress. My belief is that the issue of who to include/not include when determining the basis for seats in congress is much the same as deciding which guns are legal/illegal for people to keep and bear. Back when the Constitution was written both of these issues were dealt with in a sensical manner. Arms were most basic and immigrants were arriving by the shipload. Times have changed and our Constitution hasn't kept up.
 
" Us Citizens Entitled To Self Autonomy "

* Immigration Clause Clear As Political Science First Principles *

nope; there is already a Constitutional mechanism to better enforce our naturalization clause since we have no immigration clause.
The clause from us 14th amendment , " and subject to the jurisdiction thereof " is us immigration clause , as subject to us jurisdiction implies that a migrant is a subject by title in us legal immigration system .

A us citizen sojourning abroad without a visa is not a subject by title in a foreign legal immigration system and not subject to the jurisdiction thereof , however the sojourner remains subject to the jurisdiction thereof , to the united states , and a formal responsibility exists by us government to protect ( by reprise ) violations of civil liberties against its citizen , wherever they may be .

Any migrant sojourning and not a subject by title in us legal immigration system remains a subject by title as a citizen in the legal immigration system from its country of origin , and likewise remains subject to the jurisdiction thereof , to its nation government , but not to us government .

When a migrant becomes a subject by title in us legal immigration system , a formal contract by visa is created and a migrant becomes subject to the jurisdiction thereof , and the civil liberties of the migrant are protected ( in reprise ) without a presumption for a formal diplomatic request of collaboration .

 
Last edited:
" Us Citizens Entitled To Self Autonomy "

* Immigration Clause Clear As Political Science First Principles *


The clause from us 14th amendment , " and subject to the jurisdiction thereof " is us immigration clause , as subject to us jurisdiction implies that a migrant is a subject by title in us legal immigration system .

A us citizen sojourning abroad without a visa is not a subject by title in a foreign legal immigration system and not subject to the jurisdiction thereof , however the sojourner remains subject to the jurisdiction thereof , to the united states , and a formal responsibility exists by us government to protect ( by reprise ) violations of civil liberties against is citizen .

Any migrant sojourning and not a subject by title in us legal immigration system remains a subject by title as a citizen in the legal immigration system from its country of origin , and likewise remains subject to the jurisdiction thereof , to foreign government , but not to the united states .

When a migrant becomes a subject by title in us legal immigration system , a formal contract is created and a migrant becomes subject to the jurisdiction thereof , and the civil liberties of the migrant are protected ( in reprise ) without a presumption for a formal diplomatic request of collaboration .

The democrat Party needs these illegals to replace the taxpayers fleeing democrat hellholes.

It should not be allowed under any circumstances
 
" Apportionment Of Congressional Seats From Census Contingent On Number Of Citizens "

* Trump Administration Forced To Defend US Citizens In Court *


The Secretary of Commerce has been given what has been referred to as " wide discretion " for whether to include illegal migrants , or temporary visa migrants , in the total census for purposes of congressional representation ( house seats ) ; quite simply , that only us citizens should be counted for apportionment of congressional seates should not be discretionary , and apportionment of congressional seats should be restricted to the number of us citizens in a given area , irrespective of the number of non citizens , by a law that does not depend on political partisan whim .

In the cspan coverage of congressional hearings , the democrats spoke like bobble head idiots bantering over and again with a mantra of ignorance with an over statement of their position - that all people should be counted by the census ; however , the actual intent and concern of the congressional representatives of the democrats to the census administrators was to ensure that americans in their districts be fully accounted by the census bureau as responses were often low .

Alternatively , the republicans kept raising issue that illegal migrants cannot vote in the us , that illegal migrants cannot be elected to office in the us , that illegal migrants can vote in their own country , that illegal migrants can be counted as part of the census in their own country ( counted twice ) , that legal temporary visa migrants were excluded ( without challenge btw ) , that us citizens abroad are counted in us census , and most importantly that if apportionment of congressional seats were based on the population of illegal migrants then the constitutional requirement of " equal representation of citizens " would no longer be valid as a smaller group of us citizens would have greater representation than a larger group of us citizens .

The democrats maintained an ignorance of their public narrative seemingly without understanding that federal funds allocated to disenfranchised elderly and poor in their districts who are actual us citizens would be diminished and that other congressional representatives with unequal representation would also have the congressional weigh in to enforce it .

The us has social security numbers of us citizens and according to us 14th amendment one is a citizen of the united states and a citizen of the state in which they reside , which is easily garnered by irs filings .

Irrespective of whether a census collected the number of individuals in the us that included every illegal migrant those numbers should not ever affect the apportionment of congressional seats based on equal representation of us citizens who alone are entitled to the responsibility of their laws ; " wide discretion " should not exist as a partisan political whim and a law should be in place to absotely ensure it .

It is very clear now how heinous and treasonous the democrat public narrative has been in its assault to undermine us citizens through its facilitation of illegal immigration to entreat itself for purposes of political representation .


* Americans First *

The Congress has charged the Secretary of Commerce (the Secretary) with directing the conduct of the decennial census in such form and content as the Secretary may determine (13 U.S.C. 141(a)).


* Evil Within *

It would be interesting to know whether it is possible to remove the states of new york and california from the united states .

AG James Leads Coalition of States, Cities, and Counties in Opposing Xenophobic Policy hat Would Exclude Undocumented Immigrants from Congressional Apportionment
AG James Previously Won Supreme Court Case That Prevented Addition of Citizenship Question on Census
New York and Other Immigrant-Rich States Stand to Lose Representation in Congress and in Electoral College if Trump Administration Policy is Implemented

Why do you think the left was so massively against the citizenship question on the last census? They want those illegals in there to boost numbers for representation. That’s why you see lefties saying illegals deserve representation, because they pay taxes.

It’s the ultimate gerrymandering…they import illegals to create more seats for them in the house, and if bidens immigration plan ever comes to fruition, they’ll have millions of new voters to go along with those new house seats.
 
" Government Betrayal Of Devaluing Citizenship "

* Theistic Sectarian Humanists Versus Atheistic Secular Humanists Both Communist Idiots At Large *

Why do you think the left was so massively against the citizenship question on the last census? They want those illegals in there to boost numbers for representation. That’s why you see lefties saying illegals deserve representation, because they pay taxes.

It’s the ultimate gerrymandering…they import illegals to create more seats for them in the house, and if bidens immigration plan ever comes to fruition, they’ll have millions of new voters to go along with those new house seats.
If the motivation for illegal migrants to come into the us and have an anchor baby for social subsistence is not rectified , if the gangs and latin american dictators , if religious fanatics and government spending to facilitate illegal immigration are all not rectified , terrible things are likely to occur in the us .

Perhaps someone can explain why grand jury civil prosecution by private citizens of politicians for malfeasance of office does not occur .





Trump Challenges Equal Endowment Of Birthright Citizenship For Children Of Illegal Migrants


 
NY Dem Rep. Yvette Clarke on why she wants illegal immigration: ''I need more people in my district just for redistricting purposes...I'm from Brooklyn, New York. We have a diaspora that can absorb a significant number of these migrants.''

 
And I'm sure it's just a coinky dink that they're giving them court dates that are years away and coinciding with the next census...
 
" Suggestions Box Interns Filled With Copious Orations Of Expensive Free Advice "

* Without Boat Rides By Buy Laws From Week Creek *

And I'm sure it's just a coinky dink that they're giving them court dates that are years away and coinciding with the next census...
What is a likelihood that an immigration bill stipulates congressional seats be bound with the number of us citizens ?

What is a likelihood that an immigration bill stipulates funding to defend legislation and to implement " and subject to the jurisdiction thereof clause " of us 14th amendment through social security totalization agreements which assure children born in the us to migrants whom are not subjects by title in us legal immigration system of visa be given jus sanguinin citizenship in and from the country of maternal origin ?

What is a likelihood that an immigration bill stipulates public notice that migrants whom are not subject by title in us legal immigration system are subject to expeditious repatriation back to their country of origin ?
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top