Another bizarre decision by the Supremes: A same-sex union is now a "marriage"?

[Little-Acorn]

I see where the Supreme Court has now ruled that same-sex "marriage" is now a "right".

Just one problem: Marriage is a union between man and woman. And has been since marriage was first created. No society or religion has ever defined it as a union between two men, or two women, in the history of mankind.

No problem with same sex couples getting together. Call it a civil union or whatever. But it's not, and can't be, a marriage.

Calling a tail a leg does not make the name fit.

And if the Supremes issue a command that a tail will now be called a leg, and that creatures with tails can now walk on it like a leg, will that make it so they can?

 

[hazlnut]

I see where the Supreme Court has now ruled that same-sex "marriage" is now a "right".

The problem is, marriage is a union between man and woman. And has been since marriage was first created.

No problem with same sex couples getting together. Call it a civil union or whatever. But it's not, and can't be, a marriage.

Calling a tail a leg does not make the name fit.

And if the Supremes issue a command that a tail will now be called a leg, and that creatures with tails can now walk on it like a leg, will that make it so they can?

 

[Skylar]

I see where the Supreme Court has now ruled that same-sex "marriage" is now a "right".

The problem is, marriage is a union between man and woman. And has been since marriage was first created.

No problem with same sex couples getting together. Call it a civil union or whatever. But it's not, and can't be, a marriage.

Calling a tail a leg does not make the name fit.

And if the Supremes issue a command that a tail will now be called a leg, and that creatures with tails can now walk on it like a leg, will that make it so they can?

By 'bizarre', you mean utter predictable?

I mean, have you read the ruling? Virtually every major principle outlined in the ruling was recognized as one the court was likely to make based on precedent. Even the breakdown of the justices that voted for it and who authored the decision was predictable. The amendment cited as justifying it was predictable. Even the rulings used as precedent was predictable.

 

[Sunni Man]

Sodomite pretend marriage in now the law of the land.

 

[Little-Acorn]

I see where the Supreme Court has now ruled that same-sex "marriage" is now a "right".

Just one problem: Marriage is a union between man and woman. And has been since marriage was first created. No society or religion has ever defined it as a union between two men, or two women, in the history of mankind.

No problem with same sex couples getting together. Call it a civil union or whatever. But it's not, and can't be, a marriage.

Calling a tail a leg does not make the name fit.

And if the Supremes issue a command that a tail will now be called a leg, and that creatures with tails can now walk on it like a leg, will that make it so they can?

Three replies so far, none of which can refute the OP.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Is it? Could it be? A Conservative showing the reason why conservative thinking is old and outdated.

Watch carefully because the conservative likes to say the liberal is the one who doesnt accept new ideas. Any sec now

 

[Skylar]

Three replies so far, none of which can refute the OP.

Marriage has been a right for at least 2 generations.

You're a little late to the party.

 

[hazlnut]

Sodomite pretend marriage in now the law of the land.

 

[hortysir]

I see where the Supreme Court has now ruled that same-sex "marriage" is now a "right".

The problem is, marriage is a union between man and woman. And has been since marriage was first created.

No problem with same sex couples getting together. Call it a civil union or whatever. But it's not, and can't be, a marriage.

Calling a tail a leg does not make the name fit.

And if the Supremes issue a command that a tail will now be called a leg, and that creatures with tails can now walk on it like a leg, will that make it so they can?

Fuck you, Nut.

Just because someone doesnt feel the same away about something as you do doesn't make it a fucking Phobia.

Be an adult and k ow the definition of the words that you use

 

[Manonthestreet]

I see where the Supreme Court has now ruled that same-sex "marriage" is now a "right".

Just one problem: Marriage is a union between man and woman. And has been since marriage was first created. No society or religion has ever defined it as a union between two men, or two women, in the history of mankind.

No problem with same sex couples getting together. Call it a civil union or whatever. But it's not, and can't be, a marriage.

Calling a tail a leg does not make the name fit.

And if the Supremes issue a command that a tail will now be called a leg, and that creatures with tails can now walk on it like a leg, will that make it so they can?

Well it follows waterboy roberts thinking modeled after billie boys depends on what is means.....words are there to redefine to reach pc objective

 

[saveliberty]

This will allow liberals to focus on Second Amendment changes and marrying outside the species.

 

[Little-Acorn]

I see where the Supreme Court has now ruled that same-sex "marriage" is now a "right".

Just one problem: Marriage is a union between man and woman. And has been since marriage was first created. No society or religion has ever defined it as a union between two men, or two women, in the history of mankind.

No problem with same sex couples getting together. Call it a civil union or whatever. But it's not, and can't be, a marriage.

Calling a tail a leg does not make the name fit.

And if the Supremes issue a command that a tail will now be called a leg, and that creatures with tails can now walk on it like a leg, will that make it so they can?

 

[Little-Acorn]

Three replies so far, none of which can refute the OP.

Now ten replies. Still 0-for-everything on refuting, or even addressing, the OP.

Looks like the leftists-fanatic diversion and obfuscation machine is going full steam.

 

[saveliberty]

So this forces churches to marry people? The state is no longer keeping itself separate from religion?

 

[BlindBoo]

I see where the Supreme Court has now ruled that same-sex "marriage" is now a "right".

Just one problem: Marriage is a union between man and woman. And has been since marriage was first created. No society or religion has ever defined it as a union between two men, or two women, in the history of mankind.

No problem with same sex couples getting together. Call it a civil union or whatever. But it's not, and can't be, a marriage.

Calling a tail a leg does not make the name fit.

And if the Supremes issue a command that a tail will now be called a leg, and that creatures with tails can now walk on it like a leg, will that make it so they can?

So, it's all in a name for you?

Call it what you want. Not going to change the fact that they have the same rights now.

 

[Sunni Man]

If faggots aren't free to pack fudge.......are any of us really free? .....

 

[Skylar]

I see where the Supreme Court has now ruled that same-sex "marriage" is now a "right".

Check Loving v. Virginia. They already ddi that in 1967.

You're a little late to the party.

Just one problem: Marriage is a union between man and woman. And has been since marriage was first created. No society or religion has ever defined it as a union between two men, or two women, in the history of mankind.

Save the 20 other countries that already do. And now us. Marriage is our creation. It is what we say it is.

This decision was utterly predictable. Down the breakdown of the justices and the rulings they would cite as precedent. You didn't see it coming....because you don't know what you're talking about.

 

[pinqy]

I see where the Supreme Court has now ruled that same-sex "marriage" is now a "right".

Just one problem: Marriage is a union between man and woman. And has been since marriage was first created. No society or religion has ever defined it as a union between two men, or two women, in the history of mankind.

So why can't that change?

 

[guno]

Sodomite pretend marriage in now the law of the land.

Move to iran you will be more comfortable there

 

[hortysir]

I see where the Supreme Court has now ruled that same-sex "marriage" is now a "right".

Check Loving v. Virginia. They already ddi that in 1967.

You're a little late to the party.

Just one problem: Marriage is a union between man and woman. And has been since marriage was first created. No society or religion has ever defined it as a union between two men, or two women, in the history of mankind.

Save the 20 other countries that already do. And now us. Marriage is our creation. It is what we say it is.

This decision was utterly predictable. Down the breakdown of the justices and the rulings they would cite as precedent. You didn't see it coming....because you don't know what you're talking about.

20 other countries do it?

That's justification?

How many countries hang gays?

USA got to greatness by being different than others.
Now we walk away from our uniqueness and follow the herd