Little-Acorn
Gold Member
I see where the Supreme Court has now ruled that same-sex "marriage" is now a "right".
Just one problem: Marriage is a union between man and woman. And has been since marriage was first created. No society or religion has ever defined it as a union between two men, or two women, in the history of mankind.
No problem with same sex couples getting together. Call it a civil union or whatever. But it's not, and can't be, a marriage.
Calling a tail a leg does not make the name fit.
And if the Supremes issue a command that a tail will now be called a leg, and that creatures with tails can now walk on it like a leg, will that make it so they can?
Just one problem: Marriage is a union between man and woman. And has been since marriage was first created. No society or religion has ever defined it as a union between two men, or two women, in the history of mankind.
No problem with same sex couples getting together. Call it a civil union or whatever. But it's not, and can't be, a marriage.
Calling a tail a leg does not make the name fit.
And if the Supremes issue a command that a tail will now be called a leg, and that creatures with tails can now walk on it like a leg, will that make it so they can?
Last edited: