Ann Coulter gives Sandra Fluke and her supporters a reality check.

Jesus Christ......it's just birth control, it's been around for fifty years

Why the sudden GOP outrage that women actually want to have sex without getting pregnant?

The outrage is not with birth control, it's with government mandating that religious institutions supply it against their beliefs, which in itself is a constitutional violation. The left could not win in the abortion debate, so they had to find another way to make conservatives look bad, and birth control happened to be it. Bottom line is, getting birth control has never been hard to do in this country, you can go down to you local health care clinic and get it practically for free.
This topic is nothing more than smoke and mirrors, it is a way to get everybody thinking about something other than the democrat record for the last 4 years, and it's not working.

The problem with those religious institutions is when they receive 60% of their funding from the government. Accept government money....play by government rules

Insurance paying for birth control is a matter of public policy as is preventing unwanted pregnancies

That's right! You said it. When the government provides you with everything, you play by the government's rules. That's why I don't intend to have the government provide everything for me. That's what we've been saying all along! And as I said before, and I'll say it again -- give birth control to the liberal women ---- we don't want them procreating! comprendez vous?
 
Churches are exempt from the requirement.

Sort of - at least, Obama has given lip service, for the moment.

Your war with the 1st Amendment doesn't exist.

True, but Obama's war to end the 1st Amendment is all too real.

Obama seeks to end religious liberty by forcing Catholic institutions, schools and hospitals, to provide contraception and abortion. Little doubt Catholic hospitals will be coerced to offer abortion on demand under fascist care.

No he is not trying to force Catholic institutions to provide shit. Requiring insurance coverage to help pay for these type of needs does not end religious liberty. The Church is still free to preach the perils of eternal damnation for acting against its will.......sheesh.
 
Churches are exempt from the requirement.

Sort of - at least, Obama has given lip service, for the moment.

Your war with the 1st Amendment doesn't exist.

True, but Obama's war to end the 1st Amendment is all too real.

Obama seeks to end religious liberty by forcing Catholic institutions, schools and hospitals, to provide contraception and abortion. Little doubt Catholic hospitals will be coerced to offer abortion on demand under fascist care.

No he is not trying to force Catholic institutions to provide shit. Requiring insurance coverage to help pay for these type of needs does not end religious liberty. The Church is still free to preach the perils of eternal damnation for acting against its will.......sheesh.

Obama is clearly crossing a religious right.
 
Churches are exempt from the requirement.

Sort of - at least, Obama has given lip service, for the moment.

Your war with the 1st Amendment doesn't exist.

True, but Obama's war to end the 1st Amendment is all too real.

Obama seeks to end religious liberty by forcing Catholic institutions, schools and hospitals, to provide contraception and abortion. Little doubt Catholic hospitals will be coerced to offer abortion on demand under fascist care.

No he is not trying to force Catholic institutions to provide shit. Requiring insurance coverage to help pay for these type of needs does not end religious liberty. The Church is still free to preach the perils of eternal damnation for acting against its will.......sheesh.

Obama is clearly crossing a religious right. Our denomination has be told to protect our Catholic brothers.
 
No he is not trying to force Catholic institutions to provide shit.

Bullshit.

Fascist care mandates that birth control be supplied by all plans. Dear Leader said he would exempt churches, but then - that isn't what the unconstitutional law says, just a promise by our Ruler.
Requiring insurance coverage to help pay for these type of needs does not end religious liberty.

It violates the 1st Amendment. If we allow the sanctity of the 1st to be violated, then it is meaningless. Obama seeks to change the fundamental nature of our government and has expressed his contempt for the constitution. This open assault on the bill of rights is no surprise, but must not be allowed to succeed.

The Church is still free to preach the perils of eternal damnation for acting against its will.......sheesh.

Will you grant them zones within their churches where they are allowed to speak words not approved of by our Ruler?

How progressive of you.
 
Yet we have leftists like Dick Lick arguing in favor of ignoring the constitution don't we?

No.

You might want to read previous posts in the thread by your pals that say otherwise. Saying no, doesn't make it so when it's in black and white on the interwebs.

You might want to read the definition of IRONY.

1: a pretense of ignorance and of willingness to learn from another assumed in order to make the other's false conceptions conspicuous by adroit questioning —called also Socratic irony

2a : the use of words to express something other than and especially the opposite of the literal meaning b : a usually humorous or sardonic literary style or form characterized by irony
 
No he is not trying to force Catholic institutions to provide shit.

Bullshit.

Fascist care mandates that birth control be supplied by all plans. Dear Leader said he would exempt churches, but then - that isn't what the unconstitutional law says, just a promise by our Ruler.
Requiring insurance coverage to help pay for these type of needs does not end religious liberty.

It violates the 1st Amendment. If we allow the sanctity of the 1st to be violated, then it is meaningless. Obama seeks to change the fundamental nature of our government and has expressed his contempt for the constitution. This open assault on the bill of rights is no surprise, but must not be allowed to succeed.

The Church is still free to preach the perils of eternal damnation for acting against its will.......sheesh.

Will you grant them zones within their churches where they are allowed to speak words not approved of by our Ruler?

How progressive of you.

I don't believe it violate the 1st as the Catholic Church is still free to preach it's message, un-zoned.

Mischaracterizing this as an assault on the Bill of Rights is what is no suprise, as that is all the right has in it's favor, mischaracterizations. That behavior is in everything they say and do.
 
I don't believe it violate the 1st as the Catholic Church is still free to preach it's message, un-zoned.

Yet they are NOT allowed to practice their faith in schools and hospitals they founded and run.

Congress created law prohibiting the free exercise, at behest of our ruler.

Mischaracterizing this as an assault on the Bill of Rights is what is no suprise,

The attempt to revoke the 1st Amendment cannot be characterized as anything but an assault on the bill of rights.

as that is all the right has in it's favor, mischaracterizations. That behavior is in everything they say and do.

Obama's war on the 1st Amendment will not succeed. Too many have died defending civil liberties to allow you to end them without resistance.
 
No he is not trying to force Catholic institutions to provide shit.

Bullshit.

Fascist care mandates that birth control be supplied by all plans. Dear Leader said he would exempt churches, but then - that isn't what the unconstitutional law says, just a promise by our Ruler.


It violates the 1st Amendment. If we allow the sanctity of the 1st to be violated, then it is meaningless. Obama seeks to change the fundamental nature of our government and has expressed his contempt for the constitution. This open assault on the bill of rights is no surprise, but must not be allowed to succeed.

The Church is still free to preach the perils of eternal damnation for acting against its will.......sheesh.

Will you grant them zones within their churches where they are allowed to speak words not approved of by our Ruler?

How progressive of you.

I don't believe it violate the 1st as the Catholic Church is still free to preach it's message, un-zoned.

Mischaracterizing this as an assault on the Bill of Rights is what is no suprise, as that is all the right has in it's favor, mischaracterizations. That behavior is in everything they say and do.

The mischaracterization going on is the canard that conservatives are against birth control and figthing a war against women. It's all about Obama's unconstitutional overreaching.
 
I don't believe it violate the 1st as the Catholic Church is still free to preach it's message, un-zoned.

Yet they are NOT allowed to practice their faith in schools and hospitals they founded and run.

Congress created law prohibiting the free exercise, at behest of our ruler.

Mischaracterizing this as an assault on the Bill of Rights is what is no suprise,

The attempt to revoke the 1st Amendment cannot be characterized as anything but an assault on the bill of rights.

as that is all the right has in it's favor, mischaracterizations. That behavior is in everything they say and do.

Obama's war on the 1st Amendment will not succeed. Too many have died defending civil liberties to allow you to end them without resistance.

Myans and Aztex are not allow to have religious human sacrifices. Rastifarians cannot use their most sacred herb, and now Catholics can't force theri religious doctrine on employees at their schools or hospitals.

There is no war on the 1st amendment.
 
No he is not trying to force Catholic institutions to provide shit.

Bullshit.

Fascist care mandates that birth control be supplied by all plans. Dear Leader said he would exempt churches, but then - that isn't what the unconstitutional law says, just a promise by our Ruler.


It violates the 1st Amendment. If we allow the sanctity of the 1st to be violated, then it is meaningless. Obama seeks to change the fundamental nature of our government and has expressed his contempt for the constitution. This open assault on the bill of rights is no surprise, but must not be allowed to succeed.

The Church is still free to preach the perils of eternal damnation for acting against its will.......sheesh.

Will you grant them zones within their churches where they are allowed to speak words not approved of by our Ruler?

How progressive of you.

I don't believe it violate the 1st as the Catholic Church is still free to preach it's message, un-zoned.

Mischaracterizing this as an assault on the Bill of Rights is what is no suprise, as that is all the right has in it's favor, mischaracterizations. That behavior is in everything they say and do.

Gotta love it. "We're not violating your rights just because we're making you do things you disagree with; we're still generously allowing you to SAY whatever you want." Hey, dumbass, why don't you force people to perform abortions and tell them how their rights aren't violated because they still get to SAY that abortion is wrong and evil?

It would help a lot if stupid, fascistic pieces of shit like you would bother to READ the First Amendment before making your braindead pronouncements on what does and doesn't violate it. Sadly, that still won't make you any less of a moron in general.
 
Gotta love it. "We're not violating your rights just because we're making you do things you disagree with; we're still generously allowing you to SAY whatever you want." Hey, dumbass, why don't you force people to perform abortions and tell them how their rights aren't violated because they still get to SAY that abortion is wrong and evil?

They'll force Catholic hospitals to perform abortions, there is no question about that - I doubt Boo will even deny it.

Boo will defend it saying that no particular doctor is forced to perform abortions, just that the hospital must have an abortionist on staff. AND that they aren't required to perform abortions in the church building, so no rights are violated.

It would help a lot if stupid, fascistic pieces of shit like you would bother to READ the First Amendment before making your braindead pronouncements on what does and doesn't violate it. Sadly, that still won't make you any less of a moron in general.

I thing Boo knows full well what he's fighting to end.
 
Bullshit.

Fascist care mandates that birth control be supplied by all plans. Dear Leader said he would exempt churches, but then - that isn't what the unconstitutional law says, just a promise by our Ruler.


It violates the 1st Amendment. If we allow the sanctity of the 1st to be violated, then it is meaningless. Obama seeks to change the fundamental nature of our government and has expressed his contempt for the constitution. This open assault on the bill of rights is no surprise, but must not be allowed to succeed.



Will you grant them zones within their churches where they are allowed to speak words not approved of by our Ruler?

How progressive of you.

I don't believe it violate the 1st as the Catholic Church is still free to preach it's message, un-zoned.

Mischaracterizing this as an assault on the Bill of Rights is what is no suprise, as that is all the right has in it's favor, mischaracterizations. That behavior is in everything they say and do.

Gotta love it. "We're not violating your rights just because we're making you do things you disagree with; we're still generously allowing you to SAY whatever you want." Hey, dumbass, why don't you force people to perform abortions and tell them how their rights aren't violated because they still get to SAY that abortion is wrong and evil?

It would help a lot if stupid, fascistic pieces of shit like you would bother to READ the First Amendment before making your braindead pronouncements on what does and doesn't violate it. Sadly, that still won't make you any less of a moron in general.

Why would anyone want to force an abortion on anyone? That make no sense(like your argument).

Nice whine though!

:eusa_boohoo::eusa_boohoo:

Did you stomp your feet while typing that shit out?
 
Gotta love it. "We're not violating your rights just because we're making you do things you disagree with; we're still generously allowing you to SAY whatever you want." Hey, dumbass, why don't you force people to perform abortions and tell them how their rights aren't violated because they still get to SAY that abortion is wrong and evil?

They'll force Catholic hospitals to perform abortions, there is no question about that - I doubt Boo will even deny it.

Boo will defend it saying that no particular doctor is forced to perform abortions, just that the hospital must have an abortionist on staff. AND that they aren't required to perform abortions in the church building, so no rights are violated.

It would help a lot if stupid, fascistic pieces of shit like you would bother to READ the First Amendment before making your braindead pronouncements on what does and doesn't violate it. Sadly, that still won't make you any less of a moron in general.

I thing Boo knows full well what he's fighting to end.

Did you guys call Ms. Cleo again?

:clap2::clap2:
 
I can't for the life of me see why anybody should pay for somebody else's rubbers.

A very cheap preventative care solution. Much better than your insurance pool having to treat STDs, especially HIV.
"very cheap"....Therefore BUY THEM YOURSELF.

People who have to rely on the gubmint to wipe their asses for them will never willingly purchase their own rubbers. That's the gubmint's job. They haven't a clue how the gubmint pays for them and they don't care as long as they get "free" stuff.
 
I don't believe it violate the 1st as the Catholic Church is still free to preach it's message, un-zoned.

Yet they are NOT allowed to practice their faith in schools and hospitals they founded and run.

Congress created law prohibiting the free exercise, at behest of our ruler.



The attempt to revoke the 1st Amendment cannot be characterized as anything but an assault on the bill of rights.

as that is all the right has in it's favor, mischaracterizations. That behavior is in everything they say and do.

Obama's war on the 1st Amendment will not succeed. Too many have died defending civil liberties to allow you to end them without resistance.

Myans and Aztex are not allow to have religious human sacrifices. Rastifarians cannot use their most sacred herb, and now Catholics can't force theri religious doctrine on employees at their schools or hospitals.

There is no war on the 1st amendment.
Boo Boo...I am calling bullshit on your post because you make a claim yet provide no proof as to it's veracity.
BTW,....Those people are called AZTECS....Dummy.
And yes, Religious institutions STILL have the First Amendment right to operate as they see fit according to their religious doctrine.
You appear to believe this battle has been won by the socialists in the Obama admin. Forget it. Christianity and Christians have had it up to their eyeballs with the Left's attacks.
You people are over.
 
No hate larger than calling another human being unwanted.

What kind of sick bastard EVER thinks of a baby as "unwanted"? "Unplanned", maybe, but "unwanted"?

Guess you've never heard then of the gals who have babies and then dump them in the dumpster? If we had given these women free BCPs, they wouldn't have gotten pregnant in the first place. What about the boyfriend/father/husband who kills a newborn? Babies ARE unwanted sometimes, sad but true, ESPECIALLY if they were unplanned. I still say give these people all the birth control they need to keep from reproducing! If their employer or church forbids it, too bad. But I do think they can get this at Planned Parenthood, can't they. Don't they operate on a sliding fee scale? Preventing liberals from reproducing should be one of our top priorities. I have written my congressman about it as well.

You idiot, those women have access to free birth control already. THEY ALREADY HAVE IT AND YET THIS STILL HAPPENS, and with more frequency.

Hey weird tidbit I picked up today...something like 2/3 (or maybe 1/3, I can't remember which, I didn't have time to really absorb) of babies born in the Victorian era were illegitimate.

Apparently there was some sort of social upheaval...I think probably it was the industrial age and the women's movement in its infancy...women were having an awakening of sorts. This is also the era that spawned Sanger and others....

With great promiscuity goes great birthing, I suppose...
 
I don't believe it violate the 1st as the Catholic Church is still free to preach it's message, un-zoned.

Mischaracterizing this as an assault on the Bill of Rights is what is no suprise, as that is all the right has in it's favor, mischaracterizations. That behavior is in everything they say and do.

Gotta love it. "We're not violating your rights just because we're making you do things you disagree with; we're still generously allowing you to SAY whatever you want." Hey, dumbass, why don't you force people to perform abortions and tell them how their rights aren't violated because they still get to SAY that abortion is wrong and evil?

It would help a lot if stupid, fascistic pieces of shit like you would bother to READ the First Amendment before making your braindead pronouncements on what does and doesn't violate it. Sadly, that still won't make you any less of a moron in general.

Why would anyone want to force an abortion on anyone? That make no sense(like your argument).

Nice whine though!

:eusa_boohoo::eusa_boohoo:

Did you stomp your feet while typing that shit out?

Ask China. They've already achieved their utopian society. It starts with controling healthcare and it ends with the gubmint telling you what you can and can't have whether you want it or not.

You really don't put much thought into things do you? No wonder they call you blind.
 

Forum List

Back
Top