CNN analyst: "I've never seen a witness who's lied to Congress, who's lied to court, who's lied to the IRS, who's lied to the Southern District ...

[Man With A Plan]

It amazes me that even at this point in the trial...when Bragg has totally failed to show a crime took place...that the liberal chorus here STILL thinks that Trump is guilty of something criminal!

Don't you people get it? There never was a crime. Bragg promised that he had one but that was a lie. This was always about lawfare! Tying Trump up in court four days a week when he should have been out campaigning and costing him millions in legal fees.

 

[Man With A Plan]

And this judge? He's a disgrace. This is a case that NEVER should have gotten this far! It would have been tossed by any impartial judge long ago! Daniels and Cohen are your star witnesses? Are you kidding? This trial is one of the most shameful episodes I've ever seen and it's so blatantly political that it's backfiring on Democrats. People see what you've done and they're disgusted by it!

 

[Smokin' OP]

Cohen went to prison for tax fraud...it had nothing to do with Trump. He got a reduced sentence because he agreed to testify against Trump.

Cohen got released for COVID.

Michael Cohen officially released from prison sentence​

The Hill
https://thehill.com › homenews › state-watch › 582654-...
Nov 22, 2021 — Cohen was released from prison in May 2020 due to COVID-19 concerns, and has served out most of the rest of his sentence in home confinement at ...

With someone as sleazy as Cohen?

That's why Trump kept him on the payroll for 10 years.

That means he cut a deal to lie about what Trump did in order to get a shorter sentence. A DA with integrity would have never cut a deal with a sleaze ball like Cohen but Alvin Bragg doesn't have integrity so we got this farce of a trial!

WTF?

The "Sentence" was already given.
WOW.

 

[JoeB131]

And this judge? He's a disgrace. This is a case that NEVER should have gotten this far! It would have been tossed by any impartial judge long ago! Daniels and Cohen are your star witnesses? Are you kidding? This trial is one of the most shameful episodes I've ever seen and it's so blatantly political that it's backfiring on Democrats. People see what you've done and they're disgusted by it!

Are they though?

Or after seeing Trump Dodgy Deal #481, are they just fatigued.

Hey, how about not nominating someone who fucks porn stars and then does dodgy deals to hide it?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

If the Biden Administration, including the DOJ, was coordinating with prosecutors from NY and GA in the trials against Trump, would that be a crime or just a bad look and damaging to the rule of law? I know you hate questions, but sometimes they are necessary.

And if you stole from Aldi today, that would be shoplifting.

You're not actually supporting the idea that any laws were bent or broken.

 

[DBA]

So, they should have chosen people who subscribe to "Truth' Social?

No, just not a compromised judge with conflicts and self professed Democrats.

Trump could have, but the State of NY had this case of falsifying business records going for years.

Then why didn't they prosecute him then? They waited until they thought th ey could pin a campaign violation on him? You do realize falsifying business records and a misdemeanor.

Based on witness testimony.
They corroborated it.

Trump has nothing to counter

The star witnesses is a perjurer.

Trump has a history well prior to his campaign of trying to protect his image and family, even with Stormy. That is his counter and it is quite solid.

 

[DBA]

The falsification of records has already been proven. Trump did himself in when he admitted he didn't do emails and used his body-guard as a contact to avoid paper trails. People on the up and up WANT paper trails.

So all he has left is that he was trying to spare Malaria's feelings, like the Slovenia Whore doesn't know what she signed up for.

They may have him on a misdemeanor. That's it.

 

[SavannahMann]

Did you not grasp the concept that what Trump "did" isn't illegal? Paying for an NDA is legal. So your half dozen witnesses have proven that Trump's lawyer paid an NDA? You have cancelled checks? You have audio recordings? That's GREAT!!! What's the crime?

If Trump had paid from personal funds then there wouldn’t be a crime. But he paid from corporate funds, and listed it as a business expense.

 

[Man With A Plan]

Are they though?

Or after seeing Trump Dodgy Deal #481, are they just fatigued.

Hey, how about not nominating someone who fucks porn stars and then does dodgy deals to hide it?

So you've given up on calling an NDA a crime...and will now call it a "dodgy deal"? Gee, Joey...is that a legal term?

How about Joe Biden and you liberals stop using the courts to kneecap your political opposition like you're some sleazy banana republic where the rule of law means nothing?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So you've given up on calling an NDA a crime...and will now call it a "dodgy deal"? Gee, Joey...is that a legal term?

How about Joe Biden and you liberals stop using the courts to kneecap your political opposition like you're some sleazy banana republic where the rule of law means nothing?

How about you put aside your vapid babbling and attempt an actual argument as to why Trump is not guilty?

That would be great.

 

[Man With A Plan]

If Trump had paid from personal funds then there wouldn’t be a crime. But he paid from corporate funds, and listed it as a business expense.

That isn't a crime. Trump paid his attorney. The attorney took it upon himself to pay the NDA trying to ingratiate himself with Trump. You don't have a crime. This joke of a trial should have never been brought in the first place and it should have been tossed by any competent judge as soon as it became obvious that Bragg couldn't prove a crime had taken place!

 

[Man With A Plan]

How about you put aside your vapid babbling and attempt an actual argument as to why Trump is not guilty?

That would be great.

Because he didn't break the law? An NDA isn't illegal.

 

[BackAgain]

No credible public prosecutor would have called a serial liar, convicted perjurer, conman and thief as a witness under any circumstances.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

That isn't a crime.

Wrong.

Trump reimbursed his attorney for a payoff and called it legal expenses, on his business filings. He filed it as billable legal hours and retainer fees. These were lies.

That is indeed a crime.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Because he didn't break the law?

That's not an argument. Is that really the best you can do?

An NDA isn't illegal.

Irrelevant. He is not charged with entering into an NDA.

 

[BackAgain]

Frankly, although it obviously won’t ever happen, Bragg and the lead persecutor in NY (on loan and on assignment from the corrupt Brandon DOJ) should have their law license ls yanked.

 

[Man With A Plan]

Wrong.

Trump reimbursed his attorney for a payoff and called it legal expenses, on his business filings. He filed it as billable legal hours and retainer fees. These were lies.

That is indeed a crime.

It was listed as a "legal expense". The money was paid by Trump to Michael Cohen who was one of his lawyers. Where is the crime?

 

[SavannahMann]

That isn't a crime. Trump paid his attorney. The attorney took it upon himself to pay the NDA trying to ingratiate himself with Trump. You don't have a crime. This joke of a trial should have never been brought in the first place and it should have been tossed by any competent judge as soon as it became obvious that Bragg couldn't prove a crime had taken place!

You should have read about the testimony, including the audio files, before pushing that theory.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

t was listed as a "legal expense"

And it was not. It was a reimbursement for a payoff. This is well demonstrated by the evidence.

I really can't make you understand basic facts of the topic.

 

[BackAgain]

Wrong.

Trump reimbursed his attorney for a payoff and called it legal expenses, on his business filings. He filed it as billable legal hours and retainer fees. These were lies.

That is indeed a crime.

No. Again, you’re wrong. The sole witness to the claim that Trump was reimbursing Cohen is Cohen, himself, a convicted perjurer, serial liar and now a confessed thief.

Plus, of course, it would have been legal for Trump to reimburse Cohen even if he knew he was doing so.