Ann Coulter gives Sandra Fluke and her supporters a reality check.

[kwc57]

Why would anyone want to force an abortion on anyone? That make no sense(like your argument).

Nice whine though!



Did you stomp your feet while typing that shit out?

Ask China. They've already achieved their utopian society. It starts with controling healthcare and it ends with the gubmint telling you what you can and can't have whether you want it or not.

You really don't put much thought into things do you? No wonder they call you blind.

Wow such an intelligent response. China? You guys are projecting again. Liberals are not Chinese Communist.

Um, the dog was went blind and was totally deaf.

You are such a good sheep. Keep "progessing" down the socialist path and you'll get there eventually.

 

[BlindBoo]

Ask China. They've already achieved their utopian society. It starts with controling healthcare and it ends with the gubmint telling you what you can and can't have whether you want it or not.

You really don't put much thought into things do you? No wonder they call you blind.

Wow such an intelligent response. China? You guys are projecting again. Liberals are not Chinese Communist.

Um, the dog was went blind and was totally deaf.

You are such a good sheep. Keep "progessing" down the socialist path and you'll get there eventually.

No, no she was an Australian Shepard. She was a great dog even with her disabilties...oh wait.... you were calling me a sheep for daring to disagree with you guys on the rabid right......nevermind!

 

[madasheck]

No...The PEOPLE spoke. The COURT overruled the people.

And this is good?

T - In the United States, there is something called the "Constitution".

When an initiative such as "Prop 8" is ruled to be "Unconstitutional" by official appointed Californian Supreme Court Justices, then it cannot be put to a vote, because it would potentially result in an "Unconstitutional" measure being passed.

So, you ask whether or not is it a good thing that the California Supreme Court prevented 'the people' from passing a measure that would be in direct violation of the US Constitution? Definitely.

Would you support an initiative in your home state that would ban a person's right to own a firearm, despite it being in direct violation with the Second Amendment, simply because "it's what the people wanted"?

If you said "no" to the underlined statement, then you must agree - to some extent - that there are just some things that are not proper for a state to hold a popular vote to.


.
.
.

It was passed idiot. The US Supreme Court is the final arbitor. Even Constitutional amendments can be reversed by the people fool.

Um, no they can't.

 

[Cecilie1200]

And it's "Mayans".

Honestly, if you expect to be taken seriously at least make an effort to correctly spell those words you have only heard on tv and never actually read about...

Nobody take you spelling naztis with an offhand insult seriously.

my-annes works for me.

You spelling naztis take messageboards a bit too seriously.

Actually, it would be illiterate dipshits like you, who can't even spell their insults correctly, who are not taken seriously except by other illiterate dipshits. How does it feel to know that the only people who consider you worth the effort of pissing on are respected only slightly more than your average insane, drunken street bum?

 

[The T]

No...The PEOPLE spoke. The COURT overruled the people.

And this is good?

T - In the United States, there is something called the "Constitution".

When an initiative such as "Prop 8" is ruled to be "Unconstitutional" by official appointed Californian Supreme Court Justices, then it cannot be put to a vote, because it would potentially result in an "Unconstitutional" measure being passed.

So, you ask whether or not is it a good thing that the California Supreme Court prevented 'the people' from passing a measure that would be in direct violation of the US Constitution? Definitely.

Would you support an initiative in your home state that would ban a person's right to own a firearm, despite it being in direct violation with the Second Amendment, simply because "it's what the people wanted"?

If you said "no" to the underlined statement, then you must agree - to some extent - that there are just some things that are not proper for a state to hold a popular vote to.


.
.
.

It was passed idiot. The US Supreme Court is the final arbitor. Even Constitutional amendments can be reversed by the people fool.

Yes they can...Kevin seems to think once something is written...it can't be retracted.

 

[Cecilie1200]

T - In the United States, there is something called the "Constitution".

When an initiative such as "Prop 8" is ruled to be "Unconstitutional" by official appointed Californian Supreme Court Justices, then it cannot be put to a vote, because it would potentially result in an "Unconstitutional" measure being passed.

So, you ask whether or not is it a good thing that the California Supreme Court prevented 'the people' from passing a measure that would be in direct violation of the US Constitution? Definitely.

Would you support an initiative in your home state that would ban a person's right to own a firearm, despite it being in direct violation with the Second Amendment, simply because "it's what the people wanted"?

If you said "no" to the underlined statement, then you must agree - to some extent - that there are just some things that are not proper for a state to hold a popular vote to.


.
.
.

It was passed idiot. The US Supreme Court is the final arbitor. Even Constitutional amendments can be reversed by the people fool.

Um, no they can't.

Um, yes, they can. It's called "repealing". Go look up Prohibition, Einstein.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Um, no they can't.

Damn, you mean prohibition was never repealed?

You voted for Obama, dinja?

 

[The T]

T - In the United States, there is something called the "Constitution".

When an initiative such as "Prop 8" is ruled to be "Unconstitutional" by official appointed Californian Supreme Court Justices, then it cannot be put to a vote, because it would potentially result in an "Unconstitutional" measure being passed.

So, you ask whether or not is it a good thing that the California Supreme Court prevented 'the people' from passing a measure that would be in direct violation of the US Constitution? Definitely.

Would you support an initiative in your home state that would ban a person's right to own a firearm, despite it being in direct violation with the Second Amendment, simply because "it's what the people wanted"?

If you said "no" to the underlined statement, then you must agree - to some extent - that there are just some things that are not proper for a state to hold a popular vote to.


.
.
.

It was passed idiot. The US Supreme Court is the final arbitor. Even Constitutional amendments can be reversed by the people fool.

Um, no they can't.

"I'll take what is the 21st Amendment for $1,000 Alex..."

 

[saveliberty]

T - In the United States, there is something called the "Constitution".

When an initiative such as "Prop 8" is ruled to be "Unconstitutional" by official appointed Californian Supreme Court Justices, then it cannot be put to a vote, because it would potentially result in an "Unconstitutional" measure being passed.

So, you ask whether or not is it a good thing that the California Supreme Court prevented 'the people' from passing a measure that would be in direct violation of the US Constitution? Definitely.

Would you support an initiative in your home state that would ban a person's right to own a firearm, despite it being in direct violation with the Second Amendment, simply because "it's what the people wanted"?

If you said "no" to the underlined statement, then you must agree - to some extent - that there are just some things that are not proper for a state to hold a popular vote to.


.
.
.

It was passed idiot. The US Supreme Court is the final arbitor. Even Constitutional amendments can be reversed by the people fool.

Um, no they can't.

I'm sorry I don't draw pictures to explain things and I often expect you to have a working knowledge of the subject you comment on. Prohibition approved as a Constitutional amendment, then later repealed. Feel better now?