Americans have the right to know if a supreme court justice is dying

Ruth Bader Ginsburg completes 3 weeks of radiation treatment for tumor on pancreas at NYC's Memorial Sloan Kettering Center

Why is it that we hear that Goonsburg has pancreatic cancer after she has chemotherapy. Pancreatic cancer is fatal always, this woman should retire and enjoy the end of her life instead of continuing to kill babies.

This is sadder than can be expressed, the woman is actually retarded
The retarded one is you. Ginsburg's history of fighting cancer has been well known and reported. Anyone with a brain knows various cancer often returns. What you are demanding are weekly medical updates on her health and medical treatments. I guess if you are on a death watch and praying for someone to die that kind of information is important to you.
Prognosis


While pancreatic cancer survival rates have been improving from decade to decade, the disease is still considered largely incurable.

Survival Rates
According to the American Cancer Society, for all stages of pancreatic cancer combined, the one-year relative survival rate is 20%, and the five-year rate is 7%. These low survival rates are attributable to the fact that fewer than 20% of patients’ tumors are confined to the pancreas at the time of diagnosis; in most cases, the malignancy has already progressed to the point where surgical removal is impossible.

In those cases where resection can be performed, the average survival rate is 23 to 36 months. The overall five-year survival rate is about 10%, although this can rise as high as 20% to 35% if the tumor is removed completely and when cancer has not spread to lymph nodes
What you neglect to notice is that in her case it was very early through routine testing, both times. To say she is dying when the doctors say there is no evidence of disease remaining is wishful on the part of rightists.
 
A judge unsealed Nancy Pelosi's alcohol treatment records.

Get over it kid

Federal Judge Unseals Nancy Pelosi’s Alcoholic Treatment Records


While technically a violation of about 11 laws, Judge Paralopolos stands by his ruling, fully expecting it to be overturned
But he told us clearly that there are alcoholic files on Pelosi to be released even if they are not.

This is a great judge
Why?

Medical records are intensely private. No one has a right to them without permission.

It is unbelievable you would want such a precedent set for purely partisan reasons. This judge fully expects it to be overturned but did it anyway, not based on law but politics. He should be removed from the bench.
What if Trump was seeing a shrink because he believed he was the reincarnation of Jesus...…………….

You wouldn't care then.

The fact is that Pelosi has a $100,000.00 or more bill just for alcohol on government flights.

Which means laws are being made by an addict

Your perfect World right

Again this is a great judge

There is a system in place if there is concern that the President is incompetent. It does not require the release of his private medical history to the public.

The fact is you make a lot ASSumptions about Pelosi based on very little. If she sought treatment for alcoholism good on her. She got treatment.

Your desired medical invasion for purely political reasons would make it likely people would not seek treatment for diseases lest it be publicized.

There is still a lot of stigma.

Pelosi was so drunk that she thought Bush was the President. The only way she wasn't drunk is if she is senile.

You choose

 
Ruth Bader Ginsburg completes 3 weeks of radiation treatment for tumor on pancreas at NYC's Memorial Sloan Kettering Center

Why is it that we hear that Goonsburg has pancreatic cancer after she has chemotherapy. Pancreatic cancer is fatal always, this woman should retire and enjoy the end of her life instead of continuing to kill babies.

This is sadder than can be expressed, the woman is actually retarded
The retarded one is you. Ginsburg's history of fighting cancer has been well known and reported. Anyone with a brain knows various cancer often returns. What you are demanding are weekly medical updates on her health and medical treatments. I guess if you are on a death watch and praying for someone to die that kind of information is important to you.
Prognosis


While pancreatic cancer survival rates have been improving from decade to decade, the disease is still considered largely incurable.

Survival Rates
According to the American Cancer Society, for all stages of pancreatic cancer combined, the one-year relative survival rate is 20%, and the five-year rate is 7%. These low survival rates are attributable to the fact that fewer than 20% of patients’ tumors are confined to the pancreas at the time of diagnosis; in most cases, the malignancy has already progressed to the point where surgical removal is impossible.

In those cases where resection can be performed, the average survival rate is 23 to 36 months. The overall five-year survival rate is about 10%, although this can rise as high as 20% to 35% if the tumor is removed completely and when cancer has not spread to lymph nodes
What you neglect to notice is that in her case it was very early through routine testing, both times. To say she is dying when the doctors say there is no evidence of disease remaining is wishful on the part of rightists.
The doctors told my Mother the same thing, they told my Mother that there was no cancer in her kidney fluids. It was everywhere else, you are clueless seriously. First you say it's confidential, and then you quote what the doctors said...………………………..

You need a lobotomy
 
While technically a violation of about 11 laws, Judge Paralopolos stands by his ruling, fully expecting it to be overturned
But he told us clearly that there are alcoholic files on Pelosi to be released even if they are not.

This is a great judge
Why?

Medical records are intensely private. No one has a right to them without permission.

It is unbelievable you would want such a precedent set for purely partisan reasons. This judge fully expects it to be overturned but did it anyway, not based on law but politics. He should be removed from the bench.
What if Trump was seeing a shrink because he believed he was the reincarnation of Jesus...…………….

You wouldn't care then.

The fact is that Pelosi has a $100,000.00 or more bill just for alcohol on government flights.

Which means laws are being made by an addict

Your perfect World right

Again this is a great judge

There is a system in place if there is concern that the President is incompetent. It does not require the release of his private medical history to the public.

The fact is you make a lot ASSumptions about Pelosi based on very little. If she sought treatment for alcoholism good on her. She got treatment.

Your desired medical invasion for purely political reasons would make it likely people would not seek treatment for diseases lest it be publicized.

There is still a lot of stigma.

Pelosi was so drunk that she thought Bush was the President. The only way she wasn't drunk is if she is senile.

You choose


Trump acts like that every day. What is his excuse. Why aren’t you demanding his records?
 
But he told us clearly that there are alcoholic files on Pelosi to be released even if they are not.

This is a great judge
Why?

Medical records are intensely private. No one has a right to them without permission.

It is unbelievable you would want such a precedent set for purely partisan reasons. This judge fully expects it to be overturned but did it anyway, not based on law but politics. He should be removed from the bench.
What if Trump was seeing a shrink because he believed he was the reincarnation of Jesus...…………….

You wouldn't care then.

The fact is that Pelosi has a $100,000.00 or more bill just for alcohol on government flights.

Which means laws are being made by an addict

Your perfect World right

Again this is a great judge

There is a system in place if there is concern that the President is incompetent. It does not require the release of his private medical history to the public.

The fact is you make a lot ASSumptions about Pelosi based on very little. If she sought treatment for alcoholism good on her. She got treatment.

Your desired medical invasion for purely political reasons would make it likely people would not seek treatment for diseases lest it be publicized.

There is still a lot of stigma.

Pelosi was so drunk that she thought Bush was the President. The only way she wasn't drunk is if she is senile.

You choose


Trump acts like that every day. What is his excuse. Why aren’t you demanding his records?


I am on record as voting for Trump.

Again how is it that Goonies doctors told us she has no Pancreatic cancer?

Answer, she has liver cancer, or a brain tumor that puts her to sleep during the one speech she attends yearly
 
Ruth Bader Ginsburg completes 3 weeks of radiation treatment for tumor on pancreas at NYC's Memorial Sloan Kettering Center

Why is it that we hear that Goonsburg has pancreatic cancer after she has chemotherapy. Pancreatic cancer is fatal always, this woman should retire and enjoy the end of her life instead of continuing to kill babies.

This is sadder than can be expressed, the woman is actually retarded
The retarded one is you. Ginsburg's history of fighting cancer has been well known and reported. Anyone with a brain knows various cancer often returns. What you are demanding are weekly medical updates on her health and medical treatments. I guess if you are on a death watch and praying for someone to die that kind of information is important to you.
Prognosis


While pancreatic cancer survival rates have been improving from decade to decade, the disease is still considered largely incurable.

Survival Rates
According to the American Cancer Society, for all stages of pancreatic cancer combined, the one-year relative survival rate is 20%, and the five-year rate is 7%. These low survival rates are attributable to the fact that fewer than 20% of patients’ tumors are confined to the pancreas at the time of diagnosis; in most cases, the malignancy has already progressed to the point where surgical removal is impossible.

In those cases where resection can be performed, the average survival rate is 23 to 36 months. The overall five-year survival rate is about 10%, although this can rise as high as 20% to 35% if the tumor is removed completely and when cancer has not spread to lymph nodes
What you neglect to notice is that in her case it was very early through routine testing, both times. To say she is dying when the doctors say there is no evidence of disease remaining is wishful on the part of rightists.
The doctors told my Mother the same thing, they told my Mother that there was no cancer in her kidney fluids. It was everywhere else, you are clueless seriously. First you say it's confidential, and then you quote what the doctors said...………………………..

You need a lobotomy
I would recommend the same for but you need a functioning brain to begin with.

What is in the news is what is publically and voluntarily released. Every person’s cancer is different. You seem to lack the ability to comprehend that as well as privacy laws regarding medical records in your zeal to use it for political purposes.

You remind me of a deathwatch beetle.
 
Ruth Bader Ginsburg completes 3 weeks of radiation treatment for tumor on pancreas at NYC's Memorial Sloan Kettering Center

Why is it that we hear that Goonsburg has pancreatic cancer after she has chemotherapy. Pancreatic cancer is fatal always, this woman should retire and enjoy the end of her life instead of continuing to kill babies.

This is sadder than can be expressed, the woman is actually retarded
No one has the right to another person's health information.
Even if your surgeon is an alcoholic with Parkinson's?

Play on kiddy
Do we have a right to yours?
Not taking any medications for any situation, so yea it would have no words.
That is NOT what she asked you. Simply because your medical file is thin, does not give anyone the right to have access to it with the exception of you and your authorized doctor.

It is telling to anyone watching how you go out of your way to avoid answering the question.

H.I.P.A.A.

Look it up, read it, learn. It is what grown, mature people do.
 
Why?

Medical records are intensely private. No one has a right to them without permission.

It is unbelievable you would want such a precedent set for purely partisan reasons. This judge fully expects it to be overturned but did it anyway, not based on law but politics. He should be removed from the bench.
What if Trump was seeing a shrink because he believed he was the reincarnation of Jesus...…………….

You wouldn't care then.

The fact is that Pelosi has a $100,000.00 or more bill just for alcohol on government flights.

Which means laws are being made by an addict

Your perfect World right

Again this is a great judge

There is a system in place if there is concern that the President is incompetent. It does not require the release of his private medical history to the public.

The fact is you make a lot ASSumptions about Pelosi based on very little. If she sought treatment for alcoholism good on her. She got treatment.

Your desired medical invasion for purely political reasons would make it likely people would not seek treatment for diseases lest it be publicized.

There is still a lot of stigma.

Pelosi was so drunk that she thought Bush was the President. The only way she wasn't drunk is if she is senile.

You choose


Trump acts like that every day. What is his excuse. Why aren’t you demanding his records?


I am on record as voting for Trump.

Again how is it that Goonies doctors told us she has no Pancreatic cancer?

Answer, she has liver cancer, or a brain tumor that puts her to sleep during the one speech she attends yearly

You get all this from your Ouija board?
 
Ruth Bader Ginsburg completes 3 weeks of radiation treatment for tumor on pancreas at NYC's Memorial Sloan Kettering Center

Why is it that we hear that Goonsburg has pancreatic cancer after she has chemotherapy. Pancreatic cancer is fatal always, this woman should retire and enjoy the end of her life instead of continuing to kill babies.

This is sadder than can be expressed, the woman is actually retarded
The retarded one is you. Ginsburg's history of fighting cancer has been well known and reported. Anyone with a brain knows various cancer often returns. What you are demanding are weekly medical updates on her health and medical treatments. I guess if you are on a death watch and praying for someone to die that kind of information is important to you.
Prognosis


While pancreatic cancer survival rates have been improving from decade to decade, the disease is still considered largely incurable.

Survival Rates
According to the American Cancer Society, for all stages of pancreatic cancer combined, the one-year relative survival rate is 20%, and the five-year rate is 7%. These low survival rates are attributable to the fact that fewer than 20% of patients’ tumors are confined to the pancreas at the time of diagnosis; in most cases, the malignancy has already progressed to the point where surgical removal is impossible.

In those cases where resection can be performed, the average survival rate is 23 to 36 months. The overall five-year survival rate is about 10%, although this can rise as high as 20% to 35% if the tumor is removed completely and when cancer has not spread to lymph nodes
What you neglect to notice is that in her case it was very early through routine testing, both times. To say she is dying when the doctors say there is no evidence of disease remaining is wishful on the part of rightists.
The doctors told my Mother the same thing, they told my Mother that there was no cancer in her kidney fluids. It was everywhere else, you are clueless seriously. First you say it's confidential, and then you quote what the doctors said...………………………..

You need a lobotomy
I would recommend the same for but you need a functioning brain to begin with.

What is in the news is what is publically and voluntarily released. Every person’s cancer is different. You seem to lack the ability to comprehend that as well as privacy laws regarding medical records in your zeal to use it for political purposes.

You remind me of a deathwatch beetle.

Again there is no reason to believe what the doctors say, they could lie to protect her privacy, or she could have been treated for a brain tumor. We can not know and this is wrong
 
The retarded one is you. Ginsburg's history of fighting cancer has been well known and reported. Anyone with a brain knows various cancer often returns. What you are demanding are weekly medical updates on her health and medical treatments. I guess if you are on a death watch and praying for someone to die that kind of information is important to you.
Prognosis


While pancreatic cancer survival rates have been improving from decade to decade, the disease is still considered largely incurable.

Survival Rates
According to the American Cancer Society, for all stages of pancreatic cancer combined, the one-year relative survival rate is 20%, and the five-year rate is 7%. These low survival rates are attributable to the fact that fewer than 20% of patients’ tumors are confined to the pancreas at the time of diagnosis; in most cases, the malignancy has already progressed to the point where surgical removal is impossible.

In those cases where resection can be performed, the average survival rate is 23 to 36 months. The overall five-year survival rate is about 10%, although this can rise as high as 20% to 35% if the tumor is removed completely and when cancer has not spread to lymph nodes
What you neglect to notice is that in her case it was very early through routine testing, both times. To say she is dying when the doctors say there is no evidence of disease remaining is wishful on the part of rightists.
The doctors told my Mother the same thing, they told my Mother that there was no cancer in her kidney fluids. It was everywhere else, you are clueless seriously. First you say it's confidential, and then you quote what the doctors said...………………………..

You need a lobotomy
I would recommend the same for but you need a functioning brain to begin with.

What is in the news is what is publically and voluntarily released. Every person’s cancer is different. You seem to lack the ability to comprehend that as well as privacy laws regarding medical records in your zeal to use it for political purposes.

You remind me of a deathwatch beetle.

Again there is no reason to believe what the doctors say, they could lie to protect her privacy, or she could have been treated for a brain tumor. We can not know and this is wrong
Too bad. Still doesn’t give you the right to anyone’s medical records.
 
What if Trump was seeing a shrink because he believed he was the reincarnation of Jesus...…………….

You wouldn't care then.

The fact is that Pelosi has a $100,000.00 or more bill just for alcohol on government flights.

Which means laws are being made by an addict

Your perfect World right

Again this is a great judge

There is a system in place if there is concern that the President is incompetent. It does not require the release of his private medical history to the public.

The fact is you make a lot ASSumptions about Pelosi based on very little. If she sought treatment for alcoholism good on her. She got treatment.

Your desired medical invasion for purely political reasons would make it likely people would not seek treatment for diseases lest it be publicized.

There is still a lot of stigma.

Pelosi was so drunk that she thought Bush was the President. The only way she wasn't drunk is if she is senile.

You choose


Trump acts like that every day. What is his excuse. Why aren’t you demanding his records?


I am on record as voting for Trump.

Again how is it that Goonies doctors told us she has no Pancreatic cancer?

Answer, she has liver cancer, or a brain tumor that puts her to sleep during the one speech she attends yearly

You get all this from your Ouija board?


Nope, I saw doctors do exactly this to improve my Mothers outlook near the end of her life.
 
Ruth Bader Ginsburg completes 3 weeks of radiation treatment for tumor on pancreas at NYC's Memorial Sloan Kettering Center

Why is it that we hear that Goonsburg has pancreatic cancer after she has chemotherapy. Pancreatic cancer is fatal always, this woman should retire and enjoy the end of her life instead of continuing to kill babies.

This is sadder than can be expressed, the woman is actually retarded
No one has the right to another person's health information.
Even if your surgeon is an alcoholic with Parkinson's?

Play on kiddy
Do we have a right to yours?
Not taking any medications for any situation, so yea it would have no words.
That is NOT what she asked you. Simply because your medical file is thin, does not give anyone the right to have access to it with the exception of you and your authorized doctor.

It is telling to anyone watching how you go out of your way to avoid answering the question.

H.I.P.A.A.

Look it up, read it, learn. It is what grown, mature people do.
I know exactly what hippa is as I have employees under me. None of them are interpreting laws however, all are healthier than Goonie.

What you miss is that this woman is going to die, she is old enough to deserve a vacation no...…………..

You demand that she slave until her death.

That's on you shit, not me
 
No one has the right to another person's health information.
Even if your surgeon is an alcoholic with Parkinson's?

Play on kiddy
Do we have a right to yours?
Not taking any medications for any situation, so yea it would have no words.
That is NOT what she asked you. Simply because your medical file is thin, does not give anyone the right to have access to it with the exception of you and your authorized doctor.

It is telling to anyone watching how you go out of your way to avoid answering the question.

H.I.P.A.A.

Look it up, read it, learn. It is what grown, mature people do.
I know exactly what hippa is as I have employees under me. None of them are interpreting laws however, all are healthier than Goonie.

What you miss is that this woman is going to die, she is old enough to deserve a vacation no...…………..

You demand that she slave until her death.

That's on you shit, not me
So, you're a liar too?

Where have I demanded she works to death or even be forced to keep her job. She is free to retire whenever she wishes, or die sitting the bench if that is her desire as well.

The discussion is her health and your demand to know all about; violating HER right to privacy. IF you actually have read the HIPAA laws. then you know I am right.

The reason for these laws, because the Constitution is forbidden from violating these rights, is to prevent political opponents or employers, from using your health against you as a means of employment. You are proving that the choice to pass these laws was a good one. When people like you want to use someone's health against them for political or personal gain, that shit is on them. Apparently, it is acceptable to you.

We don't have a political difference in this instance. We have a moral one and YOU are on the wrong side of it.

I'll not be wasting any more time on you.

/thread
 
Even if your surgeon is an alcoholic with Parkinson's?

Play on kiddy
Do we have a right to yours?
Not taking any medications for any situation, so yea it would have no words.
That is NOT what she asked you. Simply because your medical file is thin, does not give anyone the right to have access to it with the exception of you and your authorized doctor.

It is telling to anyone watching how you go out of your way to avoid answering the question.

H.I.P.A.A.

Look it up, read it, learn. It is what grown, mature people do.
I know exactly what hippa is as I have employees under me. None of them are interpreting laws however, all are healthier than Goonie.

What you miss is that this woman is going to die, she is old enough to deserve a vacation no...…………..

You demand that she slave until her death.

That's on you shit, not me
So, you're a liar too?

Where have I demanded she works to death or even be forced to keep her job. She is free to retire whenever she wishes, or die sitting the bench if that is her desire as well.

The discussion is her health and your demand to know all about; violating HER right to privacy. IF you actually have read the HIPAA laws. then you know I am right.

The reason for these laws, because the Constitution is forbidden from violating these rights, is to prevent political opponents or employers, from using your health against you as a means of employment. You are proving that the choice to pass these laws was a good one. When people like you want to use someone's health against them for political or personal gain, that shit is on them. Apparently, it is acceptable to you.

We don't have a political difference in this instance. We have a moral one and YOU are on the wrong side of it.

I'll not be wasting any more time on you.

/thread

And I believe that there are cruises she could go on gardens to watch the birds in and on an on. What she does is go to work, when she is not in the hospital which is as often as she works, she falls asleep...…………

Then cast a vote for what she never heard

This is not how the court is supposed to function
 
I'd put Supreme Court members health records way down on the list of my curiosities, right there along side our President's income tax return. All the government knows about UFO's remains atop that list.
 
Do we have a right to yours?
Not taking any medications for any situation, so yea it would have no words.
That is NOT what she asked you. Simply because your medical file is thin, does not give anyone the right to have access to it with the exception of you and your authorized doctor.

It is telling to anyone watching how you go out of your way to avoid answering the question.

H.I.P.A.A.

Look it up, read it, learn. It is what grown, mature people do.
I know exactly what hippa is as I have employees under me. None of them are interpreting laws however, all are healthier than Goonie.

What you miss is that this woman is going to die, she is old enough to deserve a vacation no...…………..

You demand that she slave until her death.

That's on you shit, not me
So, you're a liar too?

Where have I demanded she works to death or even be forced to keep her job. She is free to retire whenever she wishes, or die sitting the bench if that is her desire as well.

The discussion is her health and your demand to know all about; violating HER right to privacy. IF you actually have read the HIPAA laws. then you know I am right.

The reason for these laws, because the Constitution is forbidden from violating these rights, is to prevent political opponents or employers, from using your health against you as a means of employment. You are proving that the choice to pass these laws was a good one. When people like you want to use someone's health against them for political or personal gain, that shit is on them. Apparently, it is acceptable to you.

We don't have a political difference in this instance. We have a moral one and YOU are on the wrong side of it.

I'll not be wasting any more time on you.

/thread

And I believe that there are cruises she could go on gardens to watch the birds in and on an on. What she does is go to work, when she is not in the hospital which is as often as she works, she falls asleep...…………

Then cast a vote for what she never heard

This is not how the court is supposed to function
Not to mention, others are actually doing her work. She is nothing more than a figurehead, occupying a seat until they can get a Democrat in the White House. She needs to retire.
 
If Ginsburg dies after the November elections it will become an election year and Republicans will be unwilling to replace her
 

Forum List

Back
Top