America without guns, what would really happen to us....

2aguy

Diamond Member
Jul 19, 2014
111,970
52,237
2,290
The anti-gun extremists lie, and say they think this country would be safer without guns......one only needs to look at history to know what the left means by safer....

15-20 million citizens murdered in Europe by leftists

25 million murdered by leftists in Russia

70 million murdered by leftists in China

3 million murdered by leftists in Cambodia

3 million murdered by the government of Japan, leftists

Millions more around the world, murdered by their governments.....when they had no means to stop it...

That is why the left wants our guns hear.

Doubt it? Look at how they are happily cheering on the murder of Jews in Israel....you don't think they mean what they say?

As we keep telling you.......when the left tells you what they want to do....they mean it.

Decolonize the country? They mean murder people.

From the river to the sea? They mean murder people...

American gun control groups are dedicated to making that group as small as humanly possible–they say they don’t want gun bans, and if they’re honest about that, then this is what they mean–and they have ideas about what the United States would look like if we suddenly did away with the Second Amendment.

Over at The Federalist, writer Aaron Decorte argues that it won’t be what they’d like to believe.

Thought experiment, leaving aside the issue of a right enshrined in the Constitution: If Americans allow their firearms to be outlawed and then confiscated, would we in fact, become like Australia or New Zealand?


If we gave up AR-15s and then a mass shooting took place where a semi-automatic handgun was used, opponents of gun rights would take those too — the same with a shooter with a hunting rifle, then a shooter with a shotgun, and on and on. We know where this leads. It can’t end with “military style” firearms. A confiscation of AR-15s would eventually lead to a complete ban on almost every gun. How long would that take? Five years, 10 years? It wouldn’t take very long once the ball is rolling and mass shooters move to handguns and shotguns, which would quickly be banned as the public’s demand for “safety” would be too much for politicians to stand against.
Cut to a Republican senator being interviewed on CNN the day after a mass shooting where a 9mm handgun was used: Senator, just a few months ago you voted to ban AR-15s because scores of children were killed in a school shooting. Today, with more dead children, you won’t support the banning of semi-automatic handguns? How can you tell those parents why the shooter was able to legally obtain a Glock 19 that, like the AR-15s that you voted to ban, allowed the shooter to fire many rounds and reload in a matter of seconds? What’s the difference, senator? Do those dead children think it was better to be shot by a handgun rather than a long gun? Senator?
That lawmaker would crumble, and so would others. What would we be left with? A technical right to keep and bear arms that practically renders that right meaningless.
How do we know this? We know this because we have seen this before in Mexico.



 
How come they didn't murder anyone else?

If the demonstrators in Kenosha were bent on murder, then why were the only people who died in Kenosha killed by --- Rittenhouse.


No one else tried to put out the fire they started....as soon as he did that, they tried to murder him.
 

Forum List

Back
Top