Amazing Fact: During Only Time in History Of U.S. NORAD taken over by Vice President

[daws101]

Pentagon Employee Says Plane Did Not Crash into Building - 911 Inside Job - YouTube

what is this womans' name? her Id is unreadable

 

[LA RAM FAN]

someone farted in here.

 

[Capstone]

The national air defenses are set to protect from outside threats; always have been. [...]

And?

News Flash: aircraft hijackings have long been included on NORAD's list of potential threats from foreign and domestic terrorists.

It's just that prior to June 1, 2001, the protocol for dealing with those threats had never involved the expressed approval of the (civilian) Secretary of Defense or the acting Commander in Chief.

Additional facts are that the last time a domestic plane was hijacked, most of the fighter pilots and most of the planners were either pre-pubescent or not even born yet. No amount of training or simulations would get them ready for an attack on that day or any other day. [emphasis Capstone's]

Maybe not, but a HUGELY coincidental training exercise involving an eerily similar scenario to the one that actually played out that day sure as hell tempered their readiness with a buttload of confusion.

Non elected=non accountable for the most part if you look at the history of the military in this country.

That has to be one of the dumbest statements I've ever read.

Despite the fact that the Joint Chiefs and all military personnel are legally subordinate to the CIC, there's a history of a clear recognition on the part of the executive branch of the need to allow Commanders in the field significant leeway in terms of their capacity to react on the fly -- a history that came to an end by executive order on June 1, 2001.

Secondly...wow; so you're sponsoring a General somewhere to play hunches....with the lives of unenlisted Americans. I think you may have just defined "non-accountable" silly.

What sort of "hunches" are you referring to there? The hunch that any number of highly probable and/or confirmed hijackings would likely follow suit after the first one plowed into a building full of people? The hunch that the passengers aboard the remaining planes would likely be doomed whether we shoot them down or not? Hunches that anyone with the sense of a common house fly not only could have played but should have played on the morning of 9/11/01?!

And who, pray tell, would a mildly retarded monkey like Bush, or a noted War Profiteer like Cheney be accountable to in the event of their failure to act on those very same hunches? -- Apparently nobody.

 

[Liability]

someone farted in here.

Nah. That's just your own breath, scumbag.

That's what happens when you perform so many rimjobs, Rimjob.

 

[Capstone]

Pentagon Employee Says Plane Did Not Crash into Building - 911 Inside Job - YouTube

Cheney's boys on Flight 93 were late. That's why he invented the 77 myth and eventually ordered the shoot-down of 93.

Whether the passenger revolt was real or concocted ...is moot.

 

[Liability]

The OP claim is itself bogus. And then we see stupid crap like capstone's fantasy in post 65?

Start to (almost) finish, this thread is a fucking pig stye of bullshit. horse shit, pig shit and similar filthy crap.

 

[Capstone]

The OP claim is itself bogus. And then we see stupid crap like capstone's fantasy in post 65?

Good to see that my theory has been met by a similar level and style of refutation that has stained the debunking effort from day one.

 

[Liability]

The OP claim is itself bogus. And then we see stupid crap like capstone's fantasy in post 65?

Good to see that my theory has been met by a similar level and style of refutation that has stained the debunking effort from day one.

Your absurd and utterly baseless "theory" wasn't supported by anything at all.

So you aren't really entitled to anything in particular to show you the boot, dufus.

If I send you a quarter, would you consider going out to buy a brain?

 

[Capstone]

If I send you a quarter, would you consider going out to buy a brain?

Now you're speaking my language.

 

[candycorn]

The national air defenses are set to protect from outside threats; always have been. [...]

And?

News Flash: aircraft hijackings have long been included on NORAD's list of potential threats from foreign and domestic terrorists.

It's just that prior to June 1, 2001, the protocol for dealing with those threats had never involved the expressed approval of the (civilian) Secretary of Defense or the acting Commander in Chief.

See below--red highlighted areas. Or do you like looking so foolish.

Additional facts are that the last time a domestic plane was hijacked, most of the fighter pilots and most of the planners were either pre-pubescent or not even born yet. No amount of training or simulations would get them ready for an attack on that day or any other day. [emphasis Capstone's]

Maybe not, but a HUGELY coincidental training exercise involving an eerily similar scenario to the one that actually played out that day sure as hell tempered their readiness with a buttload of confusion.

Really? What was the drill about? What was it's name? Did they have drills in the past, since then?

Non elected=non accountable for the most part if you look at the history of the military in this country.

That has to be one of the dumbest statements I've ever read.

Despite the fact that the Joint Chiefs and all military personnel are legally subordinate to the CIC, there's a history of a clear recognition on the part of the executive branch of the need to allow Commanders in the field significant leeway in terms of their capacity to react on the fly -- a history that came to an end by executive order on June 1, 2001.

You're apparently not much of a fan of your own fiction; not surprising...no one else is either.

We've had military malfeasance fail in glaring ways over and over You could even say this on 9/11 if you're bent that way which you obviously are. Seldom, if ever, does anybody who calls the shots ever get hosed.


Abu Grahib. A general got busted down to a colonel. Others--lower military ranks of course--got time in prison. That isn't accountability, that is pure bullshit.

Pat Tillman: Army initially claimed that it was a heroic firefight. Later it admitted it was friendly fire. No arrests, or convictions about using a true American hero for recruitment purposes.

It could go on and on.

I prefer to have civilians in charge of the military. Apparently you're all for a coup de tat . Strange people, you twoofers.

Secondly...wow; so you're sponsoring a General somewhere to play hunches....with the lives of unenlisted Americans. I think you may have just defined "non-accountable" silly.

What sort of "hunches" are you referring to there? The hunch that any number of highly probable and/or confirmed hijackings would likely follow suit after the first one plowed into a building full of people? The hunch that the passengers aboard the remaining planes would likely be doomed whether we shoot them down or not? Hunches that anyone with the sense of a common house fly not only could have played but should have played on the morning of 9/11/01?!

And who, pray tell, would a mildly retarded monkey like Bush, or a noted War Profiteer like Cheney be accountable to in the event of their failure to act on those very same hunches? -- Apparently nobody.

[/quote]

I'll defer to your expertise on being retarded. You seem to be an expert.

The people could have voted them out in the Fall of 2004. That is accountability.

 

[daws101]

Pentagon Employee Says Plane Did Not Crash into Building - 911 Inside Job - YouTube

Cheney's boys on Flight 93 were late. That's why he invented the 77 myth and eventually ordered the shoot-down of 93.

Whether the passenger revolt was real or concocted ...is moot.

it's seven's evil twin...and just as wrong.... "Cheney's boys on Flight 93 were late. That's why he invented the 77 myth and eventually ordered the shoot-down of 93." -cap

there is no evidence to support this claim!

 

[candycorn]

Pentagon Employee Says Plane Did Not Crash into Building - 911 Inside Job - YouTube

Cheney's boys on Flight 93 were late. That's why he invented the 77 myth and eventually ordered the shoot-down of 93.

Whether the passenger revolt was real or concocted ...is moot.

Told ya; the dipshit was a few posts away from thermite, voice morphing, planted lightpoles.

Typical twoofer.

 

[daws101]

Pentagon Employee Says Plane Did Not Crash into Building - 911 Inside Job - YouTube

Cheney's boys on Flight 93 were late. That's why he invented the 77 myth and eventually ordered the shoot-down of 93.

Whether the passenger revolt was real or concocted ...is moot.

Told ya; the dipshit was a few posts away from thermite, voice morphing, planted lightpoles.

Typical twoofer.

they all get there eventually

 

[candycorn]

Cheney's boys on Flight 93 were late. That's why he invented the 77 myth and eventually ordered the shoot-down of 93.

Whether the passenger revolt was real or concocted ...is moot.

Told ya; the dipshit was a few posts away from thermite, voice morphing, planted lightpoles.

Typical twoofer.

they all get there eventually

Its incredible isn't it.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

five farts in a row from the agent trolls.congrats.

 

[daws101]

five farts in a row from the agent trolls.congrats.

another fine example

 

[Liability]

five farts in a row from the agent trolls.congrats.

9/11 Rimjob is offended standing downwind of his own breath.

'Tis a sad truth, Rimjob. Suck enough assholes, eventually you WILL stink of shit all the time.

And you do.

 

[Capstone]

... Suck enough assholes, eventually you WILL stink of shit all the time.

The voice of experience?

 

[Obamerican]

... Suck enough assholes, eventually you WILL stink of shit all the time.

The voice of experience?

When you idiots defend Rimjob I always ask myself:

"Do these stupid fucks ever read Rimjob's posting history?"

 

[Liability]

... Suck enough assholes, eventually you WILL stink of shit all the time.

The voice of experience?

No. I'm not a liberal salad tosser, ya moron.

Why?

You need a hook up with 9/11 Rimjob?