About The Growing Income Divide

Discussion in 'Economy' started by Annie, Nov 14, 2007.

  1. Annie
    Offline

    Annie Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2003
    Messages:
    50,848
    Thanks Received:
    4,646
    Trophy Points:
    1,790
    Ratings:
    +4,787
    Seems it may not be the real deal:

    http://opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110010855

     
  2. BaronVonBigmeat
    Offline

    BaronVonBigmeat Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2005
    Messages:
    1,185
    Thanks Received:
    160
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +162
    The disparity in incomes does not interest me as much as the fluidity between classes. I forget the saying but it's something about rags to riches to rags in three generations(?). However whatever growing divide we've seen in recent years is probably caused by asset inflation. If you owned multiple properties from 2001-2005 or so, then the fed's money inflation was a great benefit to you. If you were an ordinary family just looking to buy a house, it wasn't so hot.
     
  3. Toro
    Offline

    Toro Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2005
    Messages:
    57,462
    Thanks Received:
    12,188
    Trophy Points:
    2,180
    Location:
    The Big Bend via Riderville
    Ratings:
    +34,432
    That's an interesting article but it flies in the face of almost every other study, also conducted by non-political economists. Here are a few.

    http://papers.nber.org/papers/w13568

    http://gregmankiw.blogspot.com/2007/11/katz-vs-krugman.html
     
  4. Toro
    Offline

    Toro Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2005
    Messages:
    57,462
    Thanks Received:
    12,188
    Trophy Points:
    2,180
    Location:
    The Big Bend via Riderville
    Ratings:
    +34,432
  5. Toro
    Offline

    Toro Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2005
    Messages:
    57,462
    Thanks Received:
    12,188
    Trophy Points:
    2,180
    Location:
    The Big Bend via Riderville
    Ratings:
    +34,432
  6. Annie
    Offline

    Annie Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2003
    Messages:
    50,848
    Thanks Received:
    4,646
    Trophy Points:
    1,790
    Ratings:
    +4,787
  7. Toro
    Offline

    Toro Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2005
    Messages:
    57,462
    Thanks Received:
    12,188
    Trophy Points:
    2,180
    Location:
    The Big Bend via Riderville
    Ratings:
    +34,432
    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119492563733591022.html?mod=todays_us_page_one
     
  8. Toro
    Offline

    Toro Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2005
    Messages:
    57,462
    Thanks Received:
    12,188
    Trophy Points:
    2,180
    Location:
    The Big Bend via Riderville
    Ratings:
    +34,432
    What is happening is that incomes are growing faster at the top end than at the bottom end. Even after inflation, the poorest have seen a rise in income after inflation. However, that still means inequality is rising.

    Why the Treasury data says different, I don't know, but I am highly suspicious of the idea that the richest 1% are falling, which is what the graph from your OP says. That sure doesn't jive with every other indicator around.

    [​IMG]
     
  9. Toro
    Offline

    Toro Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2005
    Messages:
    57,462
    Thanks Received:
    12,188
    Trophy Points:
    2,180
    Location:
    The Big Bend via Riderville
    Ratings:
    +34,432
    That's an interesting article but it flies in the face of almost every other study, also conducted by non-political economists. Here are a few.

    http://papers.nber.org/papers/w13568

    http://gregmankiw.blogspot.com/2007/11/katz-vs-krugman.html
     
  10. Annie
    Offline

    Annie Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2003
    Messages:
    50,848
    Thanks Received:
    4,646
    Trophy Points:
    1,790
    Ratings:
    +4,787

Share This Page