- Apr 2, 2009
- 15,085
- 5,464
- 370
So, Mani you sre opposed to laws that protect life because anarchy doesn't work?
That is weird huh?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
So, Mani you sre opposed to laws that protect life because anarchy doesn't work?
So, Mani you sre opposed to laws that protect life because anarchy doesn't work?
Yeah, some girls boyfriend just beat the fuck out of her because she said no.
That statement of yours is childish and thoughtless on it's face
yeah, and somebody just robbed a gas station.
if you don't want an abortion, don't have one.
and it's "its", dumbo.
I tell you what. You do some real research and study about abortion stats and then do a stat search on crimes and domestic violence. Do a search on the rise of crimes committed by women and do it with an open mind. Then post your thoughts after doing it. Then we can talk. You know not who you are talking to here. But that is OK. I don't know you and you call me a ****, is that how all anti lifers talk to the ones they disagree with? Go ahead, my skin is thicker than yours, I guarantee it
I'd tell you to stop being a fucking retard if I thought it was possible.
Without laws protecting people, we have anarchy. Anarchy doesn't work.
QUESTION ANSWERED FUCKFACE!
I have been fighting and beating people like you for years, I have worked for the rights of mothers and the babies as well as the fathers and I win a lot. I have seen babies born because of the fight I fight. I will not give up to the selfish ignorance of someone who obviously knows nothing of LIFE
can i touch your cape?
yeah, and somebody just robbed a gas station.
if you don't want an abortion, don't have one.
and it's "its", dumbo.
I tell you what. You do some real research and study about abortion stats and then do a stat search on crimes and domestic violence. Do a search on the rise of crimes committed by women and do it with an open mind. Then post your thoughts after doing it. Then we can talk. You know not who you are talking to here. But that is OK. I don't know you and you call me a ****, is that how all anti lifers talk to the ones they disagree with? Go ahead, my skin is thicker than yours, I guarantee it
tell you what.
you obsess about other people's choices all you want.
i don't give flying fuck how you waste your time, but don't accuse me of calling you a ****, dumbo, unless you can back it up.
get it?
I tell you what. You do some real research and study about abortion stats and then do a stat search on crimes and domestic violence. Do a search on the rise of crimes committed by women and do it with an open mind. Then post your thoughts after doing it. Then we can talk. You know not who you are talking to here. But that is OK. I don't know you and you call me a ****, is that how all anti lifers talk to the ones they disagree with? Go ahead, my skin is thicker than yours, I guarantee it
tell you what.
you obsess about other people's choices all you want.
i don't give flying fuck how you waste your time, but don't accuse me of calling you a ****, dumbo, unless you can back it up.
get it?
Obsess about other people choices to kill and mutilate babies? hmmmm call it what you wish. I am passionate about it. I give a flying fuck how you choose to use my tax money to fund abortions around the world against my freewill got it guy?
tell you what.
you obsess about other people's choices all you want.
i don't give flying fuck how you waste your time, but don't accuse me of calling you a ****, dumbo, unless you can back it up.
get it?
Obsess about other people choices to kill and mutilate babies? hmmmm call it what you wish. I am passionate about it. I give a flying fuck how you choose to use my tax money to fund abortions around the world against my freewill got it guy?
how many kids have you adopted? ten? twelve? more?
but let's get back to me allegedly calling you a ****, dumbo.
prove it or shut the fuck up.
Obsess about other people choices to kill and mutilate babies? hmmmm call it what you wish. I am passionate about it. I give a flying fuck how you choose to use my tax money to fund abortions around the world against my freewill got it guy?
how many kids have you adopted? ten? twelve? more?
but let's get back to me allegedly calling you a ****, dumbo.
prove it or shut the fuck up.
I edited to add an apology for my mistaken identity thing
http://www.usmessageboard.com/report.php?p=1306753
The roots of abortion is mired in racism
how many kids have you adopted? ten? twelve? more?
but let's get back to me allegedly calling you a ****, dumbo.
prove it or shut the fuck up.
I edited to add an apology for my mistaken identity thing
http://www.usmessageboard.com/report.php?p=1306753
shit happens, thanks for owning up.
Wrong, I'm just as stupid as I've always been but you and eots have no real understanding of moral values vs. constitutionally guaranteed rights.I think Ravi's gotten more stupid as of late
Simply untrue. Well, if there is such a thing as an anti-lifer, which there isn't except perhaps serial killers and even they have their parameters.What ravi doesn't realize is that anti-lifers, too, wish to legislate their morality.
Oft we here the language of the abortion debate played out in the language of religion. The religious right rails against the destruction of a human sole, ultimately falling back- near always- on their religion for the moral grounds for their objections. The anti-lifers, in turn, respond in kind. They rail against the legislation of religion and accuse others of forcing their god upon the county. However, there is another group that has entered the scene that, while smaller than the others, poses a huge danger to both of the aforementioned. These are those pro-life atheists and other non-religious persons who object to the slaughter of the unborn. Why is this group so dangerous?
To the anti-lifers, these persons undermine the very straw man that they rely upon for the crux of their arguments. Any attempt to paint their opposition the usually colors of religious fanaticism simply will not work and this new opposition is more likely than the old to understand the biological sciences to rip to shreds their little catch phrases about the child being 'not alive' and a part of 'her body'.
Why, then, does not more of the Right embrace these allies? The reason is simple. To admit that someone can have a moral objection to abortion- or any other issue- without being religious undermined their long-held position that America needs their god in order to 'live right'. Indeed, if morality is acknowledged as existing outside of religion, then the question is raised of why we need religion at all. The cries that 'the godless' are destroying America, undermining our principles, and going after your children are shown to be the hollow screams of the ignorant and frightened. Ultimately, it is a fear of the unknown and of the loss of power and influence.
-and so, each side seeks to ignore this growing number of persons, and the battle continues to take place on the grounds of 'religious infringement' versus 'personal rights'. I fear that so long as this remains the case, our only probable options re either an inability to protect the unborn or undue and dangerous influence of religious principles upon legislation and the State.
The unborn are not citizens of this country and have no rights. Even if they had rights and desires, no one else has the right to presume to know what they would want and to use the pretense of defending their hypothetical rights and desires to impose their own agendas on the American legal system and quash women's civil rights.in china the accepted morality is different..as are the civil rights..in Americas past the prevailing morality
was different and it was reflected in our civil rights...all rights are based on morality as are the rights of the unborn
The unborn are not citizens of this country and have no rights. Even if they had rights and desires, no one else has the right to presume to know what they would want and to use the pretense of defending their hypothetical rights and desires to impose their own agendas on the American legal system and quash women's civil rights.in china the accepted morality is different..as are the civil rights..in Americas past the prevailing morality
was different and it was reflected in our civil rights...all rights are based on morality as are the rights of the unborn