The very first eyewitness CBS had on is full of shit...
It may not prove anything other than the fact that witnesses are willing to lie and the media is willing to air them.
Woo. I hesitate to disturb the fantasy in your head but witnesses aren't always reliable. Nothing new about that. You offer nothing which supports your claim he was lying. Nothing new about that either.
He had just ear-witnessed what turned out to be a fast moving plane slamming into WTC1 and suddenly he was on a national media feed trying to gather his thoughts and express them and he sounded understandably confused.
So how does that prove ANYTHING other than the possible unreliability of a single observer's account? You are desperately grasping at straws to hang on to your thoroughly debunked conclusions. Hopefully you will awake from your dream and realize what others, like Mike Metzger, have:
Confessions of an Ex-Truther Letter of Resignation Scroll Down for Newer Posts
There are no facts in the 9/11 Truth Movement. Just a lot of theories, which eventually break down to "hey, we're just asking questions" if someone questions the validity of such. No structural, civil, or any engineers agree with the truthers. Yet, most of my friends will try to explain the hard physics involved in structural collapses. None of these people are engineers, physicists, or even in a scientific field, for that matter.