54 Palestinians die as Israel refuses medical permits

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

So, let me try to wrap my mind around this.

The Palestinians do not want the Jews anywhere near them, want the Nation of Israel to go away, refuse to decide to live in the Nation of Israel; but now are bitching because they want Israel to provide health care?

#liberallunacy

Why would Palestinians want Jews to create a Jewish homeland upon the soil they've lived on for hundreds of years?

Liberal?
I'm certainly no Liberal.

OK, you're not a liberal. But you do not address the rest of my post.

Still trying to understand the logic.

If they don't want the Jews around, why bitch about not getting medical care from them?

Makes. No. Sense. At. All.

Israel's not even allowing for these Palestinians to leave Gaza for care they need, it's no wonder why some call it a giant prison.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

I thought much of the point of the article was that because of blockade's these Palestinians couldn't leave when in need of medical care?

Citizens in need of medical care outside of their national territory require the permission of the host nation. Hostility towards the host nation tends to make that a bit more challenging.

Host nation?

The nation that Jews built upon Palestinian homes?

Why would anyone be hostile to someone building a new nation upon their homes?

For someone claiming to be so intellectually superior, Jews just seem to be heavily lacking mentally, if you ask me.

 

[Boston1]

What a load of horse pucky. The pally's from outside Israel can leave wherever they are anytime they want. Israel is under no obligation to allow foreigners into their country. The Pally's who are Israeli citizens enjoy the same health care as any other Israeli citizen.

This whole thread is BS designed to lie and malign Israel through those lies

I thought much of the point of the article was that because of blockade's these Palestinians couldn't leave when in need of medical care?

Nothing's worse than Jewish lies, the things they say about Palestinians not existing before Israel's creation, or Polish death camps are downright ridiculous.

More nonsense, Israel is under no obligation to allow foreign hostiles into the country and the pally's in Gaza are NOT free to import arms or contraband, beyond that they can come and go as they please through Egypt, assuming they don't pull the same crap on the Egyptians as they have on the Israeli's. Also it's their own terrorist government that is usually the one to forbid exit through the Egypt crossing. ;-)

Can you at least try and be truthful or is your hate solely based on these kinda pallywood lies

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

What a load of horse pucky. The pally's from outside Israel can leave wherever they are anytime they want. Israel is under no obligation to allow foreigners into their country. The Pally's who are Israeli citizens enjoy the same health care as any other Israeli citizen.

This whole thread is BS designed to lie and malign Israel through those lies

I thought much of the point of the article was that because of blockade's these Palestinians couldn't leave when in need of medical care?

Nothing's worse than Jewish lies, the things they say about Palestinians not existing before Israel's creation, or Polish death camps are downright ridiculous.

More nonsense, they are NOT free to leave through Israel and they are NOT free to import arms or contraband, beyond that they can come and go as they please through Egypt.

Can you at least try and be truthful or is your hate solely based on these kinda pallywood lies

So, then Israel is an oppressive colonial force, bottom-line everybody in this World has a right to criticize Israel.

 

[Shusha]

Why would anyone be hostile to someone building a new nation upon their homes?

Not asking why they would be hostile. I know all the reasons.

The question is why they would think that hostility will lead to good relations with the neighbors. The question is why Israel has to play a cat and mouse game of "is this person coming into our nation to kill our citizens or to get superior medical care than he can receive in his own territory". And why the international community would demand a nation provide medical care to citizens of a hostile political entity, rather than demanding the end of hostilities.

 

[Boston1]

What a load of horse pucky. The pally's from outside Israel can leave wherever they are anytime they want. Israel is under no obligation to allow foreigners into their country. The Pally's who are Israeli citizens enjoy the same health care as any other Israeli citizen.

This whole thread is BS designed to lie and malign Israel through those lies

I thought much of the point of the article was that because of blockade's these Palestinians couldn't leave when in need of medical care?

Nothing's worse than Jewish lies, the things they say about Palestinians not existing before Israel's creation, or Polish death camps are downright ridiculous.

More nonsense, they are NOT free to leave through Israel and they are NOT free to import arms or contraband, beyond that they can come and go as they please through Egypt.

Can you at least try and be truthful or is your hate solely based on these kinda pallywood lies

So, then Israel is an oppressive colonial force, bottom-line everybody in this World has a right to criticize Israel.

Horse Pucky ;-) Israel is a sovereign state with every right to refuse entry of any foreign national for whatever reason they chose. Just like any other state. ;-)

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Why would anyone be hostile to someone building a new nation upon their homes?

Not asking why they would be hostile. I know all the reasons.

The question is why they would think that hostility will lead to good relations with the neighbors. The question is why Israel has to play a cat and mouse game of "is this person coming into our nation to kill our citizens or to get superior medical care than he can receive in his own territory". And why the international community would demand a nation provide medical care to citizens of a hostile political entity, rather than demanding the end of hostilities.

Why would someone not be hostile to someone stealing their land from underneath them, how about ask that one?

You Jews made your bed, and now you have your bed.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

What a load of horse pucky. The pally's from outside Israel can leave wherever they are anytime they want. Israel is under no obligation to allow foreigners into their country. The Pally's who are Israeli citizens enjoy the same health care as any other Israeli citizen.

This whole thread is BS designed to lie and malign Israel through those lies

I thought much of the point of the article was that because of blockade's these Palestinians couldn't leave when in need of medical care?

Nothing's worse than Jewish lies, the things they say about Palestinians not existing before Israel's creation, or Polish death camps are downright ridiculous.

More nonsense, they are NOT free to leave through Israel and they are NOT free to import arms or contraband, beyond that they can come and go as they please through Egypt.

Can you at least try and be truthful or is your hate solely based on these kinda pallywood lies

So, then Israel is an oppressive colonial force, bottom-line everybody in this World has a right to criticize Israel.

Horse Pucky ;-) Israel is a sovereign state with every right to refuse entry of any foreign national for whatever reason they chose. Just like any other state. ;-)

Israel's a country created by a bunch of Jewish immigrants, who decided to steal Palestinian lands.

 

[Shusha]

So, then Israel is an oppressive colonial force ...

No, Israel is protecting its citizens from hostiles. Every country has the right to do so.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

So, then Israel is an oppressive colonial force ...

No, Israel is protecting its citizens from hostiles. Every country has the right to do so.

If that's true, why are Jews some of the first in line to kick, and scream about America going against refugees, or illegals?

 

[Boston1]

Why would anyone be hostile to someone building a new nation upon their homes?

Not asking why they would be hostile. I know all the reasons.

The question is why they would think that hostility will lead to good relations with the neighbors. The question is why Israel has to play a cat and mouse game of "is this person coming into our nation to kill our citizens or to get superior medical care than he can receive in his own territory". And why the international community would demand a nation provide medical care to citizens of a hostile political entity, rather than demanding the end of hostilities.

Why would someone not be hostile to someone stealing their land from underneath them, how about ask that one?

You Jews made your bed, and now you have your bed.

Again with the lies and fabrications. No one stole anything, the Ottoman empire LOST a war. Couldn't be more simple. After that the itinerant Arab population started another war and lost again. This time to the native peoples who then established a sovereign state.

You really have been relying on pallywood way too much or you'd know this kinda basic stuff

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Why would anyone be hostile to someone building a new nation upon their homes?

Not asking why they would be hostile. I know all the reasons.

The question is why they would think that hostility will lead to good relations with the neighbors. The question is why Israel has to play a cat and mouse game of "is this person coming into our nation to kill our citizens or to get superior medical care than he can receive in his own territory". And why the international community would demand a nation provide medical care to citizens of a hostile political entity, rather than demanding the end of hostilities.

Why would someone not be hostile to someone stealing their land from underneath them, how about ask that one?

You Jews made your bed, and now you have your bed.

Again with the lies and fabrications. No one stole anything, the Ottoman empire LOST a war. Couldn't be more simple. After that the itinerant Arab population started another war and lost again. This time to the native peoples who then established a sovereign state.

You really have been relying on pallywood way too much or you'd know this kinda basic stuff

The British won against Ottomans, not the Jews.

Even though British declared Balfour for a Jewish state, the damn Jews kept bombing the British, most notable being the King David Hotel Bombing.

It shows just how disgraceful Jews have acted.

 

[Shusha]

If that's true, why are Jews some of the first in line to kick, and scream about America going against refugees, or illegals?

Are you equating refugees and "illegals" with people who plant and detonate bombs, randomly stab people, ram people with cars, throw rocks and explosives at them, shoot them? I had NO IDEA that was going on in the USA. Can you provide some links?

 

[Boston1]

What a load of horse pucky. The pally's from outside Israel can leave wherever they are anytime they want. Israel is under no obligation to allow foreigners into their country. The Pally's who are Israeli citizens enjoy the same health care as any other Israeli citizen.

This whole thread is BS designed to lie and malign Israel through those lies

I thought much of the point of the article was that because of blockade's these Palestinians couldn't leave when in need of medical care?

Nothing's worse than Jewish lies, the things they say about Palestinians not existing before Israel's creation, or Polish death camps are downright ridiculous.

More nonsense, they are NOT free to leave through Israel and they are NOT free to import arms or contraband, beyond that they can come and go as they please through Egypt.

Can you at least try and be truthful or is your hate solely based on these kinda pallywood lies

So, then Israel is an oppressive colonial force, bottom-line everybody in this World has a right to criticize Israel.

Horse Pucky ;-) Israel is a sovereign state with every right to refuse entry of any foreign national for whatever reason they chose. Just like any other state. ;-)

Israel's a country created by a bunch of Jewish immigrants, who decided to steal Palestinian lands.

Hog wash, the Israeli's are the native people who can show residence going back to the dawn of civilization. The Arabs weren't even a recognizable entity until some time in the 5th century VE. Roughly 10 thousand years later.

 

[Shusha]

Even though British declared Balfour for a Jewish state, the damn Jews kept bombing the British, most notable being the King David Hotel Bombing.

It shows just how disgraceful Jews have acted.

But the Sbarro bombing doesn't show how disgraceful the Arabs have acted, because the Arabs have every "right" to be murderously hostile?

 

[Boston1]

Why would anyone be hostile to someone building a new nation upon their homes?

Not asking why they would be hostile. I know all the reasons.

The question is why they would think that hostility will lead to good relations with the neighbors. The question is why Israel has to play a cat and mouse game of "is this person coming into our nation to kill our citizens or to get superior medical care than he can receive in his own territory". And why the international community would demand a nation provide medical care to citizens of a hostile political entity, rather than demanding the end of hostilities.

Why would someone not be hostile to someone stealing their land from underneath them, how about ask that one?

You Jews made your bed, and now you have your bed.

Again with the lies and fabrications. No one stole anything, the Ottoman empire LOST a war. Couldn't be more simple. After that the itinerant Arab population started another war and lost again. This time to the native peoples who then established a sovereign state.

You really have been relying on pallywood way too much or you'd know this kinda basic stuff

The British won against Ottomans, not the Jews.

Even though British declared Balfour for a Jewish state, the damn Jews kept bombing the British, most notable being the King David Hotel Bombing.

It shows just how disgraceful Jews have acted.

Clearly you have no idea what you are talking about. Arthur Balfour is a person not a place, so no, Balfour was not declared for the Jooooos Southern Syria was. Just like many other areas in the conquered territories were designated for certain countries.

LOL you are ridiculously confused as to the facts

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

I thought much of the point of the article was that because of blockade's these Palestinians couldn't leave when in need of medical care?

Nothing's worse than Jewish lies, the things they say about Palestinians not existing before Israel's creation, or Polish death camps are downright ridiculous.

More nonsense, they are NOT free to leave through Israel and they are NOT free to import arms or contraband, beyond that they can come and go as they please through Egypt.

Can you at least try and be truthful or is your hate solely based on these kinda pallywood lies

So, then Israel is an oppressive colonial force, bottom-line everybody in this World has a right to criticize Israel.

Horse Pucky ;-) Israel is a sovereign state with every right to refuse entry of any foreign national for whatever reason they chose. Just like any other state. ;-)

Israel's a country created by a bunch of Jewish immigrants, who decided to steal Palestinian lands.

Hog wash, the Israeli's are the native people who can show residence going back to the dawn of civilization. The Arabs weren't even a recognizable entity until some time in the 5th century VE. Roughly 10 thousand years later.

Canaan were the first in Israel, not Jews.

Muslims held control over Palestine clearly much longer than Jews ever did, as did Romans, early Persians, Assyrians, and Greeks.

Do you think any of those groups have a right to displace Jews, and Palestinians?

Oh, lets have Italians colonize Israel / Palestine because they held territory there for a period of time.

Those who are on the land have rights, and kicking them to the curb is simply unacceptable.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Why would anyone be hostile to someone building a new nation upon their homes?

Not asking why they would be hostile. I know all the reasons.

The question is why they would think that hostility will lead to good relations with the neighbors. The question is why Israel has to play a cat and mouse game of "is this person coming into our nation to kill our citizens or to get superior medical care than he can receive in his own territory". And why the international community would demand a nation provide medical care to citizens of a hostile political entity, rather than demanding the end of hostilities.

Why would someone not be hostile to someone stealing their land from underneath them, how about ask that one?

You Jews made your bed, and now you have your bed.

Again with the lies and fabrications. No one stole anything, the Ottoman empire LOST a war. Couldn't be more simple. After that the itinerant Arab population started another war and lost again. This time to the native peoples who then established a sovereign state.

You really have been relying on pallywood way too much or you'd know this kinda basic stuff

The British won against Ottomans, not the Jews.

Even though British declared Balfour for a Jewish state, the damn Jews kept bombing the British, most notable being the King David Hotel Bombing.

It shows just how disgraceful Jews have acted.

Clearly you have no idea what you are talking about. Arthur Balfour is a person not a place, so no, Balfour was not declared for the Jooooos Southern Syria was. Just like many other areas in the conquered territories were designated for certain countries.

LOL you are ridiculously confused as to the facts

I'm talking about this, if you didn't understand this, God held us.

Balfour Declaration - Wikipedia

Like almost all Zionists you seem to be painfully dumb, and desperate.

 

[Shusha]

Canaan were the first in Israel, not Jews.

Muslims held control over Palestine clearly much longer than Jews ever did, as did Romans, early Persians, Assyrians, and Greeks.

Do you think any of those groups have a right to displace Jews, and Palestinians?

Oh, lets have Italians colonize Israel / Palestine because they held territory there for a period of time.

Those who are on the land have rights, and kicking them to the curb is simply unacceptable.

Do you not see how absolutely inconsistent your own argument is? Who has rights to the land? Those who were "kicked to the curb" or those who invaded and now live on the land? You want to have it one way for the Arabs and the other way for the Jews.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Canaan were the first in Israel, not Jews.

Muslims held control over Palestine clearly much longer than Jews ever did, as did Romans, early Persians, Assyrians, and Greeks.

Do you think any of those groups have a right to displace Jews, and Palestinians?

Oh, lets have Italians colonize Israel / Palestine because they held territory there for a period of time.

Those who are on the land have rights, and kicking them to the curb is simply unacceptable.

Do you not see how absolutely inconsistent your own argument is? Who has rights to the land? Those who were "kicked to the curb" or those who invaded and now live on the land? You want to have it one way for the Arabs and the other way for the Jews.

I'm kind of neutral to the idea of Muslims liquidating the Jewish state, on one hand it's wrong to kick Jews living there off their land now, but at the other hand Israel's an oppressive rogue state.