4.6% unemployment rate

When Bush took over the market had already crashed, he rehabilitated it and it was fine until the crash of 2008, which Democrat policies were mostly to blame.

That is not a clear eyed analysis, that is mindless politico dog washing.

Crash didn't happen out of nowhere, it happened because growth in mid 2000s was a MIRAGE and when reality hit we had to pay up with a huge hang over.
Crash happened because the Democrats forced banks to give shady loans to unqualified people, the banks were gambling with people's money, and they weren't being regulated.

Yea, the Democrats-did-it. Totally. You got it. You always knew it and now you know it.

Simple, wonderful, thoughtless.

Be all that as it may, you still have to admit that your statement about how economy was fine during Bush's stay in office is absolute nonsense.
That is because they get their fake news from their MessiahRushie, who just told them today that the UE rate when Bush left office was the same 4.6% we have today.
And they are STUPID enough to believe it because they are too LAZY to check it.
C'mon, he did not say that??
December 5, 2016
RUSH: 95 million Americans not working, and they tell us there's an unemployment rate now of 4.6% or 4.8, whatever, which was what it was when Bush left office and they're trying to say that Obama's caused this great recovery.
 
That is not a clear eyed analysis, that is mindless politico dog washing.

Crash didn't happen out of nowhere, it happened because growth in mid 2000s was a MIRAGE and when reality hit we had to pay up with a huge hang over.
Crash happened because the Democrats forced banks to give shady loans to unqualified people, the banks were gambling with people's money, and they weren't being regulated.

Yea, the Democrats-did-it. Totally. You got it. You always knew it and now you know it.

Simple, wonderful, thoughtless.

Be all that as it may, you still have to admit that your statement about how economy was fine during Bush's stay in office is absolute nonsense.
That is because they get their fake news from their MessiahRushie, who just told them today that the UE rate when Bush left office was the same 4.6% we have today.
And they are STUPID enough to believe it because they are too LAZY to check it.
C'mon, he did not say that??
December 5, 2016
RUSH: 95 million Americans not working, and they tell us there's an unemployment rate now of 4.6% or 4.8, whatever, which was what it was when Bush left office and they're trying to say that Obama's caused this great recovery.
WTF?? :ack-1:
 
Crash happened because the Democrats forced banks to give shady loans to unqualified people, the banks were gambling with people's money, and they weren't being regulated.

Yea, the Democrats-did-it. Totally. You got it. You always knew it and now you know it.

Simple, wonderful, thoughtless.

Be all that as it may, you still have to admit that your statement about how economy was fine during Bush's stay in office is absolute nonsense.
That is because they get their fake news from their MessiahRushie, who just told them today that the UE rate when Bush left office was the same 4.6% we have today.
And they are STUPID enough to believe it because they are too LAZY to check it.
C'mon, he did not say that??
December 5, 2016
RUSH: 95 million Americans not working, and they tell us there's an unemployment rate now of 4.6% or 4.8, whatever, which was what it was when Bush left office and they're trying to say that Obama's caused this great recovery.
WTF?? :ack-1:
I know!!!!
But the DitrtoTards believe it and then call themselves "High-information voters" and they call those who know it is a mind-numbing lie "Low-information voters."

BTW, Friday the pathological liar claimed HE coined the term "Low-information voters" in 2008.
The term has been around since at least 1971.

December 2, 2016
RUSH: I coined the term "low-information voter" shortly after Obama's election in 2008.

The Big Apple: Low Information Voter (LIV)

A “low information voter” (LIV) is someone who doesn’t follow politics closely, but votes on a candidate’s perceived likability and public persona. The term “low information voter” was first used in Implications of Changes in Information Processing and Communications Technology for the Governing Function (1971) by Ronald D. Brunner and John P. Crecine.
 
jeesus fn christ I'm running out of face-palm pics with you guys.

It wasn't fine ignoramus, 2000's economy was a disaster defined by a dot.com bust flowing into huge real estate and finance bubble expansion and explosion into Great Recession.

1101091207_400.jpg
When Bush took over the market had already crashed, he rehabilitated it and it was fine until the crash of 2008, which Democrat policies were mostly to blame.

That is not a clear eyed analysis, that is mindless politico dog washing.

Crash didn't happen out of nowhere, it happened because growth in mid 2000s was a MIRAGE and when reality hit we had to pay up with a huge hang over.
Crash happened because the Democrats forced banks to give shady loans to unqualified people, the banks were gambling with people's money, and they weren't being regulated.

Yea, the Democrats-did-it. Totally. You got it. You always knew it and now you know it.

Simple, wonderful, thoughtless.

Be all that as it may, you still have to admit that your statement about how economy was fine during Bush's stay in office is absolute nonsense.
That is because they get their fake news from their MessiahRushie, who just told them today that the UE rate when Bush left office was the same 4.6% we have today.
And they are STUPID enough to believe it because they are too LAZY to check it.
Why, if we need fake news we'll just go to any of the crooked media outlets like CNN or MSNBC. :clap2:
 
The 4.6% unemployment rate is just more BS from the obama administration.
Now, the head of the BLS Office of Employment and Unemployment Statistics, Dr Mike Horrigan, has been working at BLS since the Reagan administration. So how do you think it works: that with each President he just agrees to change the methodology or reporting to suit the current President? Do you really think the government works that way? The first major overhaul of the unemployment statistics was recommended in 1961 and actually occurred in 1967. The next major change was recommended in 1979 and implemented in 1994. (partially implemented in the early 1980's). These things take time as government inertia is huge.
 

Forum List

Back
Top