3 states post RECORD LOW unemployment numbers in boost for President Trump

Then you won't have any problem answering the question: who has the right murdered?
I'm not talking about murders per se, I'm talking about blindly accepting anything a politician does.

Anything in particular you'd like to address?
Sure, how about the right cheering trump on for saying he's gonna start sending illegal aliens to U.S. cities after campaigning on keeping illegal aliens out and deporting the ones already here. Two conflicting positions and rightards cheer both.

Trump is not making all the calls on that one. If the Democrat politicians don't step in, their liberal activist judges do. In fact it was one of those judges who stopped Trump from keeping people in Mexico as they await their hearing in the US. It was recently overturned, but I'm sure the Democrats will keep pushing the issue to have it turned back.

So it's catch and release all over again. Trump stated that if Democrats love these illegals so much, and the courts ruled he can't stop them, to put them in Sanctuary Cities. Boy did the Democrats have a heart attack over that one.

Trump recently made an immigration reform package. It includes changing the application process to using embassies in their own country instead of coming to our border and trying to knock it down. It's putting an end to letting any uneducated lowlife into the country simply because they have relatives here. It will be more merit based than anything, and only people with reasonable English speaking skills with something to offer this country will be allowed in.

Watch how fast Democrats in the House shoot this down.

Trump's immigration reform package is typical Trump garbage. Voters do not believe we need to change immigration laws. People applying in embassies would subject people wanting asylum to threats from drug cartels. You are a lowlife and I would rather have them here instead of you. The fact is the Republicans used to stand for families. The fact is that the Pilgrims who came to this country came to escape persecution not because of any merit based criteria.
Why do you suppose these violent gangs
allowed their 'cash cows' to leave in droves?

Furthermore, why do you suppose
these same violent gangs didn't rob them of their valuables
as they allowed them to up and leave the country?
 
Sure, how about the right cheering trump on for saying he's gonna start sending illegal aliens to U.S. cities after campaigning on keeping illegal aliens out and deporting the ones already here. Two conflicting positions and rightards cheer both.

Trump is not making all the calls on that one. If the Democrat politicians don't step in, their liberal activist judges do. In fact it was one of those judges who stopped Trump from keeping people in Mexico as they await their hearing in the US. It was recently overturned, but I'm sure the Democrats will keep pushing the issue to have it turned back.

So it's catch and release all over again. Trump stated that if Democrats love these illegals so much, and the courts ruled he can't stop them, to put them in Sanctuary Cities. Boy did the Democrats have a heart attack over that one.

Trump recently made an immigration reform package. It includes changing the application process to using embassies in their own country instead of coming to our border and trying to knock it down. It's putting an end to letting any uneducated lowlife into the country simply because they have relatives here. It will be more merit based than anything, and only people with reasonable English speaking skills with something to offer this country will be allowed in.

Watch how fast Democrats in the House shoot this down.

You mean going back to the embassy method that was used from Obama and back that he changed that is cuasing MOST of the problems to begin with? Once again, you give him credit for causing the bulk of the problem in the first place. He's a disaster in Immigration.

When did DumBama change it and when did we go back? Applying in person at the border has been the law for decades.

It was also allowed to apply at the various embassies. Trump stopped that until just the last few days. You can stop making excuses for your Orange Individual One any time now.

No it wasn't. The LAW has always been you need to apply on US grounds. It's never changed, and a President can't change a law on his own. It needs to go through Congress.

If that were the case then your Orange Individual One would not have changed it back recently. You really need to step slowly away from the Hannity/Rush Radio and go outside for a nice walk in the fresh air.
 
Three states, including two big ones for the 2020 election, just set new lows for unemployment

I am under no illusion the socialist people's republic of Vermont is gonna go GOP but the other 2 would be a great boost in his reelection campaign in 2020.
Unemployment rate in Vermont....

latest_numbers_LASST500000000000004_2009_2019_all_period_M04_data_unemployment%2Brate.gif


Rightards: Yay trump! :boobies:
Is Vermont a state?
 
Three states, including two big ones for the 2020 election, just set new lows for unemployment

I am under no illusion the socialist people's republic of Vermont is gonna go GOP but the other 2 would be a great boost in his reelection campaign in 2020.
Unemployment rate in Vermont....

latest_numbers_LASST500000000000004_2009_2019_all_period_M04_data_unemployment%2Brate.gif


Rightards: Yay trump! :boobies:
Is Vermont a state?

Are you a fucking moron?

The answer to that is the same as the answer to your question.
 
Three states, including two big ones for the 2020 election, just set new lows for unemployment

I am under no illusion the socialist people's republic of Vermont is gonna go GOP but the other 2 would be a great boost in his reelection campaign in 2020.
Unemployment rate in Vermont....

latest_numbers_LASST500000000000004_2009_2019_all_period_M04_data_unemployment%2Brate.gif


Rightards: Yay trump! :boobies:
Is Vermont a state?

Are you a fucking moron?

The answer to that is the same as the answer to your question.
Are you a traitor hack?
 
Three states, including two big ones for the 2020 election, just set new lows for unemployment

I am under no illusion the socialist people's republic of Vermont is gonna go GOP but the other 2 would be a great boost in his reelection campaign in 2020.
Unemployment rate in Vermont....

latest_numbers_LASST500000000000004_2009_2019_all_period_M04_data_unemployment%2Brate.gif


Rightards: Yay trump! :boobies:
Is Vermont a state?

Are you a fucking moron?

The answer to that is the same as the answer to your question.
Are you a traitor hack?

Nope, but you are a fucking moron and Vermont is a state.

Glad we cleared that up
 
Are you insane? The right is doing it now with trump.

Then you won't have any problem answering the question: who has the right murdered?
I'm not talking about murders per se, I'm talking about blindly accepting anything a politician does.

Anything in particular you'd like to address?
Sure, how about the right cheering trump on for saying he's gonna start sending illegal aliens to U.S. cities after campaigning on keeping illegal aliens out and deporting the ones already here. Two conflicting positions and rightards cheer both.

Trump is not making all the calls on that one. If the Democrat politicians don't step in, their liberal activist judges do. In fact it was one of those judges who stopped Trump from keeping people in Mexico as they await their hearing in the US. It was recently overturned, but I'm sure the Democrats will keep pushing the issue to have it turned back.

So it's catch and release all over again. Trump stated that if Democrats love these illegals so much, and the courts ruled he can't stop them, to put them in Sanctuary Cities. Boy did the Democrats have a heart attack over that one.

Trump recently made an immigration reform package. It includes changing the application process to using embassies in their own country instead of coming to our border and trying to knock it down. It's putting an end to letting any uneducated lowlife into the country simply because they have relatives here. It will be more merit based than anything, and only people with reasonable English speaking skills with something to offer this country will be allowed in.

Watch how fast Democrats in the House shoot this down.
"Trump is not making all the calls on that one."

Well who's in charge if not trump?
 
Then you won't have any problem answering the question: who has the right murdered?
I'm not talking about murders per se, I'm talking about blindly accepting anything a politician does.

Anything in particular you'd like to address?
Sure, how about the right cheering trump on for saying he's gonna start sending illegal aliens to U.S. cities after campaigning on keeping illegal aliens out and deporting the ones already here. Two conflicting positions and rightards cheer both.

Trump is not making all the calls on that one. If the Democrat politicians don't step in, their liberal activist judges do. In fact it was one of those judges who stopped Trump from keeping people in Mexico as they await their hearing in the US. It was recently overturned, but I'm sure the Democrats will keep pushing the issue to have it turned back.

So it's catch and release all over again. Trump stated that if Democrats love these illegals so much, and the courts ruled he can't stop them, to put them in Sanctuary Cities. Boy did the Democrats have a heart attack over that one.

Trump recently made an immigration reform package. It includes changing the application process to using embassies in their own country instead of coming to our border and trying to knock it down. It's putting an end to letting any uneducated lowlife into the country simply because they have relatives here. It will be more merit based than anything, and only people with reasonable English speaking skills with something to offer this country will be allowed in.

Watch how fast Democrats in the House shoot this down.
"Trump is not making all the calls on that one."

Well who's in charge if not trump?

Mostly, it's the Mayors, Governors, and such that are in charge and have a much larger impact one way or another than any 10 Presidents. Trump (and you) are trying to take credit for something you either had little to do with or had nothing to do with once again. What does the rest of us expect, it's just another lie.
 
I'm not talking about murders per se, I'm talking about blindly accepting anything a politician does.

Anything in particular you'd like to address?
Sure, how about the right cheering trump on for saying he's gonna start sending illegal aliens to U.S. cities after campaigning on keeping illegal aliens out and deporting the ones already here. Two conflicting positions and rightards cheer both.

Trump is not making all the calls on that one. If the Democrat politicians don't step in, their liberal activist judges do. In fact it was one of those judges who stopped Trump from keeping people in Mexico as they await their hearing in the US. It was recently overturned, but I'm sure the Democrats will keep pushing the issue to have it turned back.

So it's catch and release all over again. Trump stated that if Democrats love these illegals so much, and the courts ruled he can't stop them, to put them in Sanctuary Cities. Boy did the Democrats have a heart attack over that one.

Trump recently made an immigration reform package. It includes changing the application process to using embassies in their own country instead of coming to our border and trying to knock it down. It's putting an end to letting any uneducated lowlife into the country simply because they have relatives here. It will be more merit based than anything, and only people with reasonable English speaking skills with something to offer this country will be allowed in.

Watch how fast Democrats in the House shoot this down.
"Trump is not making all the calls on that one."

Well who's in charge if not trump?

Mostly, it's the Mayors, Governors, and such that are in charge and have a much larger impact one way or another than any 10 Presidents. Trump (and you) are trying to take credit for something you either had little to do with or had nothing to do with once again. What does the rest of us expect, it's just another lie.
Mayors of Palm Beach and Broward counties, nor the governor of Florida, are asking trump to send them illegal aliens.
 
Anything in particular you'd like to address?
Sure, how about the right cheering trump on for saying he's gonna start sending illegal aliens to U.S. cities after campaigning on keeping illegal aliens out and deporting the ones already here. Two conflicting positions and rightards cheer both.

Trump is not making all the calls on that one. If the Democrat politicians don't step in, their liberal activist judges do. In fact it was one of those judges who stopped Trump from keeping people in Mexico as they await their hearing in the US. It was recently overturned, but I'm sure the Democrats will keep pushing the issue to have it turned back.

So it's catch and release all over again. Trump stated that if Democrats love these illegals so much, and the courts ruled he can't stop them, to put them in Sanctuary Cities. Boy did the Democrats have a heart attack over that one.

Trump recently made an immigration reform package. It includes changing the application process to using embassies in their own country instead of coming to our border and trying to knock it down. It's putting an end to letting any uneducated lowlife into the country simply because they have relatives here. It will be more merit based than anything, and only people with reasonable English speaking skills with something to offer this country will be allowed in.

Watch how fast Democrats in the House shoot this down.
"Trump is not making all the calls on that one."

Well who's in charge if not trump?

Mostly, it's the Mayors, Governors, and such that are in charge and have a much larger impact one way or another than any 10 Presidents. Trump (and you) are trying to take credit for something you either had little to do with or had nothing to do with once again. What does the rest of us expect, it's just another lie.
Mayors of Palm Beach and Broward counties, nor the governor of Florida, are asking trump to send them illegal aliens.
But....but...leftards love those poorly skilled, poorly educated illegals, lil faun???
 
Sure, how about the right cheering trump on for saying he's gonna start sending illegal aliens to U.S. cities after campaigning on keeping illegal aliens out and deporting the ones already here. Two conflicting positions and rightards cheer both.

Trump is not making all the calls on that one. If the Democrat politicians don't step in, their liberal activist judges do. In fact it was one of those judges who stopped Trump from keeping people in Mexico as they await their hearing in the US. It was recently overturned, but I'm sure the Democrats will keep pushing the issue to have it turned back.

So it's catch and release all over again. Trump stated that if Democrats love these illegals so much, and the courts ruled he can't stop them, to put them in Sanctuary Cities. Boy did the Democrats have a heart attack over that one.

Trump recently made an immigration reform package. It includes changing the application process to using embassies in their own country instead of coming to our border and trying to knock it down. It's putting an end to letting any uneducated lowlife into the country simply because they have relatives here. It will be more merit based than anything, and only people with reasonable English speaking skills with something to offer this country will be allowed in.

Watch how fast Democrats in the House shoot this down.
"Trump is not making all the calls on that one."

Well who's in charge if not trump?

Mostly, it's the Mayors, Governors, and such that are in charge and have a much larger impact one way or another than any 10 Presidents. Trump (and you) are trying to take credit for something you either had little to do with or had nothing to do with once again. What does the rest of us expect, it's just another lie.
Mayors of Palm Beach and Broward counties, nor the governor of Florida, are asking trump to send them illegal aliens.
But....but...leftards love those poorly skilled, poorly educated illegals, lil faun???
Sadly, your post does not address mine.
 
Then you won't have any problem answering the question: who has the right murdered?
I'm not talking about murders per se, I'm talking about blindly accepting anything a politician does.

Anything in particular you'd like to address?
Sure, how about the right cheering trump on for saying he's gonna start sending illegal aliens to U.S. cities after campaigning on keeping illegal aliens out and deporting the ones already here. Two conflicting positions and rightards cheer both.

Trump is not making all the calls on that one. If the Democrat politicians don't step in, their liberal activist judges do. In fact it was one of those judges who stopped Trump from keeping people in Mexico as they await their hearing in the US. It was recently overturned, but I'm sure the Democrats will keep pushing the issue to have it turned back.

So it's catch and release all over again. Trump stated that if Democrats love these illegals so much, and the courts ruled he can't stop them, to put them in Sanctuary Cities. Boy did the Democrats have a heart attack over that one.

Trump recently made an immigration reform package. It includes changing the application process to using embassies in their own country instead of coming to our border and trying to knock it down. It's putting an end to letting any uneducated lowlife into the country simply because they have relatives here. It will be more merit based than anything, and only people with reasonable English speaking skills with something to offer this country will be allowed in.

Watch how fast Democrats in the House shoot this down.
"Trump is not making all the calls on that one."

Well who's in charge if not trump?

In order to end the government shutdown, Congress laid out limitations on beds and holding facilities. Because the courts stopped Trump from keeping asylum seekers in Mexico, they had to come here, and there is simply no place to keep them. So he has to do something because more are on the way.

Piglosi knew quite well that Trump would have no choice but to release them into the US. When Trump said he would send them to sanctuary cities such as the one Piglosi lives in, the Democrats had a heart attack. They got a court to stop Trump from sending these asylum seekers there.

The Democrats pressured Trump into keeping Catch and Release in order to end the government shutdown.
 
Trump is not making all the calls on that one. If the Democrat politicians don't step in, their liberal activist judges do. In fact it was one of those judges who stopped Trump from keeping people in Mexico as they await their hearing in the US. It was recently overturned, but I'm sure the Democrats will keep pushing the issue to have it turned back.

So it's catch and release all over again. Trump stated that if Democrats love these illegals so much, and the courts ruled he can't stop them, to put them in Sanctuary Cities. Boy did the Democrats have a heart attack over that one.

Trump recently made an immigration reform package. It includes changing the application process to using embassies in their own country instead of coming to our border and trying to knock it down. It's putting an end to letting any uneducated lowlife into the country simply because they have relatives here. It will be more merit based than anything, and only people with reasonable English speaking skills with something to offer this country will be allowed in.

Watch how fast Democrats in the House shoot this down.

You mean going back to the embassy method that was used from Obama and back that he changed that is cuasing MOST of the problems to begin with? Once again, you give him credit for causing the bulk of the problem in the first place. He's a disaster in Immigration.

When did DumBama change it and when did we go back? Applying in person at the border has been the law for decades.

It was also allowed to apply at the various embassies. Trump stopped that until just the last few days. You can stop making excuses for your Orange Individual One any time now.

No it wasn't. The LAW has always been you need to apply on US grounds. It's never changed, and a President can't change a law on his own. It needs to go through Congress.

If that were the case then your Orange Individual One would not have changed it back recently. You really need to step slowly away from the Hannity/Rush Radio and go outside for a nice walk in the fresh air.

Then how about one of your own? Commie Fact:

While lamenting family separations at the border and the perilous journey many immigrants take to come to the United States, Republican U.S. Rep. Raul Labrador said immigrants didn’t need to come to U.S. borders to make their asylum requests.

They could do so at a U.S. embassy or consulate abroad, Labrador, of Idaho, claimed.

"What makes these tragedies so unnecessary is there’s already a process in place for those who are legitimately seeking asylum," Labrador wrote. "They can show up at any embassy or consulate abroad or any U.S. port of entry to make their asylum claims."

Individuals can make asylum claims at U.S. ports of entry, but can they also make those claims at "any embassy or consulate abroad"?

No. Asylum claims must be made within the United States.

Asylum seekers must generally apply for the protection within one year of their arrival to the United States.

"A U.S. consulate or embassy is clearly outside the U.S., so you can’t apply for asylum at a U.S. consulate or embassy," said Stephen H. Legomsky, an emeritus professor at the Washington University School of Law in St. Louis who served as chief counsel of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services from 2011 to 2013.

Our ruling
Labrador said immigrants "can show up at any embassy or consulate abroad" to make their asylum claims.

This assurance is completely wrong. Asylum seekers must be within the United States to apply for the protection, according to U.S. law. Immigration law experts affirmed that individuals cannot apply for asylum at a U.S. embassy or consulate abroad.

Labrador’s claim is inaccurate. We rate it False.


No, asylum cannot be requested at US embassies, consulates

And so, Trump wants to change that. He wants to make it legal for asylum seekers to do so at embassies so there is no need to take the death challenging hikes to the US border because of our current laws. You really need to take less fresh walks and go inside to listen to Rush and Hannity. :auiqs.jpg:
 
Three states, including two big ones for the 2020 election, just set new lows for unemployment

I am under no illusion the socialist people's republic of Vermont is gonna go GOP but the other 2 would be a great boost in his reelection campaign in 2020.

Not likely. A new Pennsylvania poll shows Biden with a 12 point lead in Pennsylvania. What is interesting is Trump's support varies very little from 42% to 45%. I know what the Trump supporters are going to say. They are going to bring up 2016 and the polling. The difference is that we have election results to look at as well. The striking thing about this poll is women support Biden by a 24 point margin which is a bigger margin than Clinton won women by.

Poll: Biden leads Trump by double digits in Pennsylvania

In Wisconsin. Democrats swept all the statewide offices. The problem is that Wisconsin is a good government state and the corruption in the Trump administration will turn off voters.
The last polls had Clinton winning Pa by between 2 and 4 points an she lost....polls don't mean jack because they poll city dwellers and more democrats than republicans ALWAYS...why yall tie yourselves to polls is beyond me.
She lost that state with the margin of error. The polls were right.

The average of all polls was 4.1% so no it wasn't even close to the margin of error nor close to any polls.

Pennsylvania 2016 Presidential Election Polls: Clinton vs. Trump
 
Three states, including two big ones for the 2020 election, just set new lows for unemployment

I am under no illusion the socialist people's republic of Vermont is gonna go GOP but the other 2 would be a great boost in his reelection campaign in 2020.

Not likely. A new Pennsylvania poll shows Biden with a 12 point lead in Pennsylvania. What is interesting is Trump's support varies very little from 42% to 45%. I know what the Trump supporters are going to say. They are going to bring up 2016 and the polling. The difference is that we have election results to look at as well. The striking thing about this poll is women support Biden by a 24 point margin which is a bigger margin than Clinton won women by.

Poll: Biden leads Trump by double digits in Pennsylvania

In Wisconsin. Democrats swept all the statewide offices. The problem is that Wisconsin is a good government state and the corruption in the Trump administration will turn off voters.
The last polls had Clinton winning Pa by between 2 and 4 points an she lost....polls don't mean jack because they poll city dwellers and more democrats than republicans ALWAYS...why yall tie yourselves to polls is beyond me.
She lost that state with the margin of error. The polls were right.

The average of all polls was 4.1% so no it wasn't even close to the margin of error nor close to any polls.

Pennsylvania 2016 Presidential Election Polls: Clinton vs. Trump
Uh, no. First of all, the average margin of error was 4 points, so 4.1 points would be close to the margin of error. But more accurately were the polls which included Johnson and Stein, since they were running to. And in a 4 way race, Hillary was predicted to win by an average of 3.7 points -- within the margin of error.
 

Forum List

Back
Top