26 of the Dems who staged anti-gun sit-in are GUNOWNERS!!! HAHAHA

Nobody likes a hypocrite. This is as bad as dems ranting about financial inequality while First Tranny Michelle steals millions of dollars from the taxpayers for her vacations.

26 of the Democrats Who Participated in the Gun Control Sit-In Own Guns

By Jillian Kay Melchior | 2:13 pm, June 23, 2016
Congressional Democrats ended their 25-hour sit-in on the House floor this afternoon, failing to force a vote on two pieces of gun legislation. The controversial sit-in included 26 Democratic lawmakers who themselves own guns, Heat Street learned after examining 2013 USA Today data on congressional firearms ownership. The participants also included 12 more Democrats in Congress who either didn’t respond to USA Today’s gun survey or declined to say whether or not they possessed a firearm.

The sit-in, launched by civil-rights leader Rep. John Lewis, centered on two pieces of proposed gun legislation. One would expand background checks to cover all commercial gun sales; the other seeks tougher prohibitions against gun purchases for terror suspects.
Buncha mo fo's.
Dear little cocksucks. I have been a gun owner for 60 years. And I fully support more controls on the assault weapons. They are the preferred weapon of the mass killers in this nation, irregardless of what stripe the crazies are. That you are trying to paint this as some kind of general ban on guns simply demonstrates the depths of deceit that you will engage in.


who cares

if you dont want one dont own one
 
Nobody likes a hypocrite. This is as bad as dems ranting about financial inequality while First Tranny Michelle steals millions of dollars from the taxpayers for her vacations.

26 of the Democrats Who Participated in the Gun Control Sit-In Own Guns

By Jillian Kay Melchior | 2:13 pm, June 23, 2016
Congressional Democrats ended their 25-hour sit-in on the House floor this afternoon, failing to force a vote on two pieces of gun legislation. The controversial sit-in included 26 Democratic lawmakers who themselves own guns, Heat Street learned after examining 2013 USA Today data on congressional firearms ownership. The participants also included 12 more Democrats in Congress who either didn’t respond to USA Today’s gun survey or declined to say whether or not they possessed a firearm.

The sit-in, launched by civil-rights leader Rep. John Lewis, centered on two pieces of proposed gun legislation. One would expand background checks to cover all commercial gun sales; the other seeks tougher prohibitions against gun purchases for terror suspects.
Buncha mo fo's.
Dear little cocksucks. I have been a gun owner for 60 years. And I fully support more controls on the assault weapons. They are the preferred weapon of the mass killers in this nation, irregardless of what stripe the crazies are. That you are trying to paint this as some kind of general ban on guns simply demonstrates the depths of deceit that you will engage in.
Charlie Wrangel said no American citizen needs to own a gun. Last time I checked he's a voting democrat! What say you? Course old Charlie says he's special and he deserves one. Now what say you?
 
O
Shows there are responsible gun owners out there who support reasonable regulations restricting terrorist access to guns

85% of Americans support it, Republicans won't even allow a vote

Republicans voted on it last week in the Senate.

4 bills failed to pass.

What gives the Democrat members of the House the idea that any bill voted on would pass, and if it did, it would pass in the Senate?

The key is VOTE for or against the bill and then let the voters decide

Right now, these bills get buried in committee and nobody is held accoutable
Remember when Reid allowed no votes? You loved it then didn't you hypocrite?

Reid allowed votes after Sandy Hook....Republicans blocked it

It was those kill Obamacare bills that never saw the light of day
Oh. OK. You admit Harry Reid is an obstructionist?
Harry was willing to put Republican bills up for a vote if Republicans allowed Democratic bills to proceed without filibuster

Guess which bills would have actually passed?
 
How to get a gun Without a Background Check

Obtaining a gun without a background check in the United States (and much of the world) is a fairly easy process, and is becoming easier all the time. Here are some of the common methods of obtaining a gun without a background check.

1. Have someone who can pass the background check buy it for you. This is illegal to do for someone who is forbidden from possessing guns. It is known as a straw purchase. The BATFE says that it is the most common method for criminals to obtain guns. In most states it is not illegal to buy a gun for someone who may legally possess one, as a gift.

2. Steal it. This is a common method for criminals to obtain guns. If you are of the persuasion that thinks more government is the answer to every problem, you might want to make it illegal for people to have their guns stolen, or to require that guns be locked up in vaults, making them harder to steal.

The Supreme Court has already ruled that it is unconstitutional to require people to have their guns locked up. People have a right to have loaded handguns (the type most commonly used in crime) unlocked in their home as ruled in the Heller decision. This ruling was extended to the states in McDonald. The Newtown shooter stole the guns he used, and murdered his mother in order to do so.

3. Buy it from someone who stole it. Another very common source for criminals. Stealing immediately breaks the ability to "trace" the firearm, rendering "tracing" nearly useless for solving crimes. It can be used for demonizing the original victim the gun was stolen from, though. Guns that are used in crime in tight gun control states, that come from states that have greater freedom in obtaining guns (often with lower crime rates), were purchased an average of 11 years before. With over 300 million firearms in the United States, methods two and three are a large and uncontrollable source of guns for criminals. Tens of millions of these guns were made before 1968, have no serial number, and cannot be traced.
How to get a gun Without a Background Check



Now, of the 4 proposals not voted on by the House, which of those do you suppose would have prevented the Orlando shooting?
Do we have laws against robbery and assault? Why, if we know people will break those laws?
 
who gives a shit? Americans are also overwhelmingly stupid and we're a representative democracy, not a direct democracy.
We send every fucking legislator, congress and senate alike, to Washington by majority vote. That is why it matters that our lawmakers pay attention to what the overwhelming majority of us want them to do. We, 92% of us, want to close the background check loopholes and prevent suspected terrorists from buying guns. Our lawmakers will not pass this legislation. The folks my state elected are actually leaders in the effort to get something done. The rest of you should be looking to the ballot box to remedy the situation in November.
and when your party wins back congress go after it. That's how majority rule works. wow.
I don't actually have a party. The President and the democrats seriously disappointed me on that issue when they had the chance and didn't have the balls to take it. But if they're willing to push it now, I'll take it.
so you admit that when the dems held the congress they still didn't do anything as majority party. And yet here we are today. hmmmm seems disingenuous to say the least.
Try, try, try again.
 
hey BTW, didn't the FBI interview the dude in orlando three times? Why didn't they just throw him in jail? I mean wtf Obummer
He didn't meet the criteria everyone is saying doesn't exist for being watched.
then why would he go on a list? I'm just saying you all are talking silly.
I saw an interview with the former Director of the FBI's Terrorist Screening Center 2009-2013 on CSPAN this morning. He said while people are being investigated they are on the watch list, and if there is not enough evidence to keep them on it, they are taken off. So Mateen was most likely on it twice while the FBI was looking into the allegations and then removed.
One of the proposals that was voted down would have alerted the FBI TSC if anyone on the watch lists in the past five years was attempting to buy a gun.
 
False!
Nice try though.
why is it false?

Are you saying it's easier to board a plane with 250 people than buy a gun?
Meaningless comparison.
why, you want the no fly list to be used to stop buying firearms? you admitted someone with a fake passport can board a plane. And then stated that wouldn't happen buying a gun. So buying a gun is more strict already. wow.
Also false but you can dream.
I'm spot on
Of course you are, in your dreams.
 
Well considering this wasn't about taking away anyone's guns, just reasonable controls to keep guns out of the hands of the insane and the terrorists, what's the problem?
Don't bother telling me. Just be aware you need to do a little reading on what this fuss is all about.
Your idea of control is never a reasonable. fuck face
Any ideas that might negatively affect your sales is not reasonable to you.
 
Nobody likes a hypocrite. This is as bad as dems ranting about financial inequality while First Tranny Michelle steals millions of dollars from the taxpayers for her vacations.

26 of the Democrats Who Participated in the Gun Control Sit-In Own Guns

By Jillian Kay Melchior | 2:13 pm, June 23, 2016
Congressional Democrats ended their 25-hour sit-in on the House floor this afternoon, failing to force a vote on two pieces of gun legislation. The controversial sit-in included 26 Democratic lawmakers who themselves own guns, Heat Street learned after examining 2013 USA Today data on congressional firearms ownership. The participants also included 12 more Democrats in Congress who either didn’t respond to USA Today’s gun survey or declined to say whether or not they possessed a firearm.

The sit-in, launched by civil-rights leader Rep. John Lewis, centered on two pieces of proposed gun legislation. One would expand background checks to cover all commercial gun sales; the other seeks tougher prohibitions against gun purchases for terror suspects.
Buncha mo fo's.
Dear little cocksucks. I have been a gun owner for 60 years. And I fully support more controls on the assault weapons. They are the preferred weapon of the mass killers in this nation, irregardless of what stripe the crazies are. That you are trying to paint this as some kind of general ban on guns simply demonstrates the depths of deceit that you will engage in.


who cares

if you dont want one dont own one
Reading not in your very limited skill set?
 
O
Republicans voted on it last week in the Senate.

4 bills failed to pass.

What gives the Democrat members of the House the idea that any bill voted on would pass, and if it did, it would pass in the Senate?

The key is VOTE for or against the bill and then let the voters decide

Right now, these bills get buried in committee and nobody is held accoutable
Remember when Reid allowed no votes? You loved it then didn't you hypocrite?

Reid allowed votes after Sandy Hook....Republicans blocked it

It was those kill Obamacare bills that never saw the light of day
Oh. OK. You admit Harry Reid is an obstructionist?
Harry was willing to put Republican bills up for a vote if Republicans allowed Democratic bills to proceed without filibuster

Guess which bills would have actually passed?
Such a load of bullshit!
 
O
The key is VOTE for or against the bill and then let the voters decide

Right now, these bills get buried in committee and nobody is held accoutable
Remember when Reid allowed no votes? You loved it then didn't you hypocrite?

Reid allowed votes after Sandy Hook....Republicans blocked it

It was those kill Obamacare bills that never saw the light of day
Oh. OK. You admit Harry Reid is an obstructionist?
Harry was willing to put Republican bills up for a vote if Republicans allowed Democratic bills to proceed without filibuster

Guess which bills would have actually passed?
Such a load of bullshit!
True! everything you post is.
Thanks for having the courage to admit it.
 
O
Remember when Reid allowed no votes? You loved it then didn't you hypocrite?

Reid allowed votes after Sandy Hook....Republicans blocked it

It was those kill Obamacare bills that never saw the light of day
Oh. OK. You admit Harry Reid is an obstructionist?
Harry was willing to put Republican bills up for a vote if Republicans allowed Democratic bills to proceed without filibuster

Guess which bills would have actually passed?
Such a load of bullshit!
True! everything you post is.
Thanks for having the courage to admit it.
Ewe are drowning in your bullshit. You got flies in yer eyes!
 
O
Reid allowed votes after Sandy Hook....Republicans blocked it

It was those kill Obamacare bills that never saw the light of day
Oh. OK. You admit Harry Reid is an obstructionist?
Harry was willing to put Republican bills up for a vote if Republicans allowed Democratic bills to proceed without filibuster

Guess which bills would have actually passed?
Such a load of bullshit!
True! everything you post is.
Thanks for having the courage to admit it.
Ewe are drowning in your bullshit. You got flies in yer eyes!
Of course dear , not take your meds.
 
O
Oh. OK. You admit Harry Reid is an obstructionist?
Harry was willing to put Republican bills up for a vote if Republicans allowed Democratic bills to proceed without filibuster

Guess which bills would have actually passed?
Such a load of bullshit!
True! everything you post is.
Thanks for having the courage to admit it.
Ewe are drowning in your bullshit. You got flies in yer eyes!
Of course dear , not take your meds.
You are just an asshole piece of shit. Eat some.
 
O
The key is VOTE for or against the bill and then let the voters decide

Right now, these bills get buried in committee and nobody is held accoutable
Remember when Reid allowed no votes? You loved it then didn't you hypocrite?

Reid allowed votes after Sandy Hook....Republicans blocked it

It was those kill Obamacare bills that never saw the light of day
Oh. OK. You admit Harry Reid is an obstructionist?
Harry was willing to put Republican bills up for a vote if Republicans allowed Democratic bills to proceed without filibuster

Guess which bills would have actually passed?
Such a load of bullshit!
Far from it

Republican filibusters stopped Democratic bills from coming for a vote
Why should Reid have put Republucan bills up for a vote?

Republicans could have offered a deal to stop filibustering if their bills could also come up for a vote.......they wouldn't because they knew their bills would fail and Dems would pass
 
O
Remember when Reid allowed no votes? You loved it then didn't you hypocrite?

Reid allowed votes after Sandy Hook....Republicans blocked it

It was those kill Obamacare bills that never saw the light of day
Oh. OK. You admit Harry Reid is an obstructionist?
Harry was willing to put Republican bills up for a vote if Republicans allowed Democratic bills to proceed without filibuster

Guess which bills would have actually passed?
Such a load of bullshit!
Far from it

Republican filibusters stopped Democratic bills from coming for a vote
Why should Reid have put Republucan bills up for a vote?

Republicans could have offered a deal to stop filibustering if their bills could also come up for a vote.......they wouldn't because they knew their bills would fail and Dems would pass
Nope! Reid did it at Obama's whim so they could falsely claim Republicans were a do nothing Congress! I hate Democrats they are lying weasels and Reid is the top lying weasel.
 
O
Reid allowed votes after Sandy Hook....Republicans blocked it

It was those kill Obamacare bills that never saw the light of day
Oh. OK. You admit Harry Reid is an obstructionist?
Harry was willing to put Republican bills up for a vote if Republicans allowed Democratic bills to proceed without filibuster

Guess which bills would have actually passed?
Such a load of bullshit!
Far from it

Republican filibusters stopped Democratic bills from coming for a vote
Why should Reid have put Republucan bills up for a vote?

Republicans could have offered a deal to stop filibustering if their bills could also come up for a vote.......they wouldn't because they knew their bills would fail and Dems would pass
Nope! Reid did it at Obama's whim so they could falsely claim Republicans were a do nothing Congress! I hate Democrats they are lying weasels and Reid is the top lying weasel.
YOU LIE
 
Nobody likes a hypocrite. This is as bad as dems ranting about financial inequality while First Tranny Michelle steals millions of dollars from the taxpayers for her vacations.

26 of the Democrats Who Participated in the Gun Control Sit-In Own Guns

By Jillian Kay Melchior | 2:13 pm, June 23, 2016
Congressional Democrats ended their 25-hour sit-in on the House floor this afternoon, failing to force a vote on two pieces of gun legislation. The controversial sit-in included 26 Democratic lawmakers who themselves own guns, Heat Street learned after examining 2013 USA Today data on congressional firearms ownership. The participants also included 12 more Democrats in Congress who either didn’t respond to USA Today’s gun survey or declined to say whether or not they possessed a firearm.

The sit-in, launched by civil-rights leader Rep. John Lewis, centered on two pieces of proposed gun legislation. One would expand background checks to cover all commercial gun sales; the other seeks tougher prohibitions against gun purchases for terror suspects.
Gabby Glifford got popped by one and that bitch was a gun owner, so what your point fool?
 
I saw an interview with the former Director of the FBI's Terrorist Screening Center 2009-2013 on CSPAN this morning. He said while people are being investigated they are on the watch list, and if there is not enough evidence to keep them on it, they are taken off. .


HAHAHA. And you believe him??? The govt never takes anyone off their list, you brainless jackass.
 

Forum List

Back
Top