22nd Congressional Candidate Allen West Statement on New Black Panther Party:

[Bfgrn]

Accusations don't stand up to the facts

The Bush administration's Justice Department -- not the Obama administration -- made the decision not to pursue criminal charges against members of the New Black Panther Party for alleged voter intimidation at a polling center in Philadelphia in 2008;

The Obama administration successfully obtained default judgment against Samir Shabazz, a member of the New Black Panther Party carrying a nightstick outside the Philadelphia polling center on Election Day 2008;

The Bush administration DOJ chose not to pursue similar charges against members of the Minutemen, one of whom allegedly carried a weapon while harassing Hispanic voters in Arizona in 2006;

No voters have come forward to claim that they were intimidated from voting on account of the New Black Panthers standing outside the polling center in 2008;

The Republican vice chairwoman of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, which is currently investigating the Justice Department's decision, has called that investigation "very small potatoes" full of "overheated rhetoric filled with insinuations and unsubstantiated charges," and said it has not "served the interests of the commission"; she further said that DOJ has given a "plausible argument" for not pursuing additional charges in the case.

Two wrongs don't make a right. Any 5 year old can tell you that. All cases of voter intimidation should be prosecuted.

Not only that, but the George Soros funded MediaMatters has become the propaganda machine of choice for the Left. Dealing in highly selective sound bites and specifically chosen excerpts for attack and criticism, it is right up there as one of the most partisan, ideologically dishonest, often manufactured, and intentionally manipulative organizations on the internet. And it provides a lot of those sound bites that all sound surprisingly alike in the mainstream media. Mediamatters provides the code word whether that be 'gravitas' or 'explosive' or whatever the mantra of the day is, and you'll find all the talking heads on the alphabet channels and networks using the same identical phrase all on the same day. When somebody puts them together in a montage, it is quite obvious and entirely funny to watch.

But at least Bfgrn using a site that partisan gives me license to use this:

Why haven't national media outlets reported on the vile and violent rants of the New Black Panther Party (NBPP) thugs whose 2008 voter intimidation tactics got a pass from the Obama administration? Simple: Radical black racism doesn't fit the Hope and Change narrative. There's no way to shoehorn Bush-bashing into the story. And, let's face it, exposing the inflammatory rhetoric of the left does nothing to help liberal editors and reporters fulfill their true calling -- embarrassing the right.

This week, Justice Department whistleblower J. Christian Adams came forward with damning public testimony about how Obama officials believe "civil rights law should not be enforced in a race-neutral manner, and should never be enforced against blacks or other national minorities." In the wake of Adams' expose on how the Obama DOJ abandoned default judgments against the NBPP bullies for the sake of politically correct racial politics, a shocking video clip of one of the lead defendants in the Philadelphia voter intimidation case resurfaced on the Internet. It shows bloodthirsty King Samir Shabazz during a 2009 National Geographic documentary interview spewing:

"You want freedom? You're gonna have to kill some crackers! You're gonna have to kill some of their babies!". . . .




. . . .If a Tea Party activist threatened to kill the babies of his political opponents, it wouldn't just be front-page news. It would be the subject of Democrat-led congressional investigations, a series of terrified New York Times columns about the perilous "climate of hate," a Justice Department probe by Attorney General Eric Holder, a domestic terror alert from Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, and another Important Teachable Moment Speech/Summit from Healer-in-Chief Barack Obama.

But with the racism shoe on the other foot, Team Obama and its media water-carriers are exhibiting the very racial cowardice Holder once purported to condemn. Thanks to Obama's feckless Department of Injustice, these black supremacist brutes are free to show up on the next national Election Day at polling places in full paramilitary regalia with nightsticks, hurling racist, anti-American epithets at those exercising their right to vote and at those protecting the integrity of the electoral process.
Whitewashing Black Racism - HUMAN EVENTS

And YOU bring HUMAN EVENTS as a credible source? After the other pea brains bring the Weekly Standard and Fox News as credible sources...WOW, are You for REAL, what a bunch of MORONS...

WHY don't you you read my first post from National Review written by Abigail M. Thernstrom, a Senior Fellow at the Manhattan Institute in New York, and a highly partisan Republican commissioner on the United States Commission on Civil Rights.

National Review

The National Review based in New York City and founded by William F. Buckley, Jr., considered one of the godfathers of American conservatism, is one of the oldest and most influential conservative magazines in the United States. It regularly publishes the work of some of the nation's leading conservatives. National Review Online provides some of the articles from the print publication online as well as original material. In the early 1990s they had, with the Heritage Foundation, a joint venture called 'Town Hall'. This BBS became a forum on Compuserve in 1994 and in June 1995 the web site 'townhall.com' went live. Townhall.com became a project of the Heritage Foundation until it was purchased in 2006 by Salem Communications Corporation. The current director of the National Review is Jeff Sandefer, President of the Texas-based energy investment firm Sandefer Capital.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Two wrongs don't make a right. Any 5 year old can tell you that. All cases of voter intimidation should be prosecuted.

Not only that, but the George Soros funded MediaMatters has become the propaganda machine of choice for the Left. Dealing in highly selective sound bites and specifically chosen excerpts for attack and criticism, it is right up there as one of the most partisan, ideologically dishonest, often manufactured, and intentionally manipulative organizations on the internet. And it provides a lot of those sound bites that all sound surprisingly alike in the mainstream media. Mediamatters provides the code word whether that be 'gravitas' or 'explosive' or whatever the mantra of the day is, and you'll find all the talking heads on the alphabet channels and networks using the same identical phrase all on the same day. When somebody puts them together in a montage, it is quite obvious and entirely funny to watch.

But at least Bfgrn using a site that partisan gives me license to use this:

Why haven't national media outlets reported on the vile and violent rants of the New Black Panther Party (NBPP) thugs whose 2008 voter intimidation tactics got a pass from the Obama administration? Simple: Radical black racism doesn't fit the Hope and Change narrative. There's no way to shoehorn Bush-bashing into the story. And, let's face it, exposing the inflammatory rhetoric of the left does nothing to help liberal editors and reporters fulfill their true calling -- embarrassing the right.

This week, Justice Department whistleblower J. Christian Adams came forward with damning public testimony about how Obama officials believe "civil rights law should not be enforced in a race-neutral manner, and should never be enforced against blacks or other national minorities." In the wake of Adams' expose on how the Obama DOJ abandoned default judgments against the NBPP bullies for the sake of politically correct racial politics, a shocking video clip of one of the lead defendants in the Philadelphia voter intimidation case resurfaced on the Internet. It shows bloodthirsty King Samir Shabazz during a 2009 National Geographic documentary interview spewing:

"You want freedom? You're gonna have to kill some crackers! You're gonna have to kill some of their babies!". . . .




. . . .If a Tea Party activist threatened to kill the babies of his political opponents, it wouldn't just be front-page news. It would be the subject of Democrat-led congressional investigations, a series of terrified New York Times columns about the perilous "climate of hate," a Justice Department probe by Attorney General Eric Holder, a domestic terror alert from Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, and another Important Teachable Moment Speech/Summit from Healer-in-Chief Barack Obama.

But with the racism shoe on the other foot, Team Obama and its media water-carriers are exhibiting the very racial cowardice Holder once purported to condemn. Thanks to Obama's feckless Department of Injustice, these black supremacist brutes are free to show up on the next national Election Day at polling places in full paramilitary regalia with nightsticks, hurling racist, anti-American epithets at those exercising their right to vote and at those protecting the integrity of the electoral process.
Whitewashing Black Racism - HUMAN EVENTS

And YOU bring HUMAN EVENTS as a credible source? After the other pea brains bring the Weekly Standard and Fox News as credible sources...WOW, are You for REAL, what a bunch of MORONS...

WHY don't you you read my first post from National Review written by Abigail M. Thernstrom, a Senior Fellow at the Manhattan Institute in New York, and a highly partisan Republican commissioner on the United States Commission on Civil Rights.

National Review

The National Review based in New York City and founded by William F. Buckley, Jr., considered one of the godfathers of American conservatism, is one of the oldest and most influential conservative magazines in the United States. It regularly publishes the work of some of the nation's leading conservatives. National Review Online provides some of the articles from the print publication online as well as original material. In the early 1990s they had, with the Heritage Foundation, a joint venture called 'Town Hall'. This BBS became a forum on Compuserve in 1994 and in June 1995 the web site 'townhall.com' went live. Townhall.com became a project of the Heritage Foundation until it was purchased in 2006 by Salem Communications Corporation. The current director of the National Review is Jeff Sandefer, President of the Texas-based energy investment firm Sandefer Capital.

 

[The T]

Two wrongs don't make a right. Any 5 year old can tell you that. All cases of voter intimidation should be prosecuted.

Not only that, but the George Soros funded MediaMatters has become the propaganda machine of choice for the Left. Dealing in highly selective sound bites and specifically chosen excerpts for attack and criticism, it is right up there as one of the most partisan, ideologically dishonest, often manufactured, and intentionally manipulative organizations on the internet. And it provides a lot of those sound bites that all sound surprisingly alike in the mainstream media. Mediamatters provides the code word whether that be 'gravitas' or 'explosive' or whatever the mantra of the day is, and you'll find all the talking heads on the alphabet channels and networks using the same identical phrase all on the same day. When somebody puts them together in a montage, it is quite obvious and entirely funny to watch.

But at least Bfgrn using a site that partisan gives me license to use this:

Why haven't national media outlets reported on the vile and violent rants of the New Black Panther Party (NBPP) thugs whose 2008 voter intimidation tactics got a pass from the Obama administration? Simple: Radical black racism doesn't fit the Hope and Change narrative. There's no way to shoehorn Bush-bashing into the story. And, let's face it, exposing the inflammatory rhetoric of the left does nothing to help liberal editors and reporters fulfill their true calling -- embarrassing the right.

This week, Justice Department whistleblower J. Christian Adams came forward with damning public testimony about how Obama officials believe "civil rights law should not be enforced in a race-neutral manner, and should never be enforced against blacks or other national minorities." In the wake of Adams' expose on how the Obama DOJ abandoned default judgments against the NBPP bullies for the sake of politically correct racial politics, a shocking video clip of one of the lead defendants in the Philadelphia voter intimidation case resurfaced on the Internet. It shows bloodthirsty King Samir Shabazz during a 2009 National Geographic documentary interview spewing:

"You want freedom? You're gonna have to kill some crackers! You're gonna have to kill some of their babies!". . . .




. . . .If a Tea Party activist threatened to kill the babies of his political opponents, it wouldn't just be front-page news. It would be the subject of Democrat-led congressional investigations, a series of terrified New York Times columns about the perilous "climate of hate," a Justice Department probe by Attorney General Eric Holder, a domestic terror alert from Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, and another Important Teachable Moment Speech/Summit from Healer-in-Chief Barack Obama.

But with the racism shoe on the other foot, Team Obama and its media water-carriers are exhibiting the very racial cowardice Holder once purported to condemn. Thanks to Obama's feckless Department of Injustice, these black supremacist brutes are free to show up on the next national Election Day at polling places in full paramilitary regalia with nightsticks, hurling racist, anti-American epithets at those exercising their right to vote and at those protecting the integrity of the electoral process.
Whitewashing Black Racism - HUMAN EVENTS

And YOU bring HUMAN EVENTS as a credible source? After the other pea brains bring the Weekly Standard and Fox News as credible sources...WOW, are You for REAL, what a bunch of MORONS...

WHY don't you you read my first post from National Review written by Abigail M. Thernstrom, a Senior Fellow at the Manhattan Institute in New York, and a highly partisan Republican commissioner on the United States Commission on Civil Rights.

National Review

The National Review based in New York City and founded by William F. Buckley, Jr., considered one of the godfathers of American conservatism, is one of the oldest and most influential conservative magazines in the United States. It regularly publishes the work of some of the nation's leading conservatives. National Review Online provides some of the articles from the print publication online as well as original material. In the early 1990s they had, with the Heritage Foundation, a joint venture called 'Town Hall'. This BBS became a forum on Compuserve in 1994 and in June 1995 the web site 'townhall.com' went live. Townhall.com became a project of the Heritage Foundation until it was purchased in 2006 by Salem Communications Corporation. The current director of the National Review is Jeff Sandefer, President of the Texas-based energy investment firm Sandefer Capital.

Nice deflection. Obama's DOJ did this. Period.

 

[Bfgrn]

Not only that, but the George Soros funded MediaMatters has become the propaganda machine of choice for the Left. Dealing in highly selective sound bites and specifically chosen excerpts for attack and criticism, it is right up there as one of the most partisan, ideologically dishonest, often manufactured, and intentionally manipulative organizations on the internet. And it provides a lot of those sound bites that all sound surprisingly alike in the mainstream media. Mediamatters provides the code word whether that be 'gravitas' or 'explosive' or whatever the mantra of the day is, and you'll find all the talking heads on the alphabet channels and networks using the same identical phrase all on the same day. When somebody puts them together in a montage, it is quite obvious and entirely funny to watch.

But at least Bfgrn using a site that partisan gives me license to use this:

And YOU bring HUMAN EVENTS as a credible source? After the other pea brains bring the Weekly Standard and Fox News as credible sources...WOW, are You for REAL, what a bunch of MORONS...

WHY don't you you read my first post from National Review written by Abigail M. Thernstrom, a Senior Fellow at the Manhattan Institute in New York, and a highly partisan Republican commissioner on the United States Commission on Civil Rights.

National Review

The National Review based in New York City and founded by William F. Buckley, Jr., considered one of the godfathers of American conservatism, is one of the oldest and most influential conservative magazines in the United States. It regularly publishes the work of some of the nation's leading conservatives. National Review Online provides some of the articles from the print publication online as well as original material. In the early 1990s they had, with the Heritage Foundation, a joint venture called 'Town Hall'. This BBS became a forum on Compuserve in 1994 and in June 1995 the web site 'townhall.com' went live. Townhall.com became a project of the Heritage Foundation until it was purchased in 2006 by Salem Communications Corporation. The current director of the National Review is Jeff Sandefer, President of the Texas-based energy investment firm Sandefer Capital.

Nice deflection. Obama's DOJ did this. Period.

How does the dogmatic mind manifest in spoken word... "Obama's DOJ did this. Period. "

 

[Trajan]

Abigail obviously didn't see the videotaped interview with the 'non threatening' guy with the billy club.

nor apparently, did she read Bartle Bulls affidavit.

 

[Bfgrn]

Abigail obviously didn't see the videotaped interview with the 'non threatening' guy with the billy club.

nor apparently, did she read Bartle Bulls affidavit.

HERE IS the video asshole...

TELL ME where he threatens anyone you moron...

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neGbKHyGuHU]YouTube - "Security" patrols stationed at polling places in Philly[/ame]

 

[The T]

Abigail obviously didn't see the videotaped interview with the 'non threatening' guy with the billy club.

nor apparently, did she read Bartle Bulls affidavit.

HERE IS the video asshole...

TELL ME where he threatens anyone you moron...

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neGbKHyGuHU"]YouTube - "Security" patrols stationed at polling places in Philly[/ame]

Didn't read the affadavits, did you? That vid is miniscule. What did we miss?

That's your problem. YOU are makin excuses for these Terrorists.

Making excuses for Obama's DOJ that ordered the charges dropped. Why didn't the defendants appear in Court?

Why is Holder's DOJ blocking an inquiry into this?

Sorry Bufu...you lose.

 

[Care4all]

FYI

The Foundation
Ten-Point Program
Vision
Legacy
e-mail
There Is No New Black Panther Party: An Open Letter From the Dr. Huey P. Newton Foundation
In response from numerous requests from individual's seeking information on the "New Black Panthers," the Dr. Huey P. Newton Foundation issues this public statement to correct the distorted record being made in the media by a small band of African Americans calling themselves the New Black Panthers. As guardian of the true history of the Black Panther Party, the Foundation, which includes former leading members of the Party, denounces this group's exploitation of the Party's name and history. Failing to find its own legitimacy in the black community, this band would graft the Party's name upon itself, which we condemn.

Firstly, the people in the New Black Panthers were never members of the Black Panther Party and have no legitimate claim on the Party's name. On the contrary, they would steal the names and pretend to walk in the footsteps of the Party's true heroes, such as Black Panther founder Huey P. Newton, George Jackson and Jonathan Jackson, Bunchy Carter, John Huggins, Fred Hampton, Mark Cark, and so many others who gave their very lives to the black liberation struggle under the Party's banner.

Secondly, they denigrate the Party's name by promoting concepts absolutely counter to the revolutionary principles on which the Party was founded. Their alleged media assault on the Ku Klux Klan serves to incite hatred rather than resolve it. The Party's fundamental principle, as best articulated by the great revolutionary Ernesto "Che" Guevara, was: "A true revolutionary is guided by great feelings of love." The Black Panthers were never a group of angry young militants full of fury toward the "white establishment." The Party operated on love for black people, not hatred of white people.

Furthermore, this group claims it would "teach" the black community about armed self-defense. The arrogance of this claim is overwhelmed by its reactionary nature. Blacks, especially in the South, have been armed in self-defense for a very long time; indeed, the spiritual parent of the Party itself was the Louisiana-based Deacons for Defense. However, the Party understood that the gun was not necessarily revolutionary, for the police and all other oppressive forces had guns. It was the ideology behind the gun that determined its nature.

CONTINUED: http://www.blackpanther.org/newsalert.htm

 

[The T]

FYI

The Foundation
Ten-Point Program
Vision
Legacy
e-mail
There Is No New Black Panther Party: An Open Letter From the Dr. Huey P. Newton Foundation
In response from numerous requests from individual's seeking information on the "New Black Panthers," the Dr. Huey P. Newton Foundation issues this public statement to correct the distorted record being made in the media by a small band of African Americans calling themselves the New Black Panthers. As guardian of the true history of the Black Panther Party, the Foundation, which includes former leading members of the Party, denounces this group's exploitation of the Party's name and history. Failing to find its own legitimacy in the black community, this band would graft the Party's name upon itself, which we condemn.

Firstly, the people in the New Black Panthers were never members of the Black Panther Party and have no legitimate claim on the Party's name. On the contrary, they would steal the names and pretend to walk in the footsteps of the Party's true heroes, such as Black Panther founder Huey P. Newton, George Jackson and Jonathan Jackson, Bunchy Carter, John Huggins, Fred Hampton, Mark Cark, and so many others who gave their very lives to the black liberation struggle under the Party's banner.

Secondly, they denigrate the Party's name by promoting concepts absolutely counter to the revolutionary principles on which the Party was founded. Their alleged media assault on the Ku Klux Klan serves to incite hatred rather than resolve it. The Party's fundamental principle, as best articulated by the great revolutionary Ernesto "Che" Guevara, was: "A true revolutionary is guided by great feelings of love." The Black Panthers were never a group of angry young militants full of fury toward the "white establishment." The Party operated on love for black people, not hatred of white people.

Furthermore, this group claims it would "teach" the black community about armed self-defense. The arrogance of this claim is overwhelmed by its reactionary nature. Blacks, especially in the South, have been armed in self-defense for a very long time; indeed, the spiritual parent of the Party itself was the Louisiana-based Deacons for Defense. However, the Party understood that the gun was not necessarily revolutionary, for the police and all other oppressive forces had guns. It was the ideology behind the gun that determined its nature.

CONTINUED: http://www.blackpanther.org/newsalert.htm

Nice Find...However it doesn't excuse the dismissal of this case no matter whom these 'New' Panthers are. They're Domestic Terrorists, and should be treated as such.

 

[Bfgrn]

nor apparently, did she read Bartle Bulls affidavit.

HERE IS the video asshole...

TELL ME where he threatens anyone you moron...

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neGbKHyGuHU"]YouTube - "Security" patrols stationed at polling places in Philly[/ame]

Didn't read the affadavits, did you? That vid is miniscule. What did we miss?

That's your problem. YOU are makin excuses for these Terrorists.

Making excuses for Obama's DOJ that ordered the charges dropped. Why didn't the defendants appear in Court?

Why is Holder's DOJ blocking an inquiry into this?

Sorry Bufu...you lose.

I DID read the affidavits, it appears YOU didn't.

http://www.usccr.gov/NBPH/04-23-2010_NBPPhearing.pdf#page=72

Republican Civil Rights commissioner: Adams "doesn't know why the decision was made." Abigail Thernstrom, the Republican vice chairwoman of the Civil Rights Commission, said during an April 23 hearing into the case:

I know Chris Adams very well, and he doesn't know why the decision was made, which was the question before -- that we were supposed to be addressing at this Commission.

AND...

Obama DOJ actually obtained judgment against individual carrying weapon at polling place

May 2009: DOJ obtained default judgment against Shabazz for carrying weapon outside polling station. On May 18, 2009, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania entered default judgment against Samir Shabazz. In his May 14 testimony before the Commission on Civil Rights, Perez stated that the Justice Department had obtained "sufficient evidence to sustain the charge" of voter intimidation against Shabazz, identified by Perez as "the defendant who had the nightstick," and that "the default judgment was sought and obtained as it related to him." Perez testified:

PEREZ: Based on the careful review of the evidence, the Department concluded that the evidence collected supported the allegations in the complaint against Minister King Samir Shabazz. The Department, therefore, obtained an injunction against defendant King Samir Shabazz, prohibiting him from displaying a weapon within 100 feet of an open polling place on any Election Day in the City of Philadelphia or from otherwise violating Section 11(b).

The Department considers this injunction to be tailored appropriately to the scope of the violation and the constitutional requirements and will fully enforce the injunction's terms.

 

[Foxfyre]

The Ten Point Plan
From Blackpanther.org

1. WE WANT FREEDOM. WE WANT POWER TO DETERMINE THE DESTINY OF OUR BLACK AND OPPRESSED COMMUNITIES.
We believe that Black and oppressed people will not be free until we are able to determine our destinies in our own communities ourselves, by fully controlling all the institutions which exist in our communities.

2. WE WANT FULL EMPLOYMENT FOR OUR PEOPLE.
We believe that the federal government is responsible and obligated to give every person employment or a guaranteed income. We believe that if the American businessmen will not give full employment, then the technology and means of production should be taken from the businessmen and placed in the community so that the people of the community can organize and employ all of its people and give a high standard of living.

3. WE WANT AN END TO THE ROBBERY BY THE CAPITALISTS OF OUR BLACK AND OPPRESSED COMMUNITIES.
We believe that this racist government has robbed us and now we are demanding the overdue debt of forty acres and two mules. Forty acres and two mules were promised 100 years ago as restitution for slave labor and mass murder of Black people. We will accept the payment in currency which will be distributed to our many communities. The American racist has taken part in the slaughter of our fifty million Black people. Therefore, we feel this is a modest demand that we make.

4. WE WANT DECENT HOUSING, FIT FOR THE SHELTER OF HUMAN BEINGS.
We believe that if the landlords will not give decent housing to our Black and oppressed communities, then housing and the land should be made into cooperatives so that the people in our communities, with government aid, can build and make decent housing for the people.

5. WE WANT DECENT EDUCATION FOR OUR PEOPLE THAT EXPOSES THE TRUE NATURE OF THIS DECADENT AMERICAN SOCIETY. WE WANT EDUCATION THAT TEACHES US OUR TRUE HISTORY AND OUR ROLE IN THE PRESENT-DAY SOCIETY.
We believe in an educational system that will give to our people a knowledge of the self. If you do not have knowledge of yourself and your position in the society and in the world, then you will have little chance to know anything else.

6. WE WANT COMPLETELY FREE HEALTH CARE FOR All BLACK AND OPPRESSED PEOPLE.
We believe that the government must provide, free of charge, for the people, health facilities which will not only treat our illnesses, most of which have come about as a result of our oppression, but which will also develop preventive medical programs to guarantee our future survival. We believe that mass health education and research programs must be developed to give all Black and oppressed people access to advanced scientific and medical information, so we may provide our selves with proper medical attention and care.

7. WE WANT AN IMMEDIATE END TO POLICE BRUTALITY AND MURDER OF BLACK PEOPLE, OTHER PEOPLE OF COLOR, All OPPRESSED PEOPLE INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.
We believe that the racist and fascist government of the United States uses its domestic enforcement agencies to carry out its program of oppression against black people, other people of color and poor people inside the united States. We believe it is our right, therefore, to defend ourselves against such armed forces and that all Black and oppressed people should be armed for self defense of our homes and communities against these fascist police forces.

8. WE WANT AN IMMEDIATE END TO ALL WARS OF AGGRESSION.
We believe that the various conflicts which exist around the world stem directly from the aggressive desire of the United States ruling circle and government to force its domination upon the oppressed people of the world. We believe that if the United States government or its lackeys do not cease these aggressive wars it is the right of the people to defend themselves by any means necessary against their aggressors.

9. WE WANT FREEDOM FOR ALL BLACK AND OPPRESSED PEOPLE NOW HELD IN U. S. FEDERAL, STATE, COUNTY, CITY AND MILITARY PRISONS AND JAILS. WE WANT TRIALS BY A JURY OF PEERS FOR All PERSONS CHARGED WITH SO-CALLED CRIMES UNDER THE LAWS OF THIS COUNTRY.
We believe that the many Black and poor oppressed people now held in United States prisons and jails have not received fair and impartial trials under a racist and fascist judicial system and should be free from incarceration. We believe in the ultimate elimination of all wretched, inhuman penal institutions, because the masses of men and women imprisoned inside the United States or by the United States military are the victims of oppressive conditions which are the real cause of their imprisonment. We believe that when persons are brought to trial they must be guaranteed, by the United States, juries of their peers, attorneys of their choice and freedom from imprisonment while awaiting trial.

10. WE WANT LAND, BREAD, HOUSING, EDUCATION, CLOTHING, JUSTICE, PEACE AND PEOPLE'S COMMUNITY CONTROL OF MODERN TECHNOLOGY.
When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bonds which have connected them with another, and to assume, among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that, whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute a new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and, accordingly, all experience hath shown that mankind are most disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But, when a long train of abuses and usurpation, pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security.
http://www.blackpanther.org/TenPoint.htm

 

[The T]

The Ten Point Plan
From Blackpanther.org

1. WE WANT FREEDOM. WE WANT POWER TO DETERMINE THE DESTINY OF OUR BLACK AND OPPRESSED COMMUNITIES.
We believe that Black and oppressed people will not be free until we are able to determine our destinies in our own communities ourselves, by fully controlling all the institutions which exist in our communities.

2. WE WANT FULL EMPLOYMENT FOR OUR PEOPLE.
We believe that the federal government is responsible and obligated to give every person employment or a guaranteed income. We believe that if the American businessmen will not give full employment, then the technology and means of production should be taken from the businessmen and placed in the community so that the people of the community can organize and employ all of its people and give a high standard of living.

3. WE WANT AN END TO THE ROBBERY BY THE CAPITALISTS OF OUR BLACK AND OPPRESSED COMMUNITIES.
We believe that this racist government has robbed us and now we are demanding the overdue debt of forty acres and two mules. Forty acres and two mules were promised 100 years ago as restitution for slave labor and mass murder of Black people. We will accept the payment in currency which will be distributed to our many communities. The American racist has taken part in the slaughter of our fifty million Black people. Therefore, we feel this is a modest demand that we make.

4. WE WANT DECENT HOUSING, FIT FOR THE SHELTER OF HUMAN BEINGS.
We believe that if the landlords will not give decent housing to our Black and oppressed communities, then housing and the land should be made into cooperatives so that the people in our communities, with government aid, can build and make decent housing for the people.

5. WE WANT DECENT EDUCATION FOR OUR PEOPLE THAT EXPOSES THE TRUE NATURE OF THIS DECADENT AMERICAN SOCIETY. WE WANT EDUCATION THAT TEACHES US OUR TRUE HISTORY AND OUR ROLE IN THE PRESENT-DAY SOCIETY.
We believe in an educational system that will give to our people a knowledge of the self. If you do not have knowledge of yourself and your position in the society and in the world, then you will have little chance to know anything else.

6. WE WANT COMPLETELY FREE HEALTH CARE FOR All BLACK AND OPPRESSED PEOPLE.
We believe that the government must provide, free of charge, for the people, health facilities which will not only treat our illnesses, most of which have come about as a result of our oppression, but which will also develop preventive medical programs to guarantee our future survival. We believe that mass health education and research programs must be developed to give all Black and oppressed people access to advanced scientific and medical information, so we may provide our selves with proper medical attention and care.

7. WE WANT AN IMMEDIATE END TO POLICE BRUTALITY AND MURDER OF BLACK PEOPLE, OTHER PEOPLE OF COLOR, All OPPRESSED PEOPLE INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.
We believe that the racist and fascist government of the United States uses its domestic enforcement agencies to carry out its program of oppression against black people, other people of color and poor people inside the united States. We believe it is our right, therefore, to defend ourselves against such armed forces and that all Black and oppressed people should be armed for self defense of our homes and communities against these fascist police forces.

8. WE WANT AN IMMEDIATE END TO ALL WARS OF AGGRESSION.
We believe that the various conflicts which exist around the world stem directly from the aggressive desire of the United States ruling circle and government to force its domination upon the oppressed people of the world. We believe that if the United States government or its lackeys do not cease these aggressive wars it is the right of the people to defend themselves by any means necessary against their aggressors.

9. WE WANT FREEDOM FOR ALL BLACK AND OPPRESSED PEOPLE NOW HELD IN U. S. FEDERAL, STATE, COUNTY, CITY AND MILITARY PRISONS AND JAILS. WE WANT TRIALS BY A JURY OF PEERS FOR All PERSONS CHARGED WITH SO-CALLED CRIMES UNDER THE LAWS OF THIS COUNTRY.
We believe that the many Black and poor oppressed people now held in United States prisons and jails have not received fair and impartial trials under a racist and fascist judicial system and should be free from incarceration. We believe in the ultimate elimination of all wretched, inhuman penal institutions, because the masses of men and women imprisoned inside the United States or by the United States military are the victims of oppressive conditions which are the real cause of their imprisonment. We believe that when persons are brought to trial they must be guaranteed, by the United States, juries of their peers, attorneys of their choice and freedom from imprisonment while awaiting trial.

10. WE WANT LAND, BREAD, HOUSING, EDUCATION, CLOTHING, JUSTICE, PEACE AND PEOPLE'S COMMUNITY CONTROL OF MODERN TECHNOLOGY.
When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bonds which have connected them with another, and to assume, among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that, whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute a new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and, accordingly, all experience hath shown that mankind are most disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But, when a long train of abuses and usurpation, pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security.
http://www.blackpanther.org/TenPoint.htm

Notice the "WE WANT"?

Whatever happened to working for what you want?

They can go to Hell.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Thursday, July 08, 2010

(Deerfield Beach, FL) “The recent decision by the Obama Justice Department to drop all charges of voter intimidation against the New Black Panther Party during the 2008 Election represents a sad day for all Americans. For an Administration that promised a new era in race relations, Obama and the Democrats in Congress have demonstrated that race will continually be exploited for political gain. It is outright hypocrisy that the Justice Department under Attorney General Holder is suing a sovereign American State, yet dismissing this heinous violation of our Constitution – the right to vote.

Throughout history, the Democrat party has been the standard bearer of voter intimidation in America – only this time the once victim is now the perpetrator.
The recent comments and actions of the New Black Panther Party are despicable, disgusting, and completely reprehensible. It is with no reservation that I make a formal condemnation of this racist and extremist group, which is anathema to the principles and values that make America a great Nation. For those who would define our country as a “nation of cowards,” or who feel the United States is neither great nor exceptional, and to any other racist and extremist groups, feel free to show yourselves the door...


...The dye has been cast in this election cycle – Democrats and their liberal progressive socialist allies will continue to play the race card when it is politically expedient. I demand an investigation of the New Black Panther Partyand the placement of it, along with any extremist group, be placed on the Terrorist Watch List if warranted. If that it not done prior to my taking the oath of office as a United States Congressman, it will happen soon thereafter.”

Read More of the statement.

___________________________

I Concur.

Wow! Who is this guy?!!

You don't find Democrats so bold and honest! I'd vote for him!

Id be concerned if Dems are going to start trying to be honest, I mean that's rare and refreshing

 

[Foxfyre]

I wish there were more politicians willing to tell it like it is too Frank. But West left out the part that he also cast the dye to be sure that all the power of the Obama Administration and its surrogates will see to it that West is destroyed if there is any way to do that. You've seen it happen time and time again if somebody like him starts to gain some traction.

Back to the Black Panther Party and Care's post that there is no New Black Panther Party, the only references I have found for the New Black Panther Party is in political blogs, Wiki, a Megyn Kelly piece and a Glen Beck piece. Beck held two sets of a 'platform' or 'policy' of the 'old' Black Panthers and also the 'new" Black Panthers--these appeared to be enlarged versions of the Ten Point Plan--and pointed out the similarties between the two.

Here's the video of that segment--the plan comparisons come a little over half way, but Kelly and Beck and I'm sure others are still digging and coming up with all sorts of stuff that the mainstream media doesn't yet have the balls to print:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_8O8x71XnQs]YouTube - Glenn Beck-New Black Panthers part1[/ame]

Now it's easy to say that none of this is proof of voter intimidation of those two Black Panther guys. You have to see the entire on site encounter--the Youtube clip doesn't do it justice--the affidavits, transcripts, etc. to see that Holder had an excellent case against these guys. But all of this other stuff is what an attorney would use as character references showing motive, opportunity, and intent.

 

[Bfgrn]

I wish there were more politicians willing to tell it like it is too Frank. But West left out the part that he also cast the dye to be sure that all the power of the Obama Administration and its surrogates will see to it that West is destroyed if there is any way to do that. You've seen it happen time and time again if somebody like him starts to gain some traction.

Back to the Black Panther Party and Care's post that there is no New Black Panther Party, the only references I have found for the New Black Panther Party is in political blogs, Wiki, a Megyn Kelly piece and a Glen Beck piece. Beck held two sets of a 'platform' or 'policy' of the 'old' Black Panthers and also the 'new" Black Panthers--these appeared to be enlarged versions of the Ten Point Plan--and pointed out the similarties between the two.

Here's the video of that segment--the plan comparisons come a little over half way, but Kelly and Beck and I'm sure others are still digging and coming up with all sorts of stuff that the mainstream media doesn't yet have the balls to print:

YouTube - Glenn Beck-New Black Panthers part1

Now it's easy to say that none of this is proof of voter intimidation of those two Black Panther guys. You have to see the entire on site encounter--the Youtube clip doesn't do it justice--the affidavits, transcripts, etc. to see that Holder had an excellent case against these guys. But all of this other stuff is what an attorney would use as character references showing motive, opportunity, and intent.

No voters have come forward to claim that they were intimidated from voting on account of the New Black Panthers standing outside the polling center in 2008

But don't let that FACT change your moronic rant.

Thank you Foxfyre...now you have exposed who you really are...a right wing pea brain, a racist and a moron.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I wish there were more politicians willing to tell it like it is too Frank. But West left out the part that he also cast the dye to be sure that all the power of the Obama Administration and its surrogates will see to it that West is destroyed if there is any way to do that. You've seen it happen time and time again if somebody like him starts to gain some traction.

Back to the Black Panther Party and Care's post that there is no New Black Panther Party, the only references I have found for the New Black Panther Party is in political blogs, Wiki, a Megyn Kelly piece and a Glen Beck piece. Beck held two sets of a 'platform' or 'policy' of the 'old' Black Panthers and also the 'new" Black Panthers--these appeared to be enlarged versions of the Ten Point Plan--and pointed out the similarties between the two.

Here's the video of that segment--the plan comparisons come a little over half way, but Kelly and Beck and I'm sure others are still digging and coming up with all sorts of stuff that the mainstream media doesn't yet have the balls to print:

YouTube - Glenn Beck-New Black Panthers part1

Now it's easy to say that none of this is proof of voter intimidation of those two Black Panther guys. You have to see the entire on site encounter--the Youtube clip doesn't do it justice--the affidavits, transcripts, etc. to see that Holder had an excellent case against these guys. But all of this other stuff is what an attorney would use as character references showing motive, opportunity, and intent.

No voters have come forward to claim that they were intimidated from voting on account of the New Black Panthers standing outside the polling center in 2008

But don't let that FACT change your moronic rant.

Thank you Foxfyre...now you have exposed who you really are...a right wing pea brain, a racist and a moron.

Yeah, I can't see how that could be viewed as intimidating

 

[Bfgrn]

"It’s still festering. The political corruption of the Obama Justice Department, that is. When last we visited the New Black Panther Party voter intimidation case, AG Eric Holder had dismissed default judgments against the Philly NBPP thugs who menaced voters and poll workers on Election Day.

Who intervened? What parties inside and outside DOJ got involved? And why?

Thank goodness someone in Congress cares enough to ask the questions. GOP Rep. Frank Wolf of Virginia has been pressing the DOJ. You will be quite interested in the exchanges between Holder’s office and Wolf’s.

Click here for PDFs of Wolf’s initial inquiry and DOJ’s initial response.
And here for Rep. Wolf’s most recent set of questions for AG Holder regarding its obstruction.

DOJ is preventing Rep. Wolf from meeting with the trial team. Why?
Rep. Wolf wants to know what communications Acting AAG for Civil Rights Loretta King had with Holder and his deputy attorney(s) prior to the case dismissal.

Rep. Wolf has asked DOJ which third-party interest groups communicated with the government about the case. Those communications are NOT privileged. He has also asked whether any Department lawyers or political employees besides the trial team engaged in any discussions with the NBPP thugs and their lawyers. Who did? Have they recused themselves?

MORE

_______________

In any event? I am on the same page with Mr. West...

The dye has been cast in this election cycle – Democrats and their liberal progressive socialist allies will continue to play the race card when it is politically expedient. I demand an investigation of the New Black Panther Partyand the placement of it, along with any extremist group, be placed on the Terrorist Watch List if warranted. If that it not done prior to my taking the oath of office as a United States Congressman, it will happen soon thereafter.”

And that means any groups that use intimidation as dispalyed in this case. no matter what colour race, creed they are. They ARE what they are. Domestic Terrorists.

The case should have never been dropped.

WOW...let two black guys wearing black with NO guns appear in a public place, and they are terrorists. Their Ten Point Plan calls for an END to violence and wars...

When white tea partiers showed up at town hall meetings and Obama speeches with guns and signs that threaten violence, they are just 'exercising their free speech'

 

[CrusaderFrank]

One's at a polling place, the other is not.

See the difference?

Maybe the Panthers should try to stop the that guy from voting?

 

[Foxfyre]

I wish there were more politicians willing to tell it like it is too Frank. But West left out the part that he also cast the dye to be sure that all the power of the Obama Administration and its surrogates will see to it that West is destroyed if there is any way to do that. You've seen it happen time and time again if somebody like him starts to gain some traction.

Back to the Black Panther Party and Care's post that there is no New Black Panther Party, the only references I have found for the New Black Panther Party is in political blogs, Wiki, a Megyn Kelly piece and a Glen Beck piece. Beck held two sets of a 'platform' or 'policy' of the 'old' Black Panthers and also the 'new" Black Panthers--these appeared to be enlarged versions of the Ten Point Plan--and pointed out the similarties between the two.

Here's the video of that segment--the plan comparisons come a little over half way, but Kelly and Beck and I'm sure others are still digging and coming up with all sorts of stuff that the mainstream media doesn't yet have the balls to print:

YouTube - Glenn Beck-New Black Panthers part1

Now it's easy to say that none of this is proof of voter intimidation of those two Black Panther guys. You have to see the entire on site encounter--the Youtube clip doesn't do it justice--the affidavits, transcripts, etc. to see that Holder had an excellent case against these guys. But all of this other stuff is what an attorney would use as character references showing motive, opportunity, and intent.

No voters have come forward to claim that they were intimidated from voting on account of the New Black Panthers standing outside the polling center in 2008

But don't let that FACT change your moronic rant.

Thank you Foxfyre...now you have exposed who you really are...a right wing pea brain, a racist and a moron.

Well at least the pea brain checks out stuff before she posts it.

You obviously don't. So what size brain do YOU have?

From the April 27 hearing:

The first three live witnesses were Mike Mauro, Chris Hill, and Bartle Bull. Mauro is a lawyer from Connecticut who had gone to Philadelphia as a volunteer. Hill is a former infantry soldier who lives only nine blocks from the polling place. They were part of a roving team that responded on Election Day to a desperate call for help from a black poll watcher. The poll watcher told Hill that the Panthers had called him a “race traitor” and threatened him, saying “there would be hell to pay if he came out.” Hill said the man was visibly scared and had clearly been intimidated. Hill added that the poll watcher was afraid to testify before the commission or in the original voter-intimidation case because “he lives in that neighborhood.”

Bartle Bull — a well-known Democratic lawyer (and former publisher of The Village Voice), who worked in the South during the height of the civil-rights campaign — saw the same thing happen. He had also gotten a call about the intimidation and drove to the polling place. One of the Panthers pointed his billy club at Bull and said, “Now you are going to find out what it is to be ruled by the black man, cracker.” This to a man who started off as a volunteer for Adlai Stevenson, who headed Robert Kennedy’s campaign in New York in 1968, and who, in 1971, worked to get civil-rights stalwart Charles Evers elected governor of Mississippi.

Bull saw several voters walk up the long driveway to the polling place, stop, turn around, and leave when they saw the Panthers standing there in their black uniforms and combat boots with one of them slapping a billy club in his hand. It was a pretty dramatic moment in the hearing room when Bull, Hill, and Mauro turned in their chairs, and Bull pointed to one of the Panthers sitting two seats down from me and identified him as the one who wielded the billy club that day and who also said on the National Geograpic documentary that he wanted to kill white people.
Voter Intimidation, New Black Panther Style - Hans A. von Spakovsky - National Review Online=1

It is not necessary for voters to come forward to say they were intimidated when you have credible eye winesses observing voters leaving without voting because the Black Panthers were there.

 

[Bfgrn]

I wish there were more politicians willing to tell it like it is too Frank. But West left out the part that he also cast the dye to be sure that all the power of the Obama Administration and its surrogates will see to it that West is destroyed if there is any way to do that. You've seen it happen time and time again if somebody like him starts to gain some traction.

Back to the Black Panther Party and Care's post that there is no New Black Panther Party, the only references I have found for the New Black Panther Party is in political blogs, Wiki, a Megyn Kelly piece and a Glen Beck piece. Beck held two sets of a 'platform' or 'policy' of the 'old' Black Panthers and also the 'new" Black Panthers--these appeared to be enlarged versions of the Ten Point Plan--and pointed out the similarties between the two.

Here's the video of that segment--the plan comparisons come a little over half way, but Kelly and Beck and I'm sure others are still digging and coming up with all sorts of stuff that the mainstream media doesn't yet have the balls to print:

YouTube - Glenn Beck-New Black Panthers part1

Now it's easy to say that none of this is proof of voter intimidation of those two Black Panther guys. You have to see the entire on site encounter--the Youtube clip doesn't do it justice--the affidavits, transcripts, etc. to see that Holder had an excellent case against these guys. But all of this other stuff is what an attorney would use as character references showing motive, opportunity, and intent.

No voters have come forward to claim that they were intimidated from voting on account of the New Black Panthers standing outside the polling center in 2008

But don't let that FACT change your moronic rant.

Thank you Foxfyre...now you have exposed who you really are...a right wing pea brain, a racist and a moron.

Well at least the pea brain checks out stuff before she posts it.

You obviously don't. So what size brain do YOU have?

From the April 27 hearing:

The first three live witnesses were Mike Mauro, Chris Hill, and Bartle Bull. Mauro is a lawyer from Connecticut who had gone to Philadelphia as a volunteer. Hill is a former infantry soldier who lives only nine blocks from the polling place. They were part of a roving team that responded on Election Day to a desperate call for help from a black poll watcher. The poll watcher told Hill that the Panthers had called him a “race traitor” and threatened him, saying “there would be hell to pay if he came out.” Hill said the man was visibly scared and had clearly been intimidated. Hill added that the poll watcher was afraid to testify before the commission or in the original voter-intimidation case because “he lives in that neighborhood.”

Bartle Bull — a well-known Democratic lawyer (and former publisher of The Village Voice), who worked in the South during the height of the civil-rights campaign — saw the same thing happen. He had also gotten a call about the intimidation and drove to the polling place. One of the Panthers pointed his billy club at Bull and said, “Now you are going to find out what it is to be ruled by the black man, cracker.” This to a man who started off as a volunteer for Adlai Stevenson, who headed Robert Kennedy’s campaign in New York in 1968, and who, in 1971, worked to get civil-rights stalwart Charles Evers elected governor of Mississippi.

Bull saw several voters walk up the long driveway to the polling place, stop, turn around, and leave when they saw the Panthers standing there in their black uniforms and combat boots with one of them slapping a billy club in his hand. It was a pretty dramatic moment in the hearing room when Bull, Hill, and Mauro turned in their chairs, and Bull pointed to one of the Panthers sitting two seats down from me and identified him as the one who wielded the billy club that day and who also said on the National Geograpic documentary that he wanted to kill white people.
Voter Intimidation, New Black Panther Style - Hans A. von Spakovsky - National Review Online=1

It is not necessary for voters to come forward to say they were intimidated when you have credible eye winesses observing voters leaving without voting because the Black Panthers were there.

WOW, did Bull (an apt moniker) tell you what party he was watching the poll for?