Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
"Red flag" for what? In New York, it's the way business is done.Is paying someone a good price for their property a crime? Why did Hillary take donations from countries like Saudi Arabia and Qatar when she claims to be a champion of women's rights?
Paying a crime boss twice what something is worth is a red flag. Donald Trump should answer the question.
So gangsterism is Okay. That's really good to know.
You really are a dumbass. Paying off a gangster isn't being a gangster. If the mayor of New York did his job, Trump wouldn't have to do such things, but New York politicians are all corrupt. They're probably getting paid by the Mafia.
So paying off a crime boss involved with murder, corruption, and criminal enterprises is okay. When his history of flirting with crime catches up to him don't say I didn't tell you so.
A federal judge later found you conspired to cheat both the Polish workers, who were paid less than $5 an hour cash with no benefits, and the union health and welfare fund. You testified that you did not notice the Polish workers, whom the judge noted were easy to spot because they were the only ones on the work site without hard hats.
What should voters make of your failure or inability to notice 150 men demolishing a multi-story building without hard hats?
You seem to have stopped talking to other posters and to be simply trolling your own thread now.
This is pretty close to an admission of defeat in regards to any debate of ideas...
Hardly, none of you wanted to talk about Donald Trump, so I took the opportunity to put the questions right out front where you could not ignore them and you still are.
Oh you MEAN Obama buying property from Rizzo? That looked dirty.You later paid a Scarfo associate twice the value of a lot, officials determined.
Since you boast that you always negotiate the best prices, why did you pay double the value of this real estate?
Is paying someone a good price for their property a crime? Why did Hillary take donations from countries like Saudi Arabia and Qatar when she claims to be a champion of women's rights?
Paying a crime boss twice what something is worth is a red flag. Donald Trump should answer the question.
There you go! if it was a disqualifier for Obama it should be a disqualifier to Trump. Glad to see you're paying attention now.
It wasn't a disqualifier among your ilk.
"Red flag" for what? In New York, it's the way business is done.Paying a crime boss twice what something is worth is a red flag. Donald Trump should answer the question.
So gangsterism is Okay. That's really good to know.
You really are a dumbass. Paying off a gangster isn't being a gangster. If the mayor of New York did his job, Trump wouldn't have to do such things, but New York politicians are all corrupt. They're probably getting paid by the Mafia.
So paying off a crime boss involved with murder, corruption, and criminal enterprises is okay. When his history of flirting with crime catches up to him don't say I didn't tell you so.
Paying extortion isn't a crime, dumbass.
A federal judge later found you conspired to cheat both the Polish workers, who were paid less than $5 an hour cash with no benefits, and the union health and welfare fund. You testified that you did not notice the Polish workers, whom the judge noted were easy to spot because they were the only ones on the work site without hard hats.
What should voters make of your failure or inability to notice 150 men demolishing a multi-story building without hard hats?
You seem to have stopped talking to other posters and to be simply trolling your own thread now.
This is pretty close to an admission of defeat in regards to any debate of ideas...
Hardly, none of you wanted to talk about Donald Trump, so I took the opportunity to put the questions right out front where you could not ignore them and you still are.
The questions do not seem serious.
When you are digging up such detailed and obscure questions about Trump when Obama got a pass, and you still won't admit that he was lying, it is hard to take you seriously.
A federal judge later found you conspired to cheat both the Polish workers, who were paid less than $5 an hour cash with no benefits, and the union health and welfare fund. You testified that you did not notice the Polish workers, whom the judge noted were easy to spot because they were the only ones on the work site without hard hats.
What should voters make of your failure or inability to notice 150 men demolishing a multi-story building without hard hats?
You seem to have stopped talking to other posters and to be simply trolling your own thread now.
This is pretty close to an admission of defeat in regards to any debate of ideas...
Hardly, none of you wanted to talk about Donald Trump, so I took the opportunity to put the questions right out front where you could not ignore them and you still are.
The questions do not seem serious.
When you are digging up such detailed and obscure questions about Trump when Obama got a pass, and you still won't admit that he was lying, it is hard to take you seriously.
More dishonesty. How on earth he can get a negative income of $3,000,000? Trump is as crooked as....... there is nothing as crooked as Trump. He makes the Corleone family (business partners of his) look like alter boysDonald Trump leaves many unanswered questions about his past and a strong reluctance to discuss anything about it. I am sure there are many people who will dismiss this article without considering it, but they should embrace it. Vetting a candidate allows us to see both the good and the bad and allows us to balance that view with the judgment that the candidate will do the correct thing in the right situation. In a Democratic society we pick our candidates and an honest and robust examination should be honored. Imagine if we had given President Obama such an examination? Would he have been elected?
21 Questions For Donald Trump
"I have covered Donald Trump off and on for 27 years — including breaking the story that in 1990, when he claimed to be worth $3 billion but could not pay interest on loans coming due, his bankers put his net worth at minus $295 million. And so I have closely watched what Trump does and what government documents reveal about his conduct.
Reporters, competing Republican candidates, and voters would learn a lot about Trump if they asked for complete answers to these 21 questions.
So, Mr. Trump…
1. You call yourself an “ardent philanthropist,” but have not donated a dollar to The Donald J. Trump Foundation since 2006. You’re not even the biggest donor to the foundation, having given about $3.7 million in the previous two decades while businesses associated with Vince McMahon’s World Wrestling Entertainment gave the Trump Foundation $5 million. All the money since 2006 has come from those doing business with you.
How does giving away other people’s money, in what could be seen as a kickback scheme, make you a philanthropist?
2. New York Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman successfully sued you, alleging your Trump University was an “illegal educational institution” that charged up to $35,000 for “Trump Elite” mentorships promising personal advice from you, but you never showed up and your “special” list of lenders was photocopied from Scotsman Guide, a magazine found at any bookstore.
Why did you not show up?
3. You claimed The Learning Annex paid you a $1 million speaking fee, but on Larry King Live, you acknowledged the fee was $400,000 and the rest was the promotional value.
Since you have testified under oath that your public statements inflate the value of your assets, can voters use this as a guide, so whenever you say $1, in reality it is only 40 cents?
4. The one-page financial statement handed out at Trump Tower when you announced your candidacy says you’ve given away $102 million worth of land.
Will you supply a list of each of these gifts, with the values you assigned to them?
5. The biggest gift you have talked about appears to be an easement at the Palos Verdes, California, golf course bearing your name on land you wanted to build houses on, but that land is subject to landslides and is now the golf course driving range.
Did you or one of your businesses take a tax deduction for this land that you could not build on and do you think anyone should get a $25 million tax deduction for a similar self-serving gift?
6. Trump Tower is not a steel girder high rise, but 58 stories of concrete.
Why did you use concrete instead of traditional steel girders?"
Read the rest of this stunning article here 21 Questions For Donald Trump
A federal judge later found you conspired to cheat both the Polish workers, who were paid less than $5 an hour cash with no benefits, and the union health and welfare fund. You testified that you did not notice the Polish workers, whom the judge noted were easy to spot because they were the only ones on the work site without hard hats.
What should voters make of your failure or inability to notice 150 men demolishing a multi-story building without hard hats?
You seem to have stopped talking to other posters and to be simply trolling your own thread now.
This is pretty close to an admission of defeat in regards to any debate of ideas...
Hardly, none of you wanted to talk about Donald Trump, so I took the opportunity to put the questions right out front where you could not ignore them and you still are.
The questions do not seem serious.
When you are digging up such detailed and obscure questions about Trump when Obama got a pass, and you still won't admit that he was lying, it is hard to take you seriously.
The questions are very serious and the weight on each candidate is the same. Obama may have gotten away with some things does that mean that Trump gets an excuse? I don't think so.
"Red flag" for what? In New York, it's the way business is done.
So gangsterism is Okay. That's really good to know.
You really are a dumbass. Paying off a gangster isn't being a gangster. If the mayor of New York did his job, Trump wouldn't have to do such things, but New York politicians are all corrupt. They're probably getting paid by the Mafia.
So paying off a crime boss involved with murder, corruption, and criminal enterprises is okay. When his history of flirting with crime catches up to him don't say I didn't tell you so.
Paying extortion isn't a crime, dumbass.
Concealing crime is against the law.
So gangsterism is Okay. That's really good to know.
You really are a dumbass. Paying off a gangster isn't being a gangster. If the mayor of New York did his job, Trump wouldn't have to do such things, but New York politicians are all corrupt. They're probably getting paid by the Mafia.
So paying off a crime boss involved with murder, corruption, and criminal enterprises is okay. When his history of flirting with crime catches up to him don't say I didn't tell you so.
Paying extortion isn't a crime, dumbass.
Concealing crime is against the law.
What crime did he conceal?
most guys sitting in most pews are asleep with their eyes open. This bugged me a lot. The kind of people that ignored this are the kind of folks ignoring Trumps dishonesty.So, speaking of vetting, do you believe Obama's story that he sat in the pew for twenty years without noticing that his friend was a raving anti-American racist?
A federal judge later found you conspired to cheat both the Polish workers, who were paid less than $5 an hour cash with no benefits, and the union health and welfare fund. You testified that you did not notice the Polish workers, whom the judge noted were easy to spot because they were the only ones on the work site without hard hats.
What should voters make of your failure or inability to notice 150 men demolishing a multi-story building without hard hats?
You seem to have stopped talking to other posters and to be simply trolling your own thread now.
This is pretty close to an admission of defeat in regards to any debate of ideas...
Hardly, none of you wanted to talk about Donald Trump, so I took the opportunity to put the questions right out front where you could not ignore them and you still are.
The questions do not seem serious.
When you are digging up such detailed and obscure questions about Trump when Obama got a pass, and you still won't admit that he was lying, it is hard to take you seriously.
The questions are very serious and the weight on each candidate is the same. Obama may have gotten away with some things does that mean that Trump gets an excuse? I don't think so.
Oh so now liberals want vetting. Not so much with Obama though who still refuses to answer questions about his past.And the point of your post is what?
Vetting a candidate allows us to see all sides of them. The decision to select them as your runner is still yours.
most guys sitting in most pews are asleep with their eyes open. This bugged me a lot. The kind of people that ignored this are the kind of folks ignoring Trumps dishonesty.So, speaking of vetting, do you believe Obama's story that he sat in the pew for twenty years without noticing that his friend was a raving anti-American racist?
Oh so now liberals want vetting. Not so much with Obama though who still refuses to answer questions about his past.And the point of your post is what?
Vetting a candidate allows us to see all sides of them. The decision to select them as your runner is still yours.
It does bug me. That should have been a great big monster size red flag. We should investigate our candidates thoroughly. Which is not achieved ny digging through the midden of a candidate 7 years ago, as revolting as it is. We need to look long and hard at todays candidates, using history to justify digging, not obfuscating the diggingSo, speaking of vetting, do you believe Obama's story that he sat in the pew for twenty years without noticing that his friend was a raving anti-American racist?
The purpose of vetting is to explore your candidate thoroughly until you are satisfied that they would make a good representative. I didn't vote for Obama, I voted for Gary Johnson.
And yet interestingly you did not answer the question.
Why is that? He is the most powerful person in the world. Surely you have an opinion.
do you believe Obama's story that he sat in the pew for twenty years without noticing that his friend was a raving anti-American racist?
I do have an opinion, but I see no point in talking about a man who will be out of office in 16 months. He has already been vetted and elected, we cannot change that.
Oh so now liberals want vetting. Not so much with Obama though who still refuses to answer questions about his past.And the point of your post is what?
Vetting a candidate allows us to see all sides of them. The decision to select them as your runner is still yours.
Obama has been elected, vetting is the process by which you examine your candidate prioe to an election. If you want to sat Democrats did a lousy job, go ahead but the Op is about Trump.
