NY vs Trump Stormy Daniels case is starting to crumble

Why would paying a fine be death of the case?

Wouldn't that mean Trump was guilty?
In effect the payment of a fine
Would be the fulfillment of the case and the end of it Rather than jail time or some type of lasting conviction which is really the point of the prosecution. The federal level crime of using campaign funds for hush money is now effectively dead in the water.
 
Keith Davidson, lawyer for adult film actress Stormy Daniels,
EX-Lawyer.

said in court Thursday that the $130,000 payment to Daniels was not “hush money,” but a “consideration” payment.


For................................?????

A legal NDA . If you need any more help just ask.
 
A legal NDA . If you need any more help just ask.
So say's Trump, his lawyers and his cult.

1715177414231.png
 
The sex isn't part of the charges...

Trump paid off Stormy from his Business Account which itself was an undisclosed illegal campaign donation...

This is all illegal and you playing dumb about the law isn't a defence..
They already proved that Trump paid her with his own money. Sorry you didn't get him this time. Oh, and the best case you had against him is put off indefinitely. Because the doj tampered with the evidence. You loons just gave Trump the presidency back! Lol, you got him this time!
 
Alvin Bragg has failed, and the NY vs. Trump case is starting to fall apart. Or as a FOX News anchor just put it a few minutes ago, the case is "starting to crumble."

Good try, libs, you almost got him that time. Maybe next time. :laughing0301:

Lawyer for Stormy Daniels denies that payment from Cohen was 'hush money'​


Keith Davidson, lawyer for adult film actress Stormy Daniels, said in court Thursday that the $130,000 payment to Daniels was not “hush money,” but a “consideration” payment.

Manhattan Assistant District Attorney Johsua Steinglass pressed Davidson on the witness stand about Daniels’ statement in January 2018, which Davidson prepared for his client, that denied any relationship with Trump and said that her only interaction with Trump was “a few public appearances and nothing more.”

“Rumors that I have received hush money from Donald Trump are completely false,” the statement says.“I don’t believe that Stormy ever alleged that any interaction with Trump was ‘romantic,‘” Davidson testified Thursday. But it is his understanding that Daniels had a sexual encounter with Trump.

He also said the payment “wasn’t a payoff.”“It wasn’t a payoff. And it wasn’t hush money. It was consideration,” Davidson said. Davidson added that he would never use “hush money” to describe the money exchange.

He would only refer to it as “consideration.” “Consideration” is a contractual legal term for what someone gives in return for the promise to abide by a contract; in this case, money. The payment was labeled "legal fees" in Trump's accounting, which prosecutors allege amounted to fraud.

Steinglass asked about the truthfulness of the Daniels’ statement. Davidson replied, “I think it’s technically true.”

He continues that he doesn’t believe anyone alleged of a relationship between Daniels and Trump -- it was an interaction.Davidson said he believes a “relationship” to be an ongoing occurrence.

NY v. Trump trial to resume with gag order proceedings after judge fines Trump $9k

"Consideration" is a legal term. It means payment for service or product.


Waht was the service? For Daniels to keep quiet. The evidence is overwhelming. I'll file your threat in the wishful thinking file.
We just had Stormy's lawyer get on the stand and state under oath that the $ was not "hush money", but straight up consideration for honoring an NDA, which is done all day, every day, throughout the world.... it's 100% legal.

THAt money for the NDA is money to keep quiet. That's what an NDA is. To shut the fuck up about something. NDA's are legal, UNLESS the NDA is in the furtherance of a crime. What was the crime? Defrauding the electorate.


When we also note that the money DID NOT come from campaign funds, Bragg, the Democrats, and this shit judge are pushing a case without a crime. This is full abuse of power, abuse of the Justice System, and abuse of the Election system. The U.S. Citizens are going to punish the Democrats in November for this crap.

Doesn't matter.
 
No one cares he had sex...

We care that he paid her off 11 days before an election..

Trump tried to have it covered up and that didn't work.

Then he lied about it.

It is very hard to pay for someone's silence using an NDA during a campaign without breaking the law.. Trump clearly broke the law...

Trump isn't helping himself by saying he didn't fuck Stormy... He clearly did, she was a very credible witness with vivd detail of what happened... She also has details that wouldn't be easily available.

Trump isn't being charged with screwing her... He is getting charged for paying her off..
This one is over loon. Put all your hopes and dreams on Fanni. That case looks really really good!
Aaaaahahahahahahaahahahahaahaaa!
 
If that's true, why did the FEDS toss the case?
Why did Bragg have to go DUMPSTER DIVING to dust it off?

Oh, that's right, for ELECTION INTERFERENCE!!!!!!!
GTFOH!!!!! :eusa_hand:
Poor SeaSwab....................

Trump's DOJ, shut the case down.


Inside William Barr's Effort to Undermine N.Y. Prosecutors​

1715177935857.png
The New York Times
https://www.nytimes.com › 2020/06/25 › nyregion › ge...

Jul 22, 2020 — The firing of the top federal prosecutor in Manhattan was foreshadowed by a disagreement over a case linked to President Trump.

Of course every teabagger accusation is a confession.




Trump accuses Biden, without evidence, of weaponising ...​

1715178046791.png
France 24
https://www.france24.com › France 24 › Americas

2 days ago — Former president Donald Trump has sharpened his allegation that his Democratic successor has weaponised the US justice system against him, ...
 
Playing dumb as dog shit about the law is not a defence....

The law was clearly broken and it favoured Trump... The Prosecution is tying Trump to not only knowing about it but also paying for it...

I know that it upsets some people if it turns out Trump is a criminal. You have to make the decision then to support a criminal or not then.
What is the law you feel was broken here, and more importantly how exactly do you think he (Trump) conspired? Please include evidence from the trial to back up your claim….thx
 

Forum List

Back
Top