NY vs Trump Stormy Daniels case is starting to crumble

Who will decide the case.

Whoever it is...when they do....will be the final word (for now).

Why do you guys waste your time on this ?
 
WTF?
Trump claims, he never had sex with Daniels.
Stormy is looking for a way back into relevancy. Unfortunately for her despite her rather impressive proportions, gravity has tossed her out of the mainstream of the game.

She's getting older and can't deal with it. I find it extremely difficult to believe that her experience with Trump was so disgusting, if indeed she did have one, that she remembers it that way. It's a bit of a stretch considering the fact that her personal tunnel has seen more traffic than the Brooklyn bridge.
 
you're pushing a NDA story that has no relevance to the charges, and bitching about being outed? gtfo
What's the fuckin' crime, Bent? Don't tell me to read the indictment like the rest of
your minions. Be specific, because as of right now, Bragg hasn't been forthcoming.
Maybe you can spell it out for him.
sheesh
 
This is the gift that keeps on giving................:suck::suck::suck:

NEW YORKStormy Daniels nearly derailed Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s case Tuesday as she testified about her alleged “sexual encounter” with former President Donald Trump, frustrating the judge and prompting the defense to motion for a mistrial.

While he declined to grant a mistrial, Judge Juan Merchan — who has not often criticized the prosecutors — did disapprove of Daniels’ behavior on the stand, allowing many of the objections raised by the defense during her questioning and agreeing when the mistrial motion was raised that many details would have been left better “unsaid.” Daniels did not hold back on the stand, speaking quickly and being told to slow down multiple times by Merchan as she provided elaborate descriptions, took detours with side stories and inserted demeaning details that showed her disdain for Trump.
___________________________
Daniels’ apparent bend toward performing on the stand was exacerbated by prosecutor Susan Hoffinger’s questions, which did not always seem designed to yield a helpful answer: Was he wearing a condom? What were the relative heights? The defense frequently objected. Merchan granted most of the requests. “The degree of detail that we’re going into here is just unnecessary,” Merchan said at one point, interrupting her testimony.
These were bits of information the defense later called “prejudicial” to the jury, asking for a mistrial because there was no other way the court could “unring this bell.” Aside from “pure embarrassment,” the only reason for asking some of those questions, defense attorney Todd Blanche said, was to “inflame the jury.”

“The guardrails for this witness answering questions from the government were just thrown to the side,” Blanche said.

On cross-examination, Daniels struck a combative tone as defense attorney Susan Necheles suggested she was motivated by making money and a hatred of Trump, though Daniels admitted to the latter with a definitive “yes.”




 
This is the gift that keeps on giving................:suck::suck::suck:

NEW YORKStormy Daniels nearly derailed Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s case Tuesday as she testified about her alleged “sexual encounter” with former President Donald Trump, frustrating the judge and prompting the defense to motion for a mistrial.

While he declined to grant a mistrial, Judge Juan Merchan — who has not often criticized the prosecutors — did disapprove of Daniels’ behavior on the stand, allowing many of the objections raised by the defense during her questioning and agreeing when the mistrial motion was raised that many details would have been left better “unsaid.” Daniels did not hold back on the stand, speaking quickly and being told to slow down multiple times by Merchan as she provided elaborate descriptions, took detours with side stories and inserted demeaning details that showed her disdain for Trump.
___________________________
Daniels’ apparent bend toward performing on the stand was exacerbated by prosecutor Susan Hoffinger’s questions, which did not always seem designed to yield a helpful answer: Was he wearing a condom? What were the relative heights? The defense frequently objected. Merchan granted most of the requests. “The degree of detail that we’re going into here is just unnecessary,” Merchan said at one point, interrupting her testimony.
These were bits of information the defense later called “prejudicial” to the jury, asking for a mistrial because there was no other way the court could “unring this bell.” Aside from “pure embarrassment,” the only reason for asking some of those questions, defense attorney Todd Blanche said, was to “inflame the jury.”

“The guardrails for this witness answering questions from the government were just thrown to the side,” Blanche said.

On cross-examination, Daniels struck a combative tone as defense attorney Susan Necheles suggested she was motivated by making money and a hatred of Trump, though Daniels admitted to the latter with a definitive “yes.”





She should have worn a lower cut blouse.... Guaranteed to affect all the male jurors.
 
What's the fuckin' crime, Bent? Don't tell me to read the indictment like the rest of
your minions. Be specific, because as of right now, Bragg hasn't been forthcoming.
Maybe you can spell it out for him.
sheesh
There is no crime.
 
So you believed the lap top story was true?
He'll never admit that even though now It has now been been irrefutably proven to be true. They become too attached to a position and when reality shifts out from underneath them they simply hang there attached to the false position.
 
So you believed the lap top story was true?
What story?

That it's Hunter's?

Yes. I believe it was.

Admittedly I was skeptical at first but I never outright denied it.

I mean really. If someone claimed they found Ivanka's laptop at a computer repair shop by a half blind owner who is a democrat who gave then gave the laptop to one of Biden's lawyers who then gave it to Rachel Madow who then let it sit at the Daily Beast for a few days before ending up with the FBI...would you simply believe it with no reservations at all?
 

Forum List

Back
Top