Zelenskyy steps on his d#$%.

[ding]

So it's ok for you to steal it? you clowns are always attacking China but they buy oil etc from other Countries the US steal it at the point of a gun.

Yes. It's Darwinian.

 

[ding]

And no, killing western barbarians is always better.

See Deadstick this guy gets Darwin.

 

[ding]

And that is why you sponsored genocide of Russians in Ukraine?

And after I gave you credit for getting Darwin.

 

[ding]

big and strong neighbours, like NATO, use small and weaker nations as skirmishers before big war.

You say it like that's a bad thing.

 

[ding]

No need in any reward for saying plain truisms. It's quite obvious that Ukraine is not just "small and weak nation". It's NATO's hired guns and skirmishers.

Sun Tzu advised that the supreme art of war is to win without fighting. While he did not explicitly say "let your enemies fight each other," his strategy heavily emphasizes letting enemies create their own destruction through mistakes. His philosophy promotes waiting for the enemy to weaken themselves or to be defeated by someone else, allowing you to seize victory without wasting your own resources.

 

[ding]

Zoolinsky keeps stepping on the same rake over and over again.

I'm not sure we care one way or the other at this point.

 

[ding]

So, in your mind it was NATO that attacked Russia?

Maybe NATO tricked Russia into invading Ukraine?

 

[BackAgain]

Of course, it is true. $300Bn is not something that one can ignore.

They got a lot of support from us. That’s true. But hardly a gift, you idiot.

Ukraine literally means "Borderland". And it is definitely Russian land, just temporarily not under Moscow's control.

It is and has been a sovereign state for many years, you fully dishonest propagandist.

C'mon. I don't want you to buy anything. What do I want, it's to explain you (and other members of our USMB community, of course) what we are fighting for and what we are fighting against.

Try using English. “Explain you.” Idiot.

 

[Ringo]

This isn’t about participating in combat operations, and Ukraine isn’t at war with Iran. Ukraine has merely sent three teams of specialists to the Middle East to demonstrate its expertise in dealing with “suicide bombers”—Zelenskyy...

The drug addict realized it’s best not to mess with Iran and started backing down.

 

[Deadstick]

This isn’t about participating in combat operations, and Ukraine isn’t at war with Iran. Ukraine has merely sent three teams of specialists to the Middle East to demonstrate its expertise in dealing with “suicide bombers”—Zelenskyy...

The drug addict realized it’s best not to mess with Iran and started backing down.

What many of these people don't get is the War in Ukraine targeting Russia and the War against Iran are both part of the same war, in other words the US Empire and it's aim of World domination/and it's resources.

 

[GLASNOST]

.... Ukraine has merely sent three teams of specialists to the Middle East to demonstrate its expertise in dealing with “suicide bombers.

And what was his advice? "Keep your distance"?

 

[Zavulon]

Is that supposed to be a bad thing?

It depends. The very fact that NATO decided expand eastward and hire proxies to attack Russia is bad for Russia, bad for proxies and bad (might become deadly bad) for NATO. Temporarily it was good for China and India, but in the case of WWIII, they will suffer, too.

 

[ding]

It depends. The very fact that NATO decided expand eastward and hire proxies to attack Russia is bad for Russia, bad for proxies and bad (might become deadly bad) for NATO. Temporarily it was good for China and India, but in the case of WWIII, they will suffer, too.

One never knows how these things will turn out. Normalization of deviance eventually leads to predictable surprises.

 

[ding]

What many of these people don't get is the War in Ukraine targeting Russia and the War against Iran are both part of the same war, in other words the US Empire and it's aim of World domination/and it's resources.

Don't forget Greenland, Venezuela and Canada. We want those resources too.

 

[Zavulon]

Sun Tzu advised that the supreme art of war is to win without fighting. While he did not explicitly say "let your enemies fight each other," his strategy heavily emphasizes letting enemies create their own destruction through mistakes.

He never said anything about just sitting and waiting. The best thing, he said, is to destroy enemies plans, the next good thing - is to destroy his alliances, third thing - is to destroy his armies and the worst one is to seige cities.

Whatever was NATO's plan - it was ruined, US is losing allies and armies and even American cities are infiltrated by foreigners.

His philosophy promotes waiting for the enemy to weaken themselves or to be defeated by someone else, allowing you to seize victory without wasting your own resources.

Actually, you are wasting resources. What is much more important - you are wasting them with pretty poor effectiveness.
-----------
Sun Tzu said: Raising a host of a hundred thousand men and marching them great distances entails heavy loss on the people and a drain on the resources of the State. The daily expenditure will amount to a thousand ounces of silver. There will be commotion at home and abroad, and men will drop down exhausted on the highways. As many as seven hundred thousand families will be impeded in their labor.
Hostile armies may face each other for years, striving for the victory which is decided in a single day. This being so, to remain in ignorance of the enemy's condition simply because one grudges the outlay of a hundred ounces of silver in honors and emoluments, is the height of inhumanity.
---------------

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

It depends. The very fact that NATO decided expand eastward and hire proxies to attack Russia is bad for Russia, bad for proxies and bad (might become deadly bad) for NATO. Temporarily it was good for China and India, but in the case of WWIII, they will suffer, too.

Eastward was where the formerly enslaved nations were.
Why would they expand in a different direction?

 

[Zavulon]

One never knows how these things will turn out. Normalization of deviance eventually leads to predictable surprises.

Of course we know, how the things will turn out. There will be a big war. That's what happens when great powers violate rules and fight each other.

 

[Zavulon]

Eastward was where the formerly enslaved nations were.
Why would they expand in a different direction?

If they wanted to avoid a big war with Russia, they wouldn't do it. And as they were liberated by Russia, NATO shouldn't have to enslave them by themselves.

 

[Zavulon]

They got a lot of support from us. That’s true. But hardly a gift, you idiot.

You paid them for commiting murder-suicide, and dead man can't return money. Those money are lost and it was pretty clear from the very beginning.

It is and has been a sovereign state for many years, you fully dishonest propagandist.

It wasn't. It always was under someone else's control. And now it's lesser sovereign than anytime else. Actually, even as a republic of the USSR Ukraine was lesser dependent from Moscow than it's dependent from Brussels, London and Washington.

Try using English. “Explain you.” Idiot.

Thank you. My bad. "Explain to you", of course.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

If they wanted to avoid a big war with Russia, they wouldn't do it. And as they were liberated by Russia, NATO shouldn't have to enslave them by themselves.

Yeah, it's so strange that formerly enslaved nations wanted protection from Russia.
They were happy to join NATO, they weren't forced.