Cause I read your link....but I also read the opinion McDonnell v. United States, 579 U.S. ___ (2016)How would you know what it supports?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Cause I read your link....but I also read the opinion McDonnell v. United States, 579 U.S. ___ (2016)How would you know what it supports?
McDonnell v. United States - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
Thanks for your attempt to explain it but you just proved you have no idea what you’re talking about.hahahahhah yeah that's it. You provided us with a case that says merely making a call to another govt official or setting up a meeting, is not an official act for purposes of bribery.....that's what the Obama DOJ tried to claim when they prosecuted Obama's political rival.
The case does not say that accepting bribes, or selling Govt access isn't illegal.
So your media lied to you about what the ruling says.Geez
I am well aware of that.
That is one of the ones Jack Smith got his ass handed to him on.
The ruling doesn't say what you are claiming that it says.
Shock.
You really aren’t smart enough to understand it.
Clearly not.I most certainly am.
So your media lied to you about what the ruling says.
Gotcha.
You poor thing. So helpless.
Remind me to never provide you with a link again. There’s no way to penetrate your indoctrination.
I have. It’s not my fault your programming keeps you from thinking for yourself.Provide links that are germane to the discussion.
hahah is that your way of saying, you just won't accept reality? hhahhaThanks for your attempt to explain it but you just proved you have no idea what you’re talking about.
How would you know what the link says? It’s clearly beyond your ability to understand.hahah is that your way of saying, you just won't accept reality? hhahha
That is literally what your link says.
Taveras and Trump are shady and corrupt. It's good they will be tried together. I think Taveras will flip on Trump.What shady business dealings? We all know the business rhe trumps are in…real estate development
What business were the xidens in? Why were they getting paid?
Trump hires the best people.Yuscil Taveras, the Mar-a-Lago IT director who flipped on Donald Trump, is a registered Democrat with a history of money troubles and a part-time gig
I hear he also eats babies and wears their faces as a mask.Yuscil Taveras, the Mar-a-Lago IT director who flipped on Donald Trump, is a registered Democrat with a history of money troubles and a part-time gig
HahahHow would you know what the link says? It’s clearly beyond your ability to understand.
But that didn’t answer my question.Taveras and Trump are shady and corrupt. It's good they will be tried together. I think Taveras will flip on Trump.
You lack the ability to understand anything that doesn't conform with your right wing media dogma.Hahah
Yes, I will admit how dembots like you process words is well beyond my ability to understand
I lack the cult processing you have been programmed with
Haha yet you’re the one using a link to a case when the demafasict tried to prosecute obama’s polical rival, as some sort of proof that it’s legal did xiden to of sold his office to foreigners…You lack the ability to understand anything that doesn't conform with your right wing media dogma.
That's why you're always so confused.
If it’s fascist to prosecute McDonnell for selling access to government, why are you guys so obsessed with wanting to prosecute Biden for it?Haha yet you’re the one using a link to a case when the demafasict tried to prosecute obama’s polical rival, as some sort of proof that it’s legal did xiden to of sold his office to foreigners…
Weird
McDonnell v. United States - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org