Yuscil Taveras, the Mar-a-Lago IT director who flipped on Donald Trump, is a registered Democrat with a history of money troubles and a part-time gig

So filing for bankruptcy is an indication that someone can't be trusted?

Does....does anyone want to tell him?

absolutely. filing for bankruptcy is regarded as a "character flaw." extending credit to a bankrupt corporation is probably one reason those deutchebank loan officers were jumping off of buildings a few years ago.
 

EXCLUSIVE: Yuscil Taveras, the Mar-a-Lago IT director who flipped on Donald Trump, is a registered Democrat with a history of money troubles and a part-time gig as 'DJ Juicy'​

31 Aug 2023 ~~ By Ben Ashforf, FLORIDA & Jose Lambiet FOR DailyMail. com

  • Mar-a-Lago IT director Yuscil Taveras is expected to testify against Trump after admitting he lied in his previous testimony in the classified documents case
  • And now, DailyMail.com can reveal Taveras, a New York native, is a registered Democrat who once filed for bankruptcy and had moonlighted as 'DJ Juicy'
  • The married dad-of-two, 45, had been initially identified in indictment docs as 'Trump Employee 4' who had allegedly been asked to 'delete' a server
The Mar-a-Lago IT director who flipped on Donald Trump in the classified documents case is a part-time DJ and registered Democrat with a history of money troubles, DailyMail.com can exclusively reveal.
Yuscil Taveras, 45, managed to rack up debts of nearly $750,000 despite holding down a string of well-paid tech jobs and moonlighting as 'DJ Juicy.'
The dad-of-two battled back from bankruptcy but now finds himself a pivotal figure in Special Counsel Jack Smith's efforts to convict Trump of mishandling top secret government material.
Justice Department filings suggest that Taveras – described as 'Trump employee 4' – initially denied any knowledge of an alleged plot to wipe incriminating CCTV from a server at the former President's swish Florida residence.
~snip~
The New York native has scrubbed his social media and kept a low profile since his explosive U-turn was revealed in an August 22 federal court filing.


Commentary:
What better a target to turn. Too bad that Taveras has zero credibility.
This is equivalent to Trump hiring a Democrat to do his Mar-a-Lago IT, to Debbie Schwartz and congress hiring Pakistani ISI to do their IT.
This should be easy to thoroughly discredit for even a moderately skilled attorney. If he can be caught lying under oath on anything, his testimony is toast.
I question how, how a person with that many issues be allowed near the president without a review and updated background check by security as a possible threat to the president?

Grifty is a serial bankrupt
 
"Mar-a-Lago IT director Yuscil Taveras is expected to testify against Trump after admitting he lied in his previous testimony in the classified documents case."

How do we know which narrative is false and which next one is or isn't anything but a convenient way to lie to get Soros support? eeeewwwwww!

You can safely assume that anything he said while Donald Trump was paying for his lawyer, was a lie. But in a court case where liars are everywhere, his testimony will have to be supported by other evidence, to be taken seriously.
 
Grifty is a serial bankrupt

oh noes , horseman, we feelz that all great businessmen file chapther 11 , and if there is one thing that trump says he is it is a great businessman who is not responsible if his corporation goes bankrupt or commits fraud. in fact, "those are just things that all smart businessmen do. "
 
oh noes , horseman, we feelz that all great businessmen file chapther 11 , and if there is one thing that trump says he is it is a great businessman who is not responsible if his corporation goes bankrupt or commits fraud. in fact, "those are just things that all smart businessmen do. "
"Who HASN'T lost 1 billion of OPM, and defaulted on 700 million to the Gangstah Bank?"
 
By watching conservative media and seeing the MAGA world repeat it word for word.

That is a completely deficient though not unexpected answer.

Let's try this question again.


If this has already been adjudicated someone should tell Joe.
He could stop denying that it ever happened and just say - yeah we did it, it's legal, 9 - 0
Baby.

Wonder why he doesn't just do that.
 
That is a completely deficient though not unexpected answer.

Let's try this question again.


If this has already been adjudicated someone should tell Joe.
He could stop denying that it ever happened and just say - yeah we did it, it's legal, 9 - 0
Baby.

Wonder why he doesn't just do that.
He can’t say deny “it ever happened” until you guys can say “what happened”.

The problem is in your assumptions, they’re baseless.
 
Appreciate the tip....selling the back 40 this year....that cap gain was gonna hurt....
i feel smarter already, smarter than the generals at least.

"hey, honey, warm up that escalator," we need to move out of this shotgun and into the white house.
 

Forum List

Back
Top