Your guide to manmade climate disasters in the world today

[CrusaderFrank]

I will update this thread most days as the earh dies screaming.
Lets start in Espana.

At least 95 people dead in Spain’s worst floods in three decades

Soldiers aid search for dozens still missing as prime minister warns extreme weather may not be over

www.theguardian.com

Scientists say extreme weather such as heatwaves and storms is becoming more intense as a result of the climate crisis.

51 dead in a sun parched area of Spain. Nothing to see here. Floods have become common place in Spain over the last few years. They are going to have to work out how to live with the results of climate breakdown,

A major worry is that this area provides much of our food. At the very least floods caused by climate change are inflationary. At worst 50 people die.

Two quick questions:

1. How big an impact will the Kelsie and TayTay wedding have on the climate? Upwards of 12 Billion people will either attend or watch, and
2. 3I/Atlas is out gassing more CO2 than the Chinese, how close can it approach Earth before ending all life on Earth in a climate apocalypse catastrophe?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

A maga speaks.

This morning it was 55F, it’s currently 69F a 14 degree increase in A MATTER OF HOURS!!

Are you telling us that if it was 70.5, a 1.5 increase, starlings and robins would burn up on re-entry?

 

[westwall]

A maga speaks.

With actual knowledge. As opposed to your religious nutjob zeal.

 

[jc456]

A maga speaks.

truth at that.

 

[jc456]

This morning it was 55F, it’s currently 69F a 14 degree increase in A MATTER OF HOURS!!

Are you telling us that if it was 70.5, a 1.5 increase, starlings and robins would burn up on re-entry?

he's probably got the video.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Fake data

 

[Sunsettommy]

A maga speaks.

So no rebuttal here thus you have been successfully refuted thank you.

By the way I didn't vote for Trump in 2024 so you can stuff it!

 

[Tommy Tainant]

With actual knowledge. As opposed to your religious nutjob zeal.

No. Just an idiot spouting shit off exxon prompt cards. You idiots will burn the world to save a dime. But ive got kids and I care.

 

[Sunsettommy]

This year has been a record year for forest fires across europe.
Last year was bad as well.
We all know that it is nothing to do with the global warming hoax.
But I am puzzled. I see european fire chiefs on my tv every night.
Ive yet to hear any of them blame the two main causes of wildfires.
Viz DEI firefighters and poor forestry management.
Prof Trump wisely identified these causes in Cali earlier this year.
This is where the blame should go and not the totally innocent trump donors like Exxon.
Why can these dupes be so wrong when Papa Trump is so right on everything ?

More unsupported blather while I present you LONG TERM OFFICIAL data showing a Decline in wildfires:

There has been no global increase in the radiated energy of wildfires … here’s the NASA satellite data.

Here’s Australia …

Here’s the data from Canada … the number of fires and the area burned are both decreasing.

And some more real-world global wildfire data …

There’s another way to measure wildfires, by the amount of CO2 emitted from fires globally. Again, the trend is downward. SOURCE

And here’s another graph, showing total area burned by wildfires 2012-2025, from here.

 

[ding]

No. Just an idiot spouting shit off exxon prompt cards. You idiots will burn the world to save a dime. But ive got kids and I care.

You made so few updates. I guess it’s not as bad as you thought, huh?

 

[Sunsettommy]

You made so few updates. I guess it’s not as bad as you thought, huh?

He doesn't realize that Exxon didn't do original research in the climate stuff it was all about internal discussions about what was published by scientists in the 1960's onward.

That is why the dumb Exxon lawsuits failed because the ecoloonies failed to spot the difference between producing original research and producing commentary on someone else's research.

 

[EMH]

He doesn't realize that Exxon didn't do original research in the climate stuff it was all about internal discussions about what was published by scientists in the 1960's onward.

That is why the dumb Exxon lawsuits failed because the ecoloonies failed to spot the difference between producing original research and producing commentary on someone else's research.

The Exxon stuff was all planted there by CO2 FRAUD. Exxon never even pondered CO2, and there was never a reason to, since CO2 does absolutely nothing.

 

[westwall]

No. Just an idiot spouting shit off exxon prompt cards. You idiots will burn the world to save a dime. But ive got kids and I care.

But enough about you....

 

[ding]

No. Just an idiot spouting shit off exxon prompt cards. You idiots will burn the world to save a dime. But ive got kids and I care.

You really are an emotional ****.

 

[Grumblenuts]

How Climate Change Is Fueling Extreme Weather

Carbon pollution is contributing to climate disasters that will only get worse unless we take action.

earthjustice.org

 

[Tommy Tainant]

You made so few updates. I guess it’s not as bad as you thought, huh?

No. Quite the opposite. I didnt realise how bad it was. I would have time for little else if I updated this thread with everything.

 

[Sunsettommy]

No. Quite the opposite. I didnt realise how bad it was. I would have time for little else if I updated this thread with everything.

LOL, you sure about that after all it was YOU who said you make updates over time but now that I have destroyed your claims at Post #229 LINK, you can relax now from continuing to support your misleading presentation.

You write at post #1,

I will update this thread most days as the earh dies screaming.
Lets start in Espana.

 

[ding]

No. Quite the opposite. I didnt realise how bad it was. I would have time for little else if I updated this thread with everything.

How much warmer will it be by the end of the decade?

Have you bought a fire retardant suit yet?

 

[ding]

No. Quite the opposite. I didnt realise how bad it was. I would have time for little else if I updated this thread with everything.

Or maybe it’s nothing at all and you had nothing to post.

 

[San Souci]

and Earth climate data continues to read PRECISELY....


NO WARMING in the ATMOSPHERE
NO WARMING in the OCEANS
NO ONGOING NET ICE MELT
NO BREAKOUT IN CANES
NO OCEAN RISE

and

NO RISE IN SURFACE AIR PRESSURE


The only warming in the actual data is Urban Heat Island Effect, that's it. Co2 does nothing. Climate truth is found here...

Since Co2 does nothing, what does cause Earth climate change?

The first part is understanding what is climate and what is weather. Climate is the parameters of Earth that allow certain ranges of weather. We don't get Cat 10 canes now, but we would if Earth had no ice. What are the parameters of climate that can change? Ocean levels Atmospheric...

www.usmessageboard.com

Apparently we really need a "debate" over the term ICE AGE because y'all are all wrong...

What is an ICE AGE? Most apparently still believe it is a terrifying horror movie event where Earth all at once freezes up. The data has never supported such a scenario. Since 2010, there has been a massive effort to re-write Earth climate history into a series of rapid "glaciations" and ice...

www.usmessageboard.com

The lies of Milankovich Cycles aka McBullshit - where was land mass Antarctica 70 million years ago

McBullshit claims Antarctica has been on the South Pole forever, it never moved at all. And, while it is on the South Pole, it has rapidly gone from ice age to tropical paradise and back over and over.... a Dennis Quaid theory for sure... We know that Antarctica has 70 million year old...

www.usmessageboard.com

How old were the 2.5 mile thick glaciers covering Chicago in the past 20k-5 million years?

This is where the climate debate is now stuck. Every piece of land within 600 miles of a pole is in ice age, everything outside of that is not. Nobody has attempted to dispute that. It is the clear truth of Earth today. Milankovitch Cycles, which I call McBullshit Cycles, take a very...

www.usmessageboard.com

The warmers need to explain the Arctic Circle's ice pattern, and how Co2 is responsible...

The map is clear. 7% of Earth ice is on Greenland. Why is there ice on Greenland south of the Arctic Circle, and no ice north of the Arctic Circle on Alaska? Co2 and sun do not explain this. The only explanation is the Greenland is within 600 miles of the pole at the top, and hence...

www.usmessageboard.com

Besides ,Trees breath CO2. And put out Oxygen