Young people are rejecting the left's pro-abortion propaganda

Dude, how would abortion be illegal in a libertarian state.

Is the state not using force to force the girl/woman to birth a baby.
Since libertarians aren’t in power hard to know how the would act, if they could get Congress to act and legalize it, that would be the best solution

My solution is the best and most solid but apparently people don’t trust Congress.
 
Since libertarians aren’t in power hard to know how the would act, if they could get Congress to act and legalize it, that would be the best solution

My solution is the best and most solid but apparently people don’t trust Congress.
Can’t answer a simple question.
 
They can run to other states where abortion is legal. Abortion will never be banned across the Land because of States Rights. States Rights is actually your friend in this debate that you are making it your enemy.,
Sure they could go through the trouble of traveling to another state, but why should they do that? On what grounds?
 
It is if society determines whether women have sovereignty over their reproductive health and can choose to remain pregnant or not. Society determines what our rights are.
And again, you can say it is a right, but the reality says no. Congress, our government, needs to fix this issue, it is not a justice issue, it is a state issue, Congress is the solutiom.
 
People who support abortion are now the old codger sitting on his porch yelling “get offa my yard”.

You're delusional. The vast majority of the youth aren't buying your irrational, religious reasons for not allowing women to end their pregnancies early. Your position has some weight and substance, once life in the womb is viable and well-developed after several months of gestation, but early in the pregnancy, your position is nonsensical and hence ridiculous.

You so-called "pro-life" people pretend to be committed to the welfare of fetuses in other people's wombs while not giving a rats-ass about the women who are pregnant and how their pregnancies affect them and the community at large. You don't care that she has to face the health risks, financial burden, and daily difficulties of pregnancy for nine months. If she loses her job due to her pregnancy, will you be there to support her financially? She's giving birth after nine months of gestation to a baby she doesn't want or can afford to raise and will likely be given to the state or raised by a mother who may not provide that child with the love and care he or she needs



gangster baby.jpg

You're raising (By being complicit in the bad predicament this child is in, due to your anti-abortion, "pro-life" policies and your penchant for defunding government programs that help single mothers raise their children properly) a little bastard "gangsta-kid", who will likely be neglected and perhaps abused by his mother.

Since when is that "pro-life"? A lot of the people here.........


california-prison.jpg


1200x0.jpg

.......were raised in that situation. I'm not making excuses for them, but a considerable % of them were raised in broken homes and abusive environments. Many foster care kids are abused and end up in prison or homeless:











You created a human soul, bringing him or her into the world, to face what? What type of life are you going to offer this human being? Are you concerned for this person? Really? Be honest. Women should have the right to decide whether they remain pregnant or not, especially early in gestation. They should have easy access to healthcare that will facilitate the termination of the gestation process occurring within their uteruses. Women should have sovereignty over their reproductive life and health, and no one should force them to remain pregnant.

Forcing women to remain pregnant and give birth to babies they don't want, isn't pro-life. These women shouldn't have to travel to another state to abort their unwanted pregnancies. Again I ask on what grounds are you justifying forcing a woman, most likely of modest means, to make the expense of traveling to another state to receive healthcare?
 
Last edited:
You're delusional. The vast majority of the youth aren't buying your irrational, religious reasons for not allowing women to end their pregnancies early. Your position has some weight and substance, once life in the womb is viable and well-developed after several months of gestation, but early in the pregnancy, your position is nonsensical and hence ridiculous.

You so-called "pro-life" people pretend to be committed to the welfare of fetuses in other people's wombs while not giving a rats-ass about the women who are pregnant and how their pregnancies affect them and the community at large. You don't care that she has to face the health risks, financial burden, and daily difficulties of pregnancy for nine months. If she loses her job due to her pregnancy, will you be there to support her financially? She's giving birth after nine months of gestation to a baby she doesn't want or can afford to raise and will likely be given to the state or raised by a mother who may not provide that child with the love and care he or she needs


You're raising (By being complicit in the bad predicament this child is in, due to your anti-abortion, "pro-life" policies and your penchant for defunding government programs that help single mothers raise their children properly) a little bastard "gangsta-kid", who will likely be neglected and perhaps abused by his mother.

Since when is that "pro-life"? A lot of the people here.........


.......were raised in that situation. I'm not making excuses for them, but a considerable % of them were raised in broken homes and abusive environments. Many foster care kids are abused and end up in prison or homeless:











You created a human soul, bringing him or her into the world, to face what? What type of life are you going to offer this human being? Are you concerned for this person? Really? Be honest. Women should have the right to decide whether they remain pregnant or not, especially early in gestation. They should have easy access to healthcare that will facilitate the termination of the gestation process occurring within their uteruses. Women should have sovereignty over their reproductive life and health, and no one should force them to remain pregnant.

Forcing women to remain pregnant and give birth to babies they don't want, isn't pro-life. These women shouldn't have to travel to another state to abort their unwanted pregnancies. Again I ask on what grounds are you justifying forcing a woman, most likely of modest means, to make the expense of traveling to another state to receive healthcare?


You kick little kids, don’t you? Huh, gramps.
 
Sure they could go through the trouble of traveling to another state, but why should they do that? On what grounds?
People travel from one state to another all of the time because a product or service is illegal in their state. Here’s a thought…. If you don’t like a State’s policy, move. Taxes, for example, are driven by policy. People move from California to Texas or New York to Florida because they don’t agree with the tax policies.
 
Pro life is pro choice. Make a choice, deal with it.

Own it
No, it's anti-choice.

You want your fetishes and neuroses to be coded into law, to take away people's choice.

How good is your position, if you are that embarrassed to admit what it is? Very telling.
 
No, it's anti-choice.

You want your fetishes and neuroses to be coded into law, to take away people's choice.

How good is your position, if you are that embarrassed to admit what it is? Very telling.

So the choice to have sex isn’t really a choice.

The cool kids know better.
 

Forum List

Back
Top