kyzr
Diamond Member
Getting 6-months for rape is WAYYYYYYYYYY more than Kobe got. Where was the outrage for Kobe?
Kobe Bryant's Rape Case Reexamined
Kobe Bryant's Rape Case Reexamined
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Clinton was a defense lawyer who secured a plea deal for her client after exposing evidentiary holes in the state's case. You're comparing that to a trial judge handing out a light sentence on the basis of prison would have a "significant impact" on the one who's been convicted.
If you think that anything therein is similar, then you're an even more special kind of stupid we ever realized. And that was a whole lot of special we assigned you before.
All attorneys have a choice who they represent. She choice to sell her soul for a rich client.Your arguments here are false analogies, in fact it would have been immoral for Clinton to give her client anything but the best defense possible since that was what she was pledged to do under our system of justice.Soldier in Africa who execute kids say the same thing.Clinton was a defense lawyer who secured a plea deal for her client after exposing evidentiary holes in the state's case. You're comparing that to a trial judge handing out a light sentence on the basis of prison would have a "significant impact" on the one who's been convicted.
If you think that anything therein is similar, then you're an even more special kind of stupid we ever realized. And that was a whole lot of special we assigned you before.
Regardless, it is beyond immoral to get a child rapist off on a technicality!
Doing her job and to the best of her ability and as obligated by law is immoral?![]()
Would you give a corporation a pass who pollutes the water as much as they legally can and then stops?
What the defendant did was immoral, what the defense attorney did was not, I have no liking for lawyers, but I also know that you cannot hold them up as immoral when they do the job that they swore to do to the best of their abilities.
All attorneys have a choice who they represent. She choice to sell her soul for a rich client.
Clinton was a defense lawyer who secured a plea deal for her client after exposing evidentiary holes in the state's case. You're comparing that to a trial judge handing out a light sentence on the basis of prison would have a "significant impact" on the one who's been convicted.
If you think that anything therein is similar, then you're an even more special kind of stupid we ever realized. And that was a whole lot of special we assigned you before.
Clinton was a defense lawyer who secured a plea deal for her client after exposing evidentiary holes in the state's case. You're comparing that to a trial judge handing out a light sentence on the basis of prison would have a "significant impact" on the one who's been convicted.
If you think that anything therein is similar, then you're an even more special kind of stupid we ever realized. And that was a whole lot of special we assigned you before.
Are you saying that her client didn't rape a 12 year old girl?
A defense attorney's job is to provide his/her client the best defense possible within the law.Actually, a defense attorney is supposed to get/ensure their client a fair trial, not keep criminals on the streets.I don't get it, Is this guy suggesting that the defense attorney is supposed to try and get his/her client MORE jail time? This whole attack on Clinton is idiotic, all it demonstrates is that she was a good defense attorney, there are far more valid lines of character attack on the Queen of Corruption.
"That it is better 100 guilty Persons should escape than that one innocent Person should suffer, is a Maxim that has been long and generally approved." -- Benjamin Franklin
Clinton was a defense lawyer who secured a plea deal for her client after exposing evidentiary holes in the state's case. You're comparing that to a trial judge handing out a light sentence on the basis of prison would have a "significant impact" on the one who's been convicted.
If you think that anything therein is similar, then you're an even more special kind of stupid we ever realized. And that was a whole lot of special we assigned you before.
Are you saying that her client didn't rape a 12 year old girl?
![]()
Meh, hate is the wrong word. At least for me.And Men should be noble and true. Yeah, not gonna happen.
Most are far better than we're given credit for. I can't say the same for Defense Attorneys , from what I can see.
Everyone hates lawyers, until they need one.
No, are you saying that the moon is made of green cheese ?A defense attorney's job is to provide his/her client the best defense possible within the law.Actually, a defense attorney is supposed to get/ensure their client a fair trial, not keep criminals on the streets.I don't get it, Is this guy suggesting that the defense attorney is supposed to try and get his/her client MORE jail time? This whole attack on Clinton is idiotic, all it demonstrates is that she was a good defense attorney, there are far more valid lines of character attack on the Queen of Corruption.
"That it is better 100 guilty Persons should escape than that one innocent Person should suffer, is a Maxim that has been long and generally approved." -- Benjamin Franklin
Are you saying her client didn't rape a 12 year old?
Clinton was a defense lawyer who secured a plea deal for her client after exposing evidentiary holes in the state's case. You're comparing that to a trial judge handing out a light sentence on the basis of prison would have a "significant impact" on the one who's been convicted.
If you think that anything therein is similar, then you're an even more special kind of stupid we ever realized. And that was a whole lot of special we assigned you before.
Are you saying that her client didn't rape a 12 year old girl?
![]()
Oh, so you don't CARE that her client did it as long as she got him a plea deal. Got it.
What a defense attorney does is downright disgusting much of the time. There is no way around that. However, they are a necessary part of the justice system that would be utterly broken without them. I have respect for defense attorneys because the vital role they play in the justice system MUST be done by someone and I sure as hell would not do that job.
What a defense attorney does is downright disgusting much of the time. There is no way around that. However, they are a necessary part of the justice system that would be utterly broken without them. I have respect for defense attorneys because the vital role they play in the justice system MUST be done by someone and I sure as hell would not do that job.
Which is why we need to fix the system by changing to a Guilty until Proven Innocent mentality and removing untrained, citizen jurors.
What a defense attorney does is downright disgusting much of the time. There is no way around that. However, they are a necessary part of the justice system that would be utterly broken without them. I have respect for defense attorneys because the vital role they play in the justice system MUST be done by someone and I sure as hell would not do that job.
Which is why we need to fix the system by changing to a Guilty until Proven Innocent mentality and removing untrained, citizen jurors.
No we do not. This nation was established on a foundation of freedom. Assumed guilt is counter to that fundamental concept.What a defense attorney does is downright disgusting much of the time. There is no way around that. However, they are a necessary part of the justice system that would be utterly broken without them. I have respect for defense attorneys because the vital role they play in the justice system MUST be done by someone and I sure as hell would not do that job.
Which is why we need to fix the system by changing to a Guilty until Proven Innocent mentality and removing untrained, citizen jurors.
No we do not. This nation was established on a foundation of freedom. Assumed guilt is counter to that fundamental concept.
I am still unsure of why you even stay in this nation - are you not openly for a totalitarian or authoritative government?