- Moderator
- #121
Voting for a third party that can't possibly win is also stupid. Voting for a third party only makes sense if there is a viable candidate - and Aleppo Johnson is not a viable candidate. Think about it...
Mcmullin can win though.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Voting for a third party that can't possibly win is also stupid. Voting for a third party only makes sense if there is a viable candidate - and Aleppo Johnson is not a viable candidate. Think about it...
If you are in Utah, go for it. He does not stand a chance to win my state, SC.I think the polls may very well be off a good bit this go-round due to turnout. Lot's of people will simply not show up to vote because they can't stomach either Clinton or Trump. So why wait in line to vote third party when the third party has no chance of winning?
But mcmullin does have a shot at winning. Its not high but if he continues to poll as he does and wins Utah and the other two fail to get to 270. The House decides and his chances skyrocket
Voting for a third party that can't possibly win is also stupid. Voting for a third party only makes sense if there is a viable candidate - and Aleppo Johnson is not a viable candidate. Think about it...
Mcmullin can win though.
The reason candidates x, y, z are "not viable" is because the MAJORITY settle for the "not viable" narrative which DE FACTO makes it a self fulfilling prophecy.its not stupid if everyone grew a spine and joined, then voila, magically theyre viableVoting for a third party that can't possibly win is also stupid. Voting for a third party only makes sense if there is a viable candidate - and Aleppo Johnson is not a viable candidate. Think about it...
Growing a stupid spine doesn't solve anything or make an idiot a viable candidate. Think about it...
But mcmullin does have a shot at winning. Its not high but if he continues to poll as he does and wins Utah and the other two fail to get to 270. The House decides and his chances skyrocket
Let's hear it
Okay.
Hillary is merely a corrupt politician.
Trump is a dangerous Nazi with absolutely no idea what he is doing.
This shouldn't even be a discussion.
Hell is frozen. I agree with Joe though I'm not sure trump is a nazi as much as backed by them
I thought Mormon Hell was the vacuum of space... You know, the Outer Darkness you guys all keep telling me I'm going to
But anyway... No, I really do think Trump is a Nazi.
Here's the thing. This isn't even about idealogy. Regardless of what you feel about Trump's position (I kind of like what he has to say about free trade), this campaign has shown that he lacks the intellect, experience, temperament and character to be President.
I disagree with Hillary, but I have no doubt she has the intellect, experience and temperament. I have questions about her character. Not enough to risk giving Trump the nukes, though.
The reason candidates x, y, z are "not viable" is because the MAJORITY settle for the "not viable" narrative which DE FACTO makes it a self fulfilling prophecy.its not stupid if everyone grew a spine and joined, then voila, magically theyre viableVoting for a third party that can't possibly win is also stupid. Voting for a third party only makes sense if there is a viable candidate - and Aleppo Johnson is not a viable candidate. Think about it...
Growing a stupid spine doesn't solve anything or make an idiot a viable candidate. Think about it...
Its completely backwards.
But mcmullin does have a shot at winning. Its not high but if he continues to poll as he does and wins Utah and the other two fail to get to 270. The House decides and his chances skyrocket
Okay, yes, there is- in theory- a way McMullin could get 1% of the vote and the House could make him president, but would he have any legitimacy if he did that?
Keep in mind, the only historical analog was the Corrupt Bargain of 1824. John Quincy Adams wonthe presidency, but he wasn't considered legitimate. And he came in second place.
It would be more likely the house would deadlock.
Thats weird.The reason candidates x, y, z are "not viable" is because the MAJORITY settle for the "not viable" narrative which DE FACTO makes it a self fulfilling prophecy.its not stupid if everyone grew a spine and joined, then voila, magically theyre viableVoting for a third party that can't possibly win is also stupid. Voting for a third party only makes sense if there is a viable candidate - and Aleppo Johnson is not a viable candidate. Think about it...
Growing a stupid spine doesn't solve anything or make an idiot a viable candidate. Think about it...
Its completely backwards.
No, the reason they aren't viable is because they are not QUALIFIED.
Thats weird.The reason candidates x, y, z are "not viable" is because the MAJORITY settle for the "not viable" narrative which DE FACTO makes it a self fulfilling prophecy.its not stupid if everyone grew a spine and joined, then voila, magically theyre viableVoting for a third party that can't possibly win is also stupid. Voting for a third party only makes sense if there is a viable candidate - and Aleppo Johnson is not a viable candidate. Think about it...
Growing a stupid spine doesn't solve anything or make an idiot a viable candidate. Think about it...
Its completely backwards.
No, the reason they aren't viable is because they are not QUALIFIED.
Im writing in michael jordan
If youll please convert.
If he gets ten votes i am considering him president. i have 6 folks committed to my cause so far.
Because I will live the rest of it not having put my name next to one of the canaard candidates for President, thus not perpetuating the "money rules everything" morals the 1st world cannot help but live by.Thats weird.The reason candidates x, y, z are "not viable" is because the MAJORITY settle for the "not viable" narrative which DE FACTO makes it a self fulfilling prophecy.its not stupid if everyone grew a spine and joined, then voila, magically theyre viable
Growing a stupid spine doesn't solve anything or make an idiot a viable candidate. Think about it...
Its completely backwards.
No, the reason they aren't viable is because they are not QUALIFIED.
Im writing in michael jordan
If youll please convert.
If he gets ten votes i am considering him president. i have 6 folks committed to my cause so far.
Good for you. How would that improve your life?
Voting for a third party that can't possibly win is also stupid. Voting for a third party only makes sense if there is a viable candidate - and Aleppo Johnson is not a viable candidate. Think about it...
Mcmullin can win though.
Win what?
God Joe how much of a brain washing have you gone through? Warren Buffet, Liberal, all in for HRC. Bill Gates, Liberal major donor to HRC. Jeffery Imelt(GE) Obama czar, how many UBER RICH MOTHER FUCKERS do I have to show you who don't want change, yet that a republican is trying to bring jobs back to America, while your bitch wants to continue Obama's stealing of US and giving it to them. Keystone pipeline would of brought many jobs to union memebers, but Warren Buffet would of lost hundreds of millions of millions of dollars from his Railroads. Obamas Environmental impact study said it would of been okay. You Joe are such a fucking idiot.It isn't about the poor people.
It is about all of us.
It is about America's transformation from a Democratic Republic nation to a Plutocratic Corporatocracy.
Bullshit. IF that's the case, it's because Republicans, not Democrats, sold out to the corporations.
You see, when you ask a wingnut when this change happened, he usually has to admit it happened when the Republicans were in charge.
Let's hear it
Voting for a third party that can't possibly win is also stupid. Voting for a third party only makes sense if there is a viable candidate - and Aleppo Johnson is not a viable candidate. Think about it...
Mcmullin can win though.
Win what?
The presidency
Voting for a third party that can't possibly win is also stupid. Voting for a third party only makes sense if there is a viable candidate - and Aleppo Johnson is not a viable candidate. Think about it...
Mcmullin can win though.
Win what?
The presidency
Presidency of what? Aleppo?
Because I will live the rest of it not having put my name next to one of the canaard candidates for President, thus not perpetuating the "money rules everything" morals the 1st world cannot help but live by.Thats weird.The reason candidates x, y, z are "not viable" is because the MAJORITY settle for the "not viable" narrative which DE FACTO makes it a self fulfilling prophecy.Growing a stupid spine doesn't solve anything or make an idiot a viable candidate. Think about it...
Its completely backwards.
No, the reason they aren't viable is because they are not QUALIFIED.
Im writing in michael jordan
If youll please convert.
If he gets ten votes i am considering him president. i have 6 folks committed to my cause so far.
Good for you. How would that improve your life?
Voting for a third party that can't possibly win is also stupid. Voting for a third party only makes sense if there is a viable candidate - and Aleppo Johnson is not a viable candidate. Think about it...
Mcmullin can win though.
Win what?
The presidency
Presidency of what? Aleppo?
Read the 12th amendment