You Don't Own That!

[PoliticalChic]

You are a liar and a dope.
The two are totally different ideas.
You took only part of my sentence to lie.


But.....I will address Nixon in a thread in the near future.

LOL- I'm a liar? Because you can't dispute the truth? Okee dokee- hahahahahaha-

Every reader will see my post and how you twisted it out of context.


And they will recognize you as exactly how I characterized you.

 

[Dragonlady]

That is the corollary to the Leftist mantra 'You didn't build that!"

A fundamental principle of Communism is that there is no private property.


1. Only six years into our Republic, the United States Supreme Court ruled:

"From these passages it is evident; that the right of acquiring and possessing property, and having it protected, is one of the natural, inherent, and unalienable rights of man. Men have a sense of property: Property is necessary to their subsistence, and correspondent to their natural wants and desires; its security was one of the objects, that induced them to unite in society. No man would become a member of a community, in which he could not enjoy the fruits of his honest labour and industry. . . The constitution expressly declares, that the right of acquiring, possessing, and protecting property is natural, inherent, and unalienable. It is a right not ex gratia from the legislature, but ex debito from the constitution. . . Where is the security, where the inviolability of property, if the legislature, by a private act, affecting particular persons ONLY, can take land from one citizen, who acquired it legally, and vest it in another?"
VANHORNE'S LESSEE v. DORRANCE, 2 U.S. 304 (1795)



2. And the definition:
…private property, which specifies to whom the property belongs. Under this form, and individual or individuals have the right to use some good and to exclude others from doing so. If they so wish, they can sell the property, and retain the proceeds from said sale.



3. "The difference between [socialism and fascism] is superficial and purely formal, but it is significant psychologically: it brings the authoritarian nature of a planned economy crudely into the open. The main characteristic of socialism (and of communism) is public ownership of the means of production, and, therefore, the abolition of private property. The right to property is the right of use and disposal. Under fascism, men retain the semblance or pretense of private property, but the government holds total power over its use and disposal."
Ayn Rand.


4. "Portland Wants Private Property Owners To Add ‘Mandatory Rest Spaces’ For The Homeless
...Portland is overrun with people sleeping rough, many of whom suffer from drug addiction and mental illness.

There are humane ways to handle the homelessness problem but, it seems, a Portland city commission would rather change Portland’s building codes in order to force private property owners to accommodate members of Portland’s homeless population, according to local media."
Portland Wants Private Property Owners To Add 'Mandatory Rest Spaces' For The Homeless


5. " OCCUPY WALL STREET GENIUS SAYS HE’S AGAINST “PRIVATE” PROPERTY, NOT “PERSONAL” PROPERTY

....that’s because he wants to keep his iPad 2, naturally, and not share it with the shiftless vagrants fighting over access to one of the three Porta-Potties recently delivered to the now-evacuated camp site in lower Manhattan.”
Occupy Wall Street Genius Says He's Against "Private" Property, Not "Personal" Property | Human Events



He, and every Democrat voter, misses the point: it suddenly dawns on the dopes that they own nothing.
Somehow, it's fine if government takes what that 'top 1%' legally owned....but not what they own.

You never tire of being wrong. Democrats are firm believers in private property, capitalism and that the hardest working and smartest should be rewarded. Only a fool believes otherwise.

But they also believe in a fair deal for all workers, and in paying as you go. Taxes should be levied before spending.

Once again you use that Obama quote improperly to make it seem like Obama opposed private property. Each time you post, you reveal your abject ignorance of the subject you're posting about.

Obama was explaining why corporations should be paying their fair share of taxes. American businesses rely on a transportations systems of bridges, roadways, and railways to transport their goods to market. They rely on utilities, clean water, and sewage disposal for their waste waters. They rely upon a good supply of well educated workers. They rely upon patent and trade mark protections. They rely on a stable government which in a safe country where their private property is respected. The business owners don't build any of these things, but they are essential to their continued success.

Taxes are not theft of your hard earned money. They're your share of the costs of building and maintaining a first world country. There are lots of jursidictions where there are no taxes, and they're all shitholes.

 

[bripat9643]

That is the corollary to the Leftist mantra 'You didn't build that!"

A fundamental principle of Communism is that there is no private property.


1. Only six years into our Republic, the United States Supreme Court ruled:

"From these passages it is evident; that the right of acquiring and possessing property, and having it protected, is one of the natural, inherent, and unalienable rights of man. Men have a sense of property: Property is necessary to their subsistence, and correspondent to their natural wants and desires; its security was one of the objects, that induced them to unite in society. No man would become a member of a community, in which he could not enjoy the fruits of his honest labour and industry. . . The constitution expressly declares, that the right of acquiring, possessing, and protecting property is natural, inherent, and unalienable. It is a right not ex gratia from the legislature, but ex debito from the constitution. . . Where is the security, where the inviolability of property, if the legislature, by a private act, affecting particular persons ONLY, can take land from one citizen, who acquired it legally, and vest it in another?"
VANHORNE'S LESSEE v. DORRANCE, 2 U.S. 304 (1795)



2. And the definition:
…private property, which specifies to whom the property belongs. Under this form, and individual or individuals have the right to use some good and to exclude others from doing so. If they so wish, they can sell the property, and retain the proceeds from said sale.



3. "The difference between [socialism and fascism] is superficial and purely formal, but it is significant psychologically: it brings the authoritarian nature of a planned economy crudely into the open. The main characteristic of socialism (and of communism) is public ownership of the means of production, and, therefore, the abolition of private property. The right to property is the right of use and disposal. Under fascism, men retain the semblance or pretense of private property, but the government holds total power over its use and disposal."
Ayn Rand.


4. "Portland Wants Private Property Owners To Add ‘Mandatory Rest Spaces’ For The Homeless
...Portland is overrun with people sleeping rough, many of whom suffer from drug addiction and mental illness.

There are humane ways to handle the homelessness problem but, it seems, a Portland city commission would rather change Portland’s building codes in order to force private property owners to accommodate members of Portland’s homeless population, according to local media."
Portland Wants Private Property Owners To Add 'Mandatory Rest Spaces' For The Homeless


5. " OCCUPY WALL STREET GENIUS SAYS HE’S AGAINST “PRIVATE” PROPERTY, NOT “PERSONAL” PROPERTY

....that’s because he wants to keep his iPad 2, naturally, and not share it with the shiftless vagrants fighting over access to one of the three Porta-Potties recently delivered to the now-evacuated camp site in lower Manhattan.”
Occupy Wall Street Genius Says He's Against "Private" Property, Not "Personal" Property | Human Events



He, and every Democrat voter, misses the point: it suddenly dawns on the dopes that they own nothing.
Somehow, it's fine if government takes what that 'top 1%' legally owned....but not what they own.

You never tire of being wrong. Democrats are firm believers in private property, capitalism and that the hardest working and smartest should be rewarded. Only a fool believes otherwise.

But they also believe in a fair deal for all workers, and in paying as you go. Taxes should be levied before spending.

Once again you use that Obama quote improperly to make it seem like Obama opposed private property. Each time you post, you reveal your abject ignorance of the subject you're posting about.

Obama was explaining why corporations should be paying their fair share of taxes. American businesses rely on a transportations systems of bridges, roadways, and railways to transport their goods to market. They rely on utilities, clean water, and sewage disposal for their waste waters. They rely upon a good supply of well educated workers. They rely upon patent and trade mark protections. They rely on a stable government which in a safe country where their private property is respected. The business owners don't build any of these things, but they are essential to their continued success.

Taxes are not theft of your hard earned money. They're your share of the costs of building and maintaining a first world country. There are lots of jursidictions where there are no taxes, and they're all shitholes.

"You never tire of being wrong. Democrats are firm believers in private property, capitalism and that the hardest working and smartest should be rewarded. Only a fool believes otherwise."

 

[PoliticalChic]

That is the corollary to the Leftist mantra 'You didn't build that!"

A fundamental principle of Communism is that there is no private property.


1. Only six years into our Republic, the United States Supreme Court ruled:

"From these passages it is evident; that the right of acquiring and possessing property, and having it protected, is one of the natural, inherent, and unalienable rights of man. Men have a sense of property: Property is necessary to their subsistence, and correspondent to their natural wants and desires; its security was one of the objects, that induced them to unite in society. No man would become a member of a community, in which he could not enjoy the fruits of his honest labour and industry. . . The constitution expressly declares, that the right of acquiring, possessing, and protecting property is natural, inherent, and unalienable. It is a right not ex gratia from the legislature, but ex debito from the constitution. . . Where is the security, where the inviolability of property, if the legislature, by a private act, affecting particular persons ONLY, can take land from one citizen, who acquired it legally, and vest it in another?"
VANHORNE'S LESSEE v. DORRANCE, 2 U.S. 304 (1795)



2. And the definition:
…private property, which specifies to whom the property belongs. Under this form, and individual or individuals have the right to use some good and to exclude others from doing so. If they so wish, they can sell the property, and retain the proceeds from said sale.



3. "The difference between [socialism and fascism] is superficial and purely formal, but it is significant psychologically: it brings the authoritarian nature of a planned economy crudely into the open. The main characteristic of socialism (and of communism) is public ownership of the means of production, and, therefore, the abolition of private property. The right to property is the right of use and disposal. Under fascism, men retain the semblance or pretense of private property, but the government holds total power over its use and disposal."
Ayn Rand.


4. "Portland Wants Private Property Owners To Add ‘Mandatory Rest Spaces’ For The Homeless
...Portland is overrun with people sleeping rough, many of whom suffer from drug addiction and mental illness.

There are humane ways to handle the homelessness problem but, it seems, a Portland city commission would rather change Portland’s building codes in order to force private property owners to accommodate members of Portland’s homeless population, according to local media."
Portland Wants Private Property Owners To Add 'Mandatory Rest Spaces' For The Homeless


5. " OCCUPY WALL STREET GENIUS SAYS HE’S AGAINST “PRIVATE” PROPERTY, NOT “PERSONAL” PROPERTY

....that’s because he wants to keep his iPad 2, naturally, and not share it with the shiftless vagrants fighting over access to one of the three Porta-Potties recently delivered to the now-evacuated camp site in lower Manhattan.”
Occupy Wall Street Genius Says He's Against "Private" Property, Not "Personal" Property | Human Events



He, and every Democrat voter, misses the point: it suddenly dawns on the dopes that they own nothing.
Somehow, it's fine if government takes what that 'top 1%' legally owned....but not what they own.

You never tire of being wrong. Democrats are firm believers in private property, capitalism and that the hardest working and smartest should be rewarded. Only a fool believes otherwise.

But they also believe in a fair deal for all workers, and in paying as you go. Taxes should be levied before spending.

Once again you use that Obama quote improperly to make it seem like Obama opposed private property. Each time you post, you reveal your abject ignorance of the subject you're posting about.

Obama was explaining why corporations should be paying their fair share of taxes. American businesses rely on a transportations systems of bridges, roadways, and railways to transport their goods to market. They rely on utilities, clean water, and sewage disposal for their waste waters. They rely upon a good supply of well educated workers. They rely upon patent and trade mark protections. They rely on a stable government which in a safe country where their private property is respected. The business owners don't build any of these things, but they are essential to their continued success.

Taxes are not theft of your hard earned money. They're your share of the costs of building and maintaining a first world country. There are lots of jursidictions where there are no taxes, and they're all shitholes.

"Democrats are firm believers in private property, capitalism and that the hardest working and smartest should be rewarded. Only a fool believes otherwise."


Let's check.

1. "President Obama's instantly infamous "You didn't build that" speech is a major turning point of the 2012 election not because it was a gaffe but because it was an accurate and concise summary of core progressive fiscal dogma. It was also a political blunder of epic proportions because in his speech Obama unintentionally proved the conservatives' case for limited government."
The Ultimate Takedown of Obama's 'You Didn't Build That' Speech



2. Elizabeth Warren saying it....the original statement.





3. “OBAMA: ‘THERE’S LITTLE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN COMMUNISM AND CAPITALISM’” Obama: ‘There’s Little Difference Between Communism and Capitalism’



I admire the consistency in your posts: you don’t let a little thing like brain damage stop you.

 

[PoliticalChic]

That is the corollary to the Leftist mantra 'You didn't build that!"

A fundamental principle of Communism is that there is no private property.


1. Only six years into our Republic, the United States Supreme Court ruled:

"From these passages it is evident; that the right of acquiring and possessing property, and having it protected, is one of the natural, inherent, and unalienable rights of man. Men have a sense of property: Property is necessary to their subsistence, and correspondent to their natural wants and desires; its security was one of the objects, that induced them to unite in society. No man would become a member of a community, in which he could not enjoy the fruits of his honest labour and industry. . . The constitution expressly declares, that the right of acquiring, possessing, and protecting property is natural, inherent, and unalienable. It is a right not ex gratia from the legislature, but ex debito from the constitution. . . Where is the security, where the inviolability of property, if the legislature, by a private act, affecting particular persons ONLY, can take land from one citizen, who acquired it legally, and vest it in another?"
VANHORNE'S LESSEE v. DORRANCE, 2 U.S. 304 (1795)



2. And the definition:
…private property, which specifies to whom the property belongs. Under this form, and individual or individuals have the right to use some good and to exclude others from doing so. If they so wish, they can sell the property, and retain the proceeds from said sale.



3. "The difference between [socialism and fascism] is superficial and purely formal, but it is significant psychologically: it brings the authoritarian nature of a planned economy crudely into the open. The main characteristic of socialism (and of communism) is public ownership of the means of production, and, therefore, the abolition of private property. The right to property is the right of use and disposal. Under fascism, men retain the semblance or pretense of private property, but the government holds total power over its use and disposal."
Ayn Rand.


4. "Portland Wants Private Property Owners To Add ‘Mandatory Rest Spaces’ For The Homeless
...Portland is overrun with people sleeping rough, many of whom suffer from drug addiction and mental illness.

There are humane ways to handle the homelessness problem but, it seems, a Portland city commission would rather change Portland’s building codes in order to force private property owners to accommodate members of Portland’s homeless population, according to local media."
Portland Wants Private Property Owners To Add 'Mandatory Rest Spaces' For The Homeless


5. " OCCUPY WALL STREET GENIUS SAYS HE’S AGAINST “PRIVATE” PROPERTY, NOT “PERSONAL” PROPERTY

....that’s because he wants to keep his iPad 2, naturally, and not share it with the shiftless vagrants fighting over access to one of the three Porta-Potties recently delivered to the now-evacuated camp site in lower Manhattan.”
Occupy Wall Street Genius Says He's Against "Private" Property, Not "Personal" Property | Human Events



He, and every Democrat voter, misses the point: it suddenly dawns on the dopes that they own nothing.
Somehow, it's fine if government takes what that 'top 1%' legally owned....but not what they own.

You never tire of being wrong. Democrats are firm believers in private property, capitalism and that the hardest working and smartest should be rewarded. Only a fool believes otherwise.

But they also believe in a fair deal for all workers, and in paying as you go. Taxes should be levied before spending.

Once again you use that Obama quote improperly to make it seem like Obama opposed private property. Each time you post, you reveal your abject ignorance of the subject you're posting about.

Obama was explaining why corporations should be paying their fair share of taxes. American businesses rely on a transportations systems of bridges, roadways, and railways to transport their goods to market. They rely on utilities, clean water, and sewage disposal for their waste waters. They rely upon a good supply of well educated workers. They rely upon patent and trade mark protections. They rely on a stable government which in a safe country where their private property is respected. The business owners don't build any of these things, but they are essential to their continued success.

Taxes are not theft of your hard earned money. They're your share of the costs of building and maintaining a first world country. There are lots of jursidictions where there are no taxes, and they're all shitholes.

 

[Cellblock2429]

That is the corollary to the Leftist mantra 'You didn't build that!"

A fundamental principle of Communism is that there is no private property.


1. Only six years into our Republic, the United States Supreme Court ruled:

"From these passages it is evident; that the right of acquiring and possessing property, and having it protected, is one of the natural, inherent, and unalienable rights of man. Men have a sense of property: Property is necessary to their subsistence, and correspondent to their natural wants and desires; its security was one of the objects, that induced them to unite in society. No man would become a member of a community, in which he could not enjoy the fruits of his honest labour and industry. . . The constitution expressly declares, that the right of acquiring, possessing, and protecting property is natural, inherent, and unalienable. It is a right not ex gratia from the legislature, but ex debito from the constitution. . . Where is the security, where the inviolability of property, if the legislature, by a private act, affecting particular persons ONLY, can take land from one citizen, who acquired it legally, and vest it in another?"
VANHORNE'S LESSEE v. DORRANCE, 2 U.S. 304 (1795)



2. And the definition:
…private property, which specifies to whom the property belongs. Under this form, and individual or individuals have the right to use some good and to exclude others from doing so. If they so wish, they can sell the property, and retain the proceeds from said sale.



3. "The difference between [socialism and fascism] is superficial and purely formal, but it is significant psychologically: it brings the authoritarian nature of a planned economy crudely into the open. The main characteristic of socialism (and of communism) is public ownership of the means of production, and, therefore, the abolition of private property. The right to property is the right of use and disposal. Under fascism, men retain the semblance or pretense of private property, but the government holds total power over its use and disposal."
Ayn Rand.


4. "Portland Wants Private Property Owners To Add ‘Mandatory Rest Spaces’ For The Homeless
...Portland is overrun with people sleeping rough, many of whom suffer from drug addiction and mental illness.

There are humane ways to handle the homelessness problem but, it seems, a Portland city commission would rather change Portland’s building codes in order to force private property owners to accommodate members of Portland’s homeless population, according to local media."
Portland Wants Private Property Owners To Add 'Mandatory Rest Spaces' For The Homeless


5. " OCCUPY WALL STREET GENIUS SAYS HE’S AGAINST “PRIVATE” PROPERTY, NOT “PERSONAL” PROPERTY

....that’s because he wants to keep his iPad 2, naturally, and not share it with the shiftless vagrants fighting over access to one of the three Porta-Potties recently delivered to the now-evacuated camp site in lower Manhattan.”
Occupy Wall Street Genius Says He's Against "Private" Property, Not "Personal" Property | Human Events



He, and every Democrat voter, misses the point: it suddenly dawns on the dopes that they own nothing.
Somehow, it's fine if government takes what that 'top 1%' legally owned....but not what they own.

/——-/ The day will come where Progs insist people take homeless in to their homes and provide for them. Of course the Prog leaders will be exempt.

 

[PoliticalChic]

That is the corollary to the Leftist mantra 'You didn't build that!"

A fundamental principle of Communism is that there is no private property.


1. Only six years into our Republic, the United States Supreme Court ruled:

"From these passages it is evident; that the right of acquiring and possessing property, and having it protected, is one of the natural, inherent, and unalienable rights of man. Men have a sense of property: Property is necessary to their subsistence, and correspondent to their natural wants and desires; its security was one of the objects, that induced them to unite in society. No man would become a member of a community, in which he could not enjoy the fruits of his honest labour and industry. . . The constitution expressly declares, that the right of acquiring, possessing, and protecting property is natural, inherent, and unalienable. It is a right not ex gratia from the legislature, but ex debito from the constitution. . . Where is the security, where the inviolability of property, if the legislature, by a private act, affecting particular persons ONLY, can take land from one citizen, who acquired it legally, and vest it in another?"
VANHORNE'S LESSEE v. DORRANCE, 2 U.S. 304 (1795)



2. And the definition:
…private property, which specifies to whom the property belongs. Under this form, and individual or individuals have the right to use some good and to exclude others from doing so. If they so wish, they can sell the property, and retain the proceeds from said sale.



3. "The difference between [socialism and fascism] is superficial and purely formal, but it is significant psychologically: it brings the authoritarian nature of a planned economy crudely into the open. The main characteristic of socialism (and of communism) is public ownership of the means of production, and, therefore, the abolition of private property. The right to property is the right of use and disposal. Under fascism, men retain the semblance or pretense of private property, but the government holds total power over its use and disposal."
Ayn Rand.


4. "Portland Wants Private Property Owners To Add ‘Mandatory Rest Spaces’ For The Homeless
...Portland is overrun with people sleeping rough, many of whom suffer from drug addiction and mental illness.

There are humane ways to handle the homelessness problem but, it seems, a Portland city commission would rather change Portland’s building codes in order to force private property owners to accommodate members of Portland’s homeless population, according to local media."
Portland Wants Private Property Owners To Add 'Mandatory Rest Spaces' For The Homeless


5. " OCCUPY WALL STREET GENIUS SAYS HE’S AGAINST “PRIVATE” PROPERTY, NOT “PERSONAL” PROPERTY

....that’s because he wants to keep his iPad 2, naturally, and not share it with the shiftless vagrants fighting over access to one of the three Porta-Potties recently delivered to the now-evacuated camp site in lower Manhattan.”
Occupy Wall Street Genius Says He's Against "Private" Property, Not "Personal" Property | Human Events



He, and every Democrat voter, misses the point: it suddenly dawns on the dopes that they own nothing.
Somehow, it's fine if government takes what that 'top 1%' legally owned....but not what they own.

/——-/ The day will come where Progs insist people take homeless in to their homes and provide for them. Of course the Prog leaders will be exempt.

That's pretty much were item #4 above is headed.


The Communists....er, Democrats, have no understanding of the principles on which this nation was built.


""Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" is a well-known phrase in the United States Declaration of Independence.... Locke argued in his Two Treatises of Government that political society existed for the sake of protecting "property", which he defined as a person's "life, liberty, and estate".

a. That all men are by nature equally free and independent and have certain inherent rights, of which, when they enter into a state of society, they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their posterity; namely, the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety." Virginia Declaration of Rights" Life Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

 

[PoliticalChic]

This is the anti-capitalism cartoon the Liberals use in public school to indoctrinate:

This is what they should be showing if Americans ran government schools:

 

[ThoughtCrimes]

2. And the definition: …private property, which specifies to whom the property belongs. Under this form, and individual or individuals have the right to use some good and to exclude others from doing so. If they so wish, they can sell the property, and retain the proceeds from said sale.

3. "The difference between [socialism and fascism] is superficial and purely formal, but it is significant psychologically: it brings the authoritarian nature of a planned economy crudely into the open. The main characteristic of socialism (and of communism) is public ownership of the means of production, and, therefore, the abolition of private property. The right to property is the right of use and disposal. Under fascism, men retain the semblance or pretense of private property, but the government holds total power over its use and disposal."
Ayn Rand.

Well, are you accusing Trump "The Magic Orange" of being the same type of socialistic cum fascistic demon scum for doing essentially the same thing along the Rio Grand right now. And before you start slinging crap on the ceiling with equating unlawful takings by one method yet excusing another is the height of hypocrisy.

A taking of property via zoning, planning regulations / laws and eminent domain by a State, County or City isn't substantially different in law re: private property taken through the eminent domain clause of Amendment V REQUIRED 'just compensation'; Kohl v. United States, 91 U.S. 367 (1875) . Trump's boys are low-balling the value of the property below fair market value with the result of folks who can't afford an attorney for an extended legal fight are forced into taking less than fair market value.

So where are your posts referring to The Magic Orange as a Socialist and/or a Fascist and/or a Commie and/or a Nazi? Where are you taking that Fat-Assed lying fraud to task in your OP's for his transgressions? If it walks like a fascist or socialist, talks like a socialist or fascist and acts like a damn socialist or a fascist, only a sycophant of the TWO FACED FRAUD would claim the Magic Orange is a wizard or ignore his transgressions in law or not bring him to task for his transgressions and lawlessness.

And how the HELL can you cite Ayn Rand from one side of your mouth when you trample upon Objectivism from the other? What a damned hypocrite! I suggest you read Ms. Rand's 1938 Novella, Anthem. You are in there as one of the "Teachers" Chica!

 

[PoliticalChic]

That is the corollary to the Leftist mantra 'You didn't build that!"

A fundamental principle of Communism is that there is no private property.


1. Only six years into our Republic, the United States Supreme Court ruled:

"From these passages it is evident; that the right of acquiring and possessing property, and having it protected, is one of the natural, inherent, and unalienable rights of man. Men have a sense of property: Property is necessary to their subsistence, and correspondent to their natural wants and desires; its security was one of the objects, that induced them to unite in society. No man would become a member of a community, in which he could not enjoy the fruits of his honest labour and industry. . . The constitution expressly declares, that the right of acquiring, possessing, and protecting property is natural, inherent, and unalienable. It is a right not ex gratia from the legislature, but ex debito from the constitution. . . Where is the security, where the inviolability of property, if the legislature, by a private act, affecting particular persons ONLY, can take land from one citizen, who acquired it legally, and vest it in another?"
VANHORNE'S LESSEE v. DORRANCE, 2 U.S. 304 (1795)



2. And the definition:
…private property, which specifies to whom the property belongs. Under this form, and individual or individuals have the right to use some good and to exclude others from doing so. If they so wish, they can sell the property, and retain the proceeds from said sale.



3. "The difference between [socialism and fascism] is superficial and purely formal, but it is significant psychologically: it brings the authoritarian nature of a planned economy crudely into the open. The main characteristic of socialism (and of communism) is public ownership of the means of production, and, therefore, the abolition of private property. The right to property is the right of use and disposal. Under fascism, men retain the semblance or pretense of private property, but the government holds total power over its use and disposal."
Ayn Rand.


4. "Portland Wants Private Property Owners To Add ‘Mandatory Rest Spaces’ For The Homeless
...Portland is overrun with people sleeping rough, many of whom suffer from drug addiction and mental illness.

There are humane ways to handle the homelessness problem but, it seems, a Portland city commission would rather change Portland’s building codes in order to force private property owners to accommodate members of Portland’s homeless population, according to local media."
Portland Wants Private Property Owners To Add 'Mandatory Rest Spaces' For The Homeless


5. " OCCUPY WALL STREET GENIUS SAYS HE’S AGAINST “PRIVATE” PROPERTY, NOT “PERSONAL” PROPERTY

....that’s because he wants to keep his iPad 2, naturally, and not share it with the shiftless vagrants fighting over access to one of the three Porta-Potties recently delivered to the now-evacuated camp site in lower Manhattan.”
Occupy Wall Street Genius Says He's Against "Private" Property, Not "Personal" Property | Human Events



He, and every Democrat voter, misses the point: it suddenly dawns on the dopes that they own nothing.
Somehow, it's fine if government takes what that 'top 1%' legally owned....but not what they own.

“'Socialism as Popular as Capitalism Among Young Adults in U.S.'-- Since 2010, young adults' positive ratings of socialism have hovered near 50%, while the rate has been consistently near 34% for Gen Xers.” (Gallup, Nov. 2019).


“Private corporate property is not only wrong, but also nonsensical…we cannot accept capitalism’s conception of economic relations as “free and private.” (Democratic Socialists of America, of which AOC and Rashida Tlaib are proud members.)

“Only through the total eradication of private property will we create the new man.” (Che Guevara)

“Youth must refrain from ungrateful questioning of governmental mandates. The very spirit of rebellion is reprehensible!" (Che Guevara)


"Obama: Forget The Difference Between Capitalism And Communism"
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/03/25/obama_forget_the_difference_between_capitalism_and_communism_just_decide_what_works.html