You are unemployed and want a new job, under a Democratic president you have a better chance of getting one!

[Luckyone]

I'm not registered with the Dems or Repubs and when all of the candidates suck, I don't vote. It's that simple.

I fully understand your position. I am going to be totally honest with you. I am 79 years old and until 2020 I had never voted before. The reason was "that no candidate before had been good enough or bad enough to vote for or against". If any nominee had at least one of these 4 basics (morals, ethics, principles of humanity), I knew that even if they were not good, the damage that they would do would not be truly bad or lasting (after 4 or 8 years it would go away).

I did not like Trump in 2016 but I did not vote because I was unsure of whether Trump was that bad or not but in 2020 I voted for the very first time in my life because I got to know who Trump is and that he has none of those 4 basics and can do untold and permanent damage to this country. As such, my vote this year will be against him and not FOR Harris. She is not special but the does have some off the basics.

I think you need to consider the same thing that I considered, given that our nation is at risk of untold and permanent damage, if Trump gets elected.

If he gets elected and does as I think he will, you will be as much blame for it as Trump will be, given that you could have done something about it, but didn't..

 

[Marchimedes]

What are you talking about? He did not invent the data, he just presented it. The data came from economic sources.

Okay. Then I guess we have to back track to said economic sources. Please to be a doll and do such. I thank you for your cooperation. Or I'll fu(kin do it.

 

[TruthNotBS]

I fully understand your position. I am going to be totally honest with you. I am 79 years old and until 2020 I had never voted before. The reason was "that no candidate before had been good enough or bad enough to vote for or against". If any nominee had at least one of these 4 basics (morals, ethics, principles of humanity), I knew that even if they were not good, the damage that they would do would not be truly bad or lasting (after 4 or 8 years it would go away).

I did not like Trump in 2016 but I did not vote because I was unsure of whether Trump was that bad or not but in 2020 I voted for the very first time in my life because I got to know who Trump is and that he has none of those 4 basics and can do untold and permanent damage to this country. As such, my vote this year will be against him and not FOR Harris. She is not special but the does have some off the basics.

I think you need to consider the same thing that I considered, given that our nation is at risk of untold and permanent damage, if Trump gets elected.

If he gets elected and does as I think he will, you will be as much blame for it as Trump will be, given that you could have done something about it, but didn't..

I'm 51 and I voted for the first time in 2016 for Trump. I went from 18 to 43 without voting for anyone, until Trump hoodwinked me with his supposed pro working-class, populace act. Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice, I'm a big dummy. I know better now.

 

[jc456]

Yep. Then you respond "naw", then I say "yep", and then you say "naw" and then I say "yep" and then you say "naw" and then....etc ad infinitum.

Means you have nothing

 

[Luckyone]

Okay. Then I guess we have to back track to said economic sources. Please to be a doll and do such. I thank you for your cooperation. Or I'll fu(kin do it.

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics is the source of that information

 

[Marchimedes]

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics is the source of that information

I know that one. I cite it all the fu(kin time. But you gave it to me. But then as I back tacked you it went to
PolitiFact.

Try again.

 

[TruthNotBS]

Means you have nothing

 

[beagle9]

You originally called me a "smart ace", when you meant "smart-ass". Ironically, that makes you an ass.

I try not to curse, but you bring out the worst in people, so that makes you the ASS.

 

[beagle9]

I fully understand your position. I am going to be totally honest with you. I am 79 years old and until 2020 I had never voted before. The reason was "that no candidate before had been good enough or bad enough to vote for or against". If any nominee had at least one of these 4 basics (morals, ethics, principles of humanity), I knew that even if they were not good, the damage that they would do would not be truly bad or lasting (after 4 or 8 years it would go away).

I did not like Trump in 2016 but I did not vote because I was unsure of whether Trump was that bad or not but in 2020 I voted for the very first time in my life because I got to know who Trump is and that he has none of those 4 basics and can do untold and permanent damage to this country. As such, my vote this year will be against him and not FOR Harris. She is not special but the does have some off the basics.

I think you need to consider the same thing that I considered, given that our nation is at risk of untold and permanent damage, if Trump gets elected.

If he gets elected and does as I think he will, you will be as much blame for it as Trump will be, given that you could have done something about it, but didn't..

Are you just stupid or what ? Trump caused irreparable damage eh ? Name anything ANYTHING Trump signed that caused irrefutable irreparable damage to this country. List the document or bill number please.

 

[TruthNotBS]

I try not to curse, but you bring out the worst in people, so that makes you the ASS.

I'm exorcising your worst demons and until I'm finished you'll continue being an ass. I'm trying to help you Beagle9.

 

[Luckyone]

Are you just stupid or what ? Trump caused irreparable damage eh ? Name anything ANYTHING Trump signed that caused irrefutable irreparable damage to this country. List the document or bill number please.

I did not say he did but that he would

Bottom line, Trump is incompetent and he did not know anything the first time around. He also did not hire the right people then that could help him accomplish what he wanted to do. Even then, he did attempt do destroy our Constitution. He now has more experience and now he knows the people that will help him (Project 2025). In addition, he is now angry and resentful.

Put this together and he will destroy our country "the second time around"

 

[TruthNotBS]

I did not say he did but that he would

Bottom line, Trump is incompetent and he did not know anything the first time around. He also did not hire the right people then that could help him accomplish what he wanted to do. Even then, he did attempt do destroy our Constitution. He now has more experience and now he knows the people that will help him (Project 2025). In addition, he is now angry and resentful.

Put this together and he will destroy our country "the second time around"

He filled his administration with swamp people. Wasn't he going to "drain the swamp"? His administration was a "swamp all-star" team of former Goldman Sachs executives, Wall Street hedge fund managers, and neocon warmongers like Bolton and Pompeo.

 

[beagle9]

He filled his administration with swamp people. Wasn't he going to "drain the swamp"? His administration was a "swamp all-star" team of former Goldman Sachs executives, Wall Street hedge fund managers, and neocon warmongers like Bolton and Pompeo.

Well when the nations brightest intellectuals come from year's and year's of a system that was changing for the worst, and the trend was hey these things have been normalized and are OK now, then what the hell do any of you expect after the pool's have been poisoned with leftist infiltrating and affecting negatively all that was once upon a time "good" in life's water's ??
Trump had to trust those who were hopefully not damaged completely from the pool, but unfortunately the damage was more severe than he thought possible.

 

[Hector12]

Bill Clinton stated this evening that since 1989, 51 million new jobs have been created and under the Democrats, of those 51, 49 million were created under Democratic presidents and only 2 million were created under Republican presidents.

Clinton said he had to check it 3 times but that it was confirmed.

Here is a link to one of the articles that confirms that information:

“Since 1989 and a new age of globalization began, 51 million jobs have been created in America. 49 million, 96%, have been created under Democratic presidents.”

This means that more Americans were working under Democratic rule than under Republican presidents. More people working means a better economy, better lives, and better life for all.

This is also something that is true and that has been confirmed 100%

View attachment 999299

January 9, 2009, 12:04 pm
Bush On Jobs: The Worst Track Record On Record
President George W. Bush entered office in 2001 just as a recession was starting, and is preparing to leave in the middle of a long one. That’s almost 22 months of recession during his 96 months in office.

His job-creation record won’t look much better. The Bush administration created about three million jobs (net) over its eight years, a fraction of the 23 million jobs created under President Bill Clinton’s administration and only slightly better than President George H.W. Bush did in his four years in office.

Here’s a look at job creation under each president since the Labor Department started keeping payroll records in 1939. The counts are based on total payrolls between the start of the month the president took office (using the final payroll count for the end of the prior December) and his final December in office.

Because the size of the economy and labor force varies, we also calculate in percentage terms how much the total payroll count expanded under each president. The current President Bush, once taking account how long he’s been in office, shows the worst track record for job creation since the government began keeping records. –Sudeep Reddy

http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2009/01/09/bush-on-jobs-the-worst-track-record-on-record/

From Truman to Bush: Presidential Employment Gains - The Big Picture

 

[TruthNotBS]

Well when the nations brightest intellectuals come from year's and year's of a system that was changing for the worst, and the trend was hey these things have been normalized and are OK now, then what the hell do any of you expect after the pool's have been poisoned with leftist infiltrating and affecting negatively all that was once upon a time "good" in life's water's ??
Trump had to trust those who were hopefully not damaged completely from the pool, but unfortunately the damage was more severe than he thought possible.

He staffed his administration full of swamp people when supposedly he was trying to drain the swamp. That makes no sense. Ridiculous.

 

[jc456]

I try not to curse, but you bring out the worst in people, so that makes you the ASS.

And troll

 

[beagle9]

He staffed his administration full of swamp people when supposedly he was trying to drain the swamp. That makes no sense. Ridiculous.

Again, who in the hell was left to choose from ? They may have qualified on paper, but their views on life were twisted from living in a twisted leftist utopia that was gaining ground in America faster than a speeding bullet. Their views on life are tainted because of the new tolerance for thing's that should not be tolerated in a civilized society.

Many were being tolerant of thing's that put their children's lives in danger or at risk, but because of the so called normalization of such thing's, it caused people to drop their guards. Hopefully people are waking up, and if the intrusion of women's sport's don't awaken them, then we are done as a nation.

 

[Luckyone]

Again, who in the hell was left to choose from ? They may have qualified on paper, but their views on life were twisted from living in a twisted leftist utopia that was gaining ground in America faster than a speeding bullet. Their views on life are tainted because of the new tolerance for thing's that should not be tolerated in a civilized society.

Many were being tolerant of thing's that put their children's lives in danger or at risk, but because of the so called normalization of such thing's, it caused people to drop their guards. Hopefully people are waking up, and if the intrusion of women's sport's don't awaken them, then we are done as a nation.

Do you ever read what you write? In reading your posts, you seem to live in a world that you built yourself where this happens

 

[TruthNotBS]

Again, who in the hell was left to choose from ? They may have qualified on paper, but their views on life were twisted from living in a twisted leftist utopia that was gaining ground in America faster than a speeding bullet. Their views on life are tainted because of the new tolerance for thing's that should not be tolerated in a civilized society.

Many were being tolerant of thing's that put their children's lives in danger or at risk, but because of the so called normalization of such thing's, it caused people to drop their guards. Hopefully people are waking up, and if the intrusion of women's sport's don't awaken them, then we are done as a nation.

There are thousands of people in Washington and Universities, academia, scholars, working for think tanks, that aren't right-wing or pro-swamp, so what you're suggesting whether you recognize it or not, is that he's incompetent. He lacks the creativity and competence to hire the right people. He hires a bunch of the most rabid, right-wing neocons and anti-working-class people in the country. No matter of rhetorical tap dancing will ever justify that.

 

[beagle9]

Do you ever read what you write? In reading your posts, you seem to live in a world that you built yourself where this happens

View attachment 1011901

Oh so you have no answer. I should have figured as much. You people aren't fooling the masses anymore, and hey you people actually caused J6 with your leftist agenda and attacking Trump for 4 years + over it, but you figure that no one has the ability to put 2+2 together, and that is absolutely ridiculous.