You are unemployed and want a new job, under a Democratic president you have a better chance of getting one!

[Mashmont]

Have you ever found anyone or any nation were greed does not exist? This is not about getting rid of it but controlling it..............on both sides.

Whenever you have a big pile of money, you have people who want to control/steal it. That's why big government is always a problem. Massive taxes, massive piles of money, massive corruption. Leftwingers are the ones who do this. Notice when you have a Foundation with huge assets, even if started by a conservatives businessman, it always ends up in leftwing control. Annenberg is a perfect example of that.

 

[beagle9]

You really do not understand the basics, do you.

Do you even understand the WORD Basic?

Deflection noted

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Boy if you could just have a magic wand, then the world would just be all Lillie's and Rose's with a chicken in every pot, and and a house, car, and easy job for all participants, otherwise regardless of their sinful character's (some way more than other's), and then they could just do bad unto other's without any regard to how nice or good a person was to them.

When you get rid of your god complex, then maybe you can join the rest of common sense society that understands the complexities of all thing's being dealt with.

Seems to me those that see everything in black and white, us vs them, right or wrong with no grey areas are the ones lacking the common sense society that understands the complexities

 

[TruthNotBS]

The one ingredient you intentionally missed in your long drawn out diatribe is the fact that renters have the constant pressure to set rent at levels that don't stop potential renters from being interested in renting from them, but they also have a vested interest in having safe, clean rental properties that have rent set at the levels to insure that to be the case. Government needs to stop with the damned social engineering of societies, and get the hell out of the way.

The government can't provide the vetting that is needed to stop bad people from moving in on renter's, and then destroying their properties while also making the community around those properties unsafe. Not only that, but I'm tired as a taxpayer subsidizing the bull shite with my tax dollar's because the government then pays the renter for the damages incurred after convincing the renter to accept the bad renter's into the rental.

Their will always be slum lord's, and they are always willing to accept anyone, and their will always be government housing where the government is the slum lord, but it's time for the government to get the hell out of renter's business who want to provide safe clean environments to those that want to pay that renter for exactly that.

Go to hell with your commie/socialist one size fits all thinking.

We have a country to save now.

The one ingredient you intentionally missed in your long drawn out diatribe is the fact that renters have the constant pressure to set rent at levels that don't stop potential renters from being interested in renting from them, but they also have a vested interest in having safe, clean rental properties that have rent set at the levels to insure that to be the case. Government needs to stop with the damned social engineering of societies, and get the hell out of the way.

Gobbledygook. You're now claiming that the working class doesn't take care of their housing? Only rich people do
? What nonsense. Landlordism should be heavily regulated, due to its potential for abuse. Even Adam Smith, the father of capitalism, didn't like landlords and essentially called them worthless parasites.

The government can't provide the vetting that is needed to stop bad people from moving in on renters, and then destroying their properties while also making the community around those properties unsafe.

Who's vetting the landlords? We have laws and the means to enforce them through good policing, so your diatribe against the working class, supposedly being unruly and destroying their housing is ridiculous. People need affordable housing, and housing is way too expensive now, only catering to a small segment of the population, gentrifying communities that once had affordable, working-class homes and apartments.

The drug war and illegal immigration, all of these social ills are the product of capitalism, not communism. Communists place drug dealers in front of a firing squad and force those addicted to narcotics to go to rehab or a psyche ward until they're cured and stop abusing themselves and their communities. We have zero tolerance for street crime, so you're confusing us with American liberals. We're not liberals, we're communists. Capitalism creates liberals, so they're your baby, not ours.

Not only that, but I'm tired as a taxpayer subsidizing the bull shite with my tax dollar's because the government then pays the renter for the damages incurred after convincing the renter to accept the bad renter's into the rental.

Who are these "bad renters"? Define your terms and what, who you're referring to. The reality is that society shouldn't allow landlordism. Housing should only be for personal use, i.e. housing people.

Their will always be slum lord's,

Slums are a symptom of capitalism, not communism. Communists eliminate the material conditions that create and allow slums and ghettos. We purge society of its criminal elements, educating and civilizing people. There are only 3 options for violent criminals in a communist society. The Gulag, psyche-ward, and execution.

and they are always willing to accept anyone, and their will always be government housing where the government is the slum lord, but it's time for the government to get the hell out of renter's business who want to provide safe clean environments to those that want to pay that renter for exactly that.

Landlords just want to make money, without work. Leeching off of other's labor. Capitalist-run goverments and societies create slums and hence have "slum-lords", communists quickly eliminate the material and cultural conditions that create and allow slums to exist. In an actual, genuine, communist society everyone is housed, in a clean, safe environment.

Go to hell with your commie/socialist one size fits all thinking.

It was never that way, you're just regurgitating your Cold War capitalist propaganda. In a modern, technologically advanced communist society, that is led by democratic councils and their delegates, there are more opportunities for a broad variety of housing options. There will be more home ownership in communism than under capitalism. In Cuba today, 95% of the population owns a home or apartment. You have more of a right to your home in communism, than you do under capitalism, where if you fail to pay your property taxes, you're kicked out of "your home", by the capitalist-run government. There are no taxes to pay in actual, marketless, moneyless communism.

Under capitalism, all you have at the end of the day, is a usage right. You have the right to use the property that you now live in. Society allows you and recognizes your right to use real estate, but if you want to find out who actually owns "your home", don't pay your property taxes this year. You'll get a knock on the door by the actual owner of the land and whatever is built on it. Try it.

In communism you have a right to housing, in capitalism, you don't, hence the homeless epidemic in this country.

We have a country to save now.

You;re going to further destroy America.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Having morals, ethics, principles and humanity AUTOMATICALLY things improve as those prevent anyone from trying to screw others.

Are you a bot?

It appears that you have been programmed to post the same 4 words in every reply

 

[Luckyone]

Are you a bot?

It appears that you have been programmed to post the same 4 words in every reply

Morals, ethics, principles and humanity.
Morals, ethics, principles and humanity.
Morals, ethics, principles and humanity.

You want more?

 

[beagle9]

Gobbledygook. You're now claiming that the working class doesn't take care of their housing? Only rich people do
? What nonsense. Landlordism should be heavily regulated, due to its potential for abuse. Even Adam Smith, the father of capitalism, didn't like landlords and essentially called them worthless parasites.



Who's vetting the landlords? We have laws and the means to enforce them through good policing, so your diatribe against the working class, supposedly being unruly and destroying their housing is ridiculous. People need affordable housing, and housing is way too expensive now, only catering to a small segment of the population, gentrifying communities that once had affordable, working-class homes and apartments.

The drug war and illegal immigration, all of these social ills are the product of capitalism, not communism. Communists place drug dealers in front of a firing squad and force those addicted to narcotics to go to rehab or a psyche ward until they're cured and stop abusing themselves and their communities. We have zero tolerance for street crime, so you're confusing us with American liberals. We're not liberals, we're communists. Capitalism creates liberals, so they're your baby, not ours.




Who are these "bad renters"? Define your terms and what, who you're referring to. The reality is that society shouldn't allow landlordism. Housing should only be for personal use, i.e. housing people.



Slums are a symptom of capitalism, not communism. Communists eliminate the material conditions that create and allow slums and ghettos. We purge society of its criminal elements, educating and civilizing people. There are only 3 options for violent criminals in a communist society. The Gulag, psyche-ward, and execution.




Landlords just want to make money, without work. Leeching off of other's labor. Capitalist-run goverments and societies create slums and hence have "slum-lords", communists quickly eliminate the material and cultural conditions that create and allow slums to exist. In an actual, genuine, communist society everyone is housed, in a clean, safe environment.



It was never that way, you're just regurgitating your Cold War capitalist propaganda. In a modern, technologically advanced communist society, that is led by democratic councils and their delegates, there are more opportunities for a broad variety of housing options. There will be more home ownership in communism than under capitalism. In Cuba today, 95% of the population owns a home or apartment. You have more of a right to your home in communism, than you do under capitalism, where if you fail to pay your property taxes, you're kicked out of "your home", by the capitalist-run government. There are no taxes to pay in actual, marketless, moneyless communism.

Under capitalism, all you have at the end of the day, is a usage right. You have the right to use the property that you now live in. Society allows you and recognizes your right to use real estate, but if you want to find out who actually owns "your home", don't pay your property taxes this year. You'll get a knock on the door by the actual owner of the land and whatever is built on it. Try it.

In communism you have a right to housing, in capitalism, you don't, hence the homeless epidemic in this country.




You;re going to further destroy America.

You can write a damned book, but it won't make you right no matter how bad you want to be right.

Gobbledygoop ? What you just did actually defines the term perfectly.

No matter how bad you want to make excuses or shift blame, the bottom line is that the government when being run by the Democrats, uhhh destroys this nation a little more each time.

Not sure what you are trying to pull with your question about "who are these bad people" ? If you don't know what actions constitute the character of a bad people or a bad person, then you are one lying or very stupid individual.

You thought that I would tell you that a bad person is a person of a specific race, gender or other right, but sorry to disapoint your leftist attempt at trying to throw your victim hood card's down as if anything you leftist think actually applies. It don't, so go cry your leftist tear's because your bull shite don't work anymore.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Have you ever found anyone or any nation were greed does not exist? This is not about getting rid of it but controlling it..............on both sides.

And how do you control it? With Proportional Representation.

 

[Luckyone]

And how do you control it? With Proportional Representation.

If you think that fantasizing about this is a topic of conversation, look elsewhere. The way you control greed is with laws and regulations that prevent excesses and punish those todo generate excess. Those regulations were in place when Trump took over and he promptly got rid of them.

 

[frigidweirdo]

If you think that fantasizing about this is a topic of conversation, look elsewhere. The way you control greed is with laws and regulations that prevent excesses and punish those todo generate excess. Those regulations were in place when Trump took over and he promptly got rid of them.

I literally already told you that you could go back to the "Fuck Trump" "fuck Biden" generic arguments that happen on here every day. You keep coming back to this topic though. Why?

 

[Luckyone]

I literally already told you that you could go back to the "Fuck Trump" "fuck Biden" generic arguments that happen on here every day. You keep coming back to this topic though. Why?

You are the one trying to talk about a subject that has no reality to it. As far as my response, it is a topic that did happen and as such, can be reversed. Rules and limits were there and Trump got rid of them. The Democrats have been trying to impose them again but the Republicans have not allowed them to. This is a VIABLE solution and not the fantasy that you are talking about. This is not about Trump or Biden, but about Republicans.

Now, get off this topic. It is not worth even talking about it.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Morals, ethics, principles and humanity.
Morals, ethics, principles and humanity.
Morals, ethics, principles and humanity.

You want more?

What are 4 concepts Luckyone does not understand.

Thank you, Alex, I will take Luckyone's robotic responses for 800.

 

[frigidweirdo]

You are the one trying to talk about a subject that has no reality to it. As far as my response, it is a topic that did happen and as such, can be reversed. Rules and limits were there and Trump got rid of them. The Democrats have been trying to impose them again but the Republicans have not allowed them to. This is a VIABLE solution and not the fantasy that you are talking about. This is not about Trump or Biden, but about Republicans.

Now, get off this topic. It is not worth even talking about it.

And you're back again....

 

[DBA]

Like they did in 2016?

Yes, like they did during Trump’s term. The thugs burned and looted and the politicians started looking for ways to impeach him. Both are tantrums, just different methods.