Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Again, you are blaming God for the accounts of the Jews.There are disturbed morals in any bible youd like to cherry pick.You mean the accounts that the Jews wrote, GT?That's funny. God of the Bible's morals are relative to which covenant he is speaking from and even then, in the new covenant, theres plenty there that humans in actionable real life find reprehensible.Im gunna ask a mod to remove dingerred because he is too daft to understand that the OP is about the morality of the god of the bible....hes off on one of his autistic derpderp modes because the OP triggered him.And a good jar of moonshine leads to passing out on top of a row of washing machines in an all night laundromat. . What is your point?
Could be just God confounding his thoughts. There are a couple of examples of that in the Bible.
They read something on Kos and run with it as truth every time.It's always humorous to watch liberals and atheists try to critique the Bible. ... ..
You mean the Jew's opinions?Gods opinion of incest seems to be relative as well.
Any God youd like to discuss has these issues, of the major world religions.Again, you are blaming God for the accounts of the Jews.There are disturbed morals in any bible youd like to cherry pick.You mean the accounts that the Jews wrote, GT?That's funny. God of the Bible's morals are relative to which covenant he is speaking from and even then, in the new covenant, theres plenty there that humans in actionable real life find reprehensible.Im gunna ask a mod to remove dingerred because he is too daft to understand that the OP is about the morality of the god of the bible....hes off on one of his autistic derpderp modes because the OP triggered him.
Could be just God confounding his thoughts. There are a couple of examples of that in the Bible.
You mean the Jew's opinions?Gods opinion of incest seems to be relative as well.
I quoted actual biblical scripture.They read something on Kos and run with it as truth every time.It's always humorous to watch liberals and atheists try to critique the Bible. ... ..
Or maybe you misunderstand that the account of the flood was an allegorical description of an actual event that was recorded by the Jews of an oral tradition that was passed down from generation to generation.I wonder if the bible d0ng follows includes the story of the murderous flood
Murder is absolutely wrong in the conclusions of human morality.
God of the bible? Oh, its relative.
No. You are arguing a literal interpretation of something you don't believe.I quoted actual biblical scripture.They read something on Kos and run with it as truth every time.It's always humorous to watch liberals and atheists try to critique the Bible. ... ..
You mean like how the Tower of Babel was an allegorical account of the migration of the cradle of civilization?You mean the Jew's opinions?Gods opinion of incest seems to be relative as well.
Which parts do you choose to like?
You mean like how the Tower of Babel was an allegorical account of the migration of the cradle of civilization?You mean the Jew's opinions?Gods opinion of incest seems to be relative as well.
Which parts do you choose to like?
The issue is yours, GT. I take ancient writings with a grain of salt. I don't need to build strawmen to make myself feel superior to others. Real logic works just fine for me.Any God youd like to discuss has these issues, of the major world religions.Again, you are blaming God for the accounts of the Jews.There are disturbed morals in any bible youd like to cherry pick.You mean the accounts that the Jews wrote, GT?That's funny. God of the Bible's morals are relative to which covenant he is speaking from and even then, in the new covenant, theres plenty there that humans in actionable real life find reprehensible.Could be just God confounding his thoughts. There are a couple of examples of that in the Bible.
Its no more ridiculous than a virgin giving birth, a god sending himself to sacrifice himself to himself without it being an actual sacrifice at all with the knowledge of his spiritual immortality ...and all for the bad choices he ...being omniscient... knew his creation would make before they made it and still created them anyways and then blamed them and called it free will & their own failure..Or maybe you misunderstand that the account of the flood was an allegorical description of an actual event that was recorded by the Jews of an oral tradition that was passed down from generation to generation.I wonder if the bible d0ng follows includes the story of the murderous flood
Murder is absolutely wrong in the conclusions of human morality.
God of the bible? Oh, its relative.
Do you really believe that God sent a flood to kill all of mankind, GT?
No, it actually doesnt because you posted cs lewis pasaages that had no less than 50 logical fallacies and youre too redundant and daft to understand a single one of them.The issue is yours, GT. I take ancient writings with a grain of salt. I don't need to build strawmen to make myself feel superior to others. Real logic works just fine for me.Any God youd like to discuss has these issues, of the major world religions.Again, you are blaming God for the accounts of the Jews.There are disturbed morals in any bible youd like to cherry pick.You mean the accounts that the Jews wrote, GT?That's funny. God of the Bible's morals are relative to which covenant he is speaking from and even then, in the new covenant, theres plenty there that humans in actionable real life find reprehensible.
I believe that there is a final state of fact for everything. We call this objective truth or reality. That once discovered it is known that it was always that way and will always be that way. In other words, it is eternal and unchanging. Which is the only solution to the first cause conundrum. This I know to be God. Ergo, God is existence. I am.You mean like how the Tower of Babel was an allegorical account of the migration of the cradle of civilization?You mean the Jew's opinions?Gods opinion of incest seems to be relative as well.
Which parts do you choose to like?
I mean like "I believe this, but I don't believe that"
Then it shouldn't be too hard for you to prove that, right?No, it actually doesnt because you posted cs lewis pasaages that had no less than 50 logical fallacies and youre too redundant and daft to understand a single one of them.The issue is yours, GT. I take ancient writings with a grain of salt. I don't need to build strawmen to make myself feel superior to others. Real logic works just fine for me.Any God youd like to discuss has these issues, of the major world religions.Again, you are blaming God for the accounts of the Jews.There are disturbed morals in any bible youd like to cherry pick.You mean the accounts that the Jews wrote, GT?
Why?somewhere, aquinas chuckles
I dont cater to your whims, I have rational discussions with folks who are honest and worthwhile and I dont consider you to be either. You can rah rah until youre blue in the face about how wrong I might be, but I know better so...you dont really belong in my discuasion threads to begin with. Theyre over your head.Then it shouldn't be too hard for you to prove that, right?No, it actually doesnt because you posted cs lewis pasaages that had no less than 50 logical fallacies and youre too redundant and daft to understand a single one of them.The issue is yours, GT. I take ancient writings with a grain of salt. I don't need to build strawmen to make myself feel superior to others. Real logic works just fine for me.Any God youd like to discuss has these issues, of the major world religions.Again, you are blaming God for the accounts of the Jews.There are disturbed morals in any bible youd like to cherry pick.