Yes, among small business owners, the propertied class are the enemies of marxist theology. Imagine no possessions right John?

Theowl32

Diamond Member
Dec 8, 2013
22,658
16,853
2,415
"I am for socialism, disarmament, and, ultimately, for abolishing the state itself... I seek the social ownership of property, the abolition of the propertied class, and the sole control of those who produce wealth. Communism is the goal."

Roger Nash Baldwin founder of the aclu

Yes, this is their goal. So, what is happening as a result of Kung flu? Here, other than a fraudulent election with a geriatric puppet in office doing the bidding of China and world marxists, it is to eliminate the American propertied class.

Potential for historic wave of families losing their homes.

That's what.

 
Last edited:
"I am for socialism, disarmament, and, ultimately, for abolishing the state itself... I seek the social ownership of property, the abolition of the propertied class, and the sole control of those who produce wealth. Communism is the goal."

Roger Nash Baldwin founder of the aclu

Yes, this is their goal. So, what is happening as a result of Kung flu? Here, other than a fraudulent election with a geriatric puppet in office doing the bidding of China and world marxists, it is to eliminate the American propertied class.

Potential for historic wave of families losing their homes.

That's what.


This describes Cuba.
 
"I am for socialism, disarmament, and, ultimately, for abolishing the state itself... I seek the social ownership of property, the abolition of the propertied class, and the sole control of those who produce wealth. Communism is the goal."

Roger Nash Baldwin founder of the aclu

Yes, this is their goal. So, what is happening as a result of Kung flu? Here, other than a fraudulent election with a geriatric puppet in office doing the bidding of China and world marxists, it is to eliminate the American propertied class.

Potential for historic wave of families losing their homes.

That's what.


Too bad for John that he didn't possess some body armor and a handgun.
 
So very sad to see the most industrious people in America wrecked by the Hoax
Oops, that is not complimentary toward Covid so look for the censors to arrive soon.
 
Too bad for John that he didn't possess some body armor and a handgun.
In typical fashion and the woke for thee and not for me fashion, the stupid ass hippy multi millionaire commie (worth an estimated $800 million dollars at time of death) he owned a bunch of properties.

Including this ginormous mansion that just recently sold for $36 million in Palm Beach.

"Former John Lennon house fetches $36 million in Palm Beach, deed says" UPDATE: Former John Lennon house sells for $36M in Palm Beach, deed shows


Lol, I guess it was just a bloody song, eh John?


LOL

 
Honestly some socialist-minded people believe they are honorable, noble, fair minded, sensible, compassionate, right in their beliefs. These are the ones poorly versed in history and who have little or no understanding of cause and effect and/or inevitable consequences.

If these gullible souls, pawns of the greedy & power hungry, succeed in allowing socialism, they will fall into one of two primary groups:
--Those who won't work because the government provides for them.
--Those who work minimally or inefficiently out of resentment that most of what they earn/produce goes to enrich those in power and/or support those who won't work.

Both groups have much less prosperity, choices, options, opportunity, liberties, hope.

The few who do prosper from socialism are those in power who organize, fund, promote, and enforce it.
 
In typical fashion and the woke for thee and not for me fashion, the stupid ass hippy multi millionaire commie (worth an estimated $800 million dollars at time of death) he owned a bunch of properties.

Including this ginormous mansion that just recently sold for $36 million in Palm Beach.

"Former John Lennon house fetches $36 million in Palm Beach, deed says" UPDATE: Former John Lennon house sells for $36M in Palm Beach, deed shows


Lol, I guess it was just a bloody song, eh John?


LOL


"Imagine no mansions...I mean, imagine YOU have no mansions. I get to have as many as I want."
 
Honestly some socialist-minded people believe they are honorable, noble, fair minded, sensible, compassionate, right in their beliefs. These are the ones poorly versed in history and who have little or no understanding of cause and effect and/or inevitable consequences.

If these gullible souls, pawns of the greedy & power hungry, succeed in allowing socialism, they will fall into one of two primary groups:
--Those who won't work because the government provides for them.
--Those who work minimally or inefficiently out of resentment that most of what they earn/produce goes to enrich those in power and/or support those who won't work.

Both groups have much less prosperity, choices, options, opportunity, liberties, hope.

The few who do prosper from socialism are those in power who organize, fund, promote, and enforce it.
commune has a poet.jpg
 
Over the past 5,000 years regimes like the current Democrats have been destroyed. People get fed up with their shit and soon after no more regime.
 
Communists are stupid as hell.
The Chinese Communists are kicking the sh!t out of U.S. capitalists, and they're doing it with the technological advancements made by these same U.S. capitalists.

U.S. corporate leaders can't wait to send new discoveries to to the Chinese factories manufacturing the U.S. capitalists' products. The Chinese need only to stop sending the shiploads of American capitalists' computers, televisions, smartphones, and the many other U.S. products manufactured there for one month, to bring the U.S. economy to a screeching halt.

This give-away of U.S. technology began with Reagan's policies to finance the outsourcing of U.S. manufacturing jobs to China. U.S. capitalist were quick to take advantage of the cheap Chinese labor and the taxpayer cash given them to move their operations to China. So, Americans have no one to blame but themselves for being the suckers that fell for Reagan's trickle down snake oil.

Ronald Reagan and his successor, George H.W. Bush were the best U.S. presidents the Chinese Communists ever had.


.


.
 
"I am for socialism, disarmament, and, ultimately, for abolishing the state itself... I seek the social ownership of property, the abolition of the propertied class, and the sole control of those who produce wealth. Communism is the goal."

Roger Nash Baldwin founder of the aclu

Yes, this is their goal. So, what is happening as a result of Kung flu? Here, other than a fraudulent election with a geriatric puppet in office doing the bidding of China and world marxists, it is to eliminate the American propertied class.

Potential for historic wave of families losing their homes.

That's what.


Wrong.
Communism never even remotely hints at doing anything with personal property.
When they speak of property, they are referring to "the means of production".

Communism came to the forefront over the industrial revolution of 1830 or so, which put all the cottage industries out of business, because they could not compete with the expensive steam powered looms and other mass production machines.

So when communism talks about ending the properties class, they mean factory owners.
They were referring to people who do not produce, but instead take a large portion of the product of labor of the workers, purely by being the owner of the equipment they need in order to work.
Communism envisioned where the workers would pool their resource enough so that they could buy their own factories. They want factories to be collectively owned by the workers.
 
The Chinese Communists are kicking the sh!t out of U.S. capitalists, and they're doing it with the technological advancements made by these same U.S. capitalists.

U.S. corporate leaders can't wait to send new discoveries to to the Chinese factories manufacturing the U.S. capitalists' products. The Chinese need only to stop sending the shiploads of American capitalists' computers, televisions, smartphones, and the many other U.S. products manufactured there for one month, to bring the U.S. economy to a screeching halt.

This give-away of U.S. technology began with Reagan's policies to finance the outsourcing of U.S. manufacturing jobs to China. U.S. capitalist were quick to take advantage of the cheap Chinese labor and the taxpayer cash given them to move their operations to China. So, Americans have no one to blame but themselves for being the suckers that fell for Reagan's trickle down snake oil.

Ronald Reagan and his successor, George H.W. Bush were the best U.S. presidents the Chinese Communists ever had.


.


.

Ronnie 'Raygun' is the father of opening up the U.S. financial system on a global basis, despite dictatorial/authoritarian political ideology.
Greed is good....Ooopps!
 
The Chinese Communists are kicking the sh!t out of U.S. capitalists, and they're doing it with the technological advancements made by these same U.S. capitalists.

U.S. corporate leaders can't wait to send new discoveries to to the Chinese factories manufacturing the U.S. capitalists' products. The Chinese need only to stop sending the shiploads of American capitalists' computers, televisions, smartphones, and the many other U.S. products manufactured there for one month, to bring the U.S. economy to a screeching halt.

This give-away of U.S. technology began with Reagan's policies to finance the outsourcing of U.S. manufacturing jobs to China. U.S. capitalist were quick to take advantage of the cheap Chinese labor and the taxpayer cash given them to move their operations to China. So, Americans have no one to blame but themselves for being the suckers that fell for Reagan's trickle down snake oil.

Ronald Reagan and his successor, George H.W. Bush were the best U.S. presidents the Chinese Communists ever had.


.


.
An hour after you eat Communist Chinese shit, are you hungry again?
 
Wrong.
Communism never even remotely hints at doing anything with personal property.
When they speak of property, they are referring to "the means of production".

Communism came to the forefront over the industrial revolution of 1830 or so, which put all the cottage industries out of business, because they could not compete with the expensive steam powered looms and other mass production machines.

So when communism talks about ending the properties class, they mean factory owners.
They were referring to people who do not produce, but instead take a large portion of the product of labor of the workers, purely by being the owner of the equipment they need in order to work.
Communism envisioned where the workers would pool their resource enough so that they could buy their own factories. They want factories to be collectively owned by the workers.
The road from capitalism to communism, as Marx laid it out, includes a period of totalitarianism in which the government by guile or forcibly disarms the populace, takes control of media, education, scientific institutions, means of production. Government dictates how people are allowed to work and live, what, if anything, they are allowed to earn and/or keep of what they earn. Speech, religion, individual expression is suppressed and/or strictly controlled. Any 'vote' by the people is controlled and manipulated.

Once all individuality, personal ambition, private property ownership has been eliminated, then the people can be free to live in peace and harmony with each contributing according to his ability and each receiving according to his needs.

Setting aside human nature for the moment, the primary problem with his theory is that it has never been fully tested. No government, having achieved totalitarianism, has willingly given it up. Those in power and who abet those in power prosper hugely. The general population gets just enough to fear losing what it has so that it does not protest. But all not in power prosper less.
 

Forum List

Back
Top