Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.
Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president
Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.
Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president
Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.
Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president
Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.
Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.
Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president
Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.
Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.
Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president
Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.
Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.
Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president
Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.
Obstruction of justice .
Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.
Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president
Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.
there is nothing "fake" about it, idiota...
obstruction of justice is illegal.
high crimes and misdemeanors is a very broad concept...
you were the same freaks who thought Clinton should be impeached for a blow job.
What laws has he broken to become a lawless President? Be specific and give a link or this is just another "President Trump has poopy pants thread".
Cripes its like every liberal on this board has turned into rdean. Sheesh.
So tell us all where the "justice" is in a political witch hunt that's gone on for 11 months now and found nothing, and is veering off in directions that's got nothing to do with COLLUSION?Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.
Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president
Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.
there is nothing "fake" about it, idiota...
obstruction of justice is illegal.
high crimes and misdemeanors is a very broad concept...
you were the same freaks who thought Clinton should be impeached for a blow job.
Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.
Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president
Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.
there is nothing "fake" about it, idiota...
obstruction of justice is illegal.
high crimes and misdemeanors is a very broad concept...
you were the same freaks who thought Clinton should be impeached for a blow job.
Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.
Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president
Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.
I have for months now thought Congress should remove Trump from office on general principle alone. After all, it's not as though his successor won't be a Republican.bye-bye Mr Pres.
Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.
Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president
Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.
there is nothing "fake" about it, idiota...
obstruction of justice is illegal.
high crimes and misdemeanors is a very broad concept...
you were the same freaks who thought Clinton should be impeached for a blow job.
Sheesh, you obviously suck as a lawyer but you'd make a great Lewinsky.
mmm. maybe not for Republicans though.
Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.
Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president
Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.
Nixon refused to release the tapes to Archibald Cox. How well did that work out for President Nixon?
Conspiracy Theory I:
Trump has been in contact with Putin; no one knows what they spoke about. It's possible Trump asked for the best way to neutralize Mr. Mueller, Putin seems to have figured out a way to neutralize his
distractors - does Plutonium ring a bell?
Poisoning of Alexander Litvinenko - Wikipedia
Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.
Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president
Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.
Ok, thanks for the clarification.Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.
Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president
Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.
Actually Trump can't fire him. He would have to order Rosenstein to do it.