Yeah, this about sums Trump up

[SmokeALib]

Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.

Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president

Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.

It's obstruction of justice which is an impeachable offense. You think this POS can fire anyone who is investigating him and get away with it?
I see you don't have any morals. Par for the course.

You lost. Time to get a job.

 

[PredFan]

Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.

Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president

Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.

It's obstruction of justice which is an impeachable offense. You think this POS can fire anyone who is investigating him and get away with it?
I see you don't have any morals. Par for the course.

Hey idiot, no crime, no obstruction. There is so much logic and reason that you are incapable of understanding. Life must kick your stupid ass on a regular basis. Sucks to be you.

 

[PredFan]

The hardest job on the planet is defending DT.
Why would anyone want that task?
He doesn't care about you.
It's obvious he only cares about himself and his sheep adulating him.

Read your own post, idiot. I'll bet you cannot even find where you contradicted yourself.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Labrov Trolls and Threatens the Orange Trollop Trump :

SeanSpicer's Mic @Spicerlies
Lavrov is a seasoned diplomat, the distain/contempt he displayed in this interview.
Stunning. Menacing. Vulgar

Warning shot to Trump

https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/888359468207091712 …


7:55 AM - 21 Jul 2017


Trump and Putin May Have Met More Times Says Russias Sergei Lavro
Source: NBC News


MOSCOW — President Donald Trump may have held more meetings with Vladimir Putin at the G-20 summit earlier this month, Russia's Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said Friday — but he shrugged off the importance of the encounters.

“They might have met even much more than just three times,” he told NBC News’ Keir Simmons in an exclusive interview, dismissing speculation about the leaders' meetings.

... snip

“After the dinner was over…I was not there…President Trump apparently went to pick up his wife and spent some minutes with President Putin…so what?” he said.



Read more: EXCLUSIVE: Russia's Lavrov Says Trump May Have Met Putin More Times

 

[usmbguest5318]

I have for months now thought Congress should remove Trump from office on general principle alone. After all, it's not as though his successor won't be a Republican.

I didn't know "general principal" was a matter of high crimes and misdemeanors.

Are you really naive enough to think that the houses of Congress being comprised as it is of so many attorneys cannot make the case that the behavior our current president has exhibited constitutes a high crime or misdemeanor? If they so determine to do, there is likely no person or entity that can reverse their decision. (Such a thing has never been tested, but then much about what Trump's thoughts, said and done has never happened before, for good reason.)

I didn't know "general principal" was a matter of high crimes and misdemeanors.

Are you really naive enough to think that the houses of Congress being comprised as it is of so many attorneys cannot make the case that the behavior our current president has exhibited constitutes a high crime or misdemeanor? If they so determine to do, there is likely no person or entity that can reverse their decision. (Such a thing has never been tested, but then much about what Trump's thoughts, said and done has never happened before, for good reason.)

Yes, that's what America really needs, liberal thought, speech and in my opinion gestapo..

Yes, well, your opinion is clearly ill informed. The Gestapo (Hitler's at least) was a combination of ideology and "law" promulgating and enforcement organization, not simply a legislative body, which is all that the U.S. Congress is. Congress can pass laws and promulgate ideology, but it has no ability to enforce adherence to either. Thus, though in your opinion what I've described is a Gestapo body/action, it's not.

You may think something funny about the inanity of our current POTUS and/or your comment, but there's nothing funny about either. Both are rueful reflections of the ethical and intellectual depravity to which an electoral majority of our nation (by having elected Trump) and you have sunk.

I was responding to your previous delusional post where you ended up with this comment. "Such a thing has never been tested, but then much about what Trump's thoughts, said and done has never happened before, for good reason"

All you presented was left wing butt hurt delusions under the guise of intelligence, sorry, I wasn't impressed.

What you want is pc control of words, beliefs, thoughts and perceived motivations that adhere to left wing dogma and a huge waste of taxpayers funds on, "Such a thing has never been tested" .. Trump won, accept reality and do your part to "Make America Great Again"..

.
View attachment 139811

I wasn't impressed.

That's of no matter for you weren't bidden to be. If you are impressed, you are. If you aren't impressed, you aren't. It's of no consequence either way. Your being so or not wasn't, isn't and won't ever be among my expectations because you are a complete stranger to me. Truly, I don't care what you think of me or my remarks because, quite frankly, you don't cross my mind at all.

What you want is pc control of words, beliefs, thoughts and perceived motivations

What I want is carefully developed and, if one desires, expressed thoughts.

Dude, release your animal and have some fun, do you ever feel the need to be blunt and bottom line?

Dude, release your animal and have some fun...

Non ducor, duco.

...do you ever feel the need to be blunt and bottom line?

My most recent comments prior to this post didn't strike you as blunt?

 

[usmbguest5318]

bye-bye Mr Pres.

I have for months now thought Congress should remove Trump from office on general principle alone. After all, it's not as though his successor won't be a Republican.

For what? Pissing off leftist traitors?

No.

 

[PredFan]

Labrov Trolls and Threatens the Orange Trollop Trump :

SeanSpicer's Mic @Spicerlies
Lavrov is a seasoned diplomat, the distain/contempt he displayed in this interview.
Stunning. Menacing. Vulgar

Warning shot to Trump

https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/888359468207091712 …


7:55 AM - 21 Jul 2017


Trump and Putin May Have Met More Times Says Russias Sergei Lavro
Source: NBC News


MOSCOW — President Donald Trump may have held more meetings with Vladimir Putin at the G-20 summit earlier this month, Russia's Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said Friday — but he shrugged off the importance of the encounters.

“They might have met even much more than just three times,” he told NBC News’ Keir Simmons in an exclusive interview, dismissing speculation about the leaders' meetings.

... snip

“After the dinner was over…I was not there…President Trump apparently went to pick up his wife and spent some minutes with President Putin…so what?” he said.



Read more: EXCLUSIVE: Russia's Lavrov Says Trump May Have Met Putin More Times

OMG OMG OMG! The POTUS having meetings with the President of Russia! No President should be allowed to have meeting with foreigners! It's treason I tell ya TREASON!

 

[Lumpy 1]

I didn't know "general principal" was a matter of high crimes and misdemeanors.

Are you really naive enough to think that the houses of Congress being comprised as it is of so many attorneys cannot make the case that the behavior our current president has exhibited constitutes a high crime or misdemeanor? If they so determine to do, there is likely no person or entity that can reverse their decision. (Such a thing has never been tested, but then much about what Trump's thoughts, said and done has never happened before, for good reason.)

Are you really naive enough to think that the houses of Congress being comprised as it is of so many attorneys cannot make the case that the behavior our current president has exhibited constitutes a high crime or misdemeanor? If they so determine to do, there is likely no person or entity that can reverse their decision. (Such a thing has never been tested, but then much about what Trump's thoughts, said and done has never happened before, for good reason.)

Yes, that's what America really needs, liberal thought, speech and in my opinion gestapo..

Yes, well, your opinion is clearly ill informed. The Gestapo (Hitler's at least) was a combination of ideology and "law" promulgating and enforcement organization, not simply a legislative body, which is all that the U.S. Congress is. Congress can pass laws and promulgate ideology, but it has no ability to enforce adherence to either. Thus, though in your opinion what I've described is a Gestapo body/action, it's not.

You may think something funny about the inanity of our current POTUS and/or your comment, but there's nothing funny about either. Both are rueful reflections of the ethical and intellectual depravity to which an electoral majority of our nation (by having elected Trump) and you have sunk.

I was responding to your previous delusional post where you ended up with this comment. "Such a thing has never been tested, but then much about what Trump's thoughts, said and done has never happened before, for good reason"

All you presented was left wing butt hurt delusions under the guise of intelligence, sorry, I wasn't impressed.

What you want is pc control of words, beliefs, thoughts and perceived motivations that adhere to left wing dogma and a huge waste of taxpayers funds on, "Such a thing has never been tested" .. Trump won, accept reality and do your part to "Make America Great Again"..

.
View attachment 139811

I wasn't impressed.

That's of no matter for you weren't bidden to be. If you are impressed, you are. If you aren't impressed, you aren't. It's of no consequence either way. Your being so or not wasn't, isn't and won't ever be among my expectations because you are a complete stranger to me. Truly, I don't care what you think of me or my remarks because, quite frankly, you don't cross my mind at all.

What you want is pc control of words, beliefs, thoughts and perceived motivations

What I want is carefully developed and, if one desires, expressed thoughts.

Dude, release your animal and have some fun, do you ever feel the need to be blunt and bottom line?

Dude, release your animal and have some fun...

Non ducor, duco.

...do you ever feel the need to be blunt and bottom line?

My most recent comments prior to this post didn't strike you as blunt?

No .. not at all, you could have got your point out in 2 words but 7 to 10 .. perfect.

There's no doubt you're a smart guy but realize your on a message board and long posts are rarely fully appreciated (read at all) There must be a place for high brow posts and serious discussions around here somewhere though.

btw. I was trying to get to your bottom lines by pissing you off a little..

 

[BluesLegend]

Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.

Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president

Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.

there is nothing "fake" about it, idiota...

obstruction of justice is illegal.

high crimes and misdemeanors is a very broad concept...

you were the same freaks who thought Clinton should be impeached for a blow job.

Lib please fake news is all you got on Trump, choke on it.

 

[jc456]

Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.

Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president

Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.

Obstruction of justice .

of what?

 

[jc456]

Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.

Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president

Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.

there is nothing "fake" about it, idiota...

obstruction of justice is illegal.

high crimes and misdemeanors is a very broad concept...

you were the same freaks who thought Clinton should be impeached for a blow job.

obstructing what? name a crime.

 

[jc456]

Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.

Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president

Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.

Nixon refused to release the tapes to Archibald Cox. How well did that work out for President Nixon?

Conspiracy Theory I:

Trump has been in contact with Putin; no one knows what they spoke about. It's possible Trump asked for the best way to neutralize Mr. Mueller, Putin seems to have figured out a way to neutralize his
distractors - does Plutonium ring a bell?
Poisoning of Alexander Litvinenko - Wikipedia

trump did his job. more than I can say for any congressional person..

 

[jc456]

bye-bye Mr Pres.

I have for months now thought Congress should remove Trump from office on general principle alone. After all, it's not as though his successor won't be a Republican.

so another person that is happy with saying fk you to 64 million voters. hmmmmm well dude, that just makes you slime.

 

[jc456]

Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.

Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president

Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.

Nixon refused to release the tapes to Archibald Cox. How well did that work out for President Nixon?

Conspiracy Theory I:

Trump has been in contact with Putin; no one knows what they spoke about. It's possible Trump asked for the best way to neutralize Mr. Mueller, Putin seems to have figured out a way to neutralize his
distractors - does Plutonium ring a bell?
Poisoning of Alexander Litvinenko - Wikipedia

There was a crime. There is no crime here. How can you leftists be this stupid and still get on the internet?

If I understand your word salad, there is a crime if, when meeting with Putin, they conspired with methods to neutalize Mr Mueller.

well when you release that tape you might have a point. until then, it's still a nothing burger with ketchup and mustard along with pickles

 

[jc456]

bye-bye Mr Pres.

I have for months now thought Congress should remove Trump from office on general principle alone. After all, it's not as though his successor won't be a Republican.

I didn't know "general principal" was a matter of high crimes and misdemeanors.

he just likes waving his middle finger at 64 million americans so he can say he got his way.

 

[jc456]

What laws has he broken to become a lawless President? Be specific and give a link or this is just another "President Trump has poopy pants thread".

Cripes its like every liberal on this board has turned into rdean. Sheesh.

Trump is asking how he can pardon himself. That doesn't sound a little nuts to you?

Desperate is what it is, and suggests a couple of things, he is somewhat attached to reality, as in touch as one might expect from a narcissist; and, he or his family have committed crimes. Of course it's likely he does not know that the SC has ruled if a person accepts a pardon, it is an admission of guilt.

desperate is what this russia russia thing is. thanks for admitting it. when there is nothing but a nothing burger loaded, one has to rethink a position. way to wake up.

 

[jc456]

What laws has he broken to become a lawless President? Be specific and give a link or this is just another "President Trump has poopy pants thread".

Cripes its like every liberal on this board has turned into rdean. Sheesh.

From the piece:

In at least two exchanges, Trump was asked directly about the fact that Donald Trump jnr's email chain showed that the information offered to his campaign in advance of the now-notorious meeting came from the Russian government. In one of them, he strongly suggested that being open to such information was no biggie. In the other, he dismissed the offer itself as "standard political stuff".

well there was no information. so nothing from a russian government.

just curious, how do news outlets get their information from anonymous sources? you think they meet and exchange information? why do they do that do you suppose? you even have a brain?

 

[usmbguest5318]

There's no doubt you're a smart guy but realize your on a message board and long posts are rarely fully appreciated (read at all)

TY

That's okay. I am not aiming to be read, or more importantly, responded to by all. I am similarly selective about what I read and respond to of what's posted on the forum. I presume everyone else as well has their own basis for being selective. If that basis is post length, so be it. As long as that works for them, it works for me too.

 

[jc456]

Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.

Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president

Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.

It's obstruction of justice which is an impeachable offense. You think this POS can fire anyone who is investigating him and get away with it?
I see you don't have any morals. Par for the course.

what is the crime?

 

[Wry Catcher]

Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.

Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president

Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.

Nixon refused to release the tapes to Archibald Cox. How well did that work out for President Nixon?

Conspiracy Theory I:

Trump has been in contact with Putin; no one knows what they spoke about. It's possible Trump asked for the best way to neutralize Mr. Mueller, Putin seems to have figured out a way to neutralize his
distractors - does Plutonium ring a bell?
Poisoning of Alexander Litvinenko - Wikipedia

There was a crime. There is no crime here. How can you leftists be this stupid and still get on the internet?

If I understand your word salad, there is a crime if, when meeting with Putin, they conspired with methods to neutalize Mr Mueller.

well when you release that tape you might have a point. until then, it's still a nothing burger with ketchup and mustard along with pickles

LOL, you really cannot read and comprehend, can you? What I wrote I titled as Conspiracy Theory I & II. It was SATIRE.