Yeah, this about sums Trump up

[bripat9643]

That's irrelevant moron. There are no charges, there is no crime, comparing Mueller to Starr is just ignorant of the facts.

Neither was there a crime with Clinton. Until it was investigated...You do know how investigations work, right?

There certainly was a specific crime that Hillary was suspected of committing, and Comey produced the evidence against her.

 

[bripat9643]

Thank you for another demonstration of snowflake unsubstantiated false accusations against people without evidence.

Busy, if you were intellectually honest you would be able to admit both Barak Obama and Hillary Clinton violated the Constitution and / or broke laws. That has already been proven. As far as Trump goes, I have no problem with him being Impeached IF DEMOCRATS CAN EVER PRODUCE ANY EVIDENCE, which they have not.

If you were intellectually honest you would also be able to admit that the Democrats are now engaged in a full-blown witch hunt of Donald Trump in an attempt to take him down by any means possible.

Mueller's investigation is the last great opportunity to 'get Trump'. Mueller's appointment resulted from the former Director of the FBI illegally leaking information rather than going through proper channels in a political attempt to get a Special Council appointed. After being appointed Mueller went out and got the 'I Hate Trump' friggin' 'Dream Team' to man his team. There is not one 'Neutral' member on his team.

Every other attempt / accusation having failed, Mueller has now been given carte blanch to dig into ANYTHING he wants, which is pretty much an admission that they don't have anything on him regarding collusion or obstruction. So they expand his ability to dig to include anything and everything.

As I predicted, that now being the case - Mueller given the authority to dig any to anything in order to 'get Trump', Mueller's team WILL find something. (Again, you don't become a billionaire International Real Estate mogul without bribing unions, foreign reps, etc...)

And as you just proved you are either ignorant or have no intellectual integrity by claiming I don't have a problem with lawless Presidents. I do. I wanted Trump gone when snowflakes like you defended him ... and still do. I have not said I d not think Trump Trump broke any laws. I have said Democrats have not produced any evidence. Do so, and I will gladly support punishment.

With all the laws proven to have been broken by Democrats and snowflakes and their criminal Democrats defending all of them, the only people exposed as having a problem punishing criminals are the Democrats.

Obama: Violated both Constitution and law, aided and abetted enemies of the US
- No punishment

Hillary: Violated laws, to include Espionage' - No Punishment

US AG Eric Holder, US AG Loretta Lynch, Ex FBI Director James Comey, EX-NSA Director Clapper, CIA Director Brennan, Obama Cabinet Member Susan Rice, IRA Director, Harry Reid, Julian Castro....all of them were caught / exposed committing crimes...all were protected.

Hypocrisy, thy name is 'Snowflake'...

You are the hypocrite and snowflake. Anyone who disagrees with you is a snowflake.

You now know that Clinton and Obama committed crimes. You are trying to criminalize policy differences. That is in-American.

The Democrats would love to have Mueller find something but this is not a witch hunt. The DNC servers were hacked by Russians. They clearly wanted Trump to win. Trump's campaign staff had ties to Russia. We now know that Trump Jr went to a meeting with a foreign national to get dirt on Clinton.

Comey was asked to do something potentially illegal but Trump is the victim in your eyes. Trump lied about his meeting and Comey called him on it. There are several members who are neutral. Several of them currently work for the federal government. Just because someone gives a contribution does not mean they are partisan. Sessions is a Republican. Does that mean he cannot prosecute Democrats? Mueller apparently is not investigating all of Trump's business dealings. He is investigating business dealings with Russian nationals. Ken Starr prosecuted a number of Clinton associates for crimes that had nothing to do with his mandate. Was that unfair?

You have proved your ignorance or partisan leanings by ignoring the fact that Trump is breaking the law. There is no doubt of that. Yet you are not demanding he be prosecuted.

There is no evidence that Obama broke the law or abetted enemies of this country. If it were true, Trump can be accused of doing the same thing.

Clinton did not commit espionage. At most she mis-handled classified information. She did not give it to anyone.

More unsubstantiated rumors. You want to criminalize political disagreements.

HYPOCRITE, YOUR NAME IS SNOWFLAKE!!

The DNC servers were hacked by Russians.

you have no evidence to back that line. sorry, no one has inspected that server.

And Assange already stated he got the emails from someone not a russian.

THE CIA, FBI, NSC, and DNI all agree that it happened. Mike Pence saw the information that our intelligence agencies had and agreed with their findings.

Assange is a anti-America liar. The fact that he only publishes American secrets tells us what he is. He is a Putin puppet. He is the fence for the stolen information.

well it seems really simple to me. declassify and let the amercian people see the evidence. That request has been made before and not by me, but the congress.

I'm a doubting thomas, I need evidence. i don't just accept something as fact cause someone said so. i'm funny that way. you may be ok with it. that's you. but it isn't me and I demand evidence. no one hacked our election, or changed a vote. so what is it they did? I think that is a reasonable question to ask and to get an answer to.

how many must he fire how many have to leave him, how many unknown meetings with russians must there be before you republican morons get a clue?

If the meetings are unknown, then how can anyone use them as a basis for drawing any conclusion? Also, when did having a meeting become a crime?

You didn't get an 'A' in logic, did you Einstein?

 

[eddiew37]

the only liars are you trump freaks.

and yes, everyone knows moron. too bad you couldn't understand the simple English in dum Donald junior's email.

wackjob.

No, moron, only you and your butthurt comrades believe that lie. There is nothing in Jr's e-mails, that is plain to see. Your desire to have your severe butthurt soothed doesn't turn your lies to fact.

Wackjob.

Lets be honest here for a minute Pred Trump could be up to his eyeballs in shit and you'd say" what a beautiful smell ,,can I have some too"

Being totally honest here, no. he isn't anywhere near being up to his eyeballs, that only exists in your head. If ever he is proven to be dirty, I will not support him, but I'm not abandoning him because of left wing lies and corruption. That is what you all want to happen. That is the one and only reason for this charade.

If, in the unlikelyhood that you get your way and he was involved criminally. Remember this conversation. You will see the answer. it won't be the one you want to believe, but it will be the truth.

Glad you said IF he was involved ,,,, but haven't you seen enough smoke to know there IS something there? How many more firings how many more must leave him ???

No, of course not, there is no smoke, only left wing farts.

Pred sorry to say you could see putin handing checks to trump and it would make no difference to how you think but have no fear ,there are many others here just like you

 

[jillian]

You are the hypocrite and snowflake. Anyone who disagrees with you is a snowflake.

You now know that Clinton and Obama committed crimes. You are trying to criminalize policy differences. That is in-American.

The Democrats would love to have Mueller find something but this is not a witch hunt. The DNC servers were hacked by Russians. They clearly wanted Trump to win. Trump's campaign staff had ties to Russia. We now know that Trump Jr went to a meeting with a foreign national to get dirt on Clinton.

Comey was asked to do something potentially illegal but Trump is the victim in your eyes. Trump lied about his meeting and Comey called him on it. There are several members who are neutral. Several of them currently work for the federal government. Just because someone gives a contribution does not mean they are partisan. Sessions is a Republican. Does that mean he cannot prosecute Democrats? Mueller apparently is not investigating all of Trump's business dealings. He is investigating business dealings with Russian nationals. Ken Starr prosecuted a number of Clinton associates for crimes that had nothing to do with his mandate. Was that unfair?

You have proved your ignorance or partisan leanings by ignoring the fact that Trump is breaking the law. There is no doubt of that. Yet you are not demanding he be prosecuted.

There is no evidence that Obama broke the law or abetted enemies of this country. If it were true, Trump can be accused of doing the same thing.

Clinton did not commit espionage. At most she mis-handled classified information. She did not give it to anyone.

More unsubstantiated rumors. You want to criminalize political disagreements.

HYPOCRITE, YOUR NAME IS SNOWFLAKE!!

The DNC servers were hacked by Russians.

you have no evidence to back that line. sorry, no one has inspected that server.

And Assange already stated he got the emails from someone not a russian.

THE CIA, FBI, NSC, and DNI all agree that it happened. Mike Pence saw the information that our intelligence agencies had and agreed with their findings.

Assange is a anti-America liar. The fact that he only publishes American secrets tells us what he is. He is a Putin puppet. He is the fence for the stolen information.

well it seems really simple to me. declassify and let the amercian people see the evidence. That request has been made before and not by me, but the congress.

I'm a doubting thomas, I need evidence. i don't just accept something as fact cause someone said so. i'm funny that way. you may be ok with it. that's you. but it isn't me and I demand evidence. no one hacked our election, or changed a vote. so what is it they did? I think that is a reasonable question to ask and to get an answer to.

how many must he fire how many have to leave him, how many unknown meetings with russians must there be before you republican morons get a clue?

If the meetings are unknown, then how can anyone use them as a basis for drawing any conclusion? Also, when did having a meeting become a crime?

You didn't get an 'A' in logic, did you Einstein?

people with double digit IQ's like you don't get to judge others' logic.

the meetings are "unknown" because the orange sociopath and his his lying loons are duplicitous and not disclosing.

that's why there's an investigation, dum dum.

 

[eddiew37]

You are the hypocrite and snowflake. Anyone who disagrees with you is a snowflake.

You now know that Clinton and Obama committed crimes. You are trying to criminalize policy differences. That is in-American.

The Democrats would love to have Mueller find something but this is not a witch hunt. The DNC servers were hacked by Russians. They clearly wanted Trump to win. Trump's campaign staff had ties to Russia. We now know that Trump Jr went to a meeting with a foreign national to get dirt on Clinton.

Comey was asked to do something potentially illegal but Trump is the victim in your eyes. Trump lied about his meeting and Comey called him on it. There are several members who are neutral. Several of them currently work for the federal government. Just because someone gives a contribution does not mean they are partisan. Sessions is a Republican. Does that mean he cannot prosecute Democrats? Mueller apparently is not investigating all of Trump's business dealings. He is investigating business dealings with Russian nationals. Ken Starr prosecuted a number of Clinton associates for crimes that had nothing to do with his mandate. Was that unfair?

You have proved your ignorance or partisan leanings by ignoring the fact that Trump is breaking the law. There is no doubt of that. Yet you are not demanding he be prosecuted.

There is no evidence that Obama broke the law or abetted enemies of this country. If it were true, Trump can be accused of doing the same thing.

Clinton did not commit espionage. At most she mis-handled classified information. She did not give it to anyone.

More unsubstantiated rumors. You want to criminalize political disagreements.

HYPOCRITE, YOUR NAME IS SNOWFLAKE!!

The DNC servers were hacked by Russians.

you have no evidence to back that line. sorry, no one has inspected that server.

And Assange already stated he got the emails from someone not a russian.

THE CIA, FBI, NSC, and DNI all agree that it happened. Mike Pence saw the information that our intelligence agencies had and agreed with their findings.

Assange is a anti-America liar. The fact that he only publishes American secrets tells us what he is. He is a Putin puppet. He is the fence for the stolen information.

well it seems really simple to me. declassify and let the amercian people see the evidence. That request has been made before and not by me, but the congress.

I'm a doubting thomas, I need evidence. i don't just accept something as fact cause someone said so. i'm funny that way. you may be ok with it. that's you. but it isn't me and I demand evidence. no one hacked our election, or changed a vote. so what is it they did? I think that is a reasonable question to ask and to get an answer to.

how many must he fire how many have to leave him, how many unknown meetings with russians must there be before you republican morons get a clue?

If the meetings are unknown, then how can anyone use them as a basis for drawing any conclusion? Also, when did having a meeting become a crime?

You didn't get an 'A' in logic, did you Einstein?

If someone had 10 meetings with Al Capone the fbi shouldn't be concerned about that person??

 

[eddiew37]

The DNC servers were hacked by Russians.

you have no evidence to back that line. sorry, no one has inspected that server.

And Assange already stated he got the emails from someone not a russian.

THE CIA, FBI, NSC, and DNI all agree that it happened. Mike Pence saw the information that our intelligence agencies had and agreed with their findings.

Assange is a anti-America liar. The fact that he only publishes American secrets tells us what he is. He is a Putin puppet. He is the fence for the stolen information.

well it seems really simple to me. declassify and let the amercian people see the evidence. That request has been made before and not by me, but the congress.

I'm a doubting thomas, I need evidence. i don't just accept something as fact cause someone said so. i'm funny that way. you may be ok with it. that's you. but it isn't me and I demand evidence. no one hacked our election, or changed a vote. so what is it they did? I think that is a reasonable question to ask and to get an answer to.

how many must he fire how many have to leave him, how many unknown meetings with russians must there be before you republican morons get a clue?

If the meetings are unknown, then how can anyone use them as a basis for drawing any conclusion? Also, when did having a meeting become a crime?

You didn't get an 'A' in logic, did you Einstein?

people with double digit IQ's like you don't get to judge others' logic.

the meetings are "unknown" because the orange sociopath and his his lying loons are duplicitous and not disclosing.

that's why there's an investigation, dum dum.

Just in and intercept of a russian talking about sessions speaking with russians about campaign related matters

 

[jillian]

THE CIA, FBI, NSC, and DNI all agree that it happened. Mike Pence saw the information that our intelligence agencies had and agreed with their findings.

Assange is a anti-America liar. The fact that he only publishes American secrets tells us what he is. He is a Putin puppet. He is the fence for the stolen information.

well it seems really simple to me. declassify and let the amercian people see the evidence. That request has been made before and not by me, but the congress.

I'm a doubting thomas, I need evidence. i don't just accept something as fact cause someone said so. i'm funny that way. you may be ok with it. that's you. but it isn't me and I demand evidence. no one hacked our election, or changed a vote. so what is it they did? I think that is a reasonable question to ask and to get an answer to.

how many must he fire how many have to leave him, how many unknown meetings with russians must there be before you republican morons get a clue?

If the meetings are unknown, then how can anyone use them as a basis for drawing any conclusion? Also, when did having a meeting become a crime?

You didn't get an 'A' in logic, did you Einstein?

people with double digit IQ's like you don't get to judge others' logic.

the meetings are "unknown" because the orange sociopath and his his lying loons are duplicitous and not disclosing.

that's why there's an investigation, dum dum.

Just in and intercept of a russian talking about sessions speaking with russians about campaign related matters

I'm shocked..... shocked I tell ya

 

[bripat9643]

The DNC servers were hacked by Russians.

you have no evidence to back that line. sorry, no one has inspected that server.

And Assange already stated he got the emails from someone not a russian.

THE CIA, FBI, NSC, and DNI all agree that it happened. Mike Pence saw the information that our intelligence agencies had and agreed with their findings.

Assange is a anti-America liar. The fact that he only publishes American secrets tells us what he is. He is a Putin puppet. He is the fence for the stolen information.

well it seems really simple to me. declassify and let the amercian people see the evidence. That request has been made before and not by me, but the congress.

I'm a doubting thomas, I need evidence. i don't just accept something as fact cause someone said so. i'm funny that way. you may be ok with it. that's you. but it isn't me and I demand evidence. no one hacked our election, or changed a vote. so what is it they did? I think that is a reasonable question to ask and to get an answer to.

how many must he fire how many have to leave him, how many unknown meetings with russians must there be before you republican morons get a clue?

If the meetings are unknown, then how can anyone use them as a basis for drawing any conclusion? Also, when did having a meeting become a crime?

You didn't get an 'A' in logic, did you Einstein?

people with double digit IQ's like you don't get to judge others' logic.

the meetings are "unknown" because the orange sociopath and his his lying loons are duplicitous and not disclosing.

Even if that were true, nevertheless, you don't know about them. How can you draw any conclusions on what you don't know? You're even dumber than eddiew37 because you said the same thing he said even after I pointed out how irrational it was.

that's why there's an investigation, dum dum.

Wrong, there's an investigation purely because of some devious manipulation by Dims and RINO Trump haters.

 

[eddiew37]

well it seems really simple to me. declassify and let the amercian people see the evidence. That request has been made before and not by me, but the congress.

I'm a doubting thomas, I need evidence. i don't just accept something as fact cause someone said so. i'm funny that way. you may be ok with it. that's you. but it isn't me and I demand evidence. no one hacked our election, or changed a vote. so what is it they did? I think that is a reasonable question to ask and to get an answer to.

how many must he fire how many have to leave him, how many unknown meetings with russians must there be before you republican morons get a clue?

If the meetings are unknown, then how can anyone use them as a basis for drawing any conclusion? Also, when did having a meeting become a crime?

You didn't get an 'A' in logic, did you Einstein?

people with double digit IQ's like you don't get to judge others' logic.

the meetings are "unknown" because the orange sociopath and his his lying loons are duplicitous and not disclosing.

that's why there's an investigation, dum dum.

Just in and intercept of a russian talking about sessions speaking with russians about campaign related matters

I'm shocked..... shocked I tell ya

Hows this one just on TV Kushner omitted 77 assets on disclosure forms A den of thieves and republicans but I repeat myself

 

[eddiew37]

how many must he fire how many have to leave him, how many unknown meetings with russians must there be before you republican morons get a clue?

If the meetings are unknown, then how can anyone use them as a basis for drawing any conclusion? Also, when did having a meeting become a crime?

You didn't get an 'A' in logic, did you Einstein?

people with double digit IQ's like you don't get to judge others' logic.

the meetings are "unknown" because the orange sociopath and his his lying loons are duplicitous and not disclosing.

that's why there's an investigation, dum dum.

Just in and intercept of a russian talking about sessions speaking with russians about campaign related matters

I'm shocked..... shocked I tell ya

Hows this one just on TV Kushner omitted 77 assets on disclosure forms A den of thieves and republicans but I repeat myself

But bripat says what's the diff ,,,,,lol lol

 

[jillian]

how many must he fire how many have to leave him, how many unknown meetings with russians must there be before you republican morons get a clue?

If the meetings are unknown, then how can anyone use them as a basis for drawing any conclusion? Also, when did having a meeting become a crime?

You didn't get an 'A' in logic, did you Einstein?

people with double digit IQ's like you don't get to judge others' logic.

the meetings are "unknown" because the orange sociopath and his his lying loons are duplicitous and not disclosing.

that's why there's an investigation, dum dum.

Just in and intercept of a russian talking about sessions speaking with russians about campaign related matters

I'm shocked..... shocked I tell ya

Hows this one just on TV Kushner omitted 77 assets on disclosure forms A den of thieves and republicans but I repeat myself

what they were was pretty clear when he was running; pity none of the other republicans could get any air when the troll was around.

but then again, the "base" doesn't want anyone who is decent. they want disgusting.

 

[jillian]

If the meetings are unknown, then how can anyone use them as a basis for drawing any conclusion? Also, when did having a meeting become a crime?

You didn't get an 'A' in logic, did you Einstein?

people with double digit IQ's like you don't get to judge others' logic.

the meetings are "unknown" because the orange sociopath and his his lying loons are duplicitous and not disclosing.

that's why there's an investigation, dum dum.

Just in and intercept of a russian talking about sessions speaking with russians about campaign related matters

I'm shocked..... shocked I tell ya

Hows this one just on TV Kushner omitted 77 assets on disclosure forms A den of thieves and republicans but I repeat myself

But bripat says what's the diff ,,,,,lol lol

I wouldn't expect anything else from trump loons.

he is "one of them" because he's a classless disgusting bigoted misogynist pig... so they don't care what he does.

 

[bripat9643]

THE CIA, FBI, NSC, and DNI all agree that it happened. Mike Pence saw the information that our intelligence agencies had and agreed with their findings.

Assange is a anti-America liar. The fact that he only publishes American secrets tells us what he is. He is a Putin puppet. He is the fence for the stolen information.

well it seems really simple to me. declassify and let the amercian people see the evidence. That request has been made before and not by me, but the congress.

I'm a doubting thomas, I need evidence. i don't just accept something as fact cause someone said so. i'm funny that way. you may be ok with it. that's you. but it isn't me and I demand evidence. no one hacked our election, or changed a vote. so what is it they did? I think that is a reasonable question to ask and to get an answer to.

how many must he fire how many have to leave him, how many unknown meetings with russians must there be before you republican morons get a clue?

If the meetings are unknown, then how can anyone use them as a basis for drawing any conclusion? Also, when did having a meeting become a crime?

You didn't get an 'A' in logic, did you Einstein?

people with double digit IQ's like you don't get to judge others' logic.

the meetings are "unknown" because the orange sociopath and his his lying loons are duplicitous and not disclosing.

that's why there's an investigation, dum dum.

Just in and intercept of a russian talking about sessions speaking with russians about campaign related matters

Another leak of classified information. You turds don't seem to give a damn if these intelligence agencies violate the law at every turn, yet you think Americans are supposed to trust them.

Furthermore, this is another big nothing burger. What does "discuss campaign related matters?" Was it small talk? Complaining about media coverage? That could mean almost anything. It's another example of fake news trying to poison the well.

 

[bripat9643]

If the meetings are unknown, then how can anyone use them as a basis for drawing any conclusion? Also, when did having a meeting become a crime?

You didn't get an 'A' in logic, did you Einstein?

people with double digit IQ's like you don't get to judge others' logic.

the meetings are "unknown" because the orange sociopath and his his lying loons are duplicitous and not disclosing.

that's why there's an investigation, dum dum.

Just in and intercept of a russian talking about sessions speaking with russians about campaign related matters

I'm shocked..... shocked I tell ya

Hows this one just on TV Kushner omitted 77 assets on disclosure forms A den of thieves and republicans but I repeat myself

what they were was pretty clear when he was running; pity none of the other republicans could get any air when the troll was around.

but then again, the "base" doesn't want anyone who is decent. they want disgusting.

"Decent" means willing to make Americans take it up the ass when the left demands it.

 

[bripat9643]

people with double digit IQ's like you don't get to judge others' logic.

the meetings are "unknown" because the orange sociopath and his his lying loons are duplicitous and not disclosing.

that's why there's an investigation, dum dum.

Just in and intercept of a russian talking about sessions speaking with russians about campaign related matters

I'm shocked..... shocked I tell ya

Hows this one just on TV Kushner omitted 77 assets on disclosure forms A den of thieves and republicans but I repeat myself

But bripat says what's the diff ,,,,,lol lol

I wouldn't expect anything else from trump loons.

he is "one of them" because he's a classless disgusting bigoted misogynist pig... so they don't care what he does.

That's the way to win over Trump votes: flatter them!

 

[jillian]

people with double digit IQ's like you don't get to judge others' logic.

the meetings are "unknown" because the orange sociopath and his his lying loons are duplicitous and not disclosing.

that's why there's an investigation, dum dum.

Just in and intercept of a russian talking about sessions speaking with russians about campaign related matters

I'm shocked..... shocked I tell ya

Hows this one just on TV Kushner omitted 77 assets on disclosure forms A den of thieves and republicans but I repeat myself

what they were was pretty clear when he was running; pity none of the other republicans could get any air when the troll was around.

but then again, the "base" doesn't want anyone who is decent. they want disgusting.

"Decent" means willing to make Americans take it up the ass when the left demands it.

no, you classless uneducated ignorant lowlife... it means decent...

this pig has zero respect for his office, for the country or for the loons he duped.

disgusting trump loon.

 

[eddiew37]

well it seems really simple to me. declassify and let the amercian people see the evidence. That request has been made before and not by me, but the congress.

I'm a doubting thomas, I need evidence. i don't just accept something as fact cause someone said so. i'm funny that way. you may be ok with it. that's you. but it isn't me and I demand evidence. no one hacked our election, or changed a vote. so what is it they did? I think that is a reasonable question to ask and to get an answer to.

how many must he fire how many have to leave him, how many unknown meetings with russians must there be before you republican morons get a clue?

If the meetings are unknown, then how can anyone use them as a basis for drawing any conclusion? Also, when did having a meeting become a crime?

You didn't get an 'A' in logic, did you Einstein?

people with double digit IQ's like you don't get to judge others' logic.

the meetings are "unknown" because the orange sociopath and his his lying loons are duplicitous and not disclosing.

that's why there's an investigation, dum dum.

Just in and intercept of a russian talking about sessions speaking with russians about campaign related matters

Another leak of classified information. You turds don't seem to give a damn if these intelligence agencies violate the law at every turn, yet you think Americans are supposed to trust them.

Furthermore, this is another big nothing burger. What does "discuss campaign related matters?" Was it small talk? Complaining about media coverage? That could mean almost anything. It's another example of fake news trying to poison the well.

heh heh you know trump is pissed that Meuller has some of the dumps tax returns ?? Game is almost up

 

[bripat9643]

how many must he fire how many have to leave him, how many unknown meetings with russians must there be before you republican morons get a clue?

If the meetings are unknown, then how can anyone use them as a basis for drawing any conclusion? Also, when did having a meeting become a crime?

You didn't get an 'A' in logic, did you Einstein?

people with double digit IQ's like you don't get to judge others' logic.

the meetings are "unknown" because the orange sociopath and his his lying loons are duplicitous and not disclosing.

that's why there's an investigation, dum dum.

Just in and intercept of a russian talking about sessions speaking with russians about campaign related matters

I'm shocked..... shocked I tell ya

Hows this one just on TV Kushner omitted 77 assets on disclosure forms A den of thieves and republicans but I repeat myself

Assets like what, a sliver plated ronson lighter?

Who says he omitted 77 assets, anonymous government sources? If anyone underwent the kind of security clearance anal exam that Kusher is undergoing, they would have just as many discrepancies.

Once again, how does anyone know about this? Through illegal leaks of classified information, of course. FBI security clearances are supposed to be strictly confidential, and the person who divulged this information is a criminal. Yet, all you douche bags are reveling in this illegally obtained information. You claim to care about the law, but you obviously don't give a damn. Getting Trump is all that's behind this entire charade.

 

[bripat9643]

Just in and intercept of a russian talking about sessions speaking with russians about campaign related matters

I'm shocked..... shocked I tell ya

Hows this one just on TV Kushner omitted 77 assets on disclosure forms A den of thieves and republicans but I repeat myself

what they were was pretty clear when he was running; pity none of the other republicans could get any air when the troll was around.

but then again, the "base" doesn't want anyone who is decent. they want disgusting.

"Decent" means willing to make Americans take it up the ass when the left demands it.

no, you classless uneducated ignorant lowlife... it means decent...

this pig has zero respect for his office, for the country or for the loons he duped.

disgusting trump loon.

When lefties use the term when referring to right wingers, they mean exactly what I said: willing to make Americans take it up the ass when the left demands it. They prove it every time they describe some douche bag establishment Republican as "decent."

 

[bripat9643]

how many must he fire how many have to leave him, how many unknown meetings with russians must there be before you republican morons get a clue?

If the meetings are unknown, then how can anyone use them as a basis for drawing any conclusion? Also, when did having a meeting become a crime?

You didn't get an 'A' in logic, did you Einstein?

people with double digit IQ's like you don't get to judge others' logic.

the meetings are "unknown" because the orange sociopath and his his lying loons are duplicitous and not disclosing.

that's why there's an investigation, dum dum.

Just in and intercept of a russian talking about sessions speaking with russians about campaign related matters

Another leak of classified information. You turds don't seem to give a damn if these intelligence agencies violate the law at every turn, yet you think Americans are supposed to trust them.

Furthermore, this is another big nothing burger. What does "discuss campaign related matters?" Was it small talk? Complaining about media coverage? That could mean almost anything. It's another example of fake news trying to poison the well.

heh heh you know trump is pissed that Meuller has some of the dumps tax returns ?? Game is almost up

When did anyone say Mewler had Trump's tax returns?

Link?