Yeah, this about sums Trump up

[busybee01]

You don't seem to have any problem with lawless Presidents.

Thank you for another demonstration of snowflake unsubstantiated false accusations against people without evidence.

Busy, if you were intellectually honest you would be able to admit both Barak Obama and Hillary Clinton violated the Constitution and / or broke laws. That has already been proven. As far as Trump goes, I have no problem with him being Impeached IF DEMOCRATS CAN EVER PRODUCE ANY EVIDENCE, which they have not.

If you were intellectually honest you would also be able to admit that the Democrats are now engaged in a full-blown witch hunt of Donald Trump in an attempt to take him down by any means possible.

Mueller's investigation is the last great opportunity to 'get Trump'. Mueller's appointment resulted from the former Director of the FBI illegally leaking information rather than going through proper channels in a political attempt to get a Special Council appointed. After being appointed Mueller went out and got the 'I Hate Trump' friggin' 'Dream Team' to man his team. There is not one 'Neutral' member on his team.

Every other attempt / accusation having failed, Mueller has now been given carte blanch to dig into ANYTHING he wants, which is pretty much an admission that they don't have anything on him regarding collusion or obstruction. So they expand his ability to dig to include anything and everything.

As I predicted, that now being the case - Mueller given the authority to dig any to anything in order to 'get Trump', Mueller's team WILL find something. (Again, you don't become a billionaire International Real Estate mogul without bribing unions, foreign reps, etc...)

And as you just proved you are either ignorant or have no intellectual integrity by claiming I don't have a problem with lawless Presidents. I do. I wanted Trump gone when snowflakes like you defended him ... and still do. I have not said I d not think Trump Trump broke any laws. I have said Democrats have not produced any evidence. Do so, and I will gladly support punishment.

With all the laws proven to have been broken by Democrats and snowflakes and their criminal Democrats defending all of them, the only people exposed as having a problem punishing criminals are the Democrats.

Obama: Violated both Constitution and law, aided and abetted enemies of the US
- No punishment

Hillary: Violated laws, to include Espionage' - No Punishment

US AG Eric Holder, US AG Loretta Lynch, Ex FBI Director James Comey, EX-NSA Director Clapper, CIA Director Brennan, Obama Cabinet Member Susan Rice, IRA Director, Harry Reid, Julian Castro....all of them were caught / exposed committing crimes...all were protected.

Hypocrisy, thy name is 'Snowflake'...

You are the hypocrite and snowflake. Anyone who disagrees with you is a snowflake.

You now know that Clinton and Obama committed crimes. You are trying to criminalize policy differences. That is in-American.

The Democrats would love to have Mueller find something but this is not a witch hunt. The DNC servers were hacked by Russians. They clearly wanted Trump to win. Trump's campaign staff had ties to Russia. We now know that Trump Jr went to a meeting with a foreign national to get dirt on Clinton.

Comey was asked to do something potentially illegal but Trump is the victim in your eyes. Trump lied about his meeting and Comey called him on it. There are several members who are neutral. Several of them currently work for the federal government. Just because someone gives a contribution does not mean they are partisan. Sessions is a Republican. Does that mean he cannot prosecute Democrats? Mueller apparently is not investigating all of Trump's business dealings. He is investigating business dealings with Russian nationals. Ken Starr prosecuted a number of Clinton associates for crimes that had nothing to do with his mandate. Was that unfair?

You have proved your ignorance or partisan leanings by ignoring the fact that Trump is breaking the law. There is no doubt of that. Yet you are not demanding he be prosecuted.

There is no evidence that Obama broke the law or abetted enemies of this country. If it were true, Trump can be accused of doing the same thing.

Clinton did not commit espionage. At most she mis-handled classified information. She did not give it to anyone.

More unsubstantiated rumors. You want to criminalize political disagreements.

HYPOCRITE, YOUR NAME IS SNOWFLAKE!!

The DNC servers were hacked by Russians.

you have no evidence to back that line. sorry, no one has inspected that server.

And Assange already stated he got the emails from someone not a russian.

THE CIA, FBI, NSC, and DNI all agree that it happened. Mike Pence saw the information that our intelligence agencies had and agreed with their findings.

Assange is a anti-America liar. The fact that he only publishes American secrets tells us what he is. He is a Putin puppet. He is the fence for the stolen information.

 

[Votto]

You don't seem to have any problem with lawless Presidents.

Thank you for another demonstration of snowflake unsubstantiated false accusations against people without evidence.

Busy, if you were intellectually honest you would be able to admit both Barak Obama and Hillary Clinton violated the Constitution and / or broke laws. That has already been proven. As far as Trump goes, I have no problem with him being Impeached IF DEMOCRATS CAN EVER PRODUCE ANY EVIDENCE, which they have not.

If you were intellectually honest you would also be able to admit that the Democrats are now engaged in a full-blown witch hunt of Donald Trump in an attempt to take him down by any means possible.

Mueller's investigation is the last great opportunity to 'get Trump'. Mueller's appointment resulted from the former Director of the FBI illegally leaking information rather than going through proper channels in a political attempt to get a Special Council appointed. After being appointed Mueller went out and got the 'I Hate Trump' friggin' 'Dream Team' to man his team. There is not one 'Neutral' member on his team.

Every other attempt / accusation having failed, Mueller has now been given carte blanch to dig into ANYTHING he wants, which is pretty much an admission that they don't have anything on him regarding collusion or obstruction. So they expand his ability to dig to include anything and everything.

As I predicted, that now being the case - Mueller given the authority to dig any to anything in order to 'get Trump', Mueller's team WILL find something. (Again, you don't become a billionaire International Real Estate mogul without bribing unions, foreign reps, etc...)

And as you just proved you are either ignorant or have no intellectual integrity by claiming I don't have a problem with lawless Presidents. I do. I wanted Trump gone when snowflakes like you defended him ... and still do. I have not said I d not think Trump Trump broke any laws. I have said Democrats have not produced any evidence. Do so, and I will gladly support punishment.

With all the laws proven to have been broken by Democrats and snowflakes and their criminal Democrats defending all of them, the only people exposed as having a problem punishing criminals are the Democrats.

Obama: Violated both Constitution and law, aided and abetted enemies of the US
- No punishment

Hillary: Violated laws, to include Espionage' - No Punishment

US AG Eric Holder, US AG Loretta Lynch, Ex FBI Director James Comey, EX-NSA Director Clapper, CIA Director Brennan, Obama Cabinet Member Susan Rice, IRA Director, Harry Reid, Julian Castro....all of them were caught / exposed committing crimes...all were protected.

Hypocrisy, thy name is 'Snowflake'...

You are the hypocrite and snowflake. Anyone who disagrees with you is a snowflake.

You now know that Clinton and Obama committed crimes. You are trying to criminalize policy differences. That is in-American.

The Democrats would love to have Mueller find something but this is not a witch hunt. The DNC servers were hacked by Russians. They clearly wanted Trump to win. Trump's campaign staff had ties to Russia. We now know that Trump Jr went to a meeting with a foreign national to get dirt on Clinton.

Comey was asked to do something potentially illegal but Trump is the victim in your eyes. Trump lied about his meeting and Comey called him on it. There are several members who are neutral. Several of them currently work for the federal government. Just because someone gives a contribution does not mean they are partisan. Sessions is a Republican. Does that mean he cannot prosecute Democrats? Mueller apparently is not investigating all of Trump's business dealings. He is investigating business dealings with Russian nationals. Ken Starr prosecuted a number of Clinton associates for crimes that had nothing to do with his mandate. Was that unfair?

You have proved your ignorance or partisan leanings by ignoring the fact that Trump is breaking the law. There is no doubt of that. Yet you are not demanding he be prosecuted.

There is no evidence that Obama broke the law or abetted enemies of this country. If it were true, Trump can be accused of doing the same thing.

Clinton did not commit espionage. At most she mis-handled classified information. She did not give it to anyone.

More unsubstantiated rumors. You want to criminalize political disagreements.

HYPOCRITE, YOUR NAME IS SNOWFLAKE!!

The DNC servers were hacked by Russians.

you have no evidence to back that line. sorry, no one has inspected that server.

And Assange already stated he got the emails from someone not a russian.

THE CIA, FBI, NSC, and DNI all agree that it happened. Mike Pence saw the information that our intelligence agencies had and agreed with their findings.

Assange is a anti-America liar. The fact that he only publishes American secrets tells us what he is. He is a Putin puppet. He is the fence for the stolen information.

Just like Snowden, eh?

It's the conspiracy of the century if you ask me.

 

[jc456]

You don't seem to have any problem with lawless Presidents.

Thank you for another demonstration of snowflake unsubstantiated false accusations against people without evidence.

Busy, if you were intellectually honest you would be able to admit both Barak Obama and Hillary Clinton violated the Constitution and / or broke laws. That has already been proven. As far as Trump goes, I have no problem with him being Impeached IF DEMOCRATS CAN EVER PRODUCE ANY EVIDENCE, which they have not.

If you were intellectually honest you would also be able to admit that the Democrats are now engaged in a full-blown witch hunt of Donald Trump in an attempt to take him down by any means possible.

Mueller's investigation is the last great opportunity to 'get Trump'. Mueller's appointment resulted from the former Director of the FBI illegally leaking information rather than going through proper channels in a political attempt to get a Special Council appointed. After being appointed Mueller went out and got the 'I Hate Trump' friggin' 'Dream Team' to man his team. There is not one 'Neutral' member on his team.

Every other attempt / accusation having failed, Mueller has now been given carte blanch to dig into ANYTHING he wants, which is pretty much an admission that they don't have anything on him regarding collusion or obstruction. So they expand his ability to dig to include anything and everything.

As I predicted, that now being the case - Mueller given the authority to dig any to anything in order to 'get Trump', Mueller's team WILL find something. (Again, you don't become a billionaire International Real Estate mogul without bribing unions, foreign reps, etc...)

And as you just proved you are either ignorant or have no intellectual integrity by claiming I don't have a problem with lawless Presidents. I do. I wanted Trump gone when snowflakes like you defended him ... and still do. I have not said I d not think Trump Trump broke any laws. I have said Democrats have not produced any evidence. Do so, and I will gladly support punishment.

With all the laws proven to have been broken by Democrats and snowflakes and their criminal Democrats defending all of them, the only people exposed as having a problem punishing criminals are the Democrats.

Obama: Violated both Constitution and law, aided and abetted enemies of the US
- No punishment

Hillary: Violated laws, to include Espionage' - No Punishment

US AG Eric Holder, US AG Loretta Lynch, Ex FBI Director James Comey, EX-NSA Director Clapper, CIA Director Brennan, Obama Cabinet Member Susan Rice, IRA Director, Harry Reid, Julian Castro....all of them were caught / exposed committing crimes...all were protected.

Hypocrisy, thy name is 'Snowflake'...

You are the hypocrite and snowflake. Anyone who disagrees with you is a snowflake.

You now know that Clinton and Obama committed crimes. You are trying to criminalize policy differences. That is in-American.

The Democrats would love to have Mueller find something but this is not a witch hunt. The DNC servers were hacked by Russians. They clearly wanted Trump to win. Trump's campaign staff had ties to Russia. We now know that Trump Jr went to a meeting with a foreign national to get dirt on Clinton.

Comey was asked to do something potentially illegal but Trump is the victim in your eyes. Trump lied about his meeting and Comey called him on it. There are several members who are neutral. Several of them currently work for the federal government. Just because someone gives a contribution does not mean they are partisan. Sessions is a Republican. Does that mean he cannot prosecute Democrats? Mueller apparently is not investigating all of Trump's business dealings. He is investigating business dealings with Russian nationals. Ken Starr prosecuted a number of Clinton associates for crimes that had nothing to do with his mandate. Was that unfair?

You have proved your ignorance or partisan leanings by ignoring the fact that Trump is breaking the law. There is no doubt of that. Yet you are not demanding he be prosecuted.

There is no evidence that Obama broke the law or abetted enemies of this country. If it were true, Trump can be accused of doing the same thing.

Clinton did not commit espionage. At most she mis-handled classified information. She did not give it to anyone.

More unsubstantiated rumors. You want to criminalize political disagreements.

HYPOCRITE, YOUR NAME IS SNOWFLAKE!!

The DNC servers were hacked by Russians.

you have no evidence to back that line. sorry, no one has inspected that server.

And Assange already stated he got the emails from someone not a russian.

THE CIA, FBI, NSC, and DNI all agree that it happened. Mike Pence saw the information that our intelligence agencies had and agreed with their findings.

Assange is a anti-America liar. The fact that he only publishes American secrets tells us what he is. He is a Putin puppet. He is the fence for the stolen information.

well it seems really simple to me. declassify and let the amercian people see the evidence. That request has been made before and not by me, but the congress.

I'm a doubting thomas, I need evidence. i don't just accept something as fact cause someone said so. i'm funny that way. you may be ok with it. that's you. but it isn't me and I demand evidence. no one hacked our election, or changed a vote. so what is it they did? I think that is a reasonable question to ask and to get an answer to.

 

[bripat9643]

What laws has he broken to become a lawless President? Be specific and give a link or this is just another "President Trump has poopy pants thread".

Cripes its like every liberal on this board has turned into rdean. Sheesh.

Start with the Nepotism Act - giving jobs to family members.

Failing to divest his private holdings or place them in a blind trust.

Personally from foreign governments (through his hotels).

Firing James Comey because of the Russian Investigation.

Covering up for Flynn, until it became public that Flynn discussed sanctions with the Russians and lied about it.

Just for starters.

Those are crimes only in your imagination. Either they didn't happen or they aren't crimes. That's the problem with debating snowflakes, they don't even live in the same reality as rational people.

 

[bripat9643]

You don't seem to have any problem with lawless Presidents.

Thank you for another demonstration of snowflake unsubstantiated false accusations against people without evidence.

Busy, if you were intellectually honest you would be able to admit both Barak Obama and Hillary Clinton violated the Constitution and / or broke laws. That has already been proven. As far as Trump goes, I have no problem with him being Impeached IF DEMOCRATS CAN EVER PRODUCE ANY EVIDENCE, which they have not.

If you were intellectually honest you would also be able to admit that the Democrats are now engaged in a full-blown witch hunt of Donald Trump in an attempt to take him down by any means possible.

Mueller's investigation is the last great opportunity to 'get Trump'. Mueller's appointment resulted from the former Director of the FBI illegally leaking information rather than going through proper channels in a political attempt to get a Special Council appointed. After being appointed Mueller went out and got the 'I Hate Trump' friggin' 'Dream Team' to man his team. There is not one 'Neutral' member on his team.

Every other attempt / accusation having failed, Mueller has now been given carte blanch to dig into ANYTHING he wants, which is pretty much an admission that they don't have anything on him regarding collusion or obstruction. So they expand his ability to dig to include anything and everything.

As I predicted, that now being the case - Mueller given the authority to dig any to anything in order to 'get Trump', Mueller's team WILL find something. (Again, you don't become a billionaire International Real Estate mogul without bribing unions, foreign reps, etc...)

And as you just proved you are either ignorant or have no intellectual integrity by claiming I don't have a problem with lawless Presidents. I do. I wanted Trump gone when snowflakes like you defended him ... and still do. I have not said I d not think Trump Trump broke any laws. I have said Democrats have not produced any evidence. Do so, and I will gladly support punishment.

With all the laws proven to have been broken by Democrats and snowflakes and their criminal Democrats defending all of them, the only people exposed as having a problem punishing criminals are the Democrats.

Obama: Violated both Constitution and law, aided and abetted enemies of the US
- No punishment

Hillary: Violated laws, to include Espionage' - No Punishment

US AG Eric Holder, US AG Loretta Lynch, Ex FBI Director James Comey, EX-NSA Director Clapper, CIA Director Brennan, Obama Cabinet Member Susan Rice, IRA Director, Harry Reid, Julian Castro....all of them were caught / exposed committing crimes...all were protected.

Hypocrisy, thy name is 'Snowflake'...

You are the hypocrite and snowflake. Anyone who disagrees with you is a snowflake.

You now know that Clinton and Obama committed crimes. You are trying to criminalize policy differences. That is in-American.

The Democrats would love to have Mueller find something but this is not a witch hunt. The DNC servers were hacked by Russians. They clearly wanted Trump to win. Trump's campaign staff had ties to Russia. We now know that Trump Jr went to a meeting with a foreign national to get dirt on Clinton.

Comey was asked to do something potentially illegal but Trump is the victim in your eyes. Trump lied about his meeting and Comey called him on it. There are several members who are neutral. Several of them currently work for the federal government. Just because someone gives a contribution does not mean they are partisan. Sessions is a Republican. Does that mean he cannot prosecute Democrats? Mueller apparently is not investigating all of Trump's business dealings. He is investigating business dealings with Russian nationals. Ken Starr prosecuted a number of Clinton associates for crimes that had nothing to do with his mandate. Was that unfair?

You have proved your ignorance or partisan leanings by ignoring the fact that Trump is breaking the law. There is no doubt of that. Yet you are not demanding he be prosecuted.

There is no evidence that Obama broke the law or abetted enemies of this country. If it were true, Trump can be accused of doing the same thing.

Clinton did not commit espionage. At most she mis-handled classified information. She did not give it to anyone.

More unsubstantiated rumors. You want to criminalize political disagreements.

HYPOCRITE, YOUR NAME IS SNOWFLAKE!!

The DNC servers were hacked by Russians.

you have no evidence to back that line. sorry, no one has inspected that server.

And Assange already stated he got the emails from someone not a russian.

THE CIA, FBI, NSC, and DNI all agree that it happened. Mike Pence saw the information that our intelligence agencies had and agreed with their findings.

Assange is a anti-America liar. The fact that he only publishes American secrets tells us what he is. He is a Putin puppet. He is the fence for the stolen information.

So far everything Assange has said has turned out to be true. We understand why snowflakes hate Assange: he exposed crooked Hillary for what she is. He publishes only American secrets because that's what is sent to him. Why would someone in Ecuador care about getting the emails of corrupt politicians published on the internet?

 

[Dragonlady]

What laws has he broken to become a lawless President? Be specific and give a link or this is just another "President Trump has poopy pants thread".

Cripes its like every liberal on this board has turned into rdean. Sheesh.

Start with the Nepotism Act - giving jobs to family members.

Failing to divest his private holdings or place them in a blind trust.

Personally from foreign governments (through his hotels).

Firing James Comey because of the Russian Investigation.

Covering up for Flynn, until it became public that Flynn discussed sanctions with the Russians and lied about it.

Just for starters.

Those are crimes only in your imagination. Either they didn't happen or they aren't crimes. That's the problem with debating snowflakes, they don't even live in the same reality as rational people.

Are you saying he didn't hire his son-in-law, or that his daughter isn't working as his advisor? Or are you denying that the Nepotism Act, passed after JFK hired his brother as his AG, doesn't exist.

Are you saying there are no ethics rules? No Emoluents Clause?

Or that firing the guy who refuses to stop investigating your friend isn't "obstruction of justice".

It is you who is the snowflake living in the alternative reality, where Trump never lies and the whole world thinks he's just the best President ever.

 

[debbiedowner]

Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.

Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president

Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.

there is nothing "fake" about it, idiota...

obstruction of justice is illegal.

high crimes and misdemeanors is a very broad concept...

you were the same freaks who thought Clinton should be impeached for a blow job.

Well, it's not the fact he had a head job, it was the fact he lied. If he would have just said, "Yes I had a blow job and it was damn good" he might not have been impeached by Congress, but nooooooo he lied. Hell, he could have even said it was a bad blow job.

 

[debbiedowner]

You don't seem to have any problem with lawless Presidents.

Thank you for another demonstration of snowflake unsubstantiated false accusations against people without evidence.

Busy, if you were intellectually honest you would be able to admit both Barak Obama and Hillary Clinton violated the Constitution and / or broke laws. That has already been proven. As far as Trump goes, I have no problem with him being Impeached IF DEMOCRATS CAN EVER PRODUCE ANY EVIDENCE, which they have not.

If you were intellectually honest you would also be able to admit that the Democrats are now engaged in a full-blown witch hunt of Donald Trump in an attempt to take him down by any means possible.

Mueller's investigation is the last great opportunity to 'get Trump'. Mueller's appointment resulted from the former Director of the FBI illegally leaking information rather than going through proper channels in a political attempt to get a Special Council appointed. After being appointed Mueller went out and got the 'I Hate Trump' friggin' 'Dream Team' to man his team. There is not one 'Neutral' member on his team.

Every other attempt / accusation having failed, Mueller has now been given carte blanch to dig into ANYTHING he wants, which is pretty much an admission that they don't have anything on him regarding collusion or obstruction. So they expand his ability to dig to include anything and everything.

As I predicted, that now being the case - Mueller given the authority to dig any to anything in order to 'get Trump', Mueller's team WILL find something. (Again, you don't become a billionaire International Real Estate mogul without bribing unions, foreign reps, etc...)

And as you just proved you are either ignorant or have no intellectual integrity by claiming I don't have a problem with lawless Presidents. I do. I wanted Trump gone when snowflakes like you defended him ... and still do. I have not said I d not think Trump Trump broke any laws. I have said Democrats have not produced any evidence. Do so, and I will gladly support punishment.

With all the laws proven to have been broken by Democrats and snowflakes and their criminal Democrats defending all of them, the only people exposed as having a problem punishing criminals are the Democrats.

Obama: Violated both Constitution and law, aided and abetted enemies of the US
- No punishment

Hillary: Violated laws, to include Espionage' - No Punishment

US AG Eric Holder, US AG Loretta Lynch, Ex FBI Director James Comey, EX-NSA Director Clapper, CIA Director Brennan, Obama Cabinet Member Susan Rice, IRA Director, Harry Reid, Julian Castro....all of them were caught / exposed committing crimes...all were protected.

Hypocrisy, thy name is 'Snowflake'...

You are the hypocrite and snowflake. Anyone who disagrees with you is a snowflake.

You now know that Clinton and Obama committed crimes. You are trying to criminalize policy differences. That is in-American.

The Democrats would love to have Mueller find something but this is not a witch hunt. The DNC servers were hacked by Russians. They clearly wanted Trump to win. Trump's campaign staff had ties to Russia. We now know that Trump Jr went to a meeting with a foreign national to get dirt on Clinton.

Comey was asked to do something potentially illegal but Trump is the victim in your eyes. Trump lied about his meeting and Comey called him on it. There are several members who are neutral. Several of them currently work for the federal government. Just because someone gives a contribution does not mean they are partisan. Sessions is a Republican. Does that mean he cannot prosecute Democrats? Mueller apparently is not investigating all of Trump's business dealings. He is investigating business dealings with Russian nationals. Ken Starr prosecuted a number of Clinton associates for crimes that had nothing to do with his mandate. Was that unfair?

You have proved your ignorance or partisan leanings by ignoring the fact that Trump is breaking the law. There is no doubt of that. Yet you are not demanding he be prosecuted.

There is no evidence that Obama broke the law or abetted enemies of this country. If it were true, Trump can be accused of doing the same thing.

Clinton did not commit espionage. At most she mis-handled classified information. She did not give it to anyone.

More unsubstantiated rumors. You want to criminalize political disagreements.

HYPOCRITE, YOUR NAME IS SNOWFLAKE!!

The DNC servers were hacked by Russians.

you have no evidence to back that line. sorry, no one has inspected that server.

And Assange already stated he got the emails from someone not a russian.

THE CIA, FBI, NSC, and DNI all agree that it happened. Mike Pence saw the information that our intelligence agencies had and agreed with their findings.

Assange is a anti-America liar. The fact that he only publishes American secrets tells us what he is. He is a Putin puppet. He is the fence for the stolen information.

So far everything Assange has said has turned out to be true. We understand why snowflakes hate Assange: he exposed crooked Hillary for what she is. He publishes only American secrets because that's what is sent to him. Why would someone in Ecuador care about getting the emails of corrupt politicians published on the internet?

Is he in Ecuador?

 

[eddiew37]

we already know they worked with Russia. all that is left is to find out if it was criminal.

moron.

like I said, go to school. maybe then you'd comprehend simple facts.

You know no such thing. That is a lie you tell.

the only liars are you trump freaks.

and yes, everyone knows moron. too bad you couldn't understand the simple English in dum Donald junior's email.

wackjob.

No, moron, only you and your butthurt comrades believe that lie. There is nothing in Jr's e-mails, that is plain to see. Your desire to have your severe butthurt soothed doesn't turn your lies to fact.

Wackjob.

Lets be honest here for a minute Pred Trump could be up to his eyeballs in shit and you'd say" what a beautiful smell ,,can I have some too"

Being totally honest here, no. he isn't anywhere near being up to his eyeballs, that only exists in your head. If ever he is proven to be dirty, I will not support him, but I'm not abandoning him because of left wing lies and corruption. That is what you all want to happen. That is the one and only reason for this charade.

If, in the unlikelyhood that you get your way and he was involved criminally. Remember this conversation. You will see the answer. it won't be the one you want to believe, but it will be the truth.

 

[eddiew37]

we already know they worked with Russia. all that is left is to find out if it was criminal.

moron.

like I said, go to school. maybe then you'd comprehend simple facts.

You know no such thing. That is a lie you tell.

the only liars are you trump freaks.

and yes, everyone knows moron. too bad you couldn't understand the simple English in dum Donald junior's email.

wackjob.

No, moron, only you and your butthurt comrades believe that lie. There is nothing in Jr's e-mails, that is plain to see. Your desire to have your severe butthurt soothed doesn't turn your lies to fact.

Wackjob.

Lets be honest here for a minute Pred Trump could be up to his eyeballs in shit and you'd say" what a beautiful smell ,,can I have some too"

Being totally honest here, no. he isn't anywhere near being up to his eyeballs, that only exists in your head. If ever he is proven to be dirty, I will not support him, but I'm not abandoning him because of left wing lies and corruption. That is what you all want to happen. That is the one and only reason for this charade.

If, in the unlikelyhood that you get your way and he was involved criminally. Remember this conversation. You will see the answer. it won't be the one you want to believe, but it will be the truth.

Glad you said IF he was involved ,,,, but haven't you seen enough smoke to know there IS something there? How many more firings how many more must leave him ???

 

[eddiew37]

You don't seem to have any problem with lawless Presidents.

Thank you for another demonstration of snowflake unsubstantiated false accusations against people without evidence.

Busy, if you were intellectually honest you would be able to admit both Barak Obama and Hillary Clinton violated the Constitution and / or broke laws. That has already been proven. As far as Trump goes, I have no problem with him being Impeached IF DEMOCRATS CAN EVER PRODUCE ANY EVIDENCE, which they have not.

If you were intellectually honest you would also be able to admit that the Democrats are now engaged in a full-blown witch hunt of Donald Trump in an attempt to take him down by any means possible.

Mueller's investigation is the last great opportunity to 'get Trump'. Mueller's appointment resulted from the former Director of the FBI illegally leaking information rather than going through proper channels in a political attempt to get a Special Council appointed. After being appointed Mueller went out and got the 'I Hate Trump' friggin' 'Dream Team' to man his team. There is not one 'Neutral' member on his team.

Every other attempt / accusation having failed, Mueller has now been given carte blanch to dig into ANYTHING he wants, which is pretty much an admission that they don't have anything on him regarding collusion or obstruction. So they expand his ability to dig to include anything and everything.

As I predicted, that now being the case - Mueller given the authority to dig any to anything in order to 'get Trump', Mueller's team WILL find something. (Again, you don't become a billionaire International Real Estate mogul without bribing unions, foreign reps, etc...)

And as you just proved you are either ignorant or have no intellectual integrity by claiming I don't have a problem with lawless Presidents. I do. I wanted Trump gone when snowflakes like you defended him ... and still do. I have not said I d not think Trump Trump broke any laws. I have said Democrats have not produced any evidence. Do so, and I will gladly support punishment.

With all the laws proven to have been broken by Democrats and snowflakes and their criminal Democrats defending all of them, the only people exposed as having a problem punishing criminals are the Democrats.

Obama: Violated both Constitution and law, aided and abetted enemies of the US
- No punishment

Hillary: Violated laws, to include Espionage' - No Punishment

US AG Eric Holder, US AG Loretta Lynch, Ex FBI Director James Comey, EX-NSA Director Clapper, CIA Director Brennan, Obama Cabinet Member Susan Rice, IRA Director, Harry Reid, Julian Castro....all of them were caught / exposed committing crimes...all were protected.

Hypocrisy, thy name is 'Snowflake'...

You are the hypocrite and snowflake. Anyone who disagrees with you is a snowflake.

You now know that Clinton and Obama committed crimes. You are trying to criminalize policy differences. That is in-American.

The Democrats would love to have Mueller find something but this is not a witch hunt. The DNC servers were hacked by Russians. They clearly wanted Trump to win. Trump's campaign staff had ties to Russia. We now know that Trump Jr went to a meeting with a foreign national to get dirt on Clinton.

Comey was asked to do something potentially illegal but Trump is the victim in your eyes. Trump lied about his meeting and Comey called him on it. There are several members who are neutral. Several of them currently work for the federal government. Just because someone gives a contribution does not mean they are partisan. Sessions is a Republican. Does that mean he cannot prosecute Democrats? Mueller apparently is not investigating all of Trump's business dealings. He is investigating business dealings with Russian nationals. Ken Starr prosecuted a number of Clinton associates for crimes that had nothing to do with his mandate. Was that unfair?

You have proved your ignorance or partisan leanings by ignoring the fact that Trump is breaking the law. There is no doubt of that. Yet you are not demanding he be prosecuted.

There is no evidence that Obama broke the law or abetted enemies of this country. If it were true, Trump can be accused of doing the same thing.

Clinton did not commit espionage. At most she mis-handled classified information. She did not give it to anyone.

More unsubstantiated rumors. You want to criminalize political disagreements.

HYPOCRITE, YOUR NAME IS SNOWFLAKE!!

The DNC servers were hacked by Russians.

you have no evidence to back that line. sorry, no one has inspected that server.

And Assange already stated he got the emails from someone not a russian.

THE CIA, FBI, NSC, and DNI all agree that it happened. Mike Pence saw the information that our intelligence agencies had and agreed with their findings.

Assange is a anti-America liar. The fact that he only publishes American secrets tells us what he is. He is a Putin puppet. He is the fence for the stolen information.

well it seems really simple to me. declassify and let the amercian people see the evidence. That request has been made before and not by me, but the congress.

I'm a doubting thomas, I need evidence. i don't just accept something as fact cause someone said so. i'm funny that way. you may be ok with it. that's you. but it isn't me and I demand evidence. no one hacked our election, or changed a vote. so what is it they did? I think that is a reasonable question to ask and to get an answer to.

how many must he fire how many have to leave him, how many unknown meetings with russians must there be before you republican morons get a clue?

 

[PredFan]

Tired of this thread, too much left wing stupidity.

 

[PredFan]

It is not a crime for a business man to do business with another country. There is no crime, there is no obstruction. How dense are you assholes really?

Unless they are doing business to funnel money to someone. That is called bribery. Why are you so afraid to find out? It seems you are expecting them to find something. On the other hand, I don't know.

You don't know because you don't want to know. Muellers investigation is wasting tax dollars at an incredible rate. He hasn't found anything at all so to keep his sweet gig going, he's now looking elsewhere. Trump knows he's wasting time and money. If Mueller was doing his job, he'd have ended this farce weeks ago, he isn't, he should be fired.

Do you then agree that Ken Starr's 2 year investigation of Clinton was wrong as well? I don't and I don't see Mueller's investigation as a waste.

Again your ignorance has led you astray. There were charges against Clinton made by at least three women who claimed he raped them. That is a crime and needed to be investigated. Here, there is no crime and no charges brought.

Understand yet?

Starr also prosecuted a number of Clinton's associates on charges that had nothing to do with his original mandate. That is what you accuse Mueller of doing.Why should it take 2 years?

Understand yet? You are a partisan hack.

That's irrelevant moron. There are no charges, there is no crime, comparing Mueller to Starr is just ignorant of the facts.

 

[PredFan]

You know no such thing. That is a lie you tell.

the only liars are you trump freaks.

and yes, everyone knows moron. too bad you couldn't understand the simple English in dum Donald junior's email.

wackjob.

No, moron, only you and your butthurt comrades believe that lie. There is nothing in Jr's e-mails, that is plain to see. Your desire to have your severe butthurt soothed doesn't turn your lies to fact.

Wackjob.

Lets be honest here for a minute Pred Trump could be up to his eyeballs in shit and you'd say" what a beautiful smell ,,can I have some too"

Being totally honest here, no. he isn't anywhere near being up to his eyeballs, that only exists in your head. If ever he is proven to be dirty, I will not support him, but I'm not abandoning him because of left wing lies and corruption. That is what you all want to happen. That is the one and only reason for this charade.

If, in the unlikelyhood that you get your way and he was involved criminally. Remember this conversation. You will see the answer. it won't be the one you want to believe, but it will be the truth.

Glad you said IF he was involved ,,,, but haven't you seen enough smoke to know there IS something there? How many more firings how many more must leave him ???

No, of course not, there is no smoke, only left wing farts.

 

[Dr Grump]

[

You do, so now you understand why the right does not think that there can be a fair investigation when the team is loaded up with Democrats.

This is now a partisan investigation, not an independent one.

I think it is stupid to put people who actively worked to keep Trump from being elected to a team tasked with investigating him. If you don't think that is stupid, then you're stupid.

You have full faith in Mueller to pick the best investigators, and he has already proven to you to have picked partisan hacks as investigators. Your faith makes you look stupid.

IT is NOT an independent investigation. An "Independent" investigation would have a team of investigators who were not partisan and did not have a record of rooting for one side or the other.

As I said, Mueller's report is already tainted before he even publishes it. He cannot be trusted to get to the truth.

This is a partisan witch hunt.

/thread

you mean like the Starr investigation? That kind of partisanship?

Who appointed Mueller again? The Justice Dept. Who runs the Justice Dept? Sessions. Who appointed Sessions?

Stop your fucking whining. Mueller is YOUR guy...

 

[Dr Grump]

That's irrelevant moron. There are no charges, there is no crime, comparing Mueller to Starr is just ignorant of the facts.

Neither was there a crime with Clinton. Until it was investigated...You do know how investigations work, right?

 

[Dr Grump]

Man, you are fucking hilarious. If your IQ was 40 points higher you might even be dangerous.

please don't interact with Jillian. Your IQ doesn't even get a blip on her radar. You are dumb as a sack of rocks.

 

[Darkwind]

[

You do, so now you understand why the right does not think that there can be a fair investigation when the team is loaded up with Democrats.

This is now a partisan investigation, not an independent one.

I think it is stupid to put people who actively worked to keep Trump from being elected to a team tasked with investigating him. If you don't think that is stupid, then you're stupid.

You have full faith in Mueller to pick the best investigators, and he has already proven to you to have picked partisan hacks as investigators. Your faith makes you look stupid.

IT is NOT an independent investigation. An "Independent" investigation would have a team of investigators who were not partisan and did not have a record of rooting for one side or the other.

As I said, Mueller's report is already tainted before he even publishes it. He cannot be trusted to get to the truth.

This is a partisan witch hunt.

/thread

you mean like the Starr investigation? That kind of partisanship?

Who appointed Mueller again? The Justice Dept. Who runs the Justice Dept? Sessions. Who appointed Sessions?

Stop your fucking whining. Mueller is YOUR guy...

Put your helmet on and hush. The topic is clearly beyond you.

 

[bripat9643]

Man, you are fucking hilarious. If your IQ was 40 points higher you might even be dangerous.

please don't interact with Jillian. Your IQ doesn't even get a blip on her radar. You are dumb as a sack of rocks.

ROFL! Jillian is the biggest dingbat in the forum, and you haven't improved your credibility by claiming she's smart.

If she's such a rocket scientist, then why does she need you to protect her from me? Shouldn't she be able to cut me to ribbons without any of your assistance?

 

[PredFan]

That's irrelevant moron. There are no charges, there is no crime, comparing Mueller to Starr is just ignorant of the facts.

Neither was there a crime with Clinton. Until it was investigated...You do know how investigations work, right?

You don't know enough to be talking. There was an accusation of rape by at least three women. That deserves investigation. Not left wing nut lies.

Understand now moron?