Yeah, this about sums Trump up

[Votto]

nope, you did. I said clowdstrike had to retract their report.

Then why did you even fucking post that link...ugh...you don't know what the fuck you're talking about, do you? Your job is to spread disinformation and employ Russian Active Measures, isn't it?

We are all secret Putin agents.

Shhh. Don't tell anyone.

 

[The Derp]

again, the domain name on the emails were not the DNC server.

How do you fucking know that if by your own admission, no one's seen the servers!?

This is what I'm talking about when I say you're full of shit.

Way back in October 2016, DHS and the DNI confirmed it was a Russian hack.

 

[busybee01]

Mueller chose the best people he thought would lead the best investigation. If those people happen to be Dmeocrats, it's only because Conservatives are fucking terrible, unreliable, and untrustworthy. Otherwise, he would put them on his team. Also, it's looking more and more like Conservatives in general were colluding with Russia alongside Trump.


Gaslighting 101.


Did they, though? You gotta prove that.


So you jsut don't like who he picked because who he picked isn't inclined to take Trump at his word. Well, that begs the question; why do you take Trump at his word?

dude it's supposed to be an impartial investigation. would you think it could be impartial with all GOP investigators? let me laugh at you for one moment prior to your answer.

There is no evidence that it isn't. Several members are currently working for the Trump Justice Department. They all have sterling reputations.

so again, my question, you'd be ok with all republicans then? or only republicans can't be impartial?

I have no problem with the lawyers that Mueller has chosen. there are what you would consider Republicans on the team so to speak.

Of course you don't, dumbass Why would you have a problem with a pack of DNC party apparatchiks? There are no Republicans.

They are not party apparatchiks. They have long and distinguished careers. Mueller worked for a Republican Administration. Just giving money does not make you a apparatchik. Several lawyers that are working with Mueller are currently working in the Trump Administration.

Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.

Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president

Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.

there is nothing "fake" about it, idiota...

obstruction of justice is illegal.

high crimes and misdemeanors is a very broad concept...

you were the same freaks who thought Clinton should be impeached for a blow job.

So tell us all where the "justice" is in a political witch hunt that's gone on for 11 months now and found nothing, and is veering off in directions that's got nothing to do with COLLUSION?

The Mueller investigation is proceeding in a logical manner. They are examining Trump's ties to Russia which include business ties. Your idea of justice is a cover-up.

How STUPID are you?

1) It's NOT ILLEGAL to do business with Russia, or the CLINTONS WOULD BE IN PRISON RIGHT NOW.
2 There has to be a CRIME for there to be an INVESTIGATION, et all, COLLUSION, which for all intents and purposes at this point has been proven nothing more than a DEMOCRAT FABRICATION.
3) This is a DEMOCRAT WITCH HUNT. The purpose of a special investigator is NOT to just RUN AMOK in ANY OLD DIRECTION LOOKING for something wrong ENTIRELY OUTSIDE of the INITIAL SCOPE, but that's exactly what he's doing.
4) PRESIDENT Trump SHOULD and WOULD BE completely within his power to do so, FIRE Mueller, NOW.

HOW STUPID ARE YOU?

1) if the intent of the business was to funnel money to Trump then it is ILLEGAL
2) There is no doubt that Russia interfered in our elections. They helped Trump. Several people connected with Trump's campaign have Russia ties
3) This is not a DEMOCRAT WITCH HUNT. Mueller has received bi-partisan praise from Republicans and Democrats. In addition, Trump himself into this mess. He should not have asked Comey to end the investigation of Flynn. Ken Starr did the same thing with Bill Clinton. Do you disagree with that?
4) TRUMP could fire Mueller but it would be a political disaster

HOW STUPID ARE YOU? YOU ARE PLENTY STUPID.

 

[The Derp]

he never said that. tell you what, put up his quote. prove me wrong.

Here's his fucking tweet from last month.

TWEET 1 - 6/23/17 - 5:43PM Just out: The Obama Administration knew far in advance of November 8th about election meddling by Russia. Did nothing about it. WHY?

TWEET 2 - 6/24/17 - 4:28PM Since the Obama Administration was told way before the 2016 Election that the Russians were meddling, why no action? Focus on them, not T!

TWEET 2 - 6/24/17 - 4:44PM Obama Administration official said they "choked" when it came to acting on Russian meddling of election. They didn't want to hurt Hillary?​

3 fucking tweets in a row acknowledging Russian meddling.

Oh, and Trump's press conference from 1/11/17: ‘I Think It Was Russia’

So the problem is you all aren't on the same page. I think that's by design. You hope to conflate the issue enough to fatigue it so people drop it. But that strategy isn't working, and your attempts are becoming more desperate.

Like saying hacking isn't illegal. Fucking idiot.

 

[The Derp]

We are all secret Putin agents.Shhh. Don't tell anyone.

Unfortunately, any Conservative has to be assumed is a Russian operative if they're posting disinformation on message boards like you're doing.

 

[Votto]

We are all secret Putin agents.Shhh. Don't tell anyone.

Unfortunately, any Conservative has to be assumed is a Russian operative if they're posting disinformation on message boards like you're doing.

Curses! I told to keep it on the down low.

Natasha will be very upset.

 

[The Derp]

Curses! I told to keep it on the down low. Natasha will be very upset.

It's sad that Conservatism is such a bullshit, failed belief system that you all have to turn to Russia to help you win elections you can't win on the merits of your ideas.

 

[bripat9643]

the fact you have no evidence is your denial.

The point of an investigation is to find evidence.

Seriously, what is the disconnect there for you? Do you not understand what an investigation is?

The purpose is to find evidence for a known crime, not to go searching for any crimes they can pin on the target of a witch hunt.

 

[The Derp]

The purpose is to find evidence for a known crime, not to go searching for any crimes they can pin on the target of a witch hunt.

We already know the crime; Russian interference. Now comes the part where we find out if they had any help, support, or encouragement. Sure looks like it to me!

 

[jc456]

Curses! I told to keep it on the down low. Natasha will be very upset.

It's sad that Conservatism is such a bullshit, failed belief system that you all have to turn to Russia to help you win elections you can't win on the merits of your ideas.

keep telling yourself that trump derange syndrome dude.

 

[jc456]

The purpose is to find evidence for a known crime, not to go searching for any crimes they can pin on the target of a witch hunt.

We already know the crime; Russian interference. Now comes the part where we find out if they had any help, support, or encouragement. Sure looks like it to me!

what was the interference and why haven't we declared war?

 

[bripat9643]

Curses! I told to keep it on the down low. Natasha will be very upset.

It's sad that Conservatism is such a bullshit, failed belief system that you all have to turn to Russia to help you win elections you can't win on the merits of your ideas.

It's sad that snowflakes fell for a pack of lies and some of the dumbest ideas ever foisted on humanity. When the voters reject them, they bleat like lost sheep and conceive the lamest of conspiracy theories to explain their humiliating defeat.

 

[bripat9643]

The purpose is to find evidence for a known crime, not to go searching for any crimes they can pin on the target of a witch hunt.

We already know the crime; Russian interference. Now comes the part where we find out if they had any help, support, or encouragement. Sure looks like it to me!

Where's the proof of this crime? Can you produce a speck of tangible evidence? Why . . . no you can't. You certainly can't demonstrate that the Trump administration had anything to do with it. So why is Mueller investigating the Trump administration instead of crooks like Hillary who received millions of dollars from the Russians?

 

[bripat9643]

he never said that. tell you what, put up his quote. prove me wrong.

Here's his fucking tweet from last month.

TWEET 1 - 6/23/17 - 5:43PM Just out: The Obama Administration knew far in advance of November 8th about election meddling by Russia. Did nothing about it. WHY?

TWEET 2 - 6/24/17 - 4:28PM Since the Obama Administration was told way before the 2016 Election that the Russians were meddling, why no action? Focus on them, not T!

TWEET 2 - 6/24/17 - 4:44PM Obama Administration official said they "choked" when it came to acting on Russian meddling of election. They didn't want to hurt Hillary?​

3 fucking tweets in a row acknowledging Russian meddling.

Oh, and Trump's press conference from 1/11/17: ‘I Think It Was Russia’

So the problem is you all aren't on the same page. I think that's by design. You hope to conflate the issue enough to fatigue it so people drop it. But that strategy isn't working, and your attempts are becoming more desperate.

Like saying hacking isn't illegal. Fucking idiot.

Where's the evidence, moron? Trump is simply accepting the claims of the Obama train wreck at face value. Obama claimed the Russians meddled, so what did he do about it? Nothing, obviously. That begs the question of whether there ever was any Russian meddling or whether it was just a ruse to take the heat off of Hillary's email problem.

 

[jc456]

he never said that. tell you what, put up his quote. prove me wrong.

Here's his fucking tweet from last month.

TWEET 1 - 6/23/17 - 5:43PM Just out: The Obama Administration knew far in advance of November 8th about election meddling by Russia. Did nothing about it. WHY?

TWEET 2 - 6/24/17 - 4:28PM Since the Obama Administration was told way before the 2016 Election that the Russians were meddling, why no action? Focus on them, not T!

TWEET 2 - 6/24/17 - 4:44PM Obama Administration official said they "choked" when it came to acting on Russian meddling of election. They didn't want to hurt Hillary?​

3 fucking tweets in a row acknowledging Russian meddling.

Oh, and Trump's press conference from 1/11/17: ‘I Think It Was Russia’

So the problem is you all aren't on the same page. I think that's by design. You hope to conflate the issue enough to fatigue it so people drop it. But that strategy isn't working, and your attempts are becoming more desperate.

Like saying hacking isn't illegal. Fucking idiot.

Where's the evidence, moron? Trump is simply accepting the claims of the Obama train wreck at face value. Obama claimed the Russians meddled, so what did he do about it? Nothing, obviously. That begs the question of whether there ever was any Russian meddling or whether it was just a ruse to take the heat off of Hillary's email problem.

but there is this:

 

[Votto]

Curses! I told to keep it on the down low. Natasha will be very upset.

It's sad that Conservatism is such a bullshit, failed belief system that you all have to turn to Russia to help you win elections you can't win on the merits of your ideas.

What is sad is that the Dims lost because someone hacked their system and simply showed the world the truth, and you are pissed about that.

 

[Dragonlady]

What laws has he broken to become a lawless President? Be specific and give a link or this is just another "President Trump has poopy pants thread".

Cripes its like every liberal on this board has turned into rdean. Sheesh.

Start with the Nepotism Act - giving jobs to family members.

Failing to divest his private holdings or place them in a blind trust.

Personally profiting from foreign governments (through his hotels).

Firing James Comey because of the Russian Investigation.

Covering up for Flynn, until it became public that Flynn discussed sanctions with the Russians and lied about it.

Just for starters.

 

[busybee01]

You don't seem to have any problem with lawless Presidents.

Thank you for another demonstration of snowflake unsubstantiated false accusations against people without evidence.

Busy, if you were intellectually honest you would be able to admit both Barak Obama and Hillary Clinton violated the Constitution and / or broke laws. That has already been proven. As far as Trump goes, I have no problem with him being Impeached IF DEMOCRATS CAN EVER PRODUCE ANY EVIDENCE, which they have not.

If you were intellectually honest you would also be able to admit that the Democrats are now engaged in a full-blown witch hunt of Donald Trump in an attempt to take him down by any means possible.

Mueller's investigation is the last great opportunity to 'get Trump'. Mueller's appointment resulted from the former Director of the FBI illegally leaking information rather than going through proper channels in a political attempt to get a Special Council appointed. After being appointed Mueller went out and got the 'I Hate Trump' friggin' 'Dream Team' to man his team. There is not one 'Neutral' member on his team.

Every other attempt / accusation having failed, Mueller has now been given carte blanch to dig into ANYTHING he wants, which is pretty much an admission that they don't have anything on him regarding collusion or obstruction. So they expand his ability to dig to include anything and everything.

As I predicted, that now being the case - Mueller given the authority to dig any to anything in order to 'get Trump', Mueller's team WILL find something. (Again, you don't become a billionaire International Real Estate mogul without bribing unions, foreign reps, etc...)

And as you just proved you are either ignorant or have no intellectual integrity by claiming I don't have a problem with lawless Presidents. I do. I wanted Trump gone when snowflakes like you defended him ... and still do. I have not said I d not think Trump Trump broke any laws. I have said Democrats have not produced any evidence. Do so, and I will gladly support punishment.

With all the laws proven to have been broken by Democrats and snowflakes and their criminal Democrats defending all of them, the only people exposed as having a problem punishing criminals are the Democrats.

Obama: Violated both Constitution and law, aided and abetted enemies of the US
- No punishment

Hillary: Violated laws, to include Espionage' - No Punishment

US AG Eric Holder, US AG Loretta Lynch, Ex FBI Director James Comey, EX-NSA Director Clapper, CIA Director Brennan, Obama Cabinet Member Susan Rice, IRA Director, Harry Reid, Julian Castro....all of them were caught / exposed committing crimes...all were protected.

Hypocrisy, thy name is 'Snowflake'...

You are the hypocrite and snowflake. Anyone who disagrees with you is a snowflake.

You now know that Clinton and Obama committed crimes. You are trying to criminalize policy differences. That is in-American.

The Democrats would love to have Mueller find something but this is not a witch hunt. The DNC servers were hacked by Russians. They clearly wanted Trump to win. Trump's campaign staff had ties to Russia. We now know that Trump Jr went to a meeting with a foreign national to get dirt on Clinton.

Comey was asked to do something potentially illegal but Trump is the victim in your eyes. Trump lied about his meeting and Comey called him on it. There are several members who are neutral. Several of them currently work for the federal government. Just because someone gives a contribution does not mean they are partisan. Sessions is a Republican. Does that mean he cannot prosecute Democrats? Mueller apparently is not investigating all of Trump's business dealings. He is investigating business dealings with Russian nationals. Ken Starr prosecuted a number of Clinton associates for crimes that had nothing to do with his mandate. Was that unfair?

You have proved your ignorance or partisan leanings by ignoring the fact that Trump is breaking the law. There is no doubt of that. Yet you are not demanding he be prosecuted.

There is no evidence that Obama broke the law or abetted enemies of this country. If it were true, Trump can be accused of doing the same thing.

Clinton did not commit espionage. At most she mis-handled classified information. She did not give it to anyone.

More unsubstantiated rumors. You want to criminalize political disagreements.

HYPOCRITE, YOUR NAME IS SNOWFLAKE!!

 

[jc456]

You don't seem to have any problem with lawless Presidents.

Thank you for another demonstration of snowflake unsubstantiated false accusations against people without evidence.

Busy, if you were intellectually honest you would be able to admit both Barak Obama and Hillary Clinton violated the Constitution and / or broke laws. That has already been proven. As far as Trump goes, I have no problem with him being Impeached IF DEMOCRATS CAN EVER PRODUCE ANY EVIDENCE, which they have not.

If you were intellectually honest you would also be able to admit that the Democrats are now engaged in a full-blown witch hunt of Donald Trump in an attempt to take him down by any means possible.

Mueller's investigation is the last great opportunity to 'get Trump'. Mueller's appointment resulted from the former Director of the FBI illegally leaking information rather than going through proper channels in a political attempt to get a Special Council appointed. After being appointed Mueller went out and got the 'I Hate Trump' friggin' 'Dream Team' to man his team. There is not one 'Neutral' member on his team.

Every other attempt / accusation having failed, Mueller has now been given carte blanch to dig into ANYTHING he wants, which is pretty much an admission that they don't have anything on him regarding collusion or obstruction. So they expand his ability to dig to include anything and everything.

As I predicted, that now being the case - Mueller given the authority to dig any to anything in order to 'get Trump', Mueller's team WILL find something. (Again, you don't become a billionaire International Real Estate mogul without bribing unions, foreign reps, etc...)

And as you just proved you are either ignorant or have no intellectual integrity by claiming I don't have a problem with lawless Presidents. I do. I wanted Trump gone when snowflakes like you defended him ... and still do. I have not said I d not think Trump Trump broke any laws. I have said Democrats have not produced any evidence. Do so, and I will gladly support punishment.

With all the laws proven to have been broken by Democrats and snowflakes and their criminal Democrats defending all of them, the only people exposed as having a problem punishing criminals are the Democrats.

Obama: Violated both Constitution and law, aided and abetted enemies of the US
- No punishment

Hillary: Violated laws, to include Espionage' - No Punishment

US AG Eric Holder, US AG Loretta Lynch, Ex FBI Director James Comey, EX-NSA Director Clapper, CIA Director Brennan, Obama Cabinet Member Susan Rice, IRA Director, Harry Reid, Julian Castro....all of them were caught / exposed committing crimes...all were protected.

Hypocrisy, thy name is 'Snowflake'...

You are the hypocrite and snowflake. Anyone who disagrees with you is a snowflake.

You now know that Clinton and Obama committed crimes. You are trying to criminalize policy differences. That is in-American.

The Democrats would love to have Mueller find something but this is not a witch hunt. The DNC servers were hacked by Russians. They clearly wanted Trump to win. Trump's campaign staff had ties to Russia. We now know that Trump Jr went to a meeting with a foreign national to get dirt on Clinton.

Comey was asked to do something potentially illegal but Trump is the victim in your eyes. Trump lied about his meeting and Comey called him on it. There are several members who are neutral. Several of them currently work for the federal government. Just because someone gives a contribution does not mean they are partisan. Sessions is a Republican. Does that mean he cannot prosecute Democrats? Mueller apparently is not investigating all of Trump's business dealings. He is investigating business dealings with Russian nationals. Ken Starr prosecuted a number of Clinton associates for crimes that had nothing to do with his mandate. Was that unfair?

You have proved your ignorance or partisan leanings by ignoring the fact that Trump is breaking the law. There is no doubt of that. Yet you are not demanding he be prosecuted.

There is no evidence that Obama broke the law or abetted enemies of this country. If it were true, Trump can be accused of doing the same thing.

Clinton did not commit espionage. At most she mis-handled classified information. She did not give it to anyone.

More unsubstantiated rumors. You want to criminalize political disagreements.

HYPOCRITE, YOUR NAME IS SNOWFLAKE!!

The DNC servers were hacked by Russians.

you have no evidence to back that line. sorry, no one has inspected that server.

And Assange already stated he got the emails from someone not a russian.

 

[busybee01]

The Mueller investigation is proceeding in a logical manner. They are examining Trump's ties to Russia which include business ties. Your idea of justice is a cover-up.

It is not a crime for a business man to do business with another country. There is no crime, there is no obstruction. How dense are you assholes really?

Unless they are doing business to funnel money to someone. That is called bribery. Why are you so afraid to find out? It seems you are expecting them to find something. On the other hand, I don't know.

You don't know because you don't want to know. Muellers investigation is wasting tax dollars at an incredible rate. He hasn't found anything at all so to keep his sweet gig going, he's now looking elsewhere. Trump knows he's wasting time and money. If Mueller was doing his job, he'd have ended this farce weeks ago, he isn't, he should be fired.

Do you then agree that Ken Starr's 2 year investigation of Clinton was wrong as well? I don't and I don't see Mueller's investigation as a waste.

Again your ignorance has led you astray. There were charges against Clinton made by at least three women who claimed he raped them. That is a crime and needed to be investigated. Here, there is no crime and no charges brought.

Understand yet?

Starr also prosecuted a number of Clinton's associates on charges that had nothing to do with his original mandate. That is what you accuse Mueller of doing.Why should it take 2 years?

Understand yet? You are a partisan hack.