Yeah, this about sums Trump up

[The Derp]

So Trump cannot be impartial on his own investigation because he donated to Democrats. So Conservatives are arguing anyone who donated to Democrats has an agenda to get rid of Trump, even though Trump donated to Democrats including Hillary Clinton.

Pretzel logic from Conservatardia. Now watch as they completely ignore the cognitive dissonance.

 

[busybee01]

there is nothing "fake" about it, idiota...

obstruction of justice is illegal.

high crimes and misdemeanors is a very broad concept...

you were the same freaks who thought Clinton should be impeached for a blow job.

So tell us all where the "justice" is in a political witch hunt that's gone on for 11 months now and found nothing, and is veering off in directions that's got nothing to do with COLLUSION?

The Mueller investigation is proceeding in a logical manner. They are examining Trump's ties to Russia which include business ties. Your idea of justice is a cover-up.

It is not a crime for a business man to do business with another country. There is no crime, there is no obstruction. How dense are you assholes really?

Unless they are doing business to funnel money to someone. That is called bribery. Why are you so afraid to find out? It seems you are expecting them to find something. On the other hand, I don't know.

You don't know because you don't want to know. Muellers investigation is wasting tax dollars at an incredible rate. He hasn't found anything at all so to keep his sweet gig going, he's now looking elsewhere. Trump knows he's wasting time and money. If Mueller was doing his job, he'd have ended this farce weeks ago, he isn't, he should be fired.

Do you then agree that Ken Starr's 2 year investigation of Clinton was wrong as well? I don't and I don't see Mueller's investigation as a waste.

 

[007]

Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.

Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president

Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.

there is nothing "fake" about it, idiota...

obstruction of justice is illegal.

high crimes and misdemeanors is a very broad concept...

you were the same freaks who thought Clinton should be impeached for a blow job.

So tell us all where the "justice" is in a political witch hunt that's gone on for 11 months now and found nothing, and is veering off in directions that's got nothing to do with COLLUSION?

The Mueller investigation is proceeding in a logical manner. They are examining Trump's ties to Russia which include business ties. Your idea of justice is a cover-up.

How STUPID are you?

1) It's NOT ILLEGAL to do business with Russia, or the CLINTONS WOULD BE IN PRISON RIGHT NOW.
2 There has to be a CRIME for there to be an INVESTIGATION, et all, COLLUSION, which for all intents and purposes at this point has been proven nothing more than a DEMOCRAT FABRICATION.
3) This is a DEMOCRAT WITCH HUNT. The purpose of a special investigator is NOT to just RUN AMOK in ANY OLD DIRECTION LOOKING for something wrong ENTIRELY OUTSIDE of the INITIAL SCOPE, but that's exactly what he's doing.
4) PRESIDENT Trump SHOULD and WOULD BE completely within his power to do so, FIRE Mueller, NOW.

 

[busybee01]

Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.

Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president

Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.

there is nothing "fake" about it, idiota...

obstruction of justice is illegal.

high crimes and misdemeanors is a very broad concept...

you were the same freaks who thought Clinton should be impeached for a blow job.

Man, you are fucking hilarious. If your IQ was 40 points higher you might even be dangerous.

Considering your IQ is a -40, you have no room to talk. You are a sad victim of Trump Derangement Syndrome.

Wow, that is a devastating comeback!

Trump Derangement Syndrome is an affliction of those who despise Trump, not those who respect him.

Trump Derangement Syndrome causes normally intelligent people to say stupid things in support of him. You are nothing but a cult member. Anything he does is okay. If a Democrat did the same things, you would be lambasting him. As a matter of fact Trump has done some of the same things Obama has yet Obama is ripped and Trump is excused.

 

[easyt65]

You don't seem to have any problem with lawless Presidents.

Thank you for another demonstration of snowflake unsubstantiated false accusations against people without evidence.

Busy, if you were intellectually honest you would be able to admit both Barak Obama and Hillary Clinton violated the Constitution and / or broke laws. That has already been proven. As far as Trump goes, I have no problem with him being Impeached IF DEMOCRATS CAN EVER PRODUCE ANY EVIDENCE, which they have not.

If you were intellectually honest you would also be able to admit that the Democrats are now engaged in a full-blown witch hunt of Donald Trump in an attempt to take him down by any means possible.

Mueller's investigation is the last great opportunity to 'get Trump'. Mueller's appointment resulted from the former Director of the FBI illegally leaking information rather than going through proper channels in a political attempt to get a Special Council appointed. After being appointed Mueller went out and got the 'I Hate Trump' friggin' 'Dream Team' to man his team. There is not one 'Neutral' member on his team.

Every other attempt / accusation having failed, Mueller has now been given carte blanch to dig into ANYTHING he wants, which is pretty much an admission that they don't have anything on him regarding collusion or obstruction. So they expand his ability to dig to include anything and everything.

As I predicted, that now being the case - Mueller given the authority to dig any to anything in order to 'get Trump', Mueller's team WILL find something. (Again, you don't become a billionaire International Real Estate mogul without bribing unions, foreign reps, etc...)

And as you just proved you are either ignorant or have no intellectual integrity by claiming I don't have a problem with lawless Presidents. I do. I wanted Trump gone when snowflakes like you defended him ... and still do. I have not said I d not think Trump Trump broke any laws. I have said Democrats have not produced any evidence. Do so, and I will gladly support punishment.

With all the laws proven to have been broken by Democrats and snowflakes and their criminal Democrats defending all of them, the only people exposed as having a problem punishing criminals are the Democrats.

Obama: Violated both Constitution and law, aided and abetted enemies of the US
- No punishment

Hillary: Violated laws, to include Espionage' - No Punishment

US AG Eric Holder, US AG Loretta Lynch, Ex FBI Director James Comey, EX-NSA Director Clapper, CIA Director Brennan, Obama Cabinet Member Susan Rice, IRA Director, Harry Reid, Julian Castro....all of them were caught / exposed committing crimes...all were protected.

Hypocrisy, thy name is 'Snowflake'...

 

[RealDave]

"I hereby pardon myself for all crimes I may have done in the past & in the future. I also Pardon Don Jr & Ivanka. I Pardon Jared Kushner for as long as he remains married to Ivanka, if he gets a divorce, I'll supply the documents to throw his ass in jail"

Trumpettes cheer!!!!!!!!!

 

[jc456]

wow, bubba, it came out in the congressional hearings, no one has seen that server. not the DOJ and not the FBI, no one. look it fking up! gawd teaching you how to use the internet is cumbersome.

No. That is not what came out in the congressional hearings. Not even close.

The FBI requested access to the Democratic National Committee’s (DNC) serversand servers for other Democratic entities that were hacked during the 2016 election, FBI Director James Comey said Tuesday, but its request was not met.
and from the transcript;
"BURR: And the FBI, in this case, unlike other cases that you might investigate — did you ever have access to the actual hardware that was hacked? Or did you have to rely on a third party to provide you the data that they had collected?

COMEY: In the case of the DNC, and, I believe, the DCCC, but I’m sure the DNC, we did not have access to the devices themselves. We got relevant forensic information from a private party, a high-class entity, that had done the work. But we didn’t get direct access."

 

[jc456]

So tell us all where the "justice" is in a political witch hunt that's gone on for 11 months now and found nothing, and is veering off in directions that's got nothing to do with COLLUSION?

The Mueller investigation is proceeding in a logical manner. They are examining Trump's ties to Russia which include business ties. Your idea of justice is a cover-up.

It is not a crime for a business man to do business with another country. There is no crime, there is no obstruction. How dense are you assholes really?

Unless they are doing business to funnel money to someone. That is called bribery. Why are you so afraid to find out? It seems you are expecting them to find something. On the other hand, I don't know.

you seem to think he's guilty of something. why not present what it is you think he did and then let's go look to see if he took money. I'm good with that. now tell me what he did that is illegal.

That is what a investigation is for.

Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.

there is nothing "fake" about it, idiota...

obstruction of justice is illegal.

high crimes and misdemeanors is a very broad concept...

you were the same freaks who thought Clinton should be impeached for a blow job.

Man, you are fucking hilarious. If your IQ was 40 points higher you might even be dangerous.

Considering your IQ is a -40, you have no room to talk. You are a sad victim of Trump Derangement Syndrome.

well I know for a fact, he doesn't have trump derangement syndrome, he supports him, that term resides in the hands of snowflakes on the left.

He does have it as does you. That is why you say stupid things like hacking is not a crime.

well then why don't you demand evidence that they did this supposed interference.

For the THOUSANDTH time, the point of an investigation is to find evidence. Otherwise, there wouldn't be a need to investigate if they already had the evidence.

Seriously, are you really this obtuse or is it an act?

well what is the crime for the thousandth time. one must have a crime to produce evidence.

You don't necessarily have to have a crime. That is why you have a investigation.

no that's not correct, one has a crime and then one investigates that crime. one doesn't wake up one day and say let's go investigate something until we find a crime. that's called a witch hunt.

The crime is that Russia interfered in our elections. They clearly wanted Trump. Now we are investigating to find out what happened. The fact is that Trump's campaign had numerous ties to Russia.

you sure do know a lot of something that doesn't exist. wow. where did you get all of your info from btw?

and there is absolutely no evidence of a hack. the DNC server has not been looked at by any federal intelligence agency. please read.

 

[jc456]

So tell us all where the "justice" is in a political witch hunt that's gone on for 11 months now and found nothing, and is veering off in directions that's got nothing to do with COLLUSION?

The Mueller investigation is proceeding in a logical manner. They are examining Trump's ties to Russia which include business ties. Your idea of justice is a cover-up.

It is not a crime for a business man to do business with another country. There is no crime, there is no obstruction. How dense are you assholes really?

Unless they are doing business to funnel money to someone. That is called bribery. Why are you so afraid to find out? It seems you are expecting them to find something. On the other hand, I don't know.

You don't know because you don't want to know. Muellers investigation is wasting tax dollars at an incredible rate. He hasn't found anything at all so to keep his sweet gig going, he's now looking elsewhere. Trump knows he's wasting time and money. If Mueller was doing his job, he'd have ended this farce weeks ago, he isn't, he should be fired.

Do you then agree that Ken Starr's 2 year investigation of Clinton was wrong as well? I don't and I don't see Mueller's investigation as a waste.

it's all political. not legal.

 

[PredFan]

So tell us all where the "justice" is in a political witch hunt that's gone on for 11 months now and found nothing, and is veering off in directions that's got nothing to do with COLLUSION?

The Mueller investigation is proceeding in a logical manner. They are examining Trump's ties to Russia which include business ties. Your idea of justice is a cover-up.

It is not a crime for a business man to do business with another country. There is no crime, there is no obstruction. How dense are you assholes really?

Unless they are doing business to funnel money to someone. That is called bribery. Why are you so afraid to find out? It seems you are expecting them to find something. On the other hand, I don't know.

you seem to think he's guilty of something. why not present what it is you think he did and then let's go look to see if he took money. I'm good with that. now tell me what he did that is illegal.

That is what a investigation is for.

Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.

there is nothing "fake" about it, idiota...

obstruction of justice is illegal.

high crimes and misdemeanors is a very broad concept...

you were the same freaks who thought Clinton should be impeached for a blow job.

Man, you are fucking hilarious. If your IQ was 40 points higher you might even be dangerous.

Considering your IQ is a -40, you have no room to talk. You are a sad victim of Trump Derangement Syndrome.

well I know for a fact, he doesn't have trump derangement syndrome, he supports him, that term resides in the hands of snowflakes on the left.

He does have it as does you. That is why you say stupid things like hacking is not a crime.

well then why don't you demand evidence that they did this supposed interference.

For the THOUSANDTH time, the point of an investigation is to find evidence. Otherwise, there wouldn't be a need to investigate if they already had the evidence.

Seriously, are you really this obtuse or is it an act?

well what is the crime for the thousandth time. one must have a crime to produce evidence.

You don't necessarily have to have a crime. That is why you have a investigation.

no that's not correct, one has a crime and then one investigates that crime. one doesn't wake up one day and say let's go investigate something until we find a crime. that's called a witch hunt.

The crime is that Russia interfered in our elections. They clearly wanted Trump. Now we are investigating to find out what happened. The fact is that Trump's campaign had numerous ties to Russia.

You actually think that just because you say that there was a crime that automatically changes your delusion into fact?

Sucks to be you.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Rick Wilson: This whole thing will burn to the ground before the leadership (Repubs) will man up
When asked: So when is your party going to stand up and do something???

RW: Don't you get it? They're not. This whole thing will burn to the ground before the leadership will man up
Rick Wilson ✔ @TheRickWilson
Don't you get it? They're not. This whole thing will burn to the ground before the leadership will man up https://twitter.com/italianshortie/status/888448242295427074 …

1:19 PM - 21 Jul 2017

 

[PredFan]

So tell us all where the "justice" is in a political witch hunt that's gone on for 11 months now and found nothing, and is veering off in directions that's got nothing to do with COLLUSION?

The Mueller investigation is proceeding in a logical manner. They are examining Trump's ties to Russia which include business ties. Your idea of justice is a cover-up.

It is not a crime for a business man to do business with another country. There is no crime, there is no obstruction. How dense are you assholes really?

Unless they are doing business to funnel money to someone. That is called bribery. Why are you so afraid to find out? It seems you are expecting them to find something. On the other hand, I don't know.

You don't know because you don't want to know. Muellers investigation is wasting tax dollars at an incredible rate. He hasn't found anything at all so to keep his sweet gig going, he's now looking elsewhere. Trump knows he's wasting time and money. If Mueller was doing his job, he'd have ended this farce weeks ago, he isn't, he should be fired.

Do you then agree that Ken Starr's 2 year investigation of Clinton was wrong as well? I don't and I don't see Mueller's investigation as a waste.

Again your ignorance has led you astray. There were charges against Clinton made by at least three women who claimed he raped them. That is a crime and needed to be investigated. Here, there is no crime and no charges brought.

Understand yet?

 

[The Derp]

You actually think that just because you say that there was a crime that automatically changes your delusion into fact?

The crime was Russian hacking. The investigation is to determine whether or not Conservatives, the GOP, and Trump were involved.

 

[jc456]

You actually think that just because you say that there was a crime that automatically changes your delusion into fact?

The crime was Russian hacking. The investigation is to determine whether or not Conservatives, the GOP, and Trump were involved.

there is absolutely no evidence of russia hacking. I've asked you to provide it. no federal agency has seen the DNC server and the domain of the emails aren't the DNC server. now beyond all that, how the fk do you know russia hacked something?

 

[The Derp]

"BURR: And the FBI, in this case, unlike other cases that you might investigate — did you ever have access to the actual hardware that was hacked? Or did you have to rely on a third party to provide you the data that they had collected?

COMEY: In the case of the DNC, and, I believe, the DCCC, but I’m sure the DNC, we did not have access to the devices themselves. We got relevant forensic information from a private party, a high-class entity, that had done the work. But we didn’t get direct access."

So it was already done and provided to the FBI. So why would they go back and do it again if the work was already done? You guys screech endlessly about wasting money, well this is an example of duplication waste!

Jesus fucking tap-dancing Christ...

 

[busybee01]

Mueller chose the best people he thought would lead the best investigation. If those people happen to be Dmeocrats, it's only because Conservatives are fucking terrible, unreliable, and untrustworthy. Otherwise, he would put them on his team. Also, it's looking more and more like Conservatives in general were colluding with Russia alongside Trump.


Gaslighting 101.


Did they, though? You gotta prove that.


So you jsut don't like who he picked because who he picked isn't inclined to take Trump at his word. Well, that begs the question; why do you take Trump at his word?

dude it's supposed to be an impartial investigation. would you think it could be impartial with all GOP investigators? let me laugh at you for one moment prior to your answer.

There is no evidence that it isn't. Several members are currently working for the Trump Justice Department. They all have sterling reputations.

What? There is ample evidence that the entire team is comprised of Democrat donors. You should pay attention.

There is no evidence. You should look through the partisan haze you see through.

Denial is not a river in Egypt:

The Democratic leanings of Bob Mueller's team​

1. James Quarles: Donated almost $33,000 to Democrats, including Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. He has also donated about $2,750 to Republicans — the only lawyer on Mueller's team to have done so.
2. Jeannie Rhee: Donated more than $16,000 since 2008 to Democrats, including the maximum donation possible to Clinton in both 2015 and 2016. Rhee has also donated to Obama.
3. Andrew Weissmann: Donated more than $4,000 to Obama in 2008 and $2,000 to the DNC in 2006.
4. Elizabeth Prelogar: Donated $250 each to Clinton in 2016 and Obama in 2012.

Each of these people bring a certain expertise that Mueller feels he needs. Mueller is a Republican by the way. Who they gave to does not mean that they cannot conduct their duties in a non-partisan manner. By the way Quarles also gave to then Rep Jason Chaffetz who was a Republican.

If we follow your logic, since Sessions is a Republican, he cannot prosecute Democrats. The US Attorneys cannot prosecute Democrats.

 

[The Derp]

there is absolutely no evidence of russia hacking.

This is denial.

 

[jc456]

"BURR: And the FBI, in this case, unlike other cases that you might investigate — did you ever have access to the actual hardware that was hacked? Or did you have to rely on a third party to provide you the data that they had collected?

COMEY: In the case of the DNC, and, I believe, the DCCC, but I’m sure the DNC, we did not have access to the devices themselves. We got relevant forensic information from a private party, a high-class entity, that had done the work. But we didn’t get direct access."

So it was already done and provided to the FBI. So why would they go back and do it again if the work was already done? You guys screech endlessly about wasting money, well this is an example of duplication waste!

Jesus fucking tap-dancing Christ...

ahhh but no it wasn't and that is the grand piece again, crowdstrike had to recant their fking story. so we are back to know one looked at the dnc server. no federal agency.

 

[The Derp]

If we follow your logic, since Sessions is a Republican, he cannot prosecute Democrats. The US Attorneys cannot prosecute Democrats.

Ummm, also, Trump donated to Democrats. So according to Conservatives, his agenda is to prosecute himself for his crimes. Ridiculous. Conservatives are pathetic.

 

[jc456]

there is absolutely no evidence of russia hacking.

This is denial.

the fact you have no evidence is your denial.