Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Man, you are fucking hilarious. If your IQ was 40 points higher you might even be dangerous.Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.
Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president
Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.
there is nothing "fake" about it, idiota...
obstruction of justice is illegal.
high crimes and misdemeanors is a very broad concept...
you were the same freaks who thought Clinton should be impeached for a blow job.
http://www.newsweek.com/where-trump-irs-tax-audit-letter-488904well sure he is. look it up. here is one link.
Donald Trump says he’s being audited by the IRS, but he hasn’t released the letter that could prove it
you seem to think he's guilty of something. why not present what it is you think he did and then let's go look to see if he took money. I'm good with that. now tell me what he did that is illegal.So tell us all where the "justice" is in a political witch hunt that's gone on for 11 months now and found nothing, and is veering off in directions that's got nothing to do with COLLUSION?Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.
there is nothing "fake" about it, idiota...
obstruction of justice is illegal.
high crimes and misdemeanors is a very broad concept...
you were the same freaks who thought Clinton should be impeached for a blow job.
The Mueller investigation is proceeding in a logical manner. They are examining Trump's ties to Russia which include business ties. Your idea of justice is a cover-up.
It is not a crime for a business man to do business with another country. There is no crime, there is no obstruction. How dense are you assholes really?
Unless they are doing business to funnel money to someone. That is called bribery. Why are you so afraid to find out? It seems you are expecting them to find something. On the other hand, I don't know.
well what is the crime for the thousandth time. one must have a crime to produce evidence.well then why don't you demand evidence that they did this supposed interference.
For the THOUSANDTH time, the point of an investigation is to find evidence. Otherwise, there wouldn't be a need to investigate if they already had the evidence.
Seriously, are you really this obtuse or is it an act?
well I know for a fact, he doesn't have trump derangement syndrome, he supports him, that term resides in the hands of snowflakes on the left.Man, you are fucking hilarious. If your IQ was 40 points higher you might even be dangerous.Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.
Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president
Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.
there is nothing "fake" about it, idiota...
obstruction of justice is illegal.
high crimes and misdemeanors is a very broad concept...
you were the same freaks who thought Clinton should be impeached for a blow job.
Considering your IQ is a -40, you have no room to talk. You are a sad victim of Trump Derangement Syndrome.
no that's not correct, one has a crime and then one investigates that crime. one doesn't wake up one day and say let's go investigate something until we find a crime. that's called a witch hunt.well what is the crime for the thousandth time. one must have a crime to produce evidence.well then why don't you demand evidence that they did this supposed interference.
For the THOUSANDTH time, the point of an investigation is to find evidence. Otherwise, there wouldn't be a need to investigate if they already had the evidence.
Seriously, are you really this obtuse or is it an act?
You don't necessarily have to have a crime. That is why you have a investigation.
what hack?one must have a crime to produce evidence.
The crime is the hack. The investigation is to determine if there is evidence Trump's team colluded with Russia to hack. I've said this three times now, and all you can do is talk in circles.
how do you know that? you know no one from the government has checked it out right? so you have no evidence of a hack. and BTW, the emails from wikileaks didn't come from that server. D'oh!what hack?
Talking in circles...the hack of the DNC, which Russia did. The investigation is to determine if there's evidence Trump and his team and the GOP were involved.
I'm only following where you've been traveling. you went back to the server. again, the server has never been checked out by a government agency. evah!!! So do me a favor and state that you demand the DNC should turn over their server at once and allow it to be investigated. then I'll know you truly want to know what happened.JC456 is just pretending to be obtuse. Which is morally reprehensible. But Conservatives have no morals so for him, it's just another day at the office.
So tell us all where the "justice" is in a political witch hunt that's gone on for 11 months now and found nothing, and is veering off in directions that's got nothing to do with COLLUSION?Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.
there is nothing "fake" about it, idiota...
obstruction of justice is illegal.
high crimes and misdemeanors is a very broad concept...
you were the same freaks who thought Clinton should be impeached for a blow job.
The Mueller investigation is proceeding in a logical manner. They are examining Trump's ties to Russia which include business ties. Your idea of justice is a cover-up.
It is not a crime for a business man to do business with another country. There is no crime, there is no obstruction. How dense are you assholes really?
Unless they are doing business to funnel money to someone. That is called bribery. Why are you so afraid to find out? It seems you are expecting them to find something. On the other hand, I don't know.
how do you know that? you know no one from the government has checked it out right?
so you have no evidence of a hack. and BTW, the emails from wikileaks didn't come from that server. D'oh!
You don't know because you don't want to know. Muellers investigation is wasting tax dollars at an incredible rate. He hasn't found anything at all so to keep his sweet gig going, he's now looking elsewhere. Trump knows he's wasting time and money. If Mueller was doing his job, he'd have ended this farce weeks ago, he isn't, he should be fired.
You don't know because you don't want to know. Muellers investigation is wasting tax dollars at an incredible rate. He hasn't found anything at all so to keep his sweet gig going, he's now looking elsewhere. Trump knows he's wasting time and money. If Mueller was doing his job, he'd have ended this farce weeks ago, he isn't, he should be fired.
Sounds like you're covering for Trump to me. Why? You don't owe him anything.
BTW, the emails from wikileaks didn't come from that server. D'oh!
wow, bubba, it came out in the congressional hearings, no one has seen that server. not the DOJ and not the FBI, no one. look it fking up! gawd teaching you how to use the internet is cumbersome.how do you know that? you know no one from the government has checked it out right?
WTF??? The FBI, the DOJ, and the DNI all "checked it out". I linked you the report from the DNI saying as such. You remember that? The link you refused to open because doing so would crush whatever stupid thing you think?
so you have no evidence of a hack. and BTW, the emails from wikileaks didn't come from that server. D'oh!
WTF??????? Ummm...yes, they did. You don't know what you're talking about.